Adjuvant radiation for rectal cancer : Do we measure up to the standard of care? an epidemiologic analysis of trends over 25 years in the United States

In the United States, adjuvant radiation therapy is currently recommended for most patients with rectal cancer. We conducted this population-based study to evaluate the rate of radiation therapy and the factors affecting its delivery. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diseases of the colon & rectum 2005, Vol.48 (1), p.9-15
Hauptverfasser: BAXTER, N. N, ROTHENBERGER, D. A, MORRIS, A. M, BULLARD, K. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
container_title Diseases of the colon & rectum
container_volume 48
creator BAXTER, N. N
ROTHENBERGER, D. A
MORRIS, A. M
BULLARD, K. M
description In the United States, adjuvant radiation therapy is currently recommended for most patients with rectal cancer. We conducted this population-based study to evaluate the rate of radiation therapy and the factors affecting its delivery. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database to assess treatment of patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer diagnosed over a 25-year period (1976 through 2000). We evaluated the rate of radiation therapy use and its timing (preoperative vs. postoperative) and the influence of factors such as tumor stage and grade; patient gender and race; and geographic location. In this 25-year period, 45,627 patients met our selection criteria. The rate of radiation therapy use increased dramatically over time: from 17 percent of advanced-stage patients in 1976 to 65 percent in 2000 (P < 0.0001). Until 1996, the increase was due almost entirely to postoperative radiation therapy. Since 1996, the rate of preoperative radiation therapy use has increased (P < 0.0001) and the rate of postoperative radiation therapy use has begun to decline. We found, after controlling for the year of diagnosis, that female patients, African Americans, older patients, and patients with low-grade lesions were less likely to undergo radiation therapy (P < 0.0001). Geographic location was also an important predictor of radiation therapy use. The use of radiation therapy for patients with rectal cancer has dramatically increased over the 25-year period studied, with a recent shift to the use of preoperative radiation therapy; however, in 2000, over 30 percent of patients with advanced-stage nonmetastatic rectal cancer did not undergo radiation therapy. Given the variation in radiation therapy use that we found to be due to demographic factors, access to adjuvant radiation therapy can be improved.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10350-004-0792-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67401999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>796948081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4c26370c5d40189b9412b83a2f9459df092a51f797b613c7dbaf167700e1085a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqD_AiQdBba6XT6XS8LMu6fsCCB91zU51Ua4buzpikV-aX-HfNOAMLnuqDp14oHsZeCHgrAPS7JEAqqACaCrSpq-4R2wgly0aq7jHbAIi6khraM3ae0raMUIN-ys6Eag20SmzYnyu3Xe9xyTyi85h9WPgYIo9kM07c4mIp8vf8Q-C_ic-EaY3E1x3PgeefxFPGxWF0PIwFjnTJceG0845mH6bww9uywGmffDogOdLiSndfQmvF94Qxcb_8i7pbfCbHv2XMlJ6xJyNOiZ6f6gW7-3jz_fpzdfv105frq9vKSmNy1di6LQ9a5RoQnRlMI-qhk1iPplHGjWBqVGLURg-tkFa7AUfRag1AAjqF8oK9OebuYvi1Usr97JOlacKFwpr6VpdgY0wBX_0HbsMay2upr0UDSktQBRJHyMaQUqSx30U_Y9z3AvqDsv6orC_K-oOyvis3L0_B6zCTe7g4OSrA6xOAyeI0xuLEpweuNQWVnfwLHZGdlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214057305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adjuvant radiation for rectal cancer : Do we measure up to the standard of care? an epidemiologic analysis of trends over 25 years in the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>BAXTER, N. N ; ROTHENBERGER, D. A ; MORRIS, A. M ; BULLARD, K. M</creator><creatorcontrib>BAXTER, N. N ; ROTHENBERGER, D. A ; MORRIS, A. M ; BULLARD, K. M</creatorcontrib><description>In the United States, adjuvant radiation therapy is currently recommended for most patients with rectal cancer. We conducted this population-based study to evaluate the rate of radiation therapy and the factors affecting its delivery. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database to assess treatment of patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer diagnosed over a 25-year period (1976 through 2000). We evaluated the rate of radiation therapy use and its timing (preoperative vs. postoperative) and the influence of factors such as tumor stage and grade; patient gender and race; and geographic location. In this 25-year period, 45,627 patients met our selection criteria. The rate of radiation therapy use increased dramatically over time: from 17 percent of advanced-stage patients in 1976 to 65 percent in 2000 (P &lt; 0.0001). Until 1996, the increase was due almost entirely to postoperative radiation therapy. Since 1996, the rate of preoperative radiation therapy use has increased (P &lt; 0.0001) and the rate of postoperative radiation therapy use has begun to decline. We found, after controlling for the year of diagnosis, that female patients, African Americans, older patients, and patients with low-grade lesions were less likely to undergo radiation therapy (P &lt; 0.0001). Geographic location was also an important predictor of radiation therapy use. The use of radiation therapy for patients with rectal cancer has dramatically increased over the 25-year period studied, with a recent shift to the use of preoperative radiation therapy; however, in 2000, over 30 percent of patients with advanced-stage nonmetastatic rectal cancer did not undergo radiation therapy. Given the variation in radiation therapy use that we found to be due to demographic factors, access to adjuvant radiation therapy can be improved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0792-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15690651</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DICRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Secaucus, NJ: Springer</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Epidemiologic Studies ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; SEER Program - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tumors ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum, 2005, Vol.48 (1), p.9-15</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4c26370c5d40189b9412b83a2f9459df092a51f797b613c7dbaf167700e1085a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4c26370c5d40189b9412b83a2f9459df092a51f797b613c7dbaf167700e1085a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16915638$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15690651$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BAXTER, N. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROTHENBERGER, D. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORRIS, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BULLARD, K. M</creatorcontrib><title>Adjuvant radiation for rectal cancer : Do we measure up to the standard of care? an epidemiologic analysis of trends over 25 years in the United States</title><title>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</title><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><description>In the United States, adjuvant radiation therapy is currently recommended for most patients with rectal cancer. We conducted this population-based study to evaluate the rate of radiation therapy and the factors affecting its delivery. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database to assess treatment of patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer diagnosed over a 25-year period (1976 through 2000). We evaluated the rate of radiation therapy use and its timing (preoperative vs. postoperative) and the influence of factors such as tumor stage and grade; patient gender and race; and geographic location. In this 25-year period, 45,627 patients met our selection criteria. The rate of radiation therapy use increased dramatically over time: from 17 percent of advanced-stage patients in 1976 to 65 percent in 2000 (P &lt; 0.0001). Until 1996, the increase was due almost entirely to postoperative radiation therapy. Since 1996, the rate of preoperative radiation therapy use has increased (P &lt; 0.0001) and the rate of postoperative radiation therapy use has begun to decline. We found, after controlling for the year of diagnosis, that female patients, African Americans, older patients, and patients with low-grade lesions were less likely to undergo radiation therapy (P &lt; 0.0001). Geographic location was also an important predictor of radiation therapy use. The use of radiation therapy for patients with rectal cancer has dramatically increased over the 25-year period studied, with a recent shift to the use of preoperative radiation therapy; however, in 2000, over 30 percent of patients with advanced-stage nonmetastatic rectal cancer did not undergo radiation therapy. Given the variation in radiation therapy use that we found to be due to demographic factors, access to adjuvant radiation therapy can be improved.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>SEER Program - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0012-3706</issn><issn>1530-0358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqD_AiQdBba6XT6XS8LMu6fsCCB91zU51Ua4buzpikV-aX-HfNOAMLnuqDp14oHsZeCHgrAPS7JEAqqACaCrSpq-4R2wgly0aq7jHbAIi6khraM3ae0raMUIN-ys6Eag20SmzYnyu3Xe9xyTyi85h9WPgYIo9kM07c4mIp8vf8Q-C_ic-EaY3E1x3PgeefxFPGxWF0PIwFjnTJceG0845mH6bww9uywGmffDogOdLiSndfQmvF94Qxcb_8i7pbfCbHv2XMlJ6xJyNOiZ6f6gW7-3jz_fpzdfv105frq9vKSmNy1di6LQ9a5RoQnRlMI-qhk1iPplHGjWBqVGLURg-tkFa7AUfRag1AAjqF8oK9OebuYvi1Usr97JOlacKFwpr6VpdgY0wBX_0HbsMay2upr0UDSktQBRJHyMaQUqSx30U_Y9z3AvqDsv6orC_K-oOyvis3L0_B6zCTe7g4OSrA6xOAyeI0xuLEpweuNQWVnfwLHZGdlQ</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>BAXTER, N. N</creator><creator>ROTHENBERGER, D. A</creator><creator>MORRIS, A. M</creator><creator>BULLARD, K. M</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Adjuvant radiation for rectal cancer : Do we measure up to the standard of care? an epidemiologic analysis of trends over 25 years in the United States</title><author>BAXTER, N. N ; ROTHENBERGER, D. A ; MORRIS, A. M ; BULLARD, K. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-4c26370c5d40189b9412b83a2f9459df092a51f797b613c7dbaf167700e1085a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>SEER Program - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BAXTER, N. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROTHENBERGER, D. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORRIS, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BULLARD, K. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BAXTER, N. N</au><au>ROTHENBERGER, D. A</au><au>MORRIS, A. M</au><au>BULLARD, K. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adjuvant radiation for rectal cancer : Do we measure up to the standard of care? an epidemiologic analysis of trends over 25 years in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</jtitle><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>9-15</pages><issn>0012-3706</issn><eissn>1530-0358</eissn><coden>DICRAG</coden><abstract>In the United States, adjuvant radiation therapy is currently recommended for most patients with rectal cancer. We conducted this population-based study to evaluate the rate of radiation therapy and the factors affecting its delivery. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database to assess treatment of patients with nonmetastatic rectal cancer diagnosed over a 25-year period (1976 through 2000). We evaluated the rate of radiation therapy use and its timing (preoperative vs. postoperative) and the influence of factors such as tumor stage and grade; patient gender and race; and geographic location. In this 25-year period, 45,627 patients met our selection criteria. The rate of radiation therapy use increased dramatically over time: from 17 percent of advanced-stage patients in 1976 to 65 percent in 2000 (P &lt; 0.0001). Until 1996, the increase was due almost entirely to postoperative radiation therapy. Since 1996, the rate of preoperative radiation therapy use has increased (P &lt; 0.0001) and the rate of postoperative radiation therapy use has begun to decline. We found, after controlling for the year of diagnosis, that female patients, African Americans, older patients, and patients with low-grade lesions were less likely to undergo radiation therapy (P &lt; 0.0001). Geographic location was also an important predictor of radiation therapy use. The use of radiation therapy for patients with rectal cancer has dramatically increased over the 25-year period studied, with a recent shift to the use of preoperative radiation therapy; however, in 2000, over 30 percent of patients with advanced-stage nonmetastatic rectal cancer did not undergo radiation therapy. Given the variation in radiation therapy use that we found to be due to demographic factors, access to adjuvant radiation therapy can be improved.</abstract><cop>Secaucus, NJ</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>15690651</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10350-004-0792-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3706
ispartof Diseases of the colon & rectum, 2005, Vol.48 (1), p.9-15
issn 0012-3706
1530-0358
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67401999
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology
Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Epidemiologic Studies
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Neoplasm Staging
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
SEER Program - statistics & numerical data
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Tumors
United States - epidemiology
title Adjuvant radiation for rectal cancer : Do we measure up to the standard of care? an epidemiologic analysis of trends over 25 years in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A33%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adjuvant%20radiation%20for%20rectal%20cancer%20:%20Do%20we%20measure%20up%20to%20the%20standard%20of%20care?%20an%20epidemiologic%20analysis%20of%20trends%20over%2025%20years%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Diseases%20of%20the%20colon%20&%20rectum&rft.au=BAXTER,%20N.%20N&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=9-15&rft.issn=0012-3706&rft.eissn=1530-0358&rft.coden=DICRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10350-004-0792-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E796948081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214057305&rft_id=info:pmid/15690651&rfr_iscdi=true