The organization of recent and remote memories
Key Points In humans, damage to the medial temporal lobe typically produces temporally-graded retrograde amnesia — a loss of recent memories, but a relative sparing of more remote ones. This has been taken as evidence that the hippocampus has a time-limited role in the storage and retrieval of some...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature reviews. Neuroscience 2005-02, Vol.6 (2), p.119-130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 130 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 119 |
container_title | Nature reviews. Neuroscience |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Frankland, Paul W. Bontempi, Bruno |
description | Key Points
In humans, damage to the medial temporal lobe typically produces temporally-graded retrograde amnesia — a loss of recent memories, but a relative sparing of more remote ones. This has been taken as evidence that the hippocampus has a time-limited role in the storage and retrieval of some forms of memory. This idea forms the central tenet of most contemporary views of system consolidation: the hippocampus acts as a temporary store for new information, but permanent storage depends on a broadly distributed cortical network.
The relationship between hippocampal damage and retrograde amnesia has been studied in animal models. The main advantage of this approach is that it allows retrograde amnesia to be studied in a prospective manner — the extent of the lesion can be controlled, as can what is learned and when. As in humans, the typical finding is that disrupting hippocampal function preferentially affects recent, rather than remote, memories.
These observations in humans and animal models indicate that memories are reorganized at the system level as they mature. Most contemporary models propose that experience is initially encoded in parallel in hippocampal and cortical networks. Subsequent reactivation of the hippocampal network reinstates activity in different cortical networks. This coordinated replay across hippocampal–cortical networks leads to gradual strengthening of cortico-cortical connections, which eventually allows new memories to become independent of the hippocampus and to be gradually integrated with pre-existing cortical memories.
By contrast, multiple trace theory proposes a more permanent role for the hippocampus in some forms of declarative memory. It posits that memories are encoded in hippocampal–cortical networks, and that retrieval of contextually rich episodic memories, as well as spatial detail, always requires the hippocampus.
Memory reactivation is the core mechanism in consolidation models. Reactivation of the hippocampal memory trace is thought to lead to the reinstatement of waking patterns of neural activity in the cortex, and subsequent stabilization and refinement of hippocampal–cortical circuits.
Gradual remodelling of hippocampal–cortical circuits depends on several rounds of synaptic modification. These changes are initiated in a reactivation-dependent manner, either during online (task-relevant) or offline (sleep or quiet wakefulness) situations, and require the expression of new genes.
Imaging studies in roden |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nrn1607 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67401727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A188973079</galeid><sourcerecordid>A188973079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-7410603f47944c03a50231e3ba415a344d38c4f0c177d86fe163743d8e68463e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9LHDEQx0OpVGvF_6AslVZf7sxssknu8RCtwoEvFnwLMTu55thNbLL3oH-9kVs8PAoyDzMkn_n5JeQY6BQoU-chBRBUfiIHwCVMKOXq81vM7vfJ15xXlIIAKb6QfWiEamqQB2R69xermJYm-Gcz-Biq6KqEFsNQmdCWsI8DVn1xyWP-Rvac6TIejf6Q_Lm6vLu4nixuf99czBcT20gYJpIDFZQ5LmecW8pMQ2sGyB4Mh8YwzlumLHfUgpStEg5BMMlZq1AoLhiyQ_JrU_cxxX9rzIPufbbYdSZgXGctJKcga_khWBqUQRpRwB874CquUyhL6LpuymkkVQU62UBL06H2wcUhGftaUc9BqZlkVM4KNf0PVazF3tsY0Pny_i7hdJNgU8w5odOPyfcmPWmg-lU_PepXyO_jlOuHHtstNwpWgJ8jYLI1nUsmWJ-3nCiSzxgU7mzD5fIVlpi26-72fAGHfaqo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225001708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The organization of recent and remote memories</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Frankland, Paul W. ; Bontempi, Bruno</creator><creatorcontrib>Frankland, Paul W. ; Bontempi, Bruno</creatorcontrib><description>Key Points
In humans, damage to the medial temporal lobe typically produces temporally-graded retrograde amnesia — a loss of recent memories, but a relative sparing of more remote ones. This has been taken as evidence that the hippocampus has a time-limited role in the storage and retrieval of some forms of memory. This idea forms the central tenet of most contemporary views of system consolidation: the hippocampus acts as a temporary store for new information, but permanent storage depends on a broadly distributed cortical network.
The relationship between hippocampal damage and retrograde amnesia has been studied in animal models. The main advantage of this approach is that it allows retrograde amnesia to be studied in a prospective manner — the extent of the lesion can be controlled, as can what is learned and when. As in humans, the typical finding is that disrupting hippocampal function preferentially affects recent, rather than remote, memories.
These observations in humans and animal models indicate that memories are reorganized at the system level as they mature. Most contemporary models propose that experience is initially encoded in parallel in hippocampal and cortical networks. Subsequent reactivation of the hippocampal network reinstates activity in different cortical networks. This coordinated replay across hippocampal–cortical networks leads to gradual strengthening of cortico-cortical connections, which eventually allows new memories to become independent of the hippocampus and to be gradually integrated with pre-existing cortical memories.
By contrast, multiple trace theory proposes a more permanent role for the hippocampus in some forms of declarative memory. It posits that memories are encoded in hippocampal–cortical networks, and that retrieval of contextually rich episodic memories, as well as spatial detail, always requires the hippocampus.
Memory reactivation is the core mechanism in consolidation models. Reactivation of the hippocampal memory trace is thought to lead to the reinstatement of waking patterns of neural activity in the cortex, and subsequent stabilization and refinement of hippocampal–cortical circuits.
Gradual remodelling of hippocampal–cortical circuits depends on several rounds of synaptic modification. These changes are initiated in a reactivation-dependent manner, either during online (task-relevant) or offline (sleep or quiet wakefulness) situations, and require the expression of new genes.
Imaging studies in rodents have been able to characterize how circuits supporting memories are gradually reorganized over time, to identify sites of permanent storage in the cortex, and to provide evidence for network reorganization at both regional and sub-regional levels. Imaging and pharmacological and anatomical lesion studies have identified the prefrontal cortex as playing a crucial part in processing remote memories.
These findings indicate that the prefrontal cortex might have a dual role during recall of remote memories. First, the prefrontal cortex may be important for integrating information from many cortical modules. Second, in the case of successful recall, the prefrontal cortex may exert top-down inhibitory control over hippocampal function to minimize re-encoding of redundant information.
A fundamental question in memory research is how our brains can form enduring memories. In humans, memories of everyday life depend initially on the medial temporal lobe system, including the hippocampus. As these memories mature, they are thought to become increasingly dependent on other brain regions such as the cortex. Little is understood about how new memories in the hippocampus are transformed into remote memories in cortical networks. However, recent studies have begun to shed light on how remote memories are organized in the cortex, and the molecular and cellular events that underlie their consolidation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-003X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1471-0048</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0048</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-3178</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nrn1607</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15685217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Amnesia ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animals ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological Techniques ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain - anatomy & histology ; Brain - physiology ; Brain damage ; Brain Mapping ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Methods ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Models, Animal ; Models, Neurological ; Nerve Net - physiology ; Neurobiology ; Neuronal Plasticity - physiology ; Neuropsychology ; Neurosciences ; Neurotransmission and behavior ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; review-article ; Semantics ; Time Factors ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2005-02, Vol.6 (2), p.119-130</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2005</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Feb 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-7410603f47944c03a50231e3ba415a344d38c4f0c177d86fe163743d8e68463e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-7410603f47944c03a50231e3ba415a344d38c4f0c177d86fe163743d8e68463e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/nrn1607$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/nrn1607$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16471931$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15685217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frankland, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontempi, Bruno</creatorcontrib><title>The organization of recent and remote memories</title><title>Nature reviews. Neuroscience</title><addtitle>Nat Rev Neurosci</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Neurosci</addtitle><description>Key Points
In humans, damage to the medial temporal lobe typically produces temporally-graded retrograde amnesia — a loss of recent memories, but a relative sparing of more remote ones. This has been taken as evidence that the hippocampus has a time-limited role in the storage and retrieval of some forms of memory. This idea forms the central tenet of most contemporary views of system consolidation: the hippocampus acts as a temporary store for new information, but permanent storage depends on a broadly distributed cortical network.
The relationship between hippocampal damage and retrograde amnesia has been studied in animal models. The main advantage of this approach is that it allows retrograde amnesia to be studied in a prospective manner — the extent of the lesion can be controlled, as can what is learned and when. As in humans, the typical finding is that disrupting hippocampal function preferentially affects recent, rather than remote, memories.
These observations in humans and animal models indicate that memories are reorganized at the system level as they mature. Most contemporary models propose that experience is initially encoded in parallel in hippocampal and cortical networks. Subsequent reactivation of the hippocampal network reinstates activity in different cortical networks. This coordinated replay across hippocampal–cortical networks leads to gradual strengthening of cortico-cortical connections, which eventually allows new memories to become independent of the hippocampus and to be gradually integrated with pre-existing cortical memories.
By contrast, multiple trace theory proposes a more permanent role for the hippocampus in some forms of declarative memory. It posits that memories are encoded in hippocampal–cortical networks, and that retrieval of contextually rich episodic memories, as well as spatial detail, always requires the hippocampus.
Memory reactivation is the core mechanism in consolidation models. Reactivation of the hippocampal memory trace is thought to lead to the reinstatement of waking patterns of neural activity in the cortex, and subsequent stabilization and refinement of hippocampal–cortical circuits.
Gradual remodelling of hippocampal–cortical circuits depends on several rounds of synaptic modification. These changes are initiated in a reactivation-dependent manner, either during online (task-relevant) or offline (sleep or quiet wakefulness) situations, and require the expression of new genes.
Imaging studies in rodents have been able to characterize how circuits supporting memories are gradually reorganized over time, to identify sites of permanent storage in the cortex, and to provide evidence for network reorganization at both regional and sub-regional levels. Imaging and pharmacological and anatomical lesion studies have identified the prefrontal cortex as playing a crucial part in processing remote memories.
These findings indicate that the prefrontal cortex might have a dual role during recall of remote memories. First, the prefrontal cortex may be important for integrating information from many cortical modules. Second, in the case of successful recall, the prefrontal cortex may exert top-down inhibitory control over hippocampal function to minimize re-encoding of redundant information.
A fundamental question in memory research is how our brains can form enduring memories. In humans, memories of everyday life depend initially on the medial temporal lobe system, including the hippocampus. As these memories mature, they are thought to become increasingly dependent on other brain regions such as the cortex. Little is understood about how new memories in the hippocampus are transformed into remote memories in cortical networks. However, recent studies have begun to shed light on how remote memories are organized in the cortex, and the molecular and cellular events that underlie their consolidation.</description><subject>Amnesia</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological Techniques</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain damage</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Nerve Net - physiology</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neuronal Plasticity - physiology</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurotransmission and behavior</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>review-article</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>1471-003X</issn><issn>1471-0048</issn><issn>1471-0048</issn><issn>1469-3178</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9LHDEQx0OpVGvF_6AslVZf7sxssknu8RCtwoEvFnwLMTu55thNbLL3oH-9kVs8PAoyDzMkn_n5JeQY6BQoU-chBRBUfiIHwCVMKOXq81vM7vfJ15xXlIIAKb6QfWiEamqQB2R69xermJYm-Gcz-Biq6KqEFsNQmdCWsI8DVn1xyWP-Rvac6TIejf6Q_Lm6vLu4nixuf99czBcT20gYJpIDFZQ5LmecW8pMQ2sGyB4Mh8YwzlumLHfUgpStEg5BMMlZq1AoLhiyQ_JrU_cxxX9rzIPufbbYdSZgXGctJKcga_khWBqUQRpRwB874CquUyhL6LpuymkkVQU62UBL06H2wcUhGftaUc9BqZlkVM4KNf0PVazF3tsY0Pny_i7hdJNgU8w5odOPyfcmPWmg-lU_PepXyO_jlOuHHtstNwpWgJ8jYLI1nUsmWJ-3nCiSzxgU7mzD5fIVlpi26-72fAGHfaqo</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>Frankland, Paul W.</creator><creator>Bontempi, Bruno</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>The organization of recent and remote memories</title><author>Frankland, Paul W. ; Bontempi, Bruno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-7410603f47944c03a50231e3ba415a344d38c4f0c177d86fe163743d8e68463e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Amnesia</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological Techniques</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain damage</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Nerve Net - physiology</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neuronal Plasticity - physiology</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurotransmission and behavior</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>review-article</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frankland, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontempi, Bruno</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature reviews. Neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frankland, Paul W.</au><au>Bontempi, Bruno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The organization of recent and remote memories</atitle><jtitle>Nature reviews. Neuroscience</jtitle><stitle>Nat Rev Neurosci</stitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Neurosci</addtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>119-130</pages><issn>1471-003X</issn><issn>1471-0048</issn><eissn>1471-0048</eissn><eissn>1469-3178</eissn><abstract>Key Points
In humans, damage to the medial temporal lobe typically produces temporally-graded retrograde amnesia — a loss of recent memories, but a relative sparing of more remote ones. This has been taken as evidence that the hippocampus has a time-limited role in the storage and retrieval of some forms of memory. This idea forms the central tenet of most contemporary views of system consolidation: the hippocampus acts as a temporary store for new information, but permanent storage depends on a broadly distributed cortical network.
The relationship between hippocampal damage and retrograde amnesia has been studied in animal models. The main advantage of this approach is that it allows retrograde amnesia to be studied in a prospective manner — the extent of the lesion can be controlled, as can what is learned and when. As in humans, the typical finding is that disrupting hippocampal function preferentially affects recent, rather than remote, memories.
These observations in humans and animal models indicate that memories are reorganized at the system level as they mature. Most contemporary models propose that experience is initially encoded in parallel in hippocampal and cortical networks. Subsequent reactivation of the hippocampal network reinstates activity in different cortical networks. This coordinated replay across hippocampal–cortical networks leads to gradual strengthening of cortico-cortical connections, which eventually allows new memories to become independent of the hippocampus and to be gradually integrated with pre-existing cortical memories.
By contrast, multiple trace theory proposes a more permanent role for the hippocampus in some forms of declarative memory. It posits that memories are encoded in hippocampal–cortical networks, and that retrieval of contextually rich episodic memories, as well as spatial detail, always requires the hippocampus.
Memory reactivation is the core mechanism in consolidation models. Reactivation of the hippocampal memory trace is thought to lead to the reinstatement of waking patterns of neural activity in the cortex, and subsequent stabilization and refinement of hippocampal–cortical circuits.
Gradual remodelling of hippocampal–cortical circuits depends on several rounds of synaptic modification. These changes are initiated in a reactivation-dependent manner, either during online (task-relevant) or offline (sleep or quiet wakefulness) situations, and require the expression of new genes.
Imaging studies in rodents have been able to characterize how circuits supporting memories are gradually reorganized over time, to identify sites of permanent storage in the cortex, and to provide evidence for network reorganization at both regional and sub-regional levels. Imaging and pharmacological and anatomical lesion studies have identified the prefrontal cortex as playing a crucial part in processing remote memories.
These findings indicate that the prefrontal cortex might have a dual role during recall of remote memories. First, the prefrontal cortex may be important for integrating information from many cortical modules. Second, in the case of successful recall, the prefrontal cortex may exert top-down inhibitory control over hippocampal function to minimize re-encoding of redundant information.
A fundamental question in memory research is how our brains can form enduring memories. In humans, memories of everyday life depend initially on the medial temporal lobe system, including the hippocampus. As these memories mature, they are thought to become increasingly dependent on other brain regions such as the cortex. Little is understood about how new memories in the hippocampus are transformed into remote memories in cortical networks. However, recent studies have begun to shed light on how remote memories are organized in the cortex, and the molecular and cellular events that underlie their consolidation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>15685217</pmid><doi>10.1038/nrn1607</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-003X |
ispartof | Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2005-02, Vol.6 (2), p.119-130 |
issn | 1471-003X 1471-0048 1471-0048 1469-3178 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67401727 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Amnesia Animal Genetics and Genomics Animals Behavioral psychophysiology Behavioral Sciences Biological and medical sciences Biological Techniques Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Brain - anatomy & histology Brain - physiology Brain damage Brain Mapping Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects. Methods Humans Medical sciences Memory Memory, Short-Term - physiology Mental Recall - physiology Models, Animal Models, Neurological Nerve Net - physiology Neurobiology Neuronal Plasticity - physiology Neuropsychology Neurosciences Neurotransmission and behavior Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology review-article Semantics Time Factors Toxicology |
title | The organization of recent and remote memories |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A45%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20organization%20of%20recent%20and%20remote%20memories&rft.jtitle=Nature%20reviews.%20Neuroscience&rft.au=Frankland,%20Paul%20W.&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=119-130&rft.issn=1471-003X&rft.eissn=1471-0048&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nrn1607&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA188973079%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225001708&rft_id=info:pmid/15685217&rft_galeid=A188973079&rfr_iscdi=true |