Comparative-Effectiveness Research — Implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's Report
Despite a plethora of diagnostic and treatment options, practical information that can guide health care choices for an individual patient are often elusive, and the resultant clinical uncertainty is an important factor driving regional variations in clinical practice. Clinicians and patients need t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2009-07, Vol.361 (4), p.328-330 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 330 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 328 |
| container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
| container_volume | 361 |
| creator | Conway, Patrick H Clancy, Carolyn |
| description | Despite a plethora of diagnostic and treatment options, practical information that can guide health care choices for an individual patient are often elusive, and the resultant clinical uncertainty is an important factor driving regional variations in clinical practice. Clinicians and patients need to know not only that a treatment works on average but also which interventions work best for specific types of patients. Comparative patient-centered information is essential to translating new discoveries into better health outcomes, accelerating the application of beneficial innovations, and delivering the right treatment to the right patient at the right time.
1
The American Recovery and Reinvestment . . . |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJMp0905631 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67521699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1801362581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cc335585c4da77be3fee01db8fae057c0e7bc5437e5f1e90f7dd586da00a610e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0N1KwzAUB_AgipvTO6-liB83VpOmaZpLGZsfTAXR65qlJ66jbWrSCt75ED6hT2LGhoqYm5yQX84Jf4R2CT4lmCVnt6PrmwYLX1KyhvqEURrGMU7WUR_jKA1jLmgPbTk3x36RWGyiHhEs4Wkk-uhpaKpGWtkWrxCOtAa1qGpwLrgHB9KqWfD5_hFcVU1ZKM9M7QKjg3YGwRhysLIMhsbYvKj9Zf3sD12tivJ48b4xtt1GG1qWDnZW-wA9jkcPw8twcndxNTyfhCpOojZUilLGUqbiXHI-BaoBMMmnqZaAGVcY-FSxmHJgmoDAmuc5S5NcYiwTgoEO0NGyb2PNSweuzarCKShLWYPpXJZwFpFECA_3_8C56Wzt_5ZFERWEcMo8OlkiZY1zFnTW2KKS9i0jOFvEnv2O3fO9Vc9uWkH-g1c5e3C4AtIpWWorfUju20WEcyz8-AE6WLqqclkN8-r_eV_lB5aX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223911735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative-Effectiveness Research — Implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's Report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Conway, Patrick H ; Clancy, Carolyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Conway, Patrick H ; Clancy, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><description>Despite a plethora of diagnostic and treatment options, practical information that can guide health care choices for an individual patient are often elusive, and the resultant clinical uncertainty is an important factor driving regional variations in clinical practice. Clinicians and patients need to know not only that a treatment works on average but also which interventions work best for specific types of patients. Comparative patient-centered information is essential to translating new discoveries into better health outcomes, accelerating the application of beneficial innovations, and delivering the right treatment to the right patient at the right time.
1
The American Recovery and Reinvestment . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0905631</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19567829</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEJMAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waltham, MA: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject><![CDATA[American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US ; Biological and medical sciences ; Councils ; Financing, Government - legislation & jurisprudence ; General aspects ; Health Priorities ; Health Services Research - economics ; Health Services Research - legislation & jurisprudence ; Humans ; Infrastructure ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Patient-Centered Care - legislation & jurisprudence ; Patients ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; R&D ; Research & development ; United States]]></subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2009-07, Vol.361 (4), p.328-330</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cc335585c4da77be3fee01db8fae057c0e7bc5437e5f1e90f7dd586da00a610e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cc335585c4da77be3fee01db8fae057c0e7bc5437e5f1e90f7dd586da00a610e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp0905631$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0905631$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2746,2747,26080,27901,27902,52357,54039</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21770922$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19567829$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conway, Patrick H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clancy, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative-Effectiveness Research — Implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's Report</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>Despite a plethora of diagnostic and treatment options, practical information that can guide health care choices for an individual patient are often elusive, and the resultant clinical uncertainty is an important factor driving regional variations in clinical practice. Clinicians and patients need to know not only that a treatment works on average but also which interventions work best for specific types of patients. Comparative patient-centered information is essential to translating new discoveries into better health outcomes, accelerating the application of beneficial innovations, and delivering the right treatment to the right patient at the right time.
1
The American Recovery and Reinvestment . . .</description><subject>American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Financing, Government - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Priorities</subject><subject>Health Services Research - economics</subject><subject>Health Services Research - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Patient-Centered Care - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0N1KwzAUB_AgipvTO6-liB83VpOmaZpLGZsfTAXR65qlJ66jbWrSCt75ED6hT2LGhoqYm5yQX84Jf4R2CT4lmCVnt6PrmwYLX1KyhvqEURrGMU7WUR_jKA1jLmgPbTk3x36RWGyiHhEs4Wkk-uhpaKpGWtkWrxCOtAa1qGpwLrgHB9KqWfD5_hFcVU1ZKM9M7QKjg3YGwRhysLIMhsbYvKj9Zf3sD12tivJ48b4xtt1GG1qWDnZW-wA9jkcPw8twcndxNTyfhCpOojZUilLGUqbiXHI-BaoBMMmnqZaAGVcY-FSxmHJgmoDAmuc5S5NcYiwTgoEO0NGyb2PNSweuzarCKShLWYPpXJZwFpFECA_3_8C56Wzt_5ZFERWEcMo8OlkiZY1zFnTW2KKS9i0jOFvEnv2O3fO9Vc9uWkH-g1c5e3C4AtIpWWorfUju20WEcyz8-AE6WLqqclkN8-r_eV_lB5aX</recordid><startdate>20090723</startdate><enddate>20090723</enddate><creator>Conway, Patrick H</creator><creator>Clancy, Carolyn</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090723</creationdate><title>Comparative-Effectiveness Research — Implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's Report</title><author>Conway, Patrick H ; Clancy, Carolyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cc335585c4da77be3fee01db8fae057c0e7bc5437e5f1e90f7dd586da00a610e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Financing, Government - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Priorities</topic><topic>Health Services Research - economics</topic><topic>Health Services Research - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Patient-Centered Care - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conway, Patrick H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clancy, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conway, Patrick H</au><au>Clancy, Carolyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative-Effectiveness Research — Implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's Report</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2009-07-23</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>361</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>328</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>328-330</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><coden>NEJMAG</coden><abstract>Despite a plethora of diagnostic and treatment options, practical information that can guide health care choices for an individual patient are often elusive, and the resultant clinical uncertainty is an important factor driving regional variations in clinical practice. Clinicians and patients need to know not only that a treatment works on average but also which interventions work best for specific types of patients. Comparative patient-centered information is essential to translating new discoveries into better health outcomes, accelerating the application of beneficial innovations, and delivering the right treatment to the right patient at the right time.
1
The American Recovery and Reinvestment . . .</abstract><cop>Waltham, MA</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>19567829</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMp0905631</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
| ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 2009-07, Vol.361 (4), p.328-330 |
| issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67521699 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; New England Journal of Medicine |
| subjects | American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US Biological and medical sciences Councils Financing, Government - legislation & jurisprudence General aspects Health Priorities Health Services Research - economics Health Services Research - legislation & jurisprudence Humans Infrastructure Medical sciences Miscellaneous Patient-Centered Care - legislation & jurisprudence Patients Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine R&D Research & development United States |
| title | Comparative-Effectiveness Research — Implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's Report |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A49%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative-Effectiveness%20Research%20%E2%80%94%20Implications%20of%20the%20Federal%20Coordinating%20Council's%20Report&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Conway,%20Patrick%20H&rft.date=2009-07-23&rft.volume=361&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=328&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=328-330&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft.coden=NEJMAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMp0905631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1801362581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223911735&rft_id=info:pmid/19567829&rfr_iscdi=true |