Survey of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus policies in UK eye departments

Summary The purpose of this study was to investigate meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening and decolonisation practices for patients undergoing routine cataract surgery in ophthalmology departments across the UK. A postal questionnaire survey of all ophthalmology departments in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 2009-08, Vol.72 (4), p.314-318
Hauptverfasser: Rathod, D, Luqmani, N, Webber, S.K, Hosein, I.K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 318
container_issue 4
container_start_page 314
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 72
creator Rathod, D
Luqmani, N
Webber, S.K
Hosein, I.K
description Summary The purpose of this study was to investigate meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening and decolonisation practices for patients undergoing routine cataract surgery in ophthalmology departments across the UK. A postal questionnaire survey of all ophthalmology departments in the UK was carried out, with 75 of 152 (49.3%) questionnaires returned. Sixty-three percent of units had a departmental MRSA policy. Preoperative MRSA screening was performed in 50 (66.7%) units, three of which screened all preoperative patients and the remainder performed selective screening. The proportion of patients screened for MRSA ranged from 0 to 100%, with a median of 2% and a mean of 9.9% (95% confidence interval: 3.5–16.2%). Overall, 65.3% of respondents felt that their departmental policy was reasonable, although there was considerable dissatisfaction and confusion, with comments identifying lack of evidence and the need for guidelines applicable to day-case cataract surgery. The survey demonstrates significant inconsistencies in preoperative MRSA screening practice in ophthalmology departments throughout the UK. Current recommendations from the Department of Health suggest that day-case ophthalmology patients do not require routine screening, although the implication appears that high risk patients continue to do so. Further investigation is required to ascertain the scientific validity of these recommendations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67526728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670109001911</els_id><sourcerecordid>20878428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b291d719e9c605e9544a2c1935e0338f289cc4872159c48df47d0b6e89f89daf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks-L1DAUgIMo7uzqP-BBetFb60vatAmIIIur4oKHcc8hk76yqW1Sk3Rh_ntTZ1DwoKcXwvd-8L1HyAsKFQXavhmr8d66igHICpoKKH9EdpTXrGSylo_JDqjkZdsBvSCXMY6QwVryp-Qi_0veCNiR_X4ND3gs_FDMmKyx02RdGTDamLRLxT7p5f44eeONWWOh14A5LH7KKMbCuuLuS4FHLHpcdEgzuhSfkSeDniI-P8crcnfz4dv1p_L268fP1-9vS9N0kMoDk7TvqERpWuCYB2o0M1TWHKGuxcCENKYRHaNc5tgPTdfDoUUhByF7PdRX5PWp7hL8jxVjUrONBqdJO_RrVG3HWdsx8V-QgehE8wtkJ9AEH2PAQS3BzjocFQW1OVej2pyrzbmCRmXnOenlufp6mLH_k3KWnIFXZ0BHo6chaGds_M0xmrtzvhV6e-IwS3uwGFTMkp3B3gY0SfXe_nuOd3-lm7xLmzt-zwuKo1-Dy-tQVEWmQO2369iOAyTkJ6X1T28ctJs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20878428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus policies in UK eye departments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Rathod, D ; Luqmani, N ; Webber, S.K ; Hosein, I.K</creator><creatorcontrib>Rathod, D ; Luqmani, N ; Webber, S.K ; Hosein, I.K</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The purpose of this study was to investigate meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening and decolonisation practices for patients undergoing routine cataract surgery in ophthalmology departments across the UK. A postal questionnaire survey of all ophthalmology departments in the UK was carried out, with 75 of 152 (49.3%) questionnaires returned. Sixty-three percent of units had a departmental MRSA policy. Preoperative MRSA screening was performed in 50 (66.7%) units, three of which screened all preoperative patients and the remainder performed selective screening. The proportion of patients screened for MRSA ranged from 0 to 100%, with a median of 2% and a mean of 9.9% (95% confidence interval: 3.5–16.2%). Overall, 65.3% of respondents felt that their departmental policy was reasonable, although there was considerable dissatisfaction and confusion, with comments identifying lack of evidence and the need for guidelines applicable to day-case cataract surgery. The survey demonstrates significant inconsistencies in preoperative MRSA screening practice in ophthalmology departments throughout the UK. Current recommendations from the Department of Health suggest that day-case ophthalmology patients do not require routine screening, although the implication appears that high risk patients continue to do so. Further investigation is required to ascertain the scientific validity of these recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19595480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross Infection - microbiology ; Cross Infection - prevention & control ; Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data ; Health Services Research ; Healthcare surveys ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infection Control - statistics & numerical data ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification ; Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Organizational Policy ; Phacoemulsification ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Screening ; Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy ; Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology ; Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control ; Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United Kingdom - epidemiology]]></subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2009-08, Vol.72 (4), p.314-318</ispartof><rights>The Hospital Infection Society</rights><rights>2009 The Hospital Infection Society</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b291d719e9c605e9544a2c1935e0338f289cc4872159c48df47d0b6e89f89daf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b291d719e9c605e9544a2c1935e0338f289cc4872159c48df47d0b6e89f89daf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21878555$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19595480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rathod, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luqmani, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webber, S.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosein, I.K</creatorcontrib><title>Survey of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus policies in UK eye departments</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Summary The purpose of this study was to investigate meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening and decolonisation practices for patients undergoing routine cataract surgery in ophthalmology departments across the UK. A postal questionnaire survey of all ophthalmology departments in the UK was carried out, with 75 of 152 (49.3%) questionnaires returned. Sixty-three percent of units had a departmental MRSA policy. Preoperative MRSA screening was performed in 50 (66.7%) units, three of which screened all preoperative patients and the remainder performed selective screening. The proportion of patients screened for MRSA ranged from 0 to 100%, with a median of 2% and a mean of 9.9% (95% confidence interval: 3.5–16.2%). Overall, 65.3% of respondents felt that their departmental policy was reasonable, although there was considerable dissatisfaction and confusion, with comments identifying lack of evidence and the need for guidelines applicable to day-case cataract surgery. The survey demonstrates significant inconsistencies in preoperative MRSA screening practice in ophthalmology departments throughout the UK. Current recommendations from the Department of Health suggest that day-case ophthalmology patients do not require routine screening, although the implication appears that high risk patients continue to do so. Further investigation is required to ascertain the scientific validity of these recommendations.</description><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Healthcare surveys</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Organizational Policy</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks-L1DAUgIMo7uzqP-BBetFb60vatAmIIIur4oKHcc8hk76yqW1Sk3Rh_ntTZ1DwoKcXwvd-8L1HyAsKFQXavhmr8d66igHICpoKKH9EdpTXrGSylo_JDqjkZdsBvSCXMY6QwVryp-Qi_0veCNiR_X4ND3gs_FDMmKyx02RdGTDamLRLxT7p5f44eeONWWOh14A5LH7KKMbCuuLuS4FHLHpcdEgzuhSfkSeDniI-P8crcnfz4dv1p_L268fP1-9vS9N0kMoDk7TvqERpWuCYB2o0M1TWHKGuxcCENKYRHaNc5tgPTdfDoUUhByF7PdRX5PWp7hL8jxVjUrONBqdJO_RrVG3HWdsx8V-QgehE8wtkJ9AEH2PAQS3BzjocFQW1OVej2pyrzbmCRmXnOenlufp6mLH_k3KWnIFXZ0BHo6chaGds_M0xmrtzvhV6e-IwS3uwGFTMkp3B3gY0SfXe_nuOd3-lm7xLmzt-zwuKo1-Dy-tQVEWmQO2369iOAyTkJ6X1T28ctJs</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Rathod, D</creator><creator>Luqmani, N</creator><creator>Webber, S.K</creator><creator>Hosein, I.K</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Survey of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus policies in UK eye departments</title><author>Rathod, D ; Luqmani, N ; Webber, S.K ; Hosein, I.K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b291d719e9c605e9544a2c1935e0338f289cc4872159c48df47d0b6e89f89daf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Healthcare surveys</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Organizational Policy</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rathod, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luqmani, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webber, S.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosein, I.K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rathod, D</au><au>Luqmani, N</au><au>Webber, S.K</au><au>Hosein, I.K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus policies in UK eye departments</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>314</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>314-318</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Summary The purpose of this study was to investigate meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening and decolonisation practices for patients undergoing routine cataract surgery in ophthalmology departments across the UK. A postal questionnaire survey of all ophthalmology departments in the UK was carried out, with 75 of 152 (49.3%) questionnaires returned. Sixty-three percent of units had a departmental MRSA policy. Preoperative MRSA screening was performed in 50 (66.7%) units, three of which screened all preoperative patients and the remainder performed selective screening. The proportion of patients screened for MRSA ranged from 0 to 100%, with a median of 2% and a mean of 9.9% (95% confidence interval: 3.5–16.2%). Overall, 65.3% of respondents felt that their departmental policy was reasonable, although there was considerable dissatisfaction and confusion, with comments identifying lack of evidence and the need for guidelines applicable to day-case cataract surgery. The survey demonstrates significant inconsistencies in preoperative MRSA screening practice in ophthalmology departments throughout the UK. Current recommendations from the Department of Health suggest that day-case ophthalmology patients do not require routine screening, although the implication appears that high risk patients continue to do so. Further investigation is required to ascertain the scientific validity of these recommendations.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19595480</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.015</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 2009-08, Vol.72 (4), p.314-318
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67526728
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Antibacterial agents
Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents
Bacterial diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Cross Infection - microbiology
Cross Infection - prevention & control
Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data
Health Services Research
Healthcare surveys
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infection Control - statistics & numerical data
Infectious Disease
Infectious diseases
Mass Screening - methods
Medical sciences
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification
Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Organizational Policy
Phacoemulsification
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Screening
Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy
Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology
Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control
Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections
Staphylococcus aureus
Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology
Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control
Surveys and Questionnaires
United Kingdom - epidemiology
title Survey of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus policies in UK eye departments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T15%3A23%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20of%20meticillin-resistant%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20policies%20in%20UK%20eye%20departments&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Rathod,%20D&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=314&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=314-318&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20878428%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20878428&rft_id=info:pmid/19595480&rft_els_id=S0195670109001911&rfr_iscdi=true