Turning Point and Public Health Institutes: Vehicles for Systems Change

Public Health Institutes are free-standing multisector entities able to function as conveners to improve health status and foster innovations in health systems. Turning Point is a program funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, involving 21 statewide initiatives and 2 "linked" states...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of public health management and practice 2005-03, Vol.11 (2), p.116-122
Hauptverfasser: Padgett, Stephen M., Kinabrew, Christopher, Kimbrell, Joseph, Nicola, Ray M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue 2
container_start_page 116
container_title Journal of public health management and practice
container_volume 11
creator Padgett, Stephen M.
Kinabrew, Christopher
Kimbrell, Joseph
Nicola, Ray M.
description Public Health Institutes are free-standing multisector entities able to function as conveners to improve health status and foster innovations in health systems. Turning Point is a program funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, involving 21 statewide initiatives and 2 "linked" states that formed multisector collaborative partnerships for public health systems change. In 18 of the Turning Point states, there are also Public Health Institutes, some formed by Turning Point partnerships and some established independently. Both Turning Point and Public Health Institutes represent efforts to reform and enhance public health systems. What has been the relationship between these two organizational forms? This descriptive, qualitative study examined the relationships between state-level Turning Point partnerships and Public Health Institutes in states that have both. Key participants in both institutions were interviewed, and models were developed to represent those relationships. Principal findings suggest that the relationships of Turning Point state partnerships with Public Health Institutes have taken many shapes. Factors that influence the choices and sequencing of these options are largely related to the political and economic resources of each state. Turning Point participants perceived Public Health Institutes to be a useful organizational form for sustaining public health systems change. Public Health Institutes have more administrative and fiscal flexibility than state government and greater opportunities for policy development and advocacy. However, free-standing institutes also have greater financial uncertainty.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00124784-200503000-00004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67431710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44967957</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44967957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-57d73ff141e6282561366f2cf15eda5a8af695e3be8aad0a82d9f6a0887cebd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRbP34CcqevEVnkv2KNylqCwUFP65hk8y2KWlSs5tD_73R1noYZmCedwYexjjCLUKq7wAwFtqIKAaQkABANBSIIzZGKSGSEMfHwwzaRELJdMTOvF8NqUQKPGUjlBpRCByz5_e-a6pmwV_bqgncNiV_7fO6KviUbB2WfNb4UIU-kL_nn7Ssipo8d23H37Y-0NrzydI2C7pgJ87Wni73_Zx9PD2-T6bR_OV5NnmYRwWmMkRSlzpxDgWSik0sFSZKubhwKKm00hrrVCopyclYW4I1cZk6ZcEYXVBepsk5u9nd3XTtV08-ZOvKF1TXtqG295nSIkGNMIBmBxZd631HLtt01dp22wwh-5GY_UnMDhKzX4lD9Hr_o8_XVP4H99YG4GoHrHxou8NeiFTpVOrkGzVIdhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67431710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Turning Point and Public Health Institutes: Vehicles for Systems Change</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Padgett, Stephen M. ; Kinabrew, Christopher ; Kimbrell, Joseph ; Nicola, Ray M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Padgett, Stephen M. ; Kinabrew, Christopher ; Kimbrell, Joseph ; Nicola, Ray M.</creatorcontrib><description>Public Health Institutes are free-standing multisector entities able to function as conveners to improve health status and foster innovations in health systems. Turning Point is a program funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, involving 21 statewide initiatives and 2 "linked" states that formed multisector collaborative partnerships for public health systems change. In 18 of the Turning Point states, there are also Public Health Institutes, some formed by Turning Point partnerships and some established independently. Both Turning Point and Public Health Institutes represent efforts to reform and enhance public health systems. What has been the relationship between these two organizational forms? This descriptive, qualitative study examined the relationships between state-level Turning Point partnerships and Public Health Institutes in states that have both. Key participants in both institutions were interviewed, and models were developed to represent those relationships. Principal findings suggest that the relationships of Turning Point state partnerships with Public Health Institutes have taken many shapes. Factors that influence the choices and sequencing of these options are largely related to the political and economic resources of each state. Turning Point participants perceived Public Health Institutes to be a useful organizational form for sustaining public health systems change. Public Health Institutes have more administrative and fiscal flexibility than state government and greater opportunities for policy development and advocacy. However, free-standing institutes also have greater financial uncertainty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-4659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-5022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200503000-00004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15711441</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Academies and Institutes ; Community Health Planning - organization &amp; administration ; Cooperative Behavior ; Financing, Organized ; Foundations ; Health Care Coalitions - organization &amp; administration ; Health Care Reform ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Interinstitutional Relations ; Models, Organizational ; Organizational Innovation ; Public Health Administration - standards ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; State Government ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of public health management and practice, 2005-03, Vol.11 (2), p.116-122</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-57d73ff141e6282561366f2cf15eda5a8af695e3be8aad0a82d9f6a0887cebd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44967957$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44967957$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15711441$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Padgett, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinabrew, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimbrell, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicola, Ray M.</creatorcontrib><title>Turning Point and Public Health Institutes: Vehicles for Systems Change</title><title>Journal of public health management and practice</title><addtitle>J Public Health Manag Pract</addtitle><description>Public Health Institutes are free-standing multisector entities able to function as conveners to improve health status and foster innovations in health systems. Turning Point is a program funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, involving 21 statewide initiatives and 2 "linked" states that formed multisector collaborative partnerships for public health systems change. In 18 of the Turning Point states, there are also Public Health Institutes, some formed by Turning Point partnerships and some established independently. Both Turning Point and Public Health Institutes represent efforts to reform and enhance public health systems. What has been the relationship between these two organizational forms? This descriptive, qualitative study examined the relationships between state-level Turning Point partnerships and Public Health Institutes in states that have both. Key participants in both institutions were interviewed, and models were developed to represent those relationships. Principal findings suggest that the relationships of Turning Point state partnerships with Public Health Institutes have taken many shapes. Factors that influence the choices and sequencing of these options are largely related to the political and economic resources of each state. Turning Point participants perceived Public Health Institutes to be a useful organizational form for sustaining public health systems change. Public Health Institutes have more administrative and fiscal flexibility than state government and greater opportunities for policy development and advocacy. However, free-standing institutes also have greater financial uncertainty.</description><subject>Academies and Institutes</subject><subject>Community Health Planning - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Financing, Organized</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Health Care Coalitions - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Health Care Reform</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interinstitutional Relations</subject><subject>Models, Organizational</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Public Health Administration - standards</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>State Government</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1078-4659</issn><issn>1550-5022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRbP34CcqevEVnkv2KNylqCwUFP65hk8y2KWlSs5tD_73R1noYZmCedwYexjjCLUKq7wAwFtqIKAaQkABANBSIIzZGKSGSEMfHwwzaRELJdMTOvF8NqUQKPGUjlBpRCByz5_e-a6pmwV_bqgncNiV_7fO6KviUbB2WfNb4UIU-kL_nn7Ssipo8d23H37Y-0NrzydI2C7pgJ87Wni73_Zx9PD2-T6bR_OV5NnmYRwWmMkRSlzpxDgWSik0sFSZKubhwKKm00hrrVCopyclYW4I1cZk6ZcEYXVBepsk5u9nd3XTtV08-ZOvKF1TXtqG295nSIkGNMIBmBxZd631HLtt01dp22wwh-5GY_UnMDhKzX4lD9Hr_o8_XVP4H99YG4GoHrHxou8NeiFTpVOrkGzVIdhA</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Padgett, Stephen M.</creator><creator>Kinabrew, Christopher</creator><creator>Kimbrell, Joseph</creator><creator>Nicola, Ray M.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Turning Point and Public Health Institutes: Vehicles for Systems Change</title><author>Padgett, Stephen M. ; Kinabrew, Christopher ; Kimbrell, Joseph ; Nicola, Ray M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-57d73ff141e6282561366f2cf15eda5a8af695e3be8aad0a82d9f6a0887cebd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Academies and Institutes</topic><topic>Community Health Planning - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Financing, Organized</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Health Care Coalitions - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Health Care Reform</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interinstitutional Relations</topic><topic>Models, Organizational</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Public Health Administration - standards</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>State Government</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Padgett, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinabrew, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimbrell, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicola, Ray M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of public health management and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Padgett, Stephen M.</au><au>Kinabrew, Christopher</au><au>Kimbrell, Joseph</au><au>Nicola, Ray M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Turning Point and Public Health Institutes: Vehicles for Systems Change</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public health management and practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Public Health Manag Pract</addtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>116-122</pages><issn>1078-4659</issn><eissn>1550-5022</eissn><abstract>Public Health Institutes are free-standing multisector entities able to function as conveners to improve health status and foster innovations in health systems. Turning Point is a program funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, involving 21 statewide initiatives and 2 "linked" states that formed multisector collaborative partnerships for public health systems change. In 18 of the Turning Point states, there are also Public Health Institutes, some formed by Turning Point partnerships and some established independently. Both Turning Point and Public Health Institutes represent efforts to reform and enhance public health systems. What has been the relationship between these two organizational forms? This descriptive, qualitative study examined the relationships between state-level Turning Point partnerships and Public Health Institutes in states that have both. Key participants in both institutions were interviewed, and models were developed to represent those relationships. Principal findings suggest that the relationships of Turning Point state partnerships with Public Health Institutes have taken many shapes. Factors that influence the choices and sequencing of these options are largely related to the political and economic resources of each state. Turning Point participants perceived Public Health Institutes to be a useful organizational form for sustaining public health systems change. Public Health Institutes have more administrative and fiscal flexibility than state government and greater opportunities for policy development and advocacy. However, free-standing institutes also have greater financial uncertainty.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>15711441</pmid><doi>10.1097/00124784-200503000-00004</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-4659
ispartof Journal of public health management and practice, 2005-03, Vol.11 (2), p.116-122
issn 1078-4659
1550-5022
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67431710
source MEDLINE; JSTOR
subjects Academies and Institutes
Community Health Planning - organization & administration
Cooperative Behavior
Financing, Organized
Foundations
Health Care Coalitions - organization & administration
Health Care Reform
Health technology assessment
Humans
Interinstitutional Relations
Models, Organizational
Organizational Innovation
Public Health Administration - standards
Quality Assurance, Health Care
State Government
United States
title Turning Point and Public Health Institutes: Vehicles for Systems Change
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A01%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Turning%20Point%20and%20Public%20Health%20Institutes:%20Vehicles%20for%20Systems%20Change&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20health%20management%20and%20practice&rft.au=Padgett,%20Stephen%20M.&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=116-122&rft.issn=1078-4659&rft.eissn=1550-5022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00124784-200503000-00004&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44967957%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67431710&rft_id=info:pmid/15711441&rft_jstor_id=44967957&rfr_iscdi=true