The in vivo behaviour of a sol–gel glass and a glass-ceramic during critical diaphyseal bone defects healing

The in vivo evaluation, in New Zealand rabbits, of a sol–gel glass 70% CaO–30% SiO 2 (in mol%) and a glass-ceramic obtained from thermal treatment of the glass, both bioactive in Kokubo's simulated body fluid (SBF), is presented. Femoral bone diaphyseal critical defects were filled with: (i) so...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomaterials 2005-07, Vol.26 (21), p.4374-4382
Hauptverfasser: Gil-Albarova, Jorge, Salinas, Antonio J., Bueno-Lozano, Antonio L., Román, Jesus, Aldini-Nicolo, Nicolo, García-Barea, Agustina, Giavaresi, Gianluca, Fini, Milena, Giardino, Roberto, Vallet-Regí, Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4382
container_issue 21
container_start_page 4374
container_title Biomaterials
container_volume 26
creator Gil-Albarova, Jorge
Salinas, Antonio J.
Bueno-Lozano, Antonio L.
Román, Jesus
Aldini-Nicolo, Nicolo
García-Barea, Agustina
Giavaresi, Gianluca
Fini, Milena
Giardino, Roberto
Vallet-Regí, Maria
description The in vivo evaluation, in New Zealand rabbits, of a sol–gel glass 70% CaO–30% SiO 2 (in mol%) and a glass-ceramic obtained from thermal treatment of the glass, both bioactive in Kokubo's simulated body fluid (SBF), is presented. Femoral bone diaphyseal critical defects were filled with: (i) sol–gel glass cylinders, (ii) glass-ceramic cylinders, or (iii) no material (control group). Osteosynthesis was done by means of anterior screwed plates with an associate intramedullar Kirschner wire. Each group included 10 mature rabbits, 9 months old. Follow-up was 6 months. After sacrifice, macroscopic study showed healing of bone defects, with bone coating over the cylinders, but without evidence of satisfactory repair in control group. Radiographic study showed good implant stability and periosteal growth and bone remodelling around and over the filled bone defect. The morphometric study showed minimum evidences of degradation or resorption in glass-ceramic cylinders, maintaining its original shape, but sol–gel glass cylinders showed abundant fragmentation and surface resorption. An intimate union of the new-formed bone to both materials was observed. Mechanical study showed the higher results in the glass-ceramic group, whereas sol–gel glass and control group showed no differences. The minimum degradation of glass-ceramic cylinders suggests their application in critical bone defects locations of transmission forces or load bearing. The performance of sol–gel glass cylinders suggests their usefulness in locations where a quick resorption should be preferable, considering the possibility of serving as drug or cells vehicle for both of them.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67414752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0142961204009883</els_id><sourcerecordid>67414752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f411c2f5769588f849115509fc6c0f2f6b8f31dfc15901b855a4d69553f8665b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUQC0EokPhF5DFgl2Cb-JX2KHylCqxKWvLca5nPEriwU5G6q7_wB_yJbjMSLBrV76-OvdhH0LeAKuBgXy3r_sQJ7tgCnbMdcMYrwFqxuQTsgGtdCU6Jp6SDQPeVJ2E5oK8yHnPyp3x5jm5AKEYtFJuyHyzQxpmegzHSHvc2WOIa6LRU0tzHH_f_driSLejzZnaeSjZv3HlMNkpODqsKcxb6lJYgrMjHYI97G4zlrCPM9IBPbol013JFPAleebLzvjqfF6SH58_3Vx9ra6_f_l29eG6clzBUnkO4BovlOyE1l7zDkAI1nknHfONl732LQzeQXkp9FoIy4fCitZrKUXfXpK3p76HFH-umBczhexwHO2Mcc1GKg5cieZBsNGaK6b4I0DZAIeHO4IqQlqAAr4_gS7FnBN6c0hhsunWADP3os3e_C_a3Is2AKaILsWvz1PWfsLhX-nZbAE-ngAs33wMmEx2AWeHQ0jFiBlieMycP0vLwMI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17612311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The in vivo behaviour of a sol–gel glass and a glass-ceramic during critical diaphyseal bone defects healing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gil-Albarova, Jorge ; Salinas, Antonio J. ; Bueno-Lozano, Antonio L. ; Román, Jesus ; Aldini-Nicolo, Nicolo ; García-Barea, Agustina ; Giavaresi, Gianluca ; Fini, Milena ; Giardino, Roberto ; Vallet-Regí, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Gil-Albarova, Jorge ; Salinas, Antonio J. ; Bueno-Lozano, Antonio L. ; Román, Jesus ; Aldini-Nicolo, Nicolo ; García-Barea, Agustina ; Giavaresi, Gianluca ; Fini, Milena ; Giardino, Roberto ; Vallet-Regí, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>The in vivo evaluation, in New Zealand rabbits, of a sol–gel glass 70% CaO–30% SiO 2 (in mol%) and a glass-ceramic obtained from thermal treatment of the glass, both bioactive in Kokubo's simulated body fluid (SBF), is presented. Femoral bone diaphyseal critical defects were filled with: (i) sol–gel glass cylinders, (ii) glass-ceramic cylinders, or (iii) no material (control group). Osteosynthesis was done by means of anterior screwed plates with an associate intramedullar Kirschner wire. Each group included 10 mature rabbits, 9 months old. Follow-up was 6 months. After sacrifice, macroscopic study showed healing of bone defects, with bone coating over the cylinders, but without evidence of satisfactory repair in control group. Radiographic study showed good implant stability and periosteal growth and bone remodelling around and over the filled bone defect. The morphometric study showed minimum evidences of degradation or resorption in glass-ceramic cylinders, maintaining its original shape, but sol–gel glass cylinders showed abundant fragmentation and surface resorption. An intimate union of the new-formed bone to both materials was observed. Mechanical study showed the higher results in the glass-ceramic group, whereas sol–gel glass and control group showed no differences. The minimum degradation of glass-ceramic cylinders suggests their application in critical bone defects locations of transmission forces or load bearing. The performance of sol–gel glass cylinders suggests their usefulness in locations where a quick resorption should be preferable, considering the possibility of serving as drug or cells vehicle for both of them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-9612</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15701366</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic ; Bone healing ; Bone substitutes ; Bone Substitutes - chemistry ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Ceramics - chemistry ; Ceramics - therapeutic use ; Femoral Fractures - diagnosis ; Femoral Fractures - physiopathology ; Femoral Fractures - therapy ; Fracture Healing - physiology ; Glass - chemistry ; In vivo test ; Materials Testing ; Osseointegration ; Phase Transition ; Rabbits ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Biomaterials, 2005-07, Vol.26 (21), p.4374-4382</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f411c2f5769588f849115509fc6c0f2f6b8f31dfc15901b855a4d69553f8665b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f411c2f5769588f849115509fc6c0f2f6b8f31dfc15901b855a4d69553f8665b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15701366$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gil-Albarova, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Antonio J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bueno-Lozano, Antonio L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldini-Nicolo, Nicolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Barea, Agustina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giavaresi, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fini, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giardino, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallet-Regí, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>The in vivo behaviour of a sol–gel glass and a glass-ceramic during critical diaphyseal bone defects healing</title><title>Biomaterials</title><addtitle>Biomaterials</addtitle><description>The in vivo evaluation, in New Zealand rabbits, of a sol–gel glass 70% CaO–30% SiO 2 (in mol%) and a glass-ceramic obtained from thermal treatment of the glass, both bioactive in Kokubo's simulated body fluid (SBF), is presented. Femoral bone diaphyseal critical defects were filled with: (i) sol–gel glass cylinders, (ii) glass-ceramic cylinders, or (iii) no material (control group). Osteosynthesis was done by means of anterior screwed plates with an associate intramedullar Kirschner wire. Each group included 10 mature rabbits, 9 months old. Follow-up was 6 months. After sacrifice, macroscopic study showed healing of bone defects, with bone coating over the cylinders, but without evidence of satisfactory repair in control group. Radiographic study showed good implant stability and periosteal growth and bone remodelling around and over the filled bone defect. The morphometric study showed minimum evidences of degradation or resorption in glass-ceramic cylinders, maintaining its original shape, but sol–gel glass cylinders showed abundant fragmentation and surface resorption. An intimate union of the new-formed bone to both materials was observed. Mechanical study showed the higher results in the glass-ceramic group, whereas sol–gel glass and control group showed no differences. The minimum degradation of glass-ceramic cylinders suggests their application in critical bone defects locations of transmission forces or load bearing. The performance of sol–gel glass cylinders suggests their usefulness in locations where a quick resorption should be preferable, considering the possibility of serving as drug or cells vehicle for both of them.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic</subject><subject>Bone healing</subject><subject>Bone substitutes</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - chemistry</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Ceramics - chemistry</subject><subject>Ceramics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - diagnosis</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - therapy</subject><subject>Fracture Healing - physiology</subject><subject>Glass - chemistry</subject><subject>In vivo test</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Phase Transition</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0142-9612</issn><issn>1878-5905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUQC0EokPhF5DFgl2Cb-JX2KHylCqxKWvLca5nPEriwU5G6q7_wB_yJbjMSLBrV76-OvdhH0LeAKuBgXy3r_sQJ7tgCnbMdcMYrwFqxuQTsgGtdCU6Jp6SDQPeVJ2E5oK8yHnPyp3x5jm5AKEYtFJuyHyzQxpmegzHSHvc2WOIa6LRU0tzHH_f_driSLejzZnaeSjZv3HlMNkpODqsKcxb6lJYgrMjHYI97G4zlrCPM9IBPbol013JFPAleebLzvjqfF6SH58_3Vx9ra6_f_l29eG6clzBUnkO4BovlOyE1l7zDkAI1nknHfONl732LQzeQXkp9FoIy4fCitZrKUXfXpK3p76HFH-umBczhexwHO2Mcc1GKg5cieZBsNGaK6b4I0DZAIeHO4IqQlqAAr4_gS7FnBN6c0hhsunWADP3os3e_C_a3Is2AKaILsWvz1PWfsLhX-nZbAE-ngAs33wMmEx2AWeHQ0jFiBlieMycP0vLwMI</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Gil-Albarova, Jorge</creator><creator>Salinas, Antonio J.</creator><creator>Bueno-Lozano, Antonio L.</creator><creator>Román, Jesus</creator><creator>Aldini-Nicolo, Nicolo</creator><creator>García-Barea, Agustina</creator><creator>Giavaresi, Gianluca</creator><creator>Fini, Milena</creator><creator>Giardino, Roberto</creator><creator>Vallet-Regí, Maria</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>The in vivo behaviour of a sol–gel glass and a glass-ceramic during critical diaphyseal bone defects healing</title><author>Gil-Albarova, Jorge ; Salinas, Antonio J. ; Bueno-Lozano, Antonio L. ; Román, Jesus ; Aldini-Nicolo, Nicolo ; García-Barea, Agustina ; Giavaresi, Gianluca ; Fini, Milena ; Giardino, Roberto ; Vallet-Regí, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-f411c2f5769588f849115509fc6c0f2f6b8f31dfc15901b855a4d69553f8665b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic</topic><topic>Bone healing</topic><topic>Bone substitutes</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - chemistry</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Ceramics - chemistry</topic><topic>Ceramics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - diagnosis</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - therapy</topic><topic>Fracture Healing - physiology</topic><topic>Glass - chemistry</topic><topic>In vivo test</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Phase Transition</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gil-Albarova, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Antonio J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bueno-Lozano, Antonio L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldini-Nicolo, Nicolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Barea, Agustina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giavaresi, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fini, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giardino, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallet-Regí, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gil-Albarova, Jorge</au><au>Salinas, Antonio J.</au><au>Bueno-Lozano, Antonio L.</au><au>Román, Jesus</au><au>Aldini-Nicolo, Nicolo</au><au>García-Barea, Agustina</au><au>Giavaresi, Gianluca</au><au>Fini, Milena</au><au>Giardino, Roberto</au><au>Vallet-Regí, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The in vivo behaviour of a sol–gel glass and a glass-ceramic during critical diaphyseal bone defects healing</atitle><jtitle>Biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>Biomaterials</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>4374</spage><epage>4382</epage><pages>4374-4382</pages><issn>0142-9612</issn><eissn>1878-5905</eissn><abstract>The in vivo evaluation, in New Zealand rabbits, of a sol–gel glass 70% CaO–30% SiO 2 (in mol%) and a glass-ceramic obtained from thermal treatment of the glass, both bioactive in Kokubo's simulated body fluid (SBF), is presented. Femoral bone diaphyseal critical defects were filled with: (i) sol–gel glass cylinders, (ii) glass-ceramic cylinders, or (iii) no material (control group). Osteosynthesis was done by means of anterior screwed plates with an associate intramedullar Kirschner wire. Each group included 10 mature rabbits, 9 months old. Follow-up was 6 months. After sacrifice, macroscopic study showed healing of bone defects, with bone coating over the cylinders, but without evidence of satisfactory repair in control group. Radiographic study showed good implant stability and periosteal growth and bone remodelling around and over the filled bone defect. The morphometric study showed minimum evidences of degradation or resorption in glass-ceramic cylinders, maintaining its original shape, but sol–gel glass cylinders showed abundant fragmentation and surface resorption. An intimate union of the new-formed bone to both materials was observed. Mechanical study showed the higher results in the glass-ceramic group, whereas sol–gel glass and control group showed no differences. The minimum degradation of glass-ceramic cylinders suggests their application in critical bone defects locations of transmission forces or load bearing. The performance of sol–gel glass cylinders suggests their usefulness in locations where a quick resorption should be preferable, considering the possibility of serving as drug or cells vehicle for both of them.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15701366</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.006</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-9612
ispartof Biomaterials, 2005-07, Vol.26 (21), p.4374-4382
issn 0142-9612
1878-5905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67414752
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic
Bone healing
Bone substitutes
Bone Substitutes - chemistry
Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use
Ceramics - chemistry
Ceramics - therapeutic use
Femoral Fractures - diagnosis
Femoral Fractures - physiopathology
Femoral Fractures - therapy
Fracture Healing - physiology
Glass - chemistry
In vivo test
Materials Testing
Osseointegration
Phase Transition
Rabbits
Treatment Outcome
title The in vivo behaviour of a sol–gel glass and a glass-ceramic during critical diaphyseal bone defects healing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T01%3A37%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20in%20vivo%20behaviour%20of%20a%20sol%E2%80%93gel%20glass%20and%20a%20glass-ceramic%20during%20critical%20diaphyseal%20bone%20defects%20healing&rft.jtitle=Biomaterials&rft.au=Gil-Albarova,%20Jorge&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=4374&rft.epage=4382&rft.pages=4374-4382&rft.issn=0142-9612&rft.eissn=1878-5905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67414752%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17612311&rft_id=info:pmid/15701366&rft_els_id=S0142961204009883&rfr_iscdi=true