Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers

A field trial was conducted to compare manual catching of broilers with a mechanical catching method. Both methods were compared with respect to the incidence of bruises and dead on arrival, stress parameters, and meat quality. Also the dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate were investiga...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Poultry science 2005-03, Vol.84 (3), p.467-474
Hauptverfasser: Nijdam, E, Delezie, E, Lambooij, E, Nabuurs, M.J.A, Decuypere, E, Stegeman, J.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 474
container_issue 3
container_start_page 467
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 84
creator Nijdam, E
Delezie, E
Lambooij, E
Nabuurs, M.J.A
Decuypere, E
Stegeman, J.A
description A field trial was conducted to compare manual catching of broilers with a mechanical catching method. Both methods were compared with respect to the incidence of bruises and dead on arrival, stress parameters, and meat quality. Also the dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate were investigated on the day broilers were killed. The broilers originated from 8 commercial broiler farms; visits were made on the day of catching during spring and autumn of 2001. Broilers of one house were caught manually, and those of the second house were caught mechanically. Plasma samples were taken before catching started, 30 min after the start of catching, 30 min before the end of catching, and at exsanguination of broilers from the first- and last-loaded transport vehicles. Postmortem measurements of pH, temperature, and water-holding capacity were made. Mechanical catching was associated with higher DOA percentages than manual catching in spring, although the difference was not significant in autumn. Catching method did not influence the percentage of bruises or meat quality. Moreover, corticosterone levels indicated that both methods induced the same amount of stress. The dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate levels showed a similar pattern. Plasma levels increased at the start of catching, and they further increased during transport, shackling, and stunning. However during catching itself, no large changes were observed. Our findings indicated that attempts to reduce stress in broilers during the last day of life could better be focused on factors other than catching.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ps/84.3.467
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67539736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67539736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2907-1b0b5c1f18d1a54546af282465d8d8920cc2d6347c7a69fbba815043f5e206a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c1L5DAYBvCwuKzjx2nvu8GDF-2YN5_tUQY_FoQ9qOfwNk210jY1aQ_z3290BhYkh5Dkl4eQh5CfwNbAKnE1patSrsVaavONrEBxVQgwcEBWjAleKFPBITlK6Y0xDlqbH-QQlCl5BXpFlk0YJoxdCiMNLa3j0iWfKI4NHUKcse_m7SVNc_Qp0Qxx8LOP6XInPM70fflEtBvpgGNe9Nv9oXvFsXOfGw6Xl9c5x4euz9dPyPcW--RP9_Mxeb69edrcFw9_7_5srh8KxytmCqhZrRy0UDaASiqpseUll1o1ZVNWnDnHGy2kcQZ11dY1lqCYFK3ynGmU4pic73KnGN4Xn2Y7dMn5vsfRhyVZbZSojNAZnn2Bb2GJY36b5VyAVgw-0i52yMWQUvStnWI3YNxaYPajCjslW0orbK4i61_7yKUefPPf7v8-g9870GKw-JI7sM-PnIFgkAeXRvwD1GSOFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223165014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Nijdam, E ; Delezie, E ; Lambooij, E ; Nabuurs, M.J.A ; Decuypere, E ; Stegeman, J.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Nijdam, E ; Delezie, E ; Lambooij, E ; Nabuurs, M.J.A ; Decuypere, E ; Stegeman, J.A</creatorcontrib><description>A field trial was conducted to compare manual catching of broilers with a mechanical catching method. Both methods were compared with respect to the incidence of bruises and dead on arrival, stress parameters, and meat quality. Also the dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate were investigated on the day broilers were killed. The broilers originated from 8 commercial broiler farms; visits were made on the day of catching during spring and autumn of 2001. Broilers of one house were caught manually, and those of the second house were caught mechanically. Plasma samples were taken before catching started, 30 min after the start of catching, 30 min before the end of catching, and at exsanguination of broilers from the first- and last-loaded transport vehicles. Postmortem measurements of pH, temperature, and water-holding capacity were made. Mechanical catching was associated with higher DOA percentages than manual catching in spring, although the difference was not significant in autumn. Catching method did not influence the percentage of bruises or meat quality. Moreover, corticosterone levels indicated that both methods induced the same amount of stress. The dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate levels showed a similar pattern. Plasma levels increased at the start of catching, and they further increased during transport, shackling, and stunning. However during catching itself, no large changes were observed. Our findings indicated that attempts to reduce stress in broilers during the last day of life could better be focused on factors other than catching.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ps/84.3.467</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15782916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Agriculture - instrumentation ; Agriculture - methods ; animal stress ; animal transport ; Animal Welfare ; Animals ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; capture of animals ; Chickens ; Contusions - veterinary ; corticosterone ; Corticosterone - blood ; Lactic Acid - blood ; Meat ; Mortality ; Quality Control ; slaughter ; Stress, Physiological - veterinary</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2005-03, Vol.84 (3), p.467-474</ispartof><rights>Copyright Poultry Science Association Mar 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2907-1b0b5c1f18d1a54546af282465d8d8920cc2d6347c7a69fbba815043f5e206a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2907-1b0b5c1f18d1a54546af282465d8d8920cc2d6347c7a69fbba815043f5e206a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15782916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nijdam, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delezie, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambooij, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabuurs, M.J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decuypere, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stegeman, J.A</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>A field trial was conducted to compare manual catching of broilers with a mechanical catching method. Both methods were compared with respect to the incidence of bruises and dead on arrival, stress parameters, and meat quality. Also the dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate were investigated on the day broilers were killed. The broilers originated from 8 commercial broiler farms; visits were made on the day of catching during spring and autumn of 2001. Broilers of one house were caught manually, and those of the second house were caught mechanically. Plasma samples were taken before catching started, 30 min after the start of catching, 30 min before the end of catching, and at exsanguination of broilers from the first- and last-loaded transport vehicles. Postmortem measurements of pH, temperature, and water-holding capacity were made. Mechanical catching was associated with higher DOA percentages than manual catching in spring, although the difference was not significant in autumn. Catching method did not influence the percentage of bruises or meat quality. Moreover, corticosterone levels indicated that both methods induced the same amount of stress. The dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate levels showed a similar pattern. Plasma levels increased at the start of catching, and they further increased during transport, shackling, and stunning. However during catching itself, no large changes were observed. Our findings indicated that attempts to reduce stress in broilers during the last day of life could better be focused on factors other than catching.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Agriculture - instrumentation</subject><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>animal stress</subject><subject>animal transport</subject><subject>Animal Welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>capture of animals</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Contusions - veterinary</subject><subject>corticosterone</subject><subject>Corticosterone - blood</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - blood</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>slaughter</subject><subject>Stress, Physiological - veterinary</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c1L5DAYBvCwuKzjx2nvu8GDF-2YN5_tUQY_FoQ9qOfwNk210jY1aQ_z3290BhYkh5Dkl4eQh5CfwNbAKnE1patSrsVaavONrEBxVQgwcEBWjAleKFPBITlK6Y0xDlqbH-QQlCl5BXpFlk0YJoxdCiMNLa3j0iWfKI4NHUKcse_m7SVNc_Qp0Qxx8LOP6XInPM70fflEtBvpgGNe9Nv9oXvFsXOfGw6Xl9c5x4euz9dPyPcW--RP9_Mxeb69edrcFw9_7_5srh8KxytmCqhZrRy0UDaASiqpseUll1o1ZVNWnDnHGy2kcQZ11dY1lqCYFK3ynGmU4pic73KnGN4Xn2Y7dMn5vsfRhyVZbZSojNAZnn2Bb2GJY36b5VyAVgw-0i52yMWQUvStnWI3YNxaYPajCjslW0orbK4i61_7yKUefPPf7v8-g9870GKw-JI7sM-PnIFgkAeXRvwD1GSOFQ</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Nijdam, E</creator><creator>Delezie, E</creator><creator>Lambooij, E</creator><creator>Nabuurs, M.J.A</creator><creator>Decuypere, E</creator><creator>Stegeman, J.A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers</title><author>Nijdam, E ; Delezie, E ; Lambooij, E ; Nabuurs, M.J.A ; Decuypere, E ; Stegeman, J.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2907-1b0b5c1f18d1a54546af282465d8d8920cc2d6347c7a69fbba815043f5e206a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Agriculture - instrumentation</topic><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>animal stress</topic><topic>animal transport</topic><topic>Animal Welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>capture of animals</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Contusions - veterinary</topic><topic>corticosterone</topic><topic>Corticosterone - blood</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - blood</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>slaughter</topic><topic>Stress, Physiological - veterinary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nijdam, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delezie, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambooij, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabuurs, M.J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decuypere, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stegeman, J.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nijdam, E</au><au>Delezie, E</au><au>Lambooij, E</au><au>Nabuurs, M.J.A</au><au>Decuypere, E</au><au>Stegeman, J.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>467</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>467-474</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>A field trial was conducted to compare manual catching of broilers with a mechanical catching method. Both methods were compared with respect to the incidence of bruises and dead on arrival, stress parameters, and meat quality. Also the dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate were investigated on the day broilers were killed. The broilers originated from 8 commercial broiler farms; visits were made on the day of catching during spring and autumn of 2001. Broilers of one house were caught manually, and those of the second house were caught mechanically. Plasma samples were taken before catching started, 30 min after the start of catching, 30 min before the end of catching, and at exsanguination of broilers from the first- and last-loaded transport vehicles. Postmortem measurements of pH, temperature, and water-holding capacity were made. Mechanical catching was associated with higher DOA percentages than manual catching in spring, although the difference was not significant in autumn. Catching method did not influence the percentage of bruises or meat quality. Moreover, corticosterone levels indicated that both methods induced the same amount of stress. The dynamics of corticosterone, glucose, and lactate levels showed a similar pattern. Plasma levels increased at the start of catching, and they further increased during transport, shackling, and stunning. However during catching itself, no large changes were observed. Our findings indicated that attempts to reduce stress in broilers during the last day of life could better be focused on factors other than catching.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>15782916</pmid><doi>10.1093/ps/84.3.467</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2005-03, Vol.84 (3), p.467-474
issn 0032-5791
1525-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67539736
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Abattoirs
Agriculture - instrumentation
Agriculture - methods
animal stress
animal transport
Animal Welfare
Animals
Blood Glucose - analysis
capture of animals
Chickens
Contusions - veterinary
corticosterone
Corticosterone - blood
Lactic Acid - blood
Meat
Mortality
Quality Control
slaughter
Stress, Physiological - veterinary
title Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T20%3A01%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20bruises%20and%20mortality,%20stress%20parameters,%20and%20meat%20quality%20in%20manually%20and%20mechanically%20caught%20broilers&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Nijdam,%20E&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=467&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=467-474&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ps/84.3.467&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67539736%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223165014&rft_id=info:pmid/15782916&rfr_iscdi=true