Evaluation of PCR systems for the identification and differentiation of Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis: A collaborative trial

Diagnostic differentiation between the ruminant pathogens Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis is known to be problematic when only conventional serological and biochemical tests are used. The main reason for this is that both agents share a considerable number of related proteins and common e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The veterinary journal (1997) 2005-03, Vol.169 (2), p.268-275
Hauptverfasser: Bashiruddin, John B., Frey, Joachim, Königsson, Malin Heldtander, Johansson, Karl-Erik, Hotzel, Helmut, Diller, Roland, de Santis, Paola, Botelho, Ana, Ayling, Roger D., Nicholas, Robin A.J., Thiaucourt, François, Sachse, Konrad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 275
container_issue 2
container_start_page 268
container_title The veterinary journal (1997)
container_volume 169
creator Bashiruddin, John B.
Frey, Joachim
Königsson, Malin Heldtander
Johansson, Karl-Erik
Hotzel, Helmut
Diller, Roland
de Santis, Paola
Botelho, Ana
Ayling, Roger D.
Nicholas, Robin A.J.
Thiaucourt, François
Sachse, Konrad
description Diagnostic differentiation between the ruminant pathogens Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis is known to be problematic when only conventional serological and biochemical tests are used. The main reason for this is that both agents share a considerable number of related proteins and common epitopes. DNA-based detection methods offer advantages in terms of specificity and sensitivity. However, there is an urgent need to compare currently used PCR assays because they target different genomic regions and, therefore, may perform differently. In the present work, five laboratories, which use PCR routinely, evaluated the specificity of four different PCR systems for M. agalactiae and three systems for M. bovis on a total of 41 strains of the two Mycoplasma species including six previously unidentified strains. As the vast majority of PCR examinations (97.1% of all tests) correctly identified the strains the specificity of all seven detection systems appears to be high. In four cases, incorrect identification by conventional diagnostic methods was rectified by PCR. Isolates from non-typical hosts, i.e. three M. bovis strains from small ruminants and two M. agalactiae strains from cattle, were characterised by sequencing the 16S and part of the 23S ribosomal RNA genes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.01.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67459707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1090023304000358</els_id><sourcerecordid>67459707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-f44404e6fb172f3531b63c62ec7afd8a467b082a85cfa9b267abc5ea234a28a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAhzAp96y-F_iBHGpVoUiFYGAnq2JMy5eJfFieyPtI_DWOM0KOCGNZGvm930azVcULxndMMrqN7tNmnfDhlMqN5Tlah4V56wSvOStYo_zn7a0pFyIs-JZjDtKaSslf1qcsUpx1XJ6Xvy6nmE4QHJ-It6SL9uvJB5jwjES6wNJP5C4HqfkrDMrBVNPemcthqX9R_npaPx-gDgCgXsYwOQZPsD_TDo_u_iWXBHjhwE6H7J8RpKCg-F58cTCEPHF6b0o7t5ff9_elLefP3zcXt2WRqgmlVZKSSXWtmOKW1EJ1tXC1ByNAts3IGvV0YZDUxkLbcdrBZ2pELiQwBsQ4qK4XH33wf88YEx6dNFg3mdCf4i6VrJqFVUZ5Ctogo8xoNX74EYIR82oXgLQO70EoJcANGW5mix6dXI_dCP2fyWni2fg9QpY8Brug4v67hunTORwmoaJxeLdSmC-wuww6GgcTgZ7F9Ak3Xv3vw1-A4LVozc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67459707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of PCR systems for the identification and differentiation of Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis: A collaborative trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Bashiruddin, John B. ; Frey, Joachim ; Königsson, Malin Heldtander ; Johansson, Karl-Erik ; Hotzel, Helmut ; Diller, Roland ; de Santis, Paola ; Botelho, Ana ; Ayling, Roger D. ; Nicholas, Robin A.J. ; Thiaucourt, François ; Sachse, Konrad</creator><creatorcontrib>Bashiruddin, John B. ; Frey, Joachim ; Königsson, Malin Heldtander ; Johansson, Karl-Erik ; Hotzel, Helmut ; Diller, Roland ; de Santis, Paola ; Botelho, Ana ; Ayling, Roger D. ; Nicholas, Robin A.J. ; Thiaucourt, François ; Sachse, Konrad</creatorcontrib><description>Diagnostic differentiation between the ruminant pathogens Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis is known to be problematic when only conventional serological and biochemical tests are used. The main reason for this is that both agents share a considerable number of related proteins and common epitopes. DNA-based detection methods offer advantages in terms of specificity and sensitivity. However, there is an urgent need to compare currently used PCR assays because they target different genomic regions and, therefore, may perform differently. In the present work, five laboratories, which use PCR routinely, evaluated the specificity of four different PCR systems for M. agalactiae and three systems for M. bovis on a total of 41 strains of the two Mycoplasma species including six previously unidentified strains. As the vast majority of PCR examinations (97.1% of all tests) correctly identified the strains the specificity of all seven detection systems appears to be high. In four cases, incorrect identification by conventional diagnostic methods was rectified by PCR. Isolates from non-typical hosts, i.e. three M. bovis strains from small ruminants and two M. agalactiae strains from cattle, were characterised by sequencing the 16S and part of the 23S ribosomal RNA genes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.01.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15727920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>accuracy ; animal diseases ; Animals ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - epidemiology ; Cattle Diseases - microbiology ; diagnostic techniques ; disease diagnosis ; DNA Primers ; Europe - epidemiology ; Identification ; Mycoplasma agalactiae ; Mycoplasma agalactiae - classification ; Mycoplasma agalactiae - genetics ; Mycoplasma agalactiae - isolation &amp; purification ; Mycoplasma bovis ; Mycoplasma bovis - classification ; Mycoplasma bovis - genetics ; Mycoplasma bovis - isolation &amp; purification ; Mycoplasma Infections - epidemiology ; Mycoplasma Infections - microbiology ; Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary ; mycoplasmosis ; pathogen identification ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary ; Predictive Value of Tests ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - genetics ; ruminants ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Specificity ; strains ; test sensitivity ; test specificity</subject><ispartof>The veterinary journal (1997), 2005-03, Vol.169 (2), p.268-275</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-f44404e6fb172f3531b63c62ec7afd8a467b082a85cfa9b267abc5ea234a28a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-f44404e6fb172f3531b63c62ec7afd8a467b082a85cfa9b267abc5ea234a28a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090023304000358$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15727920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bashiruddin, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frey, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Königsson, Malin Heldtander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Karl-Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotzel, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diller, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Santis, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botelho, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayling, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholas, Robin A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiaucourt, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachse, Konrad</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of PCR systems for the identification and differentiation of Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis: A collaborative trial</title><title>The veterinary journal (1997)</title><addtitle>Vet J</addtitle><description>Diagnostic differentiation between the ruminant pathogens Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis is known to be problematic when only conventional serological and biochemical tests are used. The main reason for this is that both agents share a considerable number of related proteins and common epitopes. DNA-based detection methods offer advantages in terms of specificity and sensitivity. However, there is an urgent need to compare currently used PCR assays because they target different genomic regions and, therefore, may perform differently. In the present work, five laboratories, which use PCR routinely, evaluated the specificity of four different PCR systems for M. agalactiae and three systems for M. bovis on a total of 41 strains of the two Mycoplasma species including six previously unidentified strains. As the vast majority of PCR examinations (97.1% of all tests) correctly identified the strains the specificity of all seven detection systems appears to be high. In four cases, incorrect identification by conventional diagnostic methods was rectified by PCR. Isolates from non-typical hosts, i.e. three M. bovis strains from small ruminants and two M. agalactiae strains from cattle, were characterised by sequencing the 16S and part of the 23S ribosomal RNA genes.</description><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>animal diseases</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>diagnostic techniques</subject><subject>disease diagnosis</subject><subject>DNA Primers</subject><subject>Europe - epidemiology</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Mycoplasma agalactiae</subject><subject>Mycoplasma agalactiae - classification</subject><subject>Mycoplasma agalactiae - genetics</subject><subject>Mycoplasma agalactiae - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Mycoplasma bovis</subject><subject>Mycoplasma bovis - classification</subject><subject>Mycoplasma bovis - genetics</subject><subject>Mycoplasma bovis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Mycoplasma Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Mycoplasma Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>mycoplasmosis</subject><subject>pathogen identification</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - genetics</subject><subject>ruminants</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Specificity</subject><subject>strains</subject><subject>test sensitivity</subject><subject>test specificity</subject><issn>1090-0233</issn><issn>1532-2971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAhzAp96y-F_iBHGpVoUiFYGAnq2JMy5eJfFieyPtI_DWOM0KOCGNZGvm930azVcULxndMMrqN7tNmnfDhlMqN5Tlah4V56wSvOStYo_zn7a0pFyIs-JZjDtKaSslf1qcsUpx1XJ6Xvy6nmE4QHJ-It6SL9uvJB5jwjES6wNJP5C4HqfkrDMrBVNPemcthqX9R_npaPx-gDgCgXsYwOQZPsD_TDo_u_iWXBHjhwE6H7J8RpKCg-F58cTCEPHF6b0o7t5ff9_elLefP3zcXt2WRqgmlVZKSSXWtmOKW1EJ1tXC1ByNAts3IGvV0YZDUxkLbcdrBZ2pELiQwBsQ4qK4XH33wf88YEx6dNFg3mdCf4i6VrJqFVUZ5Ctogo8xoNX74EYIR82oXgLQO70EoJcANGW5mix6dXI_dCP2fyWni2fg9QpY8Brug4v67hunTORwmoaJxeLdSmC-wuww6GgcTgZ7F9Ak3Xv3vw1-A4LVozc</recordid><startdate>20050301</startdate><enddate>20050301</enddate><creator>Bashiruddin, John B.</creator><creator>Frey, Joachim</creator><creator>Königsson, Malin Heldtander</creator><creator>Johansson, Karl-Erik</creator><creator>Hotzel, Helmut</creator><creator>Diller, Roland</creator><creator>de Santis, Paola</creator><creator>Botelho, Ana</creator><creator>Ayling, Roger D.</creator><creator>Nicholas, Robin A.J.</creator><creator>Thiaucourt, François</creator><creator>Sachse, Konrad</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050301</creationdate><title>Evaluation of PCR systems for the identification and differentiation of Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis: A collaborative trial</title><author>Bashiruddin, John B. ; Frey, Joachim ; Königsson, Malin Heldtander ; Johansson, Karl-Erik ; Hotzel, Helmut ; Diller, Roland ; de Santis, Paola ; Botelho, Ana ; Ayling, Roger D. ; Nicholas, Robin A.J. ; Thiaucourt, François ; Sachse, Konrad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-f44404e6fb172f3531b63c62ec7afd8a467b082a85cfa9b267abc5ea234a28a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>animal diseases</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>diagnostic techniques</topic><topic>disease diagnosis</topic><topic>DNA Primers</topic><topic>Europe - epidemiology</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Mycoplasma agalactiae</topic><topic>Mycoplasma agalactiae - classification</topic><topic>Mycoplasma agalactiae - genetics</topic><topic>Mycoplasma agalactiae - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Mycoplasma bovis</topic><topic>Mycoplasma bovis - classification</topic><topic>Mycoplasma bovis - genetics</topic><topic>Mycoplasma bovis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Mycoplasma Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Mycoplasma Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>mycoplasmosis</topic><topic>pathogen identification</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - genetics</topic><topic>ruminants</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Specificity</topic><topic>strains</topic><topic>test sensitivity</topic><topic>test specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bashiruddin, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frey, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Königsson, Malin Heldtander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Karl-Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotzel, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diller, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Santis, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botelho, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayling, Roger D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholas, Robin A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiaucourt, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachse, Konrad</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The veterinary journal (1997)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bashiruddin, John B.</au><au>Frey, Joachim</au><au>Königsson, Malin Heldtander</au><au>Johansson, Karl-Erik</au><au>Hotzel, Helmut</au><au>Diller, Roland</au><au>de Santis, Paola</au><au>Botelho, Ana</au><au>Ayling, Roger D.</au><au>Nicholas, Robin A.J.</au><au>Thiaucourt, François</au><au>Sachse, Konrad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of PCR systems for the identification and differentiation of Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis: A collaborative trial</atitle><jtitle>The veterinary journal (1997)</jtitle><addtitle>Vet J</addtitle><date>2005-03-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>169</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>268-275</pages><issn>1090-0233</issn><eissn>1532-2971</eissn><abstract>Diagnostic differentiation between the ruminant pathogens Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis is known to be problematic when only conventional serological and biochemical tests are used. The main reason for this is that both agents share a considerable number of related proteins and common epitopes. DNA-based detection methods offer advantages in terms of specificity and sensitivity. However, there is an urgent need to compare currently used PCR assays because they target different genomic regions and, therefore, may perform differently. In the present work, five laboratories, which use PCR routinely, evaluated the specificity of four different PCR systems for M. agalactiae and three systems for M. bovis on a total of 41 strains of the two Mycoplasma species including six previously unidentified strains. As the vast majority of PCR examinations (97.1% of all tests) correctly identified the strains the specificity of all seven detection systems appears to be high. In four cases, incorrect identification by conventional diagnostic methods was rectified by PCR. Isolates from non-typical hosts, i.e. three M. bovis strains from small ruminants and two M. agalactiae strains from cattle, were characterised by sequencing the 16S and part of the 23S ribosomal RNA genes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15727920</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.01.018</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-0233
ispartof The veterinary journal (1997), 2005-03, Vol.169 (2), p.268-275
issn 1090-0233
1532-2971
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67459707
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects accuracy
animal diseases
Animals
Cattle
Cattle Diseases - epidemiology
Cattle Diseases - microbiology
diagnostic techniques
disease diagnosis
DNA Primers
Europe - epidemiology
Identification
Mycoplasma agalactiae
Mycoplasma agalactiae - classification
Mycoplasma agalactiae - genetics
Mycoplasma agalactiae - isolation & purification
Mycoplasma bovis
Mycoplasma bovis - classification
Mycoplasma bovis - genetics
Mycoplasma bovis - isolation & purification
Mycoplasma Infections - epidemiology
Mycoplasma Infections - microbiology
Mycoplasma Infections - veterinary
mycoplasmosis
pathogen identification
Polymerase chain reaction
Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards
Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary
Predictive Value of Tests
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - genetics
ruminants
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specificity
strains
test sensitivity
test specificity
title Evaluation of PCR systems for the identification and differentiation of Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis: A collaborative trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20PCR%20systems%20for%20the%20identification%20and%20differentiation%20of%20Mycoplasma%20agalactiae%20and%20Mycoplasma%20bovis:%20A%20collaborative%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20veterinary%20journal%20(1997)&rft.au=Bashiruddin,%20John%20B.&rft.date=2005-03-01&rft.volume=169&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=268-275&rft.issn=1090-0233&rft.eissn=1532-2971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.01.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67459707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67459707&rft_id=info:pmid/15727920&rft_els_id=S1090023304000358&rfr_iscdi=true