Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004
Background Dermatophyte infections lead to high costs and differentially affect certain groups. Previous population studies have been limited in size, duration, and representativeness. Methods Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care S...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of dermatology 2009-07, Vol.48 (7), p.704-712 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 712 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 704 |
container_title | International journal of dermatology |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Panackal, Anil A. Halpern, Elkan F. Watson, Alice J. |
description | Background Dermatophyte infections lead to high costs and differentially affect certain groups. Previous population studies have been limited in size, duration, and representativeness.
Methods Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) (1995–2004), a cross‐sectional analysis of ambulatory visits in the USA was performed. Outpatients presenting with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM)‐coded diagnoses of tinea unguium, tinea corporis/manuum, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris were identified. Trends, descriptive epidemiology, and point prevalence estimates for these conditions were determined using stratification and standardization.
Results There was an estimated average of 4,124,038 ± 202,977 annual visits for dermatophytoses during the study period. Tinea unguium, tinea corporis, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris represented 23.2%, 20.4%, 18.8%, 15.0%, and 8.4%, respectively, of such infections; 71.6% of tinea unguium visits occurred among those older than 45 years. Tinea capitis was significantly more common among the black than the white population (prevalence odds ratio = 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 9.9–15.7). Ineffective treatment of tinea pedis, tinea corporis, and tinea cruris with polyenes, such as nystatin, commonly occurred.
Conclusions Improved healthcare provider education is needed to ensure judicious antidermatophyte drug management. Further studies, including proven diagnoses via fungal microscopy and culture, are needed to explain the prevalence discrepancy of tinea capitis among black children and tinea unguium in older adults, focusing on preventable risk factors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04025.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67443288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67443288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5445-172805e7477b275df6ebd4fb890cdd9bfa73d258f367316a5f0db466021f1e633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EokPhFZA3IJBI8N0JEotRuExRWxZD15YT2-BRJhlsB5od78Dr8DQ8CcnMqF1Sb3zs8_3Hx-cHAGKU42m93uSYCp4xQUlOECpzxBDh-fU9sLhJ3AcLhDDOSsTLE_Aoxs10pASzh-AEl1wiJPkC_KmGpDvbDxG6ofuqW-g7Z5vk-y5OIUzfLLzqfLIGrpNONr6By063Y_QR9m6fvtQzPSmX23poderDCC-s8c10Velg4XoIP-wIX1wuL6r1S6g7c6tZ9XHn013Eq736FcRlyf_--j19mz0GD5xuo31y3E_B1Yf3X6pVdv7541m1PM8azhjPsCQF4lYyKWsiuXHC1oa5uihRY0xZOy2pIbxwVEiKheYOmZoJgQh22ApKT8HzQ91d6L8PNia19bGxbXuYnBKSMUqK4r8gQYQQjuaKxQFsQh9jsE7tgt_qMCqM1Gyx2qjZSTU7qWaL1d5idT1Jnx7fGOqtNbfCo6cT8OwI6DiN0QXdNT7ecAQLzBGfe3h74H761o53bkCdfXo3R_QfnXXBXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20222503</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Panackal, Anil A. ; Halpern, Elkan F. ; Watson, Alice J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Panackal, Anil A. ; Halpern, Elkan F. ; Watson, Alice J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Dermatophyte infections lead to high costs and differentially affect certain groups. Previous population studies have been limited in size, duration, and representativeness.
Methods Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) (1995–2004), a cross‐sectional analysis of ambulatory visits in the USA was performed. Outpatients presenting with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM)‐coded diagnoses of tinea unguium, tinea corporis/manuum, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris were identified. Trends, descriptive epidemiology, and point prevalence estimates for these conditions were determined using stratification and standardization.
Results There was an estimated average of 4,124,038 ± 202,977 annual visits for dermatophytoses during the study period. Tinea unguium, tinea corporis, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris represented 23.2%, 20.4%, 18.8%, 15.0%, and 8.4%, respectively, of such infections; 71.6% of tinea unguium visits occurred among those older than 45 years. Tinea capitis was significantly more common among the black than the white population (prevalence odds ratio = 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 9.9–15.7). Ineffective treatment of tinea pedis, tinea corporis, and tinea cruris with polyenes, such as nystatin, commonly occurred.
Conclusions Improved healthcare provider education is needed to ensure judicious antidermatophyte drug management. Further studies, including proven diagnoses via fungal microscopy and culture, are needed to explain the prevalence discrepancy of tinea capitis among black children and tinea unguium in older adults, focusing on preventable risk factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-9059</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-4632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04025.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19570075</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJDEBB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory Care - economics ; Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data ; Ambulatory Care - utilization ; Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Data Collection ; Dermatology ; Dermatomycoses - drug therapy ; Dermatomycoses - economics ; Dermatomycoses - epidemiology ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Health Expenditures ; Humans ; Insurance, Health - economics ; Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data ; Insurance, Health - utilization ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; United States - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of dermatology, 2009-07, Vol.48 (7), p.704-712</ispartof><rights>2009 The International Society of Dermatology</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5445-172805e7477b275df6ebd4fb890cdd9bfa73d258f367316a5f0db466021f1e633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5445-172805e7477b275df6ebd4fb890cdd9bfa73d258f367316a5f0db466021f1e633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-4632.2009.04025.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-4632.2009.04025.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21615053$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19570075$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panackal, Anil A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Elkan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alice J.</creatorcontrib><title>Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004</title><title>International journal of dermatology</title><addtitle>Int J Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background Dermatophyte infections lead to high costs and differentially affect certain groups. Previous population studies have been limited in size, duration, and representativeness.
Methods Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) (1995–2004), a cross‐sectional analysis of ambulatory visits in the USA was performed. Outpatients presenting with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM)‐coded diagnoses of tinea unguium, tinea corporis/manuum, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris were identified. Trends, descriptive epidemiology, and point prevalence estimates for these conditions were determined using stratification and standardization.
Results There was an estimated average of 4,124,038 ± 202,977 annual visits for dermatophytoses during the study period. Tinea unguium, tinea corporis, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris represented 23.2%, 20.4%, 18.8%, 15.0%, and 8.4%, respectively, of such infections; 71.6% of tinea unguium visits occurred among those older than 45 years. Tinea capitis was significantly more common among the black than the white population (prevalence odds ratio = 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 9.9–15.7). Ineffective treatment of tinea pedis, tinea corporis, and tinea cruris with polyenes, such as nystatin, commonly occurred.
Conclusions Improved healthcare provider education is needed to ensure judicious antidermatophyte drug management. Further studies, including proven diagnoses via fungal microscopy and culture, are needed to explain the prevalence discrepancy of tinea capitis among black children and tinea unguium in older adults, focusing on preventable risk factors.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - economics</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - utilization</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatomycoses - drug therapy</subject><subject>Dermatomycoses - economics</subject><subject>Dermatomycoses - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health Expenditures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - economics</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - utilization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0011-9059</issn><issn>1365-4632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EokPhFZA3IJBI8N0JEotRuExRWxZD15YT2-BRJhlsB5od78Dr8DQ8CcnMqF1Sb3zs8_3Hx-cHAGKU42m93uSYCp4xQUlOECpzxBDh-fU9sLhJ3AcLhDDOSsTLE_Aoxs10pASzh-AEl1wiJPkC_KmGpDvbDxG6ofuqW-g7Z5vk-y5OIUzfLLzqfLIGrpNONr6By063Y_QR9m6fvtQzPSmX23poderDCC-s8c10Velg4XoIP-wIX1wuL6r1S6g7c6tZ9XHn013Eq736FcRlyf_--j19mz0GD5xuo31y3E_B1Yf3X6pVdv7541m1PM8azhjPsCQF4lYyKWsiuXHC1oa5uihRY0xZOy2pIbxwVEiKheYOmZoJgQh22ApKT8HzQ91d6L8PNia19bGxbXuYnBKSMUqK4r8gQYQQjuaKxQFsQh9jsE7tgt_qMCqM1Gyx2qjZSTU7qWaL1d5idT1Jnx7fGOqtNbfCo6cT8OwI6DiN0QXdNT7ecAQLzBGfe3h74H761o53bkCdfXo3R_QfnXXBXw</recordid><startdate>200907</startdate><enddate>200907</enddate><creator>Panackal, Anil A.</creator><creator>Halpern, Elkan F.</creator><creator>Watson, Alice J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200907</creationdate><title>Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004</title><author>Panackal, Anil A. ; Halpern, Elkan F. ; Watson, Alice J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5445-172805e7477b275df6ebd4fb890cdd9bfa73d258f367316a5f0db466021f1e633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - economics</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - utilization</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatomycoses - drug therapy</topic><topic>Dermatomycoses - economics</topic><topic>Dermatomycoses - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health Expenditures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - economics</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - utilization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panackal, Anil A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Elkan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alice J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panackal, Anil A.</au><au>Halpern, Elkan F.</au><au>Watson, Alice J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004</atitle><jtitle>International journal of dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2009-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>712</epage><pages>704-712</pages><issn>0011-9059</issn><eissn>1365-4632</eissn><coden>IJDEBB</coden><abstract>Background Dermatophyte infections lead to high costs and differentially affect certain groups. Previous population studies have been limited in size, duration, and representativeness.
Methods Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) (1995–2004), a cross‐sectional analysis of ambulatory visits in the USA was performed. Outpatients presenting with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM)‐coded diagnoses of tinea unguium, tinea corporis/manuum, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris were identified. Trends, descriptive epidemiology, and point prevalence estimates for these conditions were determined using stratification and standardization.
Results There was an estimated average of 4,124,038 ± 202,977 annual visits for dermatophytoses during the study period. Tinea unguium, tinea corporis, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris represented 23.2%, 20.4%, 18.8%, 15.0%, and 8.4%, respectively, of such infections; 71.6% of tinea unguium visits occurred among those older than 45 years. Tinea capitis was significantly more common among the black than the white population (prevalence odds ratio = 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 9.9–15.7). Ineffective treatment of tinea pedis, tinea corporis, and tinea cruris with polyenes, such as nystatin, commonly occurred.
Conclusions Improved healthcare provider education is needed to ensure judicious antidermatophyte drug management. Further studies, including proven diagnoses via fungal microscopy and culture, are needed to explain the prevalence discrepancy of tinea capitis among black children and tinea unguium in older adults, focusing on preventable risk factors.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19570075</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04025.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-9059 |
ispartof | International journal of dermatology, 2009-07, Vol.48 (7), p.704-712 |
issn | 0011-9059 1365-4632 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67443288 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Ambulatory Care - economics Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data Ambulatory Care - utilization Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Data Collection Dermatology Dermatomycoses - drug therapy Dermatomycoses - economics Dermatomycoses - epidemiology Female Health Care Costs Health Expenditures Humans Insurance, Health - economics Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data Insurance, Health - utilization Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Prevalence Risk Factors United States - epidemiology Young Adult |
title | Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A49%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cutaneous%20fungal%20infections%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20Analysis%20of%20the%20National%20Ambulatory%20Medical%20Care%20Survey%20(NAMCS)%20and%20National%20Hospital%20Ambulatory%20Medical%20Care%20Survey%20(NHAMCS),%201995%E2%80%932004&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20dermatology&rft.au=Panackal,%20Anil%20A.&rft.date=2009-07&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=712&rft.pages=704-712&rft.issn=0011-9059&rft.eissn=1365-4632&rft.coden=IJDEBB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04025.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67443288%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20222503&rft_id=info:pmid/19570075&rfr_iscdi=true |