The utility of calretinin, inhibin, and WT1 immunohistochemical staining in the differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors

Calretinin has been proposed as a novel marker of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors (SCST); this study aims to determine whether calretinin can complement or supplant the established utility of inhibin in the differential diagnosis of SCST. WT1 has been shown to be expressed in ovarian serous, but not mucinous neoplasms; its expression in a variety of ovarian tumors is also examined. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissues from 111 primary ovarian tumors were analyzed with commercially available antibodies using semi-automated immunohistochemistry. Results were graded on a 4-tiered scale with staining of more than 0 but less than 5% of cells considered focal. Of 27 SCST, 56% were calretinin and 56% inhibin positive overall; 90% of granulosa cell tumors, 57% of Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors, 33% of thecomas, and 14% of fibromas were calretinin positive. Inhibin was expressed in 60% of granulosa cell tumors, 71% of Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors, 43% of fibromas, and 33% of thecomas. Of 35 surface epithelial tumors (SET), 8% of serous papillary tumors were calretinin positive, whereas 8% of serous papillary tumors and 13% of poorly differentiated carcinomas expressed inhibin. WT1 was expressed in 29% of all endometrioid carcinomas, 10% of borderline mucinous tumors, and no mucinous carcinomas; however, most of the other SETs were positive (77% serous papillary and 88% poorly differentiated carcinomas). Among the SCST, WT1 stained only granulosa cell tumors (75%), though often weakly or variably. Calretinin has only slightly greater sensitivity (76% versus 65%) and equal specificity to inhibin (92%) in the differential staining of granulosa or Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors, that is, nonstromal SCST. Hence, calretinin cannot replace but could complement inhibin as part of an immunohistochemical panel used for diagnostically challenging SCST. Although WT1 should be reliably positive in non-mucinous SET, staining of granulosa cell tumors and lack of expression in a sizable subset of endometrioid carcinomas may confound interpretation.