User interface paradigms for patient-specific surgical planning: lessons learned over a decade of research

This paper covers work in virtual reality-based, patient-specific surgical planning over the past decade. It aims to comprehensively examine the user interface paradigms and system designs during that period of time and to objectively analyze their effectiveness for the task. The goal is to provide...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computerized medical imaging and graphics 2005-03, Vol.29 (2), p.203-222
Hauptverfasser: Montgomery, Kevin, Stephanides, Michael, Schendel, Stephen, Ross, Muriel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 222
container_issue 2
container_start_page 203
container_title Computerized medical imaging and graphics
container_volume 29
creator Montgomery, Kevin
Stephanides, Michael
Schendel, Stephen
Ross, Muriel
description This paper covers work in virtual reality-based, patient-specific surgical planning over the past decade. It aims to comprehensively examine the user interface paradigms and system designs during that period of time and to objectively analyze their effectiveness for the task. The goal is to provide useful feedback on these interface and implementation paradigms to aid other researchers in this field. First, specialized systems for specific clinical use were produced with a limited set of visualization tools. Later, through collaboration with NASA, an immersive virtual environment was created to produce high-fidelity images for surgical simulation, but it underestimated the importance of collaboration. The next system, a networked, distributed virtual environment, provided immersion and collaboration, but the immersive paradigm was found to be of a disadvantage and the uniqueness of the framework unwieldy. A virtual model, workbench-style display was then created using a commercial package, but limitations of each were soon apparent. Finally, a specialized display, with an integrated visualization and simulation system is described and evaluated. Lessons learned include: surgical planning is an abstract process unlike surgical simulation; collaboration is important, as is stereo visualization; and that high-resolution preoperative images from standard viewpoints are desirable, but interaction is truly the key to planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2004.09.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67496392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S089561110400120X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67496392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-6cf56a7dc5055220e9e35ffeaee9ae844f050314471f21e2613fc7c71b34aa0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFr3DAQhUVpaLZp_0JRL7nZnbEla5VbWJK0EOilOQutPNpqsS1H8gby76OwC80tPQ3DfPNmeI-x7wg1AnY_9rWL4zxSH0a7qxsAUYOuAcUHtsK10hUohR_ZCtZaVh0inrPPOe8BoAGFn9g5SiWlbNcrtn_IlHiYFkreOuKzTbYPuzFzH1PplkDTUuWZXPDB8XxIu-DswOfBTlOYdld8oJzjlEu1aaKex6ciaHlPzvbEo-eJchm5v1_YmbdDpq-nesEebm_-bH5W97_vfm2u7ysnoFuqznnZWdU7CVI2DZCmVnpPlkhbWgvhQUKLQij0DVLTYeudcgq3rbAWtu0Fuzzqzik-HigvZgzZ0VA-pnjIplNCd61u3gVRyUZILQuoj6BLMedE3sypWJ-eDYJ5TcTszZtEzGsiBrQpiZTdb6cjh22Z_9s8RVCAzRGg4slToGSyK6a7opXILaaP4T_OvACBSKRF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17524595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>User interface paradigms for patient-specific surgical planning: lessons learned over a decade of research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Montgomery, Kevin ; Stephanides, Michael ; Schendel, Stephen ; Ross, Muriel</creator><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Kevin ; Stephanides, Michael ; Schendel, Stephen ; Ross, Muriel</creatorcontrib><description>This paper covers work in virtual reality-based, patient-specific surgical planning over the past decade. It aims to comprehensively examine the user interface paradigms and system designs during that period of time and to objectively analyze their effectiveness for the task. The goal is to provide useful feedback on these interface and implementation paradigms to aid other researchers in this field. First, specialized systems for specific clinical use were produced with a limited set of visualization tools. Later, through collaboration with NASA, an immersive virtual environment was created to produce high-fidelity images for surgical simulation, but it underestimated the importance of collaboration. The next system, a networked, distributed virtual environment, provided immersion and collaboration, but the immersive paradigm was found to be of a disadvantage and the uniqueness of the framework unwieldy. A virtual model, workbench-style display was then created using a commercial package, but limitations of each were soon apparent. Finally, a specialized display, with an integrated visualization and simulation system is described and evaluated. Lessons learned include: surgical planning is an abstract process unlike surgical simulation; collaboration is important, as is stereo visualization; and that high-resolution preoperative images from standard viewpoints are desirable, but interaction is truly the key to planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-6111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2004.09.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15755538</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Patient-Centered Care ; Space life sciences ; Surgical planning ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; Surgical simulation ; United States ; User-Computer Interface ; Virtual environments</subject><ispartof>Computerized medical imaging and graphics, 2005-03, Vol.29 (2), p.203-222</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-6cf56a7dc5055220e9e35ffeaee9ae844f050314471f21e2613fc7c71b34aa0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-6cf56a7dc5055220e9e35ffeaee9ae844f050314471f21e2613fc7c71b34aa0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089561110400120X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15755538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephanides, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schendel, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Muriel</creatorcontrib><title>User interface paradigms for patient-specific surgical planning: lessons learned over a decade of research</title><title>Computerized medical imaging and graphics</title><addtitle>Comput Med Imaging Graph</addtitle><description>This paper covers work in virtual reality-based, patient-specific surgical planning over the past decade. It aims to comprehensively examine the user interface paradigms and system designs during that period of time and to objectively analyze their effectiveness for the task. The goal is to provide useful feedback on these interface and implementation paradigms to aid other researchers in this field. First, specialized systems for specific clinical use were produced with a limited set of visualization tools. Later, through collaboration with NASA, an immersive virtual environment was created to produce high-fidelity images for surgical simulation, but it underestimated the importance of collaboration. The next system, a networked, distributed virtual environment, provided immersion and collaboration, but the immersive paradigm was found to be of a disadvantage and the uniqueness of the framework unwieldy. A virtual model, workbench-style display was then created using a commercial package, but limitations of each were soon apparent. Finally, a specialized display, with an integrated visualization and simulation system is described and evaluated. Lessons learned include: surgical planning is an abstract process unlike surgical simulation; collaboration is important, as is stereo visualization; and that high-resolution preoperative images from standard viewpoints are desirable, but interaction is truly the key to planning.</description><subject>Patient-Centered Care</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Surgical planning</subject><subject>Surgical Procedures, Operative</subject><subject>Surgical simulation</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><subject>Virtual environments</subject><issn>0895-6111</issn><issn>1879-0771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFr3DAQhUVpaLZp_0JRL7nZnbEla5VbWJK0EOilOQutPNpqsS1H8gby76OwC80tPQ3DfPNmeI-x7wg1AnY_9rWL4zxSH0a7qxsAUYOuAcUHtsK10hUohR_ZCtZaVh0inrPPOe8BoAGFn9g5SiWlbNcrtn_IlHiYFkreOuKzTbYPuzFzH1PplkDTUuWZXPDB8XxIu-DswOfBTlOYdld8oJzjlEu1aaKex6ciaHlPzvbEo-eJchm5v1_YmbdDpq-nesEebm_-bH5W97_vfm2u7ysnoFuqznnZWdU7CVI2DZCmVnpPlkhbWgvhQUKLQij0DVLTYeudcgq3rbAWtu0Fuzzqzik-HigvZgzZ0VA-pnjIplNCd61u3gVRyUZILQuoj6BLMedE3sypWJ-eDYJ5TcTszZtEzGsiBrQpiZTdb6cjh22Z_9s8RVCAzRGg4slToGSyK6a7opXILaaP4T_OvACBSKRF</recordid><startdate>20050301</startdate><enddate>20050301</enddate><creator>Montgomery, Kevin</creator><creator>Stephanides, Michael</creator><creator>Schendel, Stephen</creator><creator>Ross, Muriel</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050301</creationdate><title>User interface paradigms for patient-specific surgical planning: lessons learned over a decade of research</title><author>Montgomery, Kevin ; Stephanides, Michael ; Schendel, Stephen ; Ross, Muriel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-6cf56a7dc5055220e9e35ffeaee9ae844f050314471f21e2613fc7c71b34aa0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Patient-Centered Care</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Surgical planning</topic><topic>Surgical Procedures, Operative</topic><topic>Surgical simulation</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><topic>Virtual environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephanides, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schendel, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Muriel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computerized medical imaging and graphics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Montgomery, Kevin</au><au>Stephanides, Michael</au><au>Schendel, Stephen</au><au>Ross, Muriel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>User interface paradigms for patient-specific surgical planning: lessons learned over a decade of research</atitle><jtitle>Computerized medical imaging and graphics</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Med Imaging Graph</addtitle><date>2005-03-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>203-222</pages><issn>0895-6111</issn><eissn>1879-0771</eissn><abstract>This paper covers work in virtual reality-based, patient-specific surgical planning over the past decade. It aims to comprehensively examine the user interface paradigms and system designs during that period of time and to objectively analyze their effectiveness for the task. The goal is to provide useful feedback on these interface and implementation paradigms to aid other researchers in this field. First, specialized systems for specific clinical use were produced with a limited set of visualization tools. Later, through collaboration with NASA, an immersive virtual environment was created to produce high-fidelity images for surgical simulation, but it underestimated the importance of collaboration. The next system, a networked, distributed virtual environment, provided immersion and collaboration, but the immersive paradigm was found to be of a disadvantage and the uniqueness of the framework unwieldy. A virtual model, workbench-style display was then created using a commercial package, but limitations of each were soon apparent. Finally, a specialized display, with an integrated visualization and simulation system is described and evaluated. Lessons learned include: surgical planning is an abstract process unlike surgical simulation; collaboration is important, as is stereo visualization; and that high-resolution preoperative images from standard viewpoints are desirable, but interaction is truly the key to planning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15755538</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compmedimag.2004.09.014</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-6111
ispartof Computerized medical imaging and graphics, 2005-03, Vol.29 (2), p.203-222
issn 0895-6111
1879-0771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67496392
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Patient-Centered Care
Space life sciences
Surgical planning
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Surgical simulation
United States
User-Computer Interface
Virtual environments
title User interface paradigms for patient-specific surgical planning: lessons learned over a decade of research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A23%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=User%20interface%20paradigms%20for%20patient-specific%20surgical%20planning:%20lessons%20learned%20over%20a%20decade%20of%20research&rft.jtitle=Computerized%20medical%20imaging%20and%20graphics&rft.au=Montgomery,%20Kevin&rft.date=2005-03-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=203-222&rft.issn=0895-6111&rft.eissn=1879-0771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2004.09.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67496392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17524595&rft_id=info:pmid/15755538&rft_els_id=S089561110400120X&rfr_iscdi=true