Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004

Background  Dermatophyte infections lead to high costs and differentially affect certain groups. Previous population studies have been limited in size, duration, and representativeness. Methods  Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of dermatology 2009-07, Vol.48 (7), p.704-712
Hauptverfasser: Panackal, Anil A., Halpern, Elkan F., Watson, Alice J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 712
container_issue 7
container_start_page 704
container_title International journal of dermatology
container_volume 48
creator Panackal, Anil A.
Halpern, Elkan F.
Watson, Alice J.
description Background  Dermatophyte infections lead to high costs and differentially affect certain groups. Previous population studies have been limited in size, duration, and representativeness. Methods  Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) (1995–2004), a cross‐sectional analysis of ambulatory visits in the USA was performed. Outpatients presenting with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM)‐coded diagnoses of tinea unguium, tinea corporis/manuum, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris were identified. Trends, descriptive epidemiology, and point prevalence estimates for these conditions were determined using stratification and standardization. Results  There was an estimated average of 4,124,038 ± 202,977 annual visits for dermatophytoses during the study period. Tinea unguium, tinea corporis, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris represented 23.2%, 20.4%, 18.8%, 15.0%, and 8.4%, respectively, of such infections; 71.6% of tinea unguium visits occurred among those older than 45 years. Tinea capitis was significantly more common among the black than the white population (prevalence odds ratio = 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 9.9–15.7). Ineffective treatment of tinea pedis, tinea corporis, and tinea cruris with polyenes, such as nystatin, commonly occurred. Conclusions  Improved healthcare provider education is needed to ensure judicious antidermatophyte drug management. Further studies, including proven diagnoses via fungal microscopy and culture, are needed to explain the prevalence discrepancy of tinea capitis among black children and tinea unguium in older adults, focusing on preventable risk factors.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04025.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67443288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67443288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5445-172805e7477b275df6ebd4fb890cdd9bfa73d258f367316a5f0db466021f1e633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EokPhFZA3IJBI8N0JEotRuExRWxZD15YT2-BRJhlsB5od78Dr8DQ8CcnMqF1Sb3zs8_3Hx-cHAGKU42m93uSYCp4xQUlOECpzxBDh-fU9sLhJ3AcLhDDOSsTLE_Aoxs10pASzh-AEl1wiJPkC_KmGpDvbDxG6ofuqW-g7Z5vk-y5OIUzfLLzqfLIGrpNONr6By063Y_QR9m6fvtQzPSmX23poderDCC-s8c10Velg4XoIP-wIX1wuL6r1S6g7c6tZ9XHn013Eq736FcRlyf_--j19mz0GD5xuo31y3E_B1Yf3X6pVdv7541m1PM8azhjPsCQF4lYyKWsiuXHC1oa5uihRY0xZOy2pIbxwVEiKheYOmZoJgQh22ApKT8HzQ91d6L8PNia19bGxbXuYnBKSMUqK4r8gQYQQjuaKxQFsQh9jsE7tgt_qMCqM1Gyx2qjZSTU7qWaL1d5idT1Jnx7fGOqtNbfCo6cT8OwI6DiN0QXdNT7ecAQLzBGfe3h74H761o53bkCdfXo3R_QfnXXBXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20222503</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Panackal, Anil A. ; Halpern, Elkan F. ; Watson, Alice J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Panackal, Anil A. ; Halpern, Elkan F. ; Watson, Alice J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background  Dermatophyte infections lead to high costs and differentially affect certain groups. Previous population studies have been limited in size, duration, and representativeness. Methods  Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) (1995–2004), a cross‐sectional analysis of ambulatory visits in the USA was performed. Outpatients presenting with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM)‐coded diagnoses of tinea unguium, tinea corporis/manuum, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris were identified. Trends, descriptive epidemiology, and point prevalence estimates for these conditions were determined using stratification and standardization. Results  There was an estimated average of 4,124,038 ± 202,977 annual visits for dermatophytoses during the study period. Tinea unguium, tinea corporis, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris represented 23.2%, 20.4%, 18.8%, 15.0%, and 8.4%, respectively, of such infections; 71.6% of tinea unguium visits occurred among those older than 45 years. Tinea capitis was significantly more common among the black than the white population (prevalence odds ratio = 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 9.9–15.7). Ineffective treatment of tinea pedis, tinea corporis, and tinea cruris with polyenes, such as nystatin, commonly occurred. Conclusions  Improved healthcare provider education is needed to ensure judicious antidermatophyte drug management. Further studies, including proven diagnoses via fungal microscopy and culture, are needed to explain the prevalence discrepancy of tinea capitis among black children and tinea unguium in older adults, focusing on preventable risk factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-9059</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-4632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04025.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19570075</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJDEBB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory Care - economics ; Ambulatory Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Ambulatory Care - utilization ; Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Data Collection ; Dermatology ; Dermatomycoses - drug therapy ; Dermatomycoses - economics ; Dermatomycoses - epidemiology ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Health Expenditures ; Humans ; Insurance, Health - economics ; Insurance, Health - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Insurance, Health - utilization ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; United States - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of dermatology, 2009-07, Vol.48 (7), p.704-712</ispartof><rights>2009 The International Society of Dermatology</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5445-172805e7477b275df6ebd4fb890cdd9bfa73d258f367316a5f0db466021f1e633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5445-172805e7477b275df6ebd4fb890cdd9bfa73d258f367316a5f0db466021f1e633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-4632.2009.04025.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-4632.2009.04025.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21615053$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19570075$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panackal, Anil A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Elkan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alice J.</creatorcontrib><title>Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004</title><title>International journal of dermatology</title><addtitle>Int J Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background  Dermatophyte infections lead to high costs and differentially affect certain groups. Previous population studies have been limited in size, duration, and representativeness. Methods  Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) (1995–2004), a cross‐sectional analysis of ambulatory visits in the USA was performed. Outpatients presenting with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM)‐coded diagnoses of tinea unguium, tinea corporis/manuum, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris were identified. Trends, descriptive epidemiology, and point prevalence estimates for these conditions were determined using stratification and standardization. Results  There was an estimated average of 4,124,038 ± 202,977 annual visits for dermatophytoses during the study period. Tinea unguium, tinea corporis, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris represented 23.2%, 20.4%, 18.8%, 15.0%, and 8.4%, respectively, of such infections; 71.6% of tinea unguium visits occurred among those older than 45 years. Tinea capitis was significantly more common among the black than the white population (prevalence odds ratio = 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 9.9–15.7). Ineffective treatment of tinea pedis, tinea corporis, and tinea cruris with polyenes, such as nystatin, commonly occurred. Conclusions  Improved healthcare provider education is needed to ensure judicious antidermatophyte drug management. Further studies, including proven diagnoses via fungal microscopy and culture, are needed to explain the prevalence discrepancy of tinea capitis among black children and tinea unguium in older adults, focusing on preventable risk factors.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - economics</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - utilization</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatomycoses - drug therapy</subject><subject>Dermatomycoses - economics</subject><subject>Dermatomycoses - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health Expenditures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - economics</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - utilization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0011-9059</issn><issn>1365-4632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EokPhFZA3IJBI8N0JEotRuExRWxZD15YT2-BRJhlsB5od78Dr8DQ8CcnMqF1Sb3zs8_3Hx-cHAGKU42m93uSYCp4xQUlOECpzxBDh-fU9sLhJ3AcLhDDOSsTLE_Aoxs10pASzh-AEl1wiJPkC_KmGpDvbDxG6ofuqW-g7Z5vk-y5OIUzfLLzqfLIGrpNONr6By063Y_QR9m6fvtQzPSmX23poderDCC-s8c10Velg4XoIP-wIX1wuL6r1S6g7c6tZ9XHn013Eq736FcRlyf_--j19mz0GD5xuo31y3E_B1Yf3X6pVdv7541m1PM8azhjPsCQF4lYyKWsiuXHC1oa5uihRY0xZOy2pIbxwVEiKheYOmZoJgQh22ApKT8HzQ91d6L8PNia19bGxbXuYnBKSMUqK4r8gQYQQjuaKxQFsQh9jsE7tgt_qMCqM1Gyx2qjZSTU7qWaL1d5idT1Jnx7fGOqtNbfCo6cT8OwI6DiN0QXdNT7ecAQLzBGfe3h74H761o53bkCdfXo3R_QfnXXBXw</recordid><startdate>200907</startdate><enddate>200907</enddate><creator>Panackal, Anil A.</creator><creator>Halpern, Elkan F.</creator><creator>Watson, Alice J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200907</creationdate><title>Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004</title><author>Panackal, Anil A. ; Halpern, Elkan F. ; Watson, Alice J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5445-172805e7477b275df6ebd4fb890cdd9bfa73d258f367316a5f0db466021f1e633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - economics</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - utilization</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatomycoses - drug therapy</topic><topic>Dermatomycoses - economics</topic><topic>Dermatomycoses - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health Expenditures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - economics</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - utilization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panackal, Anil A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Elkan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Alice J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panackal, Anil A.</au><au>Halpern, Elkan F.</au><au>Watson, Alice J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004</atitle><jtitle>International journal of dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2009-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>712</epage><pages>704-712</pages><issn>0011-9059</issn><eissn>1365-4632</eissn><coden>IJDEBB</coden><abstract>Background  Dermatophyte infections lead to high costs and differentially affect certain groups. Previous population studies have been limited in size, duration, and representativeness. Methods  Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) (1995–2004), a cross‐sectional analysis of ambulatory visits in the USA was performed. Outpatients presenting with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM)‐coded diagnoses of tinea unguium, tinea corporis/manuum, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris were identified. Trends, descriptive epidemiology, and point prevalence estimates for these conditions were determined using stratification and standardization. Results  There was an estimated average of 4,124,038 ± 202,977 annual visits for dermatophytoses during the study period. Tinea unguium, tinea corporis, tinea pedis, tinea capitis, and tinea cruris represented 23.2%, 20.4%, 18.8%, 15.0%, and 8.4%, respectively, of such infections; 71.6% of tinea unguium visits occurred among those older than 45 years. Tinea capitis was significantly more common among the black than the white population (prevalence odds ratio = 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 9.9–15.7). Ineffective treatment of tinea pedis, tinea corporis, and tinea cruris with polyenes, such as nystatin, commonly occurred. Conclusions  Improved healthcare provider education is needed to ensure judicious antidermatophyte drug management. Further studies, including proven diagnoses via fungal microscopy and culture, are needed to explain the prevalence discrepancy of tinea capitis among black children and tinea unguium in older adults, focusing on preventable risk factors.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19570075</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04025.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-9059
ispartof International journal of dermatology, 2009-07, Vol.48 (7), p.704-712
issn 0011-9059
1365-4632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67443288
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Ambulatory Care - economics
Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data
Ambulatory Care - utilization
Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Data Collection
Dermatology
Dermatomycoses - drug therapy
Dermatomycoses - economics
Dermatomycoses - epidemiology
Female
Health Care Costs
Health Expenditures
Humans
Insurance, Health - economics
Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data
Insurance, Health - utilization
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Prevalence
Risk Factors
United States - epidemiology
Young Adult
title Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A49%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cutaneous%20fungal%20infections%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20Analysis%20of%20the%20National%20Ambulatory%20Medical%20Care%20Survey%20(NAMCS)%20and%20National%20Hospital%20Ambulatory%20Medical%20Care%20Survey%20(NHAMCS),%201995%E2%80%932004&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20dermatology&rft.au=Panackal,%20Anil%20A.&rft.date=2009-07&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=712&rft.pages=704-712&rft.issn=0011-9059&rft.eissn=1365-4632&rft.coden=IJDEBB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04025.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67443288%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20222503&rft_id=info:pmid/19570075&rfr_iscdi=true