Factors affecting the exchange of genetic material between Nordic and US Holstein populations

The possibility of profitable cooperation between dairy cattle populations depends on several factors. Among these factors is the similarity of breeding goals, for example, as measured by the correlations between selection indices. Correlations between selection indices less than unity can usually b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 2009-08, Vol.92 (8), p.4023-4034
Hauptverfasser: Buch, L.H., Sørensen, A.C., Lassen, J., Berg, P., Christensen, L.G., Sørensen, M.K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4034
container_issue 8
container_start_page 4023
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 92
creator Buch, L.H.
Sørensen, A.C.
Lassen, J.
Berg, P.
Christensen, L.G.
Sørensen, M.K.
description The possibility of profitable cooperation between dairy cattle populations depends on several factors. Among these factors is the similarity of breeding goals, for example, as measured by the correlations between selection indices. Correlations between selection indices less than unity can usually be explained by differences in economic values, trait definitions, national genetic evaluation procedures, and genotype×environment interactions. The objective of this study was to test whether uniform definitions of the female fertility traits would increase the exchange of genes across populations, and to quantify the effect on genetic gain. A second objective was to test whether a more similar relative weighting of the index traits across populations would increase the exchange of genes across populations, and to quantify the effect on genetic gain. This was done in a stochastic simulation study of the Nordic and US Holstein populations. Uniform definitions of the female fertility traits did not increase total genetic gain in the Nordic Holstein population. The standardization did not seem to affect selection across populations either. However, the results were sensitive to the assumptions made in the simulation study, especially the genetic correlations between traits. A more similar relative weighting of the index traits across populations did not change total genetic gain in the Nordic Holstein population. The possibility of exchanging genetic material with the US Holstein population led to significantly higher progress in the aggregate genotype in the Nordic Holstein population compared with a situation in which exchange was not possible. Hence, importation of US Holstein genetics for use in the Nordic Holstein population is recommended. In addition, results indicated that population size is of greater importance than differences in trait definitions and relative weighting of the index traits for the advantage of exchanging genetic material between the Nordic and the US Holstein populations. The possibility of exchanging genetic material with the Nordic Holstein population did not change progress in the aggregate genotype in the US Holstein population compared with a situation in which exchange was not possible, but it tended to result in lower genetic progress in protein yield and greater genetic progress or smaller genetic declines in the functional traits. Thus, importation of genetic material from Nordic Holsteins may slow down the deterioration of ani
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.2008-1541
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67508733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002203020970726X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1821204731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-4d5eb3fd65de35c2a88d396126ebb734d8579001387ed2b6968af1fc6b11f1af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9rFDEcR4Modq0evWrw4G1qfkwymaMUa4Wih7pHCZnkm9kss5M1yVj9782wCwXBU0h4fHh5CL2m5IpTqT7sXb5ihKiGipY-QRsqmGg47dVTtCGEsYZwwi7Qi5z39UoZEc_RBe0lI1LJDfpxY2yJKWPjPdgS5hGXHWD4bXdmHgFHj0eYoQSLD6ZACmbCA5QHgBl_jcnVdzM7vL3Ht3HKBcKMj_G4TKaEOOeX6Jk3U4ZX5_MSbW8-fb--be6-ff5y_fGusa0kpWmdgIF7J4UDLiwzSjneS8okDEPHW6dE1xNCuerAsUH2UhlPvZUDpZ4azy_R-9PuMcWfC-SiDyFbmCYzQ1yylp0gquO8gu_-AfdxSXN107QXineS9hVqTpBNMecEXh9TOJj0R1Oi1-i6RtdrdL1Gr_yb8-gyHMA90ufKj3q7MO4eQgKdD2aaKk7XqZ5ppVvCVr23J9CbqM2YQtbbe1Y_TqisdqytRHcioOb8FSDpbAPMFlydtUW7GP5j-RfMhKX1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195837619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors affecting the exchange of genetic material between Nordic and US Holstein populations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Buch, L.H. ; Sørensen, A.C. ; Lassen, J. ; Berg, P. ; Christensen, L.G. ; Sørensen, M.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buch, L.H. ; Sørensen, A.C. ; Lassen, J. ; Berg, P. ; Christensen, L.G. ; Sørensen, M.K.</creatorcontrib><description>The possibility of profitable cooperation between dairy cattle populations depends on several factors. Among these factors is the similarity of breeding goals, for example, as measured by the correlations between selection indices. Correlations between selection indices less than unity can usually be explained by differences in economic values, trait definitions, national genetic evaluation procedures, and genotype×environment interactions. The objective of this study was to test whether uniform definitions of the female fertility traits would increase the exchange of genes across populations, and to quantify the effect on genetic gain. A second objective was to test whether a more similar relative weighting of the index traits across populations would increase the exchange of genes across populations, and to quantify the effect on genetic gain. This was done in a stochastic simulation study of the Nordic and US Holstein populations. Uniform definitions of the female fertility traits did not increase total genetic gain in the Nordic Holstein population. The standardization did not seem to affect selection across populations either. However, the results were sensitive to the assumptions made in the simulation study, especially the genetic correlations between traits. A more similar relative weighting of the index traits across populations did not change total genetic gain in the Nordic Holstein population. The possibility of exchanging genetic material with the US Holstein population led to significantly higher progress in the aggregate genotype in the Nordic Holstein population compared with a situation in which exchange was not possible. Hence, importation of US Holstein genetics for use in the Nordic Holstein population is recommended. In addition, results indicated that population size is of greater importance than differences in trait definitions and relative weighting of the index traits for the advantage of exchanging genetic material between the Nordic and the US Holstein populations. The possibility of exchanging genetic material with the Nordic Holstein population did not change progress in the aggregate genotype in the US Holstein population compared with a situation in which exchange was not possible, but it tended to result in lower genetic progress in protein yield and greater genetic progress or smaller genetic declines in the functional traits. Thus, importation of genetic material from Nordic Holsteins may slow down the deterioration of animal health and reproduction in US Holsteins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1541</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19620686</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>animal breeding ; animal genetic resources ; animal health ; animal reproduction ; Animals ; Breeding ; breeding scheme simulation ; Cattle - genetics ; dairy breeds ; dairy cattle ; dairy cows ; Dairying ; Europe ; exchange of genetic material ; Female ; female fertility ; Fertility - genetics ; genetic correlation ; genetic improvement ; genetic material ; genetic merit ; genetic variation ; Genotype ; genotype-environment interaction ; Holstein ; Inbreeding ; Insemination, Artificial - veterinary ; Male ; milk protein yield ; population size ; Regression Analysis ; selection ; selection criteria ; selection index ; simulation models ; stochastic processes ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2009-08, Vol.92 (8), p.4023-4034</ispartof><rights>2009 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Dairy Science Association Aug 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-4d5eb3fd65de35c2a88d396126ebb734d8579001387ed2b6968af1fc6b11f1af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-4d5eb3fd65de35c2a88d396126ebb734d8579001387ed2b6968af1fc6b11f1af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1541$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19620686$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buch, L.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, L.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, M.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors affecting the exchange of genetic material between Nordic and US Holstein populations</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>The possibility of profitable cooperation between dairy cattle populations depends on several factors. Among these factors is the similarity of breeding goals, for example, as measured by the correlations between selection indices. Correlations between selection indices less than unity can usually be explained by differences in economic values, trait definitions, national genetic evaluation procedures, and genotype×environment interactions. The objective of this study was to test whether uniform definitions of the female fertility traits would increase the exchange of genes across populations, and to quantify the effect on genetic gain. A second objective was to test whether a more similar relative weighting of the index traits across populations would increase the exchange of genes across populations, and to quantify the effect on genetic gain. This was done in a stochastic simulation study of the Nordic and US Holstein populations. Uniform definitions of the female fertility traits did not increase total genetic gain in the Nordic Holstein population. The standardization did not seem to affect selection across populations either. However, the results were sensitive to the assumptions made in the simulation study, especially the genetic correlations between traits. A more similar relative weighting of the index traits across populations did not change total genetic gain in the Nordic Holstein population. The possibility of exchanging genetic material with the US Holstein population led to significantly higher progress in the aggregate genotype in the Nordic Holstein population compared with a situation in which exchange was not possible. Hence, importation of US Holstein genetics for use in the Nordic Holstein population is recommended. In addition, results indicated that population size is of greater importance than differences in trait definitions and relative weighting of the index traits for the advantage of exchanging genetic material between the Nordic and the US Holstein populations. The possibility of exchanging genetic material with the Nordic Holstein population did not change progress in the aggregate genotype in the US Holstein population compared with a situation in which exchange was not possible, but it tended to result in lower genetic progress in protein yield and greater genetic progress or smaller genetic declines in the functional traits. Thus, importation of genetic material from Nordic Holsteins may slow down the deterioration of animal health and reproduction in US Holsteins.</description><subject>animal breeding</subject><subject>animal genetic resources</subject><subject>animal health</subject><subject>animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>breeding scheme simulation</subject><subject>Cattle - genetics</subject><subject>dairy breeds</subject><subject>dairy cattle</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>Dairying</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>exchange of genetic material</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>female fertility</subject><subject>Fertility - genetics</subject><subject>genetic correlation</subject><subject>genetic improvement</subject><subject>genetic material</subject><subject>genetic merit</subject><subject>genetic variation</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>genotype-environment interaction</subject><subject>Holstein</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>milk protein yield</subject><subject>population size</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>selection</subject><subject>selection criteria</subject><subject>selection index</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>stochastic processes</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9rFDEcR4Modq0evWrw4G1qfkwymaMUa4Wih7pHCZnkm9kss5M1yVj9782wCwXBU0h4fHh5CL2m5IpTqT7sXb5ihKiGipY-QRsqmGg47dVTtCGEsYZwwi7Qi5z39UoZEc_RBe0lI1LJDfpxY2yJKWPjPdgS5hGXHWD4bXdmHgFHj0eYoQSLD6ZACmbCA5QHgBl_jcnVdzM7vL3Ht3HKBcKMj_G4TKaEOOeX6Jk3U4ZX5_MSbW8-fb--be6-ff5y_fGusa0kpWmdgIF7J4UDLiwzSjneS8okDEPHW6dE1xNCuerAsUH2UhlPvZUDpZ4azy_R-9PuMcWfC-SiDyFbmCYzQ1yylp0gquO8gu_-AfdxSXN107QXineS9hVqTpBNMecEXh9TOJj0R1Oi1-i6RtdrdL1Gr_yb8-gyHMA90ufKj3q7MO4eQgKdD2aaKk7XqZ5ppVvCVr23J9CbqM2YQtbbe1Y_TqisdqytRHcioOb8FSDpbAPMFlydtUW7GP5j-RfMhKX1</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Buch, L.H.</creator><creator>Sørensen, A.C.</creator><creator>Lassen, J.</creator><creator>Berg, P.</creator><creator>Christensen, L.G.</creator><creator>Sørensen, M.K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Factors affecting the exchange of genetic material between Nordic and US Holstein populations</title><author>Buch, L.H. ; Sørensen, A.C. ; Lassen, J. ; Berg, P. ; Christensen, L.G. ; Sørensen, M.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-4d5eb3fd65de35c2a88d396126ebb734d8579001387ed2b6968af1fc6b11f1af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>animal breeding</topic><topic>animal genetic resources</topic><topic>animal health</topic><topic>animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>breeding scheme simulation</topic><topic>Cattle - genetics</topic><topic>dairy breeds</topic><topic>dairy cattle</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>Dairying</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>exchange of genetic material</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>female fertility</topic><topic>Fertility - genetics</topic><topic>genetic correlation</topic><topic>genetic improvement</topic><topic>genetic material</topic><topic>genetic merit</topic><topic>genetic variation</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>genotype-environment interaction</topic><topic>Holstein</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>milk protein yield</topic><topic>population size</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>selection</topic><topic>selection criteria</topic><topic>selection index</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>stochastic processes</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buch, L.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lassen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, L.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, M.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buch, L.H.</au><au>Sørensen, A.C.</au><au>Lassen, J.</au><au>Berg, P.</au><au>Christensen, L.G.</au><au>Sørensen, M.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors affecting the exchange of genetic material between Nordic and US Holstein populations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4023</spage><epage>4034</epage><pages>4023-4034</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>The possibility of profitable cooperation between dairy cattle populations depends on several factors. Among these factors is the similarity of breeding goals, for example, as measured by the correlations between selection indices. Correlations between selection indices less than unity can usually be explained by differences in economic values, trait definitions, national genetic evaluation procedures, and genotype×environment interactions. The objective of this study was to test whether uniform definitions of the female fertility traits would increase the exchange of genes across populations, and to quantify the effect on genetic gain. A second objective was to test whether a more similar relative weighting of the index traits across populations would increase the exchange of genes across populations, and to quantify the effect on genetic gain. This was done in a stochastic simulation study of the Nordic and US Holstein populations. Uniform definitions of the female fertility traits did not increase total genetic gain in the Nordic Holstein population. The standardization did not seem to affect selection across populations either. However, the results were sensitive to the assumptions made in the simulation study, especially the genetic correlations between traits. A more similar relative weighting of the index traits across populations did not change total genetic gain in the Nordic Holstein population. The possibility of exchanging genetic material with the US Holstein population led to significantly higher progress in the aggregate genotype in the Nordic Holstein population compared with a situation in which exchange was not possible. Hence, importation of US Holstein genetics for use in the Nordic Holstein population is recommended. In addition, results indicated that population size is of greater importance than differences in trait definitions and relative weighting of the index traits for the advantage of exchanging genetic material between the Nordic and the US Holstein populations. The possibility of exchanging genetic material with the Nordic Holstein population did not change progress in the aggregate genotype in the US Holstein population compared with a situation in which exchange was not possible, but it tended to result in lower genetic progress in protein yield and greater genetic progress or smaller genetic declines in the functional traits. Thus, importation of genetic material from Nordic Holsteins may slow down the deterioration of animal health and reproduction in US Holsteins.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19620686</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2008-1541</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2009-08, Vol.92 (8), p.4023-4034
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67508733
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects animal breeding
animal genetic resources
animal health
animal reproduction
Animals
Breeding
breeding scheme simulation
Cattle - genetics
dairy breeds
dairy cattle
dairy cows
Dairying
Europe
exchange of genetic material
Female
female fertility
Fertility - genetics
genetic correlation
genetic improvement
genetic material
genetic merit
genetic variation
Genotype
genotype-environment interaction
Holstein
Inbreeding
Insemination, Artificial - veterinary
Male
milk protein yield
population size
Regression Analysis
selection
selection criteria
selection index
simulation models
stochastic processes
United States
title Factors affecting the exchange of genetic material between Nordic and US Holstein populations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T21%3A10%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20affecting%20the%20exchange%20of%20genetic%20material%20between%20Nordic%20and%20US%20Holstein%20populations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Buch,%20L.H.&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4023&rft.epage=4034&rft.pages=4023-4034&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2008-1541&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1821204731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195837619&rft_id=info:pmid/19620686&rft_els_id=S002203020970726X&rfr_iscdi=true