Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers
A field trial was conducted to compare manual catching of broilers with a mechanical catching method. Both methods were compared with respect to the incidence of bruises and dead on arrival, stress parameters, and meat quality. Also the dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate were investiga...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Poultry science 2005-03, Vol.84 (3), p.467-474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 474 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 467 |
container_title | Poultry science |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Nijdam, E Delezie, E Lambooij, E Nabuurs, M.J.A Decuypere, E Stegeman, J.A |
description | A field trial was conducted to compare manual catching of broilers with a mechanical catching method. Both methods were compared with respect to the incidence of bruises and dead on arrival, stress parameters, and meat quality. Also the dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate were investigated on the day broilers were killed. The broilers originated from 8 commercial broiler farms; visits were made on the day of catching during spring and autumn of 2001. Broilers of one house were caught manually, and those of the second house were caught mechanically. Plasma samples were taken before catching started, 30 min after the start of catching, 30 min before the end of catching, and at exsanguination of broilers from the first- and last-loaded transport vehicles. Postmortem measurements of pH, temperature, and water-holding capacity were made. Mechanical catching was associated with higher DOA percentages than manual catching in spring, although the difference was not significant in autumn. Catching method did not influence the percentage of bruises or meat quality. Moreover, corticosterone levels indicated that both methods induced the same amount of stress. The dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate levels showed a similar pattern. Plasma levels increased at the start of catching, and they further increased during transport, shackling, and stunning. However during catching itself, no large changes were observed. Our findings indicated that attempts to reduce stress in broilers during the last day of life could better be focused on factors other than catching. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ps/84.3.467 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67539736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67539736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2907-1b0b5c1f18d1a54546af282465d8d8920cc2d6347c7a69fbba815043f5e206a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c1L5DAYBvCwuKzjx2nvu8GDF-2YN5_tUQY_FoQ9qOfwNk210jY1aQ_z3290BhYkh5Dkl4eQh5CfwNbAKnE1patSrsVaavONrEBxVQgwcEBWjAleKFPBITlK6Y0xDlqbH-QQlCl5BXpFlk0YJoxdCiMNLa3j0iWfKI4NHUKcse_m7SVNc_Qp0Qxx8LOP6XInPM70fflEtBvpgGNe9Nv9oXvFsXOfGw6Xl9c5x4euz9dPyPcW--RP9_Mxeb69edrcFw9_7_5srh8KxytmCqhZrRy0UDaASiqpseUll1o1ZVNWnDnHGy2kcQZ11dY1lqCYFK3ynGmU4pic73KnGN4Xn2Y7dMn5vsfRhyVZbZSojNAZnn2Bb2GJY36b5VyAVgw-0i52yMWQUvStnWI3YNxaYPajCjslW0orbK4i61_7yKUefPPf7v8-g9870GKw-JI7sM-PnIFgkAeXRvwD1GSOFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223165014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Nijdam, E ; Delezie, E ; Lambooij, E ; Nabuurs, M.J.A ; Decuypere, E ; Stegeman, J.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Nijdam, E ; Delezie, E ; Lambooij, E ; Nabuurs, M.J.A ; Decuypere, E ; Stegeman, J.A</creatorcontrib><description>A field trial was conducted to compare manual catching of broilers with a mechanical catching method. Both methods were compared with respect to the incidence of bruises and dead on arrival, stress parameters, and meat quality. Also the dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate were investigated on the day broilers were killed. The broilers originated from 8 commercial broiler farms; visits were made on the day of catching during spring and autumn of 2001. Broilers of one house were caught manually, and those of the second house were caught mechanically. Plasma samples were taken before catching started, 30 min after the start of catching, 30 min before the end of catching, and at exsanguination of broilers from the first- and last-loaded transport vehicles. Postmortem measurements of pH, temperature, and water-holding capacity were made. Mechanical catching was associated with higher DOA percentages than manual catching in spring, although the difference was not significant in autumn. Catching method did not influence the percentage of bruises or meat quality. Moreover, corticosterone levels indicated that both methods induced the same amount of stress. The dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate levels showed a similar pattern. Plasma levels increased at the start of catching, and they further increased during transport, shackling, and stunning. However during catching itself, no large changes were observed. Our findings indicated that attempts to reduce stress in broilers during the last day of life could better be focused on factors other than catching.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ps/84.3.467</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15782916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Agriculture - instrumentation ; Agriculture - methods ; animal stress ; animal transport ; Animal Welfare ; Animals ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; capture of animals ; Chickens ; Contusions - veterinary ; corticosterone ; Corticosterone - blood ; Lactic Acid - blood ; Meat ; Mortality ; Quality Control ; slaughter ; Stress, Physiological - veterinary</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2005-03, Vol.84 (3), p.467-474</ispartof><rights>Copyright Poultry Science Association Mar 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2907-1b0b5c1f18d1a54546af282465d8d8920cc2d6347c7a69fbba815043f5e206a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2907-1b0b5c1f18d1a54546af282465d8d8920cc2d6347c7a69fbba815043f5e206a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15782916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nijdam, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delezie, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambooij, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabuurs, M.J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decuypere, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stegeman, J.A</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>A field trial was conducted to compare manual catching of broilers with a mechanical catching method. Both methods were compared with respect to the incidence of bruises and dead on arrival, stress parameters, and meat quality. Also the dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate were investigated on the day broilers were killed. The broilers originated from 8 commercial broiler farms; visits were made on the day of catching during spring and autumn of 2001. Broilers of one house were caught manually, and those of the second house were caught mechanically. Plasma samples were taken before catching started, 30 min after the start of catching, 30 min before the end of catching, and at exsanguination of broilers from the first- and last-loaded transport vehicles. Postmortem measurements of pH, temperature, and water-holding capacity were made. Mechanical catching was associated with higher DOA percentages than manual catching in spring, although the difference was not significant in autumn. Catching method did not influence the percentage of bruises or meat quality. Moreover, corticosterone levels indicated that both methods induced the same amount of stress. The dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate levels showed a similar pattern. Plasma levels increased at the start of catching, and they further increased during transport, shackling, and stunning. However during catching itself, no large changes were observed. Our findings indicated that attempts to reduce stress in broilers during the last day of life could better be focused on factors other than catching.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Agriculture - instrumentation</subject><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>animal stress</subject><subject>animal transport</subject><subject>Animal Welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>capture of animals</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Contusions - veterinary</subject><subject>corticosterone</subject><subject>Corticosterone - blood</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - blood</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>slaughter</subject><subject>Stress, Physiological - veterinary</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c1L5DAYBvCwuKzjx2nvu8GDF-2YN5_tUQY_FoQ9qOfwNk210jY1aQ_z3290BhYkh5Dkl4eQh5CfwNbAKnE1patSrsVaavONrEBxVQgwcEBWjAleKFPBITlK6Y0xDlqbH-QQlCl5BXpFlk0YJoxdCiMNLa3j0iWfKI4NHUKcse_m7SVNc_Qp0Qxx8LOP6XInPM70fflEtBvpgGNe9Nv9oXvFsXOfGw6Xl9c5x4euz9dPyPcW--RP9_Mxeb69edrcFw9_7_5srh8KxytmCqhZrRy0UDaASiqpseUll1o1ZVNWnDnHGy2kcQZ11dY1lqCYFK3ynGmU4pic73KnGN4Xn2Y7dMn5vsfRhyVZbZSojNAZnn2Bb2GJY36b5VyAVgw-0i52yMWQUvStnWI3YNxaYPajCjslW0orbK4i61_7yKUefPPf7v8-g9870GKw-JI7sM-PnIFgkAeXRvwD1GSOFQ</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Nijdam, E</creator><creator>Delezie, E</creator><creator>Lambooij, E</creator><creator>Nabuurs, M.J.A</creator><creator>Decuypere, E</creator><creator>Stegeman, J.A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers</title><author>Nijdam, E ; Delezie, E ; Lambooij, E ; Nabuurs, M.J.A ; Decuypere, E ; Stegeman, J.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2907-1b0b5c1f18d1a54546af282465d8d8920cc2d6347c7a69fbba815043f5e206a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Agriculture - instrumentation</topic><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>animal stress</topic><topic>animal transport</topic><topic>Animal Welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>capture of animals</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Contusions - veterinary</topic><topic>corticosterone</topic><topic>Corticosterone - blood</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - blood</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>slaughter</topic><topic>Stress, Physiological - veterinary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nijdam, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delezie, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambooij, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabuurs, M.J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decuypere, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stegeman, J.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nijdam, E</au><au>Delezie, E</au><au>Lambooij, E</au><au>Nabuurs, M.J.A</au><au>Decuypere, E</au><au>Stegeman, J.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>467</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>467-474</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>A field trial was conducted to compare manual catching of broilers with a mechanical catching method. Both methods were compared with respect to the incidence of bruises and dead on arrival, stress parameters, and meat quality. Also the dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate were investigated on the day broilers were killed. The broilers originated from 8 commercial broiler farms; visits were made on the day of catching during spring and autumn of 2001. Broilers of one house were caught manually, and those of the second house were caught mechanically. Plasma samples were taken before catching started, 30 min after the start of catching, 30 min before the end of catching, and at exsanguination of broilers from the first- and last-loaded transport vehicles. Postmortem measurements of pH, temperature, and water-holding capacity were made. Mechanical catching was associated with higher DOA percentages than manual catching in spring, although the difference was not significant in autumn. Catching method did not influence the percentage of bruises or meat quality. Moreover, corticosterone levels indicated that both methods induced the same amount of stress. The dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate levels showed a similar pattern. Plasma levels increased at the start of catching, and they further increased during transport, shackling, and stunning. However during catching itself, no large changes were observed. Our findings indicated that attempts to reduce stress in broilers during the last day of life could better be focused on factors other than catching.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>15782916</pmid><doi>10.1093/ps/84.3.467</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-5791 |
ispartof | Poultry science, 2005-03, Vol.84 (3), p.467-474 |
issn | 0032-5791 1525-3171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67539736 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Abattoirs Agriculture - instrumentation Agriculture - methods animal stress animal transport Animal Welfare Animals Blood Glucose - analysis capture of animals Chickens Contusions - veterinary corticosterone Corticosterone - blood Lactic Acid - blood Meat Mortality Quality Control slaughter Stress, Physiological - veterinary |
title | Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T20%3A01%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20bruises%20and%20mortality,%20stress%20parameters,%20and%20meat%20quality%20in%20manually%20and%20mechanically%20caught%20broilers&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Nijdam,%20E&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=467&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=467-474&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ps/84.3.467&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67539736%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223165014&rft_id=info:pmid/15782916&rfr_iscdi=true |