Effect of Water Addition on Selective Consumption (Sorting) of Dry Diets by Dairy Cattle
The objective of this study was to determine whether adding water to a dry diet would reduce sorting and improve cow performance. Eighteen multiparous lactating Holstein cows were used in a cross-over design with 21-d periods. Treatments had the same dietary composition and differed only by adding w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dairy science 2005-03, Vol.88 (3), p.1043-1049 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1049 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1043 |
container_title | Journal of dairy science |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Leonardi, C Giannico, F Armentano, L. E |
description | The objective of this study was to determine whether adding water to a dry diet would reduce sorting and improve cow performance. Eighteen multiparous lactating Holstein cows were used in a cross-over design with 21-d periods. Treatments had the same dietary composition and differed only by adding water (WET) or not (DRY). Diets consisted of 10% alfalfa silage, 30% hay (approximately 80% grass and 20% alfalfa), and 60% concentrate [dry matter (DM) basis]. Dietary DM was 80.8% for DRY and 64.4% for WET. Both diets contained 16.9% crude protein and 24.3% neutral detergent fiber. Particle size was determined using the Wisconsin Particle Size Separator on the as-fed diets. The separator has five square-hole screens (Y1 to Y5) with diagonal openings of 26.9mm for Y1, 18mm for Y2, 8.98mm for Y3, 5.61mm for Y4, and 1.65mm for Y5, and one pan. Sorting was calculated on a 60°C DM basis (60DM). Predicted intake of Yi was calculated as the product of 60DM intake (60DMI) and the 60DM fraction of Yi in the total mixed ration for that screen. For DRY and WET, actual 60DMI by screen expressed as a percentage of predicted intake was 61.4% vs. 75.2% for Y1, 83.8% vs. 98.6% for Y2, 85.6% vs. 90.8% for Y3, 95.2% vs. 96.0% for Y4, 100.1% vs. 101.9% for Y5, and 105.9% vs. 102.9% for pan, respectively. Adding water did not affect total DM intake (28.3 kg/d) or milk production (41.3 kg/d). Neutral detergent fiber intake was 6.42 kg/d for WET and 6.15 kg/d for DRY. Milk fat percentage tended to be higher (3.41% vs. 3.31%) when cows consumed WET vs. DRY. No differences in ruminal pH, NH3, and volatile fatty acids were observed. Cows sorted against long particles in favor of shorter particles on both diets. Adding water to dry diets reduced sorting and tended to increase neutral detergent fiber intake and milk fat percentage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72772-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67473632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030205727727</els_id><sourcerecordid>893621091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-ed15d5baaa364a0a6c119798226f1ee3150646d135017e2f09e2c6a64f6d4c7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1vFCEUhonR2G31L-hoomkvpvIxwMxlM60fSRMv1kbvCAuHLZvZYQWmpv--7EfcxCsJCZzwnPec84LQO4IvGRHtp5VNl3OMKa0xw_Qc8wtJpaS1fIZmhFNeM9K1z9HsL3KCTlNalZBQzF-iE8IlaynrZujXjXNgchVc9VNniNWVtT77MFZlz2Eob_4Bqj6MaVpvdg_n8xCzH5cX26Tr-Fhde8ipWpSL9iXsdc4DvEIvnB4SvD6cZ-ju882P_mt9-_3Lt_7qtjactbkGS7jlC601E43GWhhCOtm1lApHABjhWDTCEsYxkUAd7oAaoUXjhG2MdOwMfdzrbmL4PUHKau2TgWHQI4QpKSEbyQSjBXz_D7gKUxxLb4p0vJTktCtQt4dMDClFcGoT_VrHR0Ww2nqvivdq573aGqswVzvvlSy5bw4FpsUa7DHzYHYBPhwAnYweXNSj8enICS45lfw40r1f3v_xEVRa62EosmRbvm0VK-00rIBv96DTQellLGJ3c4oJw7hry2oK0e8JKF_w4CGqZDyMBmyRNVnZ4P9jsicl1re6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195798529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Water Addition on Selective Consumption (Sorting) of Dry Diets by Dairy Cattle</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Leonardi, C ; Giannico, F ; Armentano, L. E</creator><creatorcontrib>Leonardi, C ; Giannico, F ; Armentano, L. E</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to determine whether adding water to a dry diet would reduce sorting and improve cow performance. Eighteen multiparous lactating Holstein cows were used in a cross-over design with 21-d periods. Treatments had the same dietary composition and differed only by adding water (WET) or not (DRY). Diets consisted of 10% alfalfa silage, 30% hay (approximately 80% grass and 20% alfalfa), and 60% concentrate [dry matter (DM) basis]. Dietary DM was 80.8% for DRY and 64.4% for WET. Both diets contained 16.9% crude protein and 24.3% neutral detergent fiber. Particle size was determined using the Wisconsin Particle Size Separator on the as-fed diets. The separator has five square-hole screens (Y1 to Y5) with diagonal openings of 26.9mm for Y1, 18mm for Y2, 8.98mm for Y3, 5.61mm for Y4, and 1.65mm for Y5, and one pan. Sorting was calculated on a 60°C DM basis (60DM). Predicted intake of Yi was calculated as the product of 60DM intake (60DMI) and the 60DM fraction of Yi in the total mixed ration for that screen. For DRY and WET, actual 60DMI by screen expressed as a percentage of predicted intake was 61.4% vs. 75.2% for Y1, 83.8% vs. 98.6% for Y2, 85.6% vs. 90.8% for Y3, 95.2% vs. 96.0% for Y4, 100.1% vs. 101.9% for Y5, and 105.9% vs. 102.9% for pan, respectively. Adding water did not affect total DM intake (28.3 kg/d) or milk production (41.3 kg/d). Neutral detergent fiber intake was 6.42 kg/d for WET and 6.15 kg/d for DRY. Milk fat percentage tended to be higher (3.41% vs. 3.31%) when cows consumed WET vs. DRY. No differences in ruminal pH, NH3, and volatile fatty acids were observed. Cows sorted against long particles in favor of shorter particles on both diets. Adding water to dry diets reduced sorting and tended to increase neutral detergent fiber intake and milk fat percentage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72772-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15738239</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDSCAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal Feed ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; animal preferences ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle - metabolism ; Cattle - physiology ; Cross-Over Studies ; dairy cows ; Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage ; Eating ; Energy Intake ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Lactation - metabolism ; long particle ; Milk - chemistry ; Milk - secretion ; Particle Size ; Random Allocation ; Rumen - metabolism ; Silage ; sorting ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems ; water ; Water - administration & dosage</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2005-03, Vol.88 (3), p.1043-1049</ispartof><rights>2005 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Dairy Science Association Mar 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-ed15d5baaa364a0a6c119798226f1ee3150646d135017e2f09e2c6a64f6d4c7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-ed15d5baaa364a0a6c119798226f1ee3150646d135017e2f09e2c6a64f6d4c7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72772-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16575275$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leonardi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannico, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armentano, L. E</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Water Addition on Selective Consumption (Sorting) of Dry Diets by Dairy Cattle</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to determine whether adding water to a dry diet would reduce sorting and improve cow performance. Eighteen multiparous lactating Holstein cows were used in a cross-over design with 21-d periods. Treatments had the same dietary composition and differed only by adding water (WET) or not (DRY). Diets consisted of 10% alfalfa silage, 30% hay (approximately 80% grass and 20% alfalfa), and 60% concentrate [dry matter (DM) basis]. Dietary DM was 80.8% for DRY and 64.4% for WET. Both diets contained 16.9% crude protein and 24.3% neutral detergent fiber. Particle size was determined using the Wisconsin Particle Size Separator on the as-fed diets. The separator has five square-hole screens (Y1 to Y5) with diagonal openings of 26.9mm for Y1, 18mm for Y2, 8.98mm for Y3, 5.61mm for Y4, and 1.65mm for Y5, and one pan. Sorting was calculated on a 60°C DM basis (60DM). Predicted intake of Yi was calculated as the product of 60DM intake (60DMI) and the 60DM fraction of Yi in the total mixed ration for that screen. For DRY and WET, actual 60DMI by screen expressed as a percentage of predicted intake was 61.4% vs. 75.2% for Y1, 83.8% vs. 98.6% for Y2, 85.6% vs. 90.8% for Y3, 95.2% vs. 96.0% for Y4, 100.1% vs. 101.9% for Y5, and 105.9% vs. 102.9% for pan, respectively. Adding water did not affect total DM intake (28.3 kg/d) or milk production (41.3 kg/d). Neutral detergent fiber intake was 6.42 kg/d for WET and 6.15 kg/d for DRY. Milk fat percentage tended to be higher (3.41% vs. 3.31%) when cows consumed WET vs. DRY. No differences in ruminal pH, NH3, and volatile fatty acids were observed. Cows sorted against long particles in favor of shorter particles on both diets. Adding water to dry diets reduced sorting and tended to increase neutral detergent fiber intake and milk fat percentage.</description><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>animal preferences</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle - metabolism</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Eating</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Lactation - metabolism</subject><subject>long particle</subject><subject>Milk - chemistry</subject><subject>Milk - secretion</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rumen - metabolism</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>sorting</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><subject>water</subject><subject>Water - administration & dosage</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1vFCEUhonR2G31L-hoomkvpvIxwMxlM60fSRMv1kbvCAuHLZvZYQWmpv--7EfcxCsJCZzwnPec84LQO4IvGRHtp5VNl3OMKa0xw_Qc8wtJpaS1fIZmhFNeM9K1z9HsL3KCTlNalZBQzF-iE8IlaynrZujXjXNgchVc9VNniNWVtT77MFZlz2Eob_4Bqj6MaVpvdg_n8xCzH5cX26Tr-Fhde8ipWpSL9iXsdc4DvEIvnB4SvD6cZ-ju882P_mt9-_3Lt_7qtjactbkGS7jlC601E43GWhhCOtm1lApHABjhWDTCEsYxkUAd7oAaoUXjhG2MdOwMfdzrbmL4PUHKau2TgWHQI4QpKSEbyQSjBXz_D7gKUxxLb4p0vJTktCtQt4dMDClFcGoT_VrHR0Ww2nqvivdq573aGqswVzvvlSy5bw4FpsUa7DHzYHYBPhwAnYweXNSj8enICS45lfw40r1f3v_xEVRa62EosmRbvm0VK-00rIBv96DTQellLGJ3c4oJw7hry2oK0e8JKF_w4CGqZDyMBmyRNVnZ4P9jsicl1re6</recordid><startdate>20050301</startdate><enddate>20050301</enddate><creator>Leonardi, C</creator><creator>Giannico, F</creator><creator>Armentano, L. E</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050301</creationdate><title>Effect of Water Addition on Selective Consumption (Sorting) of Dry Diets by Dairy Cattle</title><author>Leonardi, C ; Giannico, F ; Armentano, L. E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-ed15d5baaa364a0a6c119798226f1ee3150646d135017e2f09e2c6a64f6d4c7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>animal preferences</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle - metabolism</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Eating</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Lactation - metabolism</topic><topic>long particle</topic><topic>Milk - chemistry</topic><topic>Milk - secretion</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rumen - metabolism</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>sorting</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><topic>water</topic><topic>Water - administration & dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leonardi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannico, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armentano, L. E</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leonardi, C</au><au>Giannico, F</au><au>Armentano, L. E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Water Addition on Selective Consumption (Sorting) of Dry Diets by Dairy Cattle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2005-03-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1043</spage><epage>1049</epage><pages>1043-1049</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><coden>JDSCAE</coden><abstract>The objective of this study was to determine whether adding water to a dry diet would reduce sorting and improve cow performance. Eighteen multiparous lactating Holstein cows were used in a cross-over design with 21-d periods. Treatments had the same dietary composition and differed only by adding water (WET) or not (DRY). Diets consisted of 10% alfalfa silage, 30% hay (approximately 80% grass and 20% alfalfa), and 60% concentrate [dry matter (DM) basis]. Dietary DM was 80.8% for DRY and 64.4% for WET. Both diets contained 16.9% crude protein and 24.3% neutral detergent fiber. Particle size was determined using the Wisconsin Particle Size Separator on the as-fed diets. The separator has five square-hole screens (Y1 to Y5) with diagonal openings of 26.9mm for Y1, 18mm for Y2, 8.98mm for Y3, 5.61mm for Y4, and 1.65mm for Y5, and one pan. Sorting was calculated on a 60°C DM basis (60DM). Predicted intake of Yi was calculated as the product of 60DM intake (60DMI) and the 60DM fraction of Yi in the total mixed ration for that screen. For DRY and WET, actual 60DMI by screen expressed as a percentage of predicted intake was 61.4% vs. 75.2% for Y1, 83.8% vs. 98.6% for Y2, 85.6% vs. 90.8% for Y3, 95.2% vs. 96.0% for Y4, 100.1% vs. 101.9% for Y5, and 105.9% vs. 102.9% for pan, respectively. Adding water did not affect total DM intake (28.3 kg/d) or milk production (41.3 kg/d). Neutral detergent fiber intake was 6.42 kg/d for WET and 6.15 kg/d for DRY. Milk fat percentage tended to be higher (3.41% vs. 3.31%) when cows consumed WET vs. DRY. No differences in ruminal pH, NH3, and volatile fatty acids were observed. Cows sorted against long particles in favor of shorter particles on both diets. Adding water to dry diets reduced sorting and tended to increase neutral detergent fiber intake and milk fat percentage.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15738239</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72772-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0302 |
ispartof | Journal of dairy science, 2005-03, Vol.88 (3), p.1043-1049 |
issn | 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67473632 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animal Feed Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena animal preferences Animal productions Animals Biological and medical sciences Cattle - metabolism Cattle - physiology Cross-Over Studies dairy cows Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage Eating Energy Intake Feeding. Feeding behavior Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Lactation - metabolism long particle Milk - chemistry Milk - secretion Particle Size Random Allocation Rumen - metabolism Silage sorting Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems water Water - administration & dosage |
title | Effect of Water Addition on Selective Consumption (Sorting) of Dry Diets by Dairy Cattle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A09%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Water%20Addition%20on%20Selective%20Consumption%20(Sorting)%20of%20Dry%20Diets%20by%20Dairy%20Cattle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Leonardi,%20C&rft.date=2005-03-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1043&rft.epage=1049&rft.pages=1043-1049&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft.coden=JDSCAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72772-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E893621091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195798529&rft_id=info:pmid/15738239&rft_els_id=S0022030205727727&rfr_iscdi=true |