Predictors of Placebo Response in Pooled Lamotrigine Neuropathic Pain Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVESOne limitation of neuropathic pain clinical trials is the often large and variable extent of response in the placebo group, possibly obscuring true medication effects. We pooled data from 252 individuals in the placebo arms of 3 clinical trials of lamotrigine in patients with neuropathic p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Clinical journal of pain 2009-07, Vol.25 (6), p.469-476
Hauptverfasser: Irizarry, Michael C, Webb, David J, Ali, Zahid, Chizh, Boris A, Gold, Michael, Kinrade, Frances J, Meisner, Paul D, Blum, David, Silver, Marianne T, Weil, John G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 476
container_issue 6
container_start_page 469
container_title The Clinical journal of pain
container_volume 25
creator Irizarry, Michael C
Webb, David J
Ali, Zahid
Chizh, Boris A
Gold, Michael
Kinrade, Frances J
Meisner, Paul D
Blum, David
Silver, Marianne T
Weil, John G
description OBJECTIVESOne limitation of neuropathic pain clinical trials is the often large and variable extent of response in the placebo group, possibly obscuring true medication effects. We pooled data from 252 individuals in the placebo arms of 3 clinical trials of lamotrigine in patients with neuropathic pain to examine the relationship of baseline patient and study site characteristics with 12-week change in the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale score (ΔPI-NRS). The 574 patients in the pooled lamotrigine treatment arms were used as a replication dataset. MATERIALS AND METHODSWe performed univariable and multivariable regression analysis of predictors of ΔPI-NRS. Clinical factors examined were baseline pain intensity score (mean daily PI-NRS over the week prior to randomization), age, sex, diagnosis, prior and concurrent gabapentin use, prior and concurrent tricyclic antidepressant use, pain duration, variability of daily pain scores during the baseline week, and slope of daily pain scores over the baseline week. Site factors evaluated were study site, US geographic region, recruitment rate, and recruitment period. RESULTSBaseline PI-NRS and site recruitment rate were independent predictors of the 12-week ΔPI-NRS in the last observation carried forward, observed case, and repeated measures analyses. Patients with higher baseline PI-NRS scores had a significantly greater 12-week reduction in pain intensity than patients with lower baseline scores. Patients within sites with a faster recruitment rate also had a significantly greater reduction of pain intensity than those in sites with slower recruitment. DISCUSSIONThese results suggest that both patient and study site characteristics can influence the response in the placebo arms of neuropathic pain studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31819ddded
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67401053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67401053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4053-46605ebc09af0a5e1b605f358880222b56b401ccf6ed806f7668a02170aeffaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9v1DAQxS0EotvCN0DIF7iljP_GOVarAkUriFB7jhxnzBq88WInqvj2uOqKSsxlNKPfm6d5hLxhcMmgaz9cfekvYQQmUDDDummacHpGNkwJ3SgJ3XOygVZ2jQHZnpHzUn4CMMUNvCRnrFOSt53YkLs-4xTcknKhydM-Wodjot-xHNNckIaZ9ilFnOjOHtKSw48wI_2Ka05Hu-yDo72tzDaGOTgb6W0ONpZX5IWvDV-f-gW5-3h9u_3c7L59utle7RonQYlGag0KRwed9WAVsrHOXihjDHDOR6VHCcw5r3EyoH2rtbHAWQsWvbdeXJD3j3ePOf1esSzDIRSHMdoZ01oG3VZ9daqgfARdTqVk9MMxh4PNfwYGw0OcQ41z-D_OKnt7ur-OB5yeRKf8KvDuBNhS3_fZzi6UfxxnWknGuyf_-xQXzOVXXO8xD3u0cdkPUIsrMA0H6KCtU_OwEuIvAUuO7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67401053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of Placebo Response in Pooled Lamotrigine Neuropathic Pain Clinical Trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Irizarry, Michael C ; Webb, David J ; Ali, Zahid ; Chizh, Boris A ; Gold, Michael ; Kinrade, Frances J ; Meisner, Paul D ; Blum, David ; Silver, Marianne T ; Weil, John G</creator><creatorcontrib>Irizarry, Michael C ; Webb, David J ; Ali, Zahid ; Chizh, Boris A ; Gold, Michael ; Kinrade, Frances J ; Meisner, Paul D ; Blum, David ; Silver, Marianne T ; Weil, John G</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVESOne limitation of neuropathic pain clinical trials is the often large and variable extent of response in the placebo group, possibly obscuring true medication effects. We pooled data from 252 individuals in the placebo arms of 3 clinical trials of lamotrigine in patients with neuropathic pain to examine the relationship of baseline patient and study site characteristics with 12-week change in the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale score (ΔPI-NRS). The 574 patients in the pooled lamotrigine treatment arms were used as a replication dataset. MATERIALS AND METHODSWe performed univariable and multivariable regression analysis of predictors of ΔPI-NRS. Clinical factors examined were baseline pain intensity score (mean daily PI-NRS over the week prior to randomization), age, sex, diagnosis, prior and concurrent gabapentin use, prior and concurrent tricyclic antidepressant use, pain duration, variability of daily pain scores during the baseline week, and slope of daily pain scores over the baseline week. Site factors evaluated were study site, US geographic region, recruitment rate, and recruitment period. RESULTSBaseline PI-NRS and site recruitment rate were independent predictors of the 12-week ΔPI-NRS in the last observation carried forward, observed case, and repeated measures analyses. Patients with higher baseline PI-NRS scores had a significantly greater 12-week reduction in pain intensity than patients with lower baseline scores. Patients within sites with a faster recruitment rate also had a significantly greater reduction of pain intensity than those in sites with slower recruitment. DISCUSSIONThese results suggest that both patient and study site characteristics can influence the response in the placebo arms of neuropathic pain studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31819ddded</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19542793</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJPAEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis ; Neuralgia - drug therapy ; Neuralgia - psychology ; Neurology ; Pain Clinics ; Placebo Effect ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Regression Analysis ; Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors ; Time Factors ; Triazines - therapeutic use ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>The Clinical journal of pain, 2009-07, Vol.25 (6), p.469-476</ispartof><rights>2009 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4053-46605ebc09af0a5e1b605f358880222b56b401ccf6ed806f7668a02170aeffaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4053-46605ebc09af0a5e1b605f358880222b56b401ccf6ed806f7668a02170aeffaf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21654129$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19542793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Irizarry, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Zahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chizh, Boris A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinrade, Frances J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisner, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Marianne T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weil, John G</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of Placebo Response in Pooled Lamotrigine Neuropathic Pain Clinical Trials</title><title>The Clinical journal of pain</title><addtitle>Clin J Pain</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVESOne limitation of neuropathic pain clinical trials is the often large and variable extent of response in the placebo group, possibly obscuring true medication effects. We pooled data from 252 individuals in the placebo arms of 3 clinical trials of lamotrigine in patients with neuropathic pain to examine the relationship of baseline patient and study site characteristics with 12-week change in the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale score (ΔPI-NRS). The 574 patients in the pooled lamotrigine treatment arms were used as a replication dataset. MATERIALS AND METHODSWe performed univariable and multivariable regression analysis of predictors of ΔPI-NRS. Clinical factors examined were baseline pain intensity score (mean daily PI-NRS over the week prior to randomization), age, sex, diagnosis, prior and concurrent gabapentin use, prior and concurrent tricyclic antidepressant use, pain duration, variability of daily pain scores during the baseline week, and slope of daily pain scores over the baseline week. Site factors evaluated were study site, US geographic region, recruitment rate, and recruitment period. RESULTSBaseline PI-NRS and site recruitment rate were independent predictors of the 12-week ΔPI-NRS in the last observation carried forward, observed case, and repeated measures analyses. Patients with higher baseline PI-NRS scores had a significantly greater 12-week reduction in pain intensity than patients with lower baseline scores. Patients within sites with a faster recruitment rate also had a significantly greater reduction of pain intensity than those in sites with slower recruitment. DISCUSSIONThese results suggest that both patient and study site characteristics can influence the response in the placebo arms of neuropathic pain studies.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis</subject><subject>Neuralgia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neuralgia - psychology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Pain Clinics</subject><subject>Placebo Effect</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Triazines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0749-8047</issn><issn>1536-5409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9v1DAQxS0EotvCN0DIF7iljP_GOVarAkUriFB7jhxnzBq88WInqvj2uOqKSsxlNKPfm6d5hLxhcMmgaz9cfekvYQQmUDDDummacHpGNkwJ3SgJ3XOygVZ2jQHZnpHzUn4CMMUNvCRnrFOSt53YkLs-4xTcknKhydM-Wodjot-xHNNckIaZ9ilFnOjOHtKSw48wI_2Ka05Hu-yDo72tzDaGOTgb6W0ONpZX5IWvDV-f-gW5-3h9u_3c7L59utle7RonQYlGag0KRwed9WAVsrHOXihjDHDOR6VHCcw5r3EyoH2rtbHAWQsWvbdeXJD3j3ePOf1esSzDIRSHMdoZ01oG3VZ9daqgfARdTqVk9MMxh4PNfwYGw0OcQ41z-D_OKnt7ur-OB5yeRKf8KvDuBNhS3_fZzi6UfxxnWknGuyf_-xQXzOVXXO8xD3u0cdkPUIsrMA0H6KCtU_OwEuIvAUuO7g</recordid><startdate>200907</startdate><enddate>200907</enddate><creator>Irizarry, Michael C</creator><creator>Webb, David J</creator><creator>Ali, Zahid</creator><creator>Chizh, Boris A</creator><creator>Gold, Michael</creator><creator>Kinrade, Frances J</creator><creator>Meisner, Paul D</creator><creator>Blum, David</creator><creator>Silver, Marianne T</creator><creator>Weil, John G</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200907</creationdate><title>Predictors of Placebo Response in Pooled Lamotrigine Neuropathic Pain Clinical Trials</title><author>Irizarry, Michael C ; Webb, David J ; Ali, Zahid ; Chizh, Boris A ; Gold, Michael ; Kinrade, Frances J ; Meisner, Paul D ; Blum, David ; Silver, Marianne T ; Weil, John G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4053-46605ebc09af0a5e1b605f358880222b56b401ccf6ed806f7668a02170aeffaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis</topic><topic>Neuralgia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neuralgia - psychology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Pain Clinics</topic><topic>Placebo Effect</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception); interoception; electrolocation. Sensory receptors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Triazines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Irizarry, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Zahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chizh, Boris A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinrade, Frances J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisner, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Marianne T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weil, John G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Clinical journal of pain</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Irizarry, Michael C</au><au>Webb, David J</au><au>Ali, Zahid</au><au>Chizh, Boris A</au><au>Gold, Michael</au><au>Kinrade, Frances J</au><au>Meisner, Paul D</au><au>Blum, David</au><au>Silver, Marianne T</au><au>Weil, John G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of Placebo Response in Pooled Lamotrigine Neuropathic Pain Clinical Trials</atitle><jtitle>The Clinical journal of pain</jtitle><addtitle>Clin J Pain</addtitle><date>2009-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>469</spage><epage>476</epage><pages>469-476</pages><issn>0749-8047</issn><eissn>1536-5409</eissn><coden>CJPAEU</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVESOne limitation of neuropathic pain clinical trials is the often large and variable extent of response in the placebo group, possibly obscuring true medication effects. We pooled data from 252 individuals in the placebo arms of 3 clinical trials of lamotrigine in patients with neuropathic pain to examine the relationship of baseline patient and study site characteristics with 12-week change in the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale score (ΔPI-NRS). The 574 patients in the pooled lamotrigine treatment arms were used as a replication dataset. MATERIALS AND METHODSWe performed univariable and multivariable regression analysis of predictors of ΔPI-NRS. Clinical factors examined were baseline pain intensity score (mean daily PI-NRS over the week prior to randomization), age, sex, diagnosis, prior and concurrent gabapentin use, prior and concurrent tricyclic antidepressant use, pain duration, variability of daily pain scores during the baseline week, and slope of daily pain scores over the baseline week. Site factors evaluated were study site, US geographic region, recruitment rate, and recruitment period. RESULTSBaseline PI-NRS and site recruitment rate were independent predictors of the 12-week ΔPI-NRS in the last observation carried forward, observed case, and repeated measures analyses. Patients with higher baseline PI-NRS scores had a significantly greater 12-week reduction in pain intensity than patients with lower baseline scores. Patients within sites with a faster recruitment rate also had a significantly greater reduction of pain intensity than those in sites with slower recruitment. DISCUSSIONThese results suggest that both patient and study site characteristics can influence the response in the placebo arms of neuropathic pain studies.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>19542793</pmid><doi>10.1097/AJP.0b013e31819ddded</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8047
ispartof The Clinical journal of pain, 2009-07, Vol.25 (6), p.469-476
issn 0749-8047
1536-5409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67401053
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis
Neuralgia - drug therapy
Neuralgia - psychology
Neurology
Pain Clinics
Placebo Effect
Predictive Value of Tests
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Regression Analysis
Somesthesis and somesthetic pathways (proprioception, exteroception, nociception)
interoception
electrolocation. Sensory receptors
Time Factors
Triazines - therapeutic use
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Predictors of Placebo Response in Pooled Lamotrigine Neuropathic Pain Clinical Trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T17%3A29%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20Placebo%20Response%20in%20Pooled%20Lamotrigine%20Neuropathic%20Pain%20Clinical%20Trials&rft.jtitle=The%20Clinical%20journal%20of%20pain&rft.au=Irizarry,%20Michael%20C&rft.date=2009-07&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=469&rft.epage=476&rft.pages=469-476&rft.issn=0749-8047&rft.eissn=1536-5409&rft.coden=CJPAEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AJP.0b013e31819ddded&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67401053%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67401053&rft_id=info:pmid/19542793&rfr_iscdi=true