Better than Random? The Chemotype Enrichment Problem

Chemotype enrichment is increasingly recognized as an important measure of virtual screening performance. However, little attention has been paid to producing metrics which can quantify chemotype retrieval. Here, we examine two different protocols for analyzing chemotype retrieval: “cluster averagin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2009-05, Vol.49 (5), p.1154-1162
Hauptverfasser: Mackey, Mark D, Melville, James L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Chemotype enrichment is increasingly recognized as an important measure of virtual screening performance. However, little attention has been paid to producing metrics which can quantify chemotype retrieval. Here, we examine two different protocols for analyzing chemotype retrieval: “cluster averaging”, where the contribution of each active to the scoring metric is proportional to the number of other actives with the same chemotype, and “first found”, where only the first active for a given chemotype contributes to the score. We demonstrate that this latter analysis, common in the qualitative analysis used in the current literature, has important drawbacks when combined with quantitative metrics.
ISSN:1549-9596
1520-5142
1549-960X
DOI:10.1021/ci8003978