Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: A clinical overview
Abstract Burn trauma ranges from the minor burn to the devastating injury, which can impact on all aspects of a person's life including aesthetic appearance, relationships with others and psychological, social and physical functioning. Measurement of outcome in burns patients is therefore compl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Burns 2009-08, Vol.35 (5), p.618-641 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 641 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 618 |
container_title | Burns |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Falder, Sian Browne, Allyson Edgar, Dale Staples, Emma Fong, Joy Rea, Suzanne Wood, Fiona |
description | Abstract Burn trauma ranges from the minor burn to the devastating injury, which can impact on all aspects of a person's life including aesthetic appearance, relationships with others and psychological, social and physical functioning. Measurement of outcome in burns patients is therefore complex and multi-faceted. The increasing numbers of major burn survivors implies that understanding health outcomes in these patients has assumed high priority. This paper sets out a conceptual framework for unifying outcome measurement, which may be useful to all members of the multidisciplinary team who are contemplating outcome assessment in their burn patients. It outlines seven core domains of assessment which are (i) skin; (ii) neuromuscular function; (iii) sensory and pain; (iv) psychological function; (v) physical role function; (vi) community participation; and (vii) perceived quality of life. Within each domain, we present a brief clinical review of the most commonly administered measurement tools that have been, or potentially could be, used to assess aspects of these core domains. Where possible, the psychometric properties and clinical utility of these tools are presented. A concise discussion of key methodological issues which should be addressed in this assessment process is then provided, together with suggestions for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.burns.2008.09.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67397254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0305417908002957</els_id><sourcerecordid>67397254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-7446d0963e5e1a5d484a629315f99bd7de3a7f4c910121ba492ec23afcd1fd8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2L1DAUhoMo7rj6CwTpjd61nny06VFWWAa_YMEL9TpkklPI2GnWpB3Zf2_qjAremJtAeN6XnOcw9pRDw4F3L_fNbklTbgRA3wA2AOIe2_BeY80V4H22AQltrbjGC_Yo5z2U0_bwkF1w5JxLxA17vY2JqrjMLh4oV0NMlfXLOFdrd5WXdAzHmPKr6rpyY5iCs2MVj1Se6cdj9mCwY6Yn5_uSfX339sv2Q33z6f3H7fVN7ZSWc62V6jxgJ6klbluvemU7gZK3A-LOa0_S6kE5LFMJvrMKBTkh7eA8H3xv5SV7ceq9TfH7Qnk2h5AdjaOdKC7ZdFqiFq0qoDyBLsWcEw3mNoWDTXeGg1mdmb355cyszgygKc5K6tm5ftkdyP_NnCUV4PkZsLnMPyQ7uZD_cIJ3iK2Awl2dOCoyiqBksgs0OfIhkZuNj-E_H3nzT_638m90R3kfS6J4NtxkYcB8Xte7bhf6ksZWy58VWp-i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67397254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: A clinical overview</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Falder, Sian ; Browne, Allyson ; Edgar, Dale ; Staples, Emma ; Fong, Joy ; Rea, Suzanne ; Wood, Fiona</creator><creatorcontrib>Falder, Sian ; Browne, Allyson ; Edgar, Dale ; Staples, Emma ; Fong, Joy ; Rea, Suzanne ; Wood, Fiona</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Burn trauma ranges from the minor burn to the devastating injury, which can impact on all aspects of a person's life including aesthetic appearance, relationships with others and psychological, social and physical functioning. Measurement of outcome in burns patients is therefore complex and multi-faceted. The increasing numbers of major burn survivors implies that understanding health outcomes in these patients has assumed high priority. This paper sets out a conceptual framework for unifying outcome measurement, which may be useful to all members of the multidisciplinary team who are contemplating outcome assessment in their burn patients. It outlines seven core domains of assessment which are (i) skin; (ii) neuromuscular function; (iii) sensory and pain; (iv) psychological function; (v) physical role function; (vi) community participation; and (vii) perceived quality of life. Within each domain, we present a brief clinical review of the most commonly administered measurement tools that have been, or potentially could be, used to assess aspects of these core domains. Where possible, the psychometric properties and clinical utility of these tools are presented. A concise discussion of key methodological issues which should be addressed in this assessment process is then provided, together with suggestions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.09.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19111399</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BURND8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Assessment ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burns ; Burns - psychology ; Burns - rehabilitation ; Burns(s) ; Critical Care ; Function ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Measurement ; Medical sciences ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Outcome(s) ; Quality of Life ; Recovery of Function ; Survivors - psychology ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Burns, 2009-08, Vol.35 (5), p.618-641</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-7446d0963e5e1a5d484a629315f99bd7de3a7f4c910121ba492ec23afcd1fd8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-7446d0963e5e1a5d484a629315f99bd7de3a7f4c910121ba492ec23afcd1fd8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2008.09.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21699520$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19111399$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falder, Sian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, Allyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgar, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staples, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rea, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Fiona</creatorcontrib><title>Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: A clinical overview</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>Abstract Burn trauma ranges from the minor burn to the devastating injury, which can impact on all aspects of a person's life including aesthetic appearance, relationships with others and psychological, social and physical functioning. Measurement of outcome in burns patients is therefore complex and multi-faceted. The increasing numbers of major burn survivors implies that understanding health outcomes in these patients has assumed high priority. This paper sets out a conceptual framework for unifying outcome measurement, which may be useful to all members of the multidisciplinary team who are contemplating outcome assessment in their burn patients. It outlines seven core domains of assessment which are (i) skin; (ii) neuromuscular function; (iii) sensory and pain; (iv) psychological function; (v) physical role function; (vi) community participation; and (vii) perceived quality of life. Within each domain, we present a brief clinical review of the most commonly administered measurement tools that have been, or potentially could be, used to assess aspects of these core domains. Where possible, the psychometric properties and clinical utility of these tools are presented. A concise discussion of key methodological issues which should be addressed in this assessment process is then provided, together with suggestions for future research.</description><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Burns - psychology</subject><subject>Burns - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Burns(s)</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Function</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Outcome(s)</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2L1DAUhoMo7rj6CwTpjd61nny06VFWWAa_YMEL9TpkklPI2GnWpB3Zf2_qjAremJtAeN6XnOcw9pRDw4F3L_fNbklTbgRA3wA2AOIe2_BeY80V4H22AQltrbjGC_Yo5z2U0_bwkF1w5JxLxA17vY2JqrjMLh4oV0NMlfXLOFdrd5WXdAzHmPKr6rpyY5iCs2MVj1Se6cdj9mCwY6Yn5_uSfX339sv2Q33z6f3H7fVN7ZSWc62V6jxgJ6klbluvemU7gZK3A-LOa0_S6kE5LFMJvrMKBTkh7eA8H3xv5SV7ceq9TfH7Qnk2h5AdjaOdKC7ZdFqiFq0qoDyBLsWcEw3mNoWDTXeGg1mdmb355cyszgygKc5K6tm5ftkdyP_NnCUV4PkZsLnMPyQ7uZD_cIJ3iK2Awl2dOCoyiqBksgs0OfIhkZuNj-E_H3nzT_638m90R3kfS6J4NtxkYcB8Xte7bhf6ksZWy58VWp-i</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Falder, Sian</creator><creator>Browne, Allyson</creator><creator>Edgar, Dale</creator><creator>Staples, Emma</creator><creator>Fong, Joy</creator><creator>Rea, Suzanne</creator><creator>Wood, Fiona</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: A clinical overview</title><author>Falder, Sian ; Browne, Allyson ; Edgar, Dale ; Staples, Emma ; Fong, Joy ; Rea, Suzanne ; Wood, Fiona</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-7446d0963e5e1a5d484a629315f99bd7de3a7f4c910121ba492ec23afcd1fd8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Burns - psychology</topic><topic>Burns - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Burns(s)</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Function</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Outcome(s)</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falder, Sian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, Allyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgar, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staples, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rea, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Fiona</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falder, Sian</au><au>Browne, Allyson</au><au>Edgar, Dale</au><au>Staples, Emma</au><au>Fong, Joy</au><au>Rea, Suzanne</au><au>Wood, Fiona</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: A clinical overview</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>618</spage><epage>641</epage><pages>618-641</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><coden>BURND8</coden><abstract>Abstract Burn trauma ranges from the minor burn to the devastating injury, which can impact on all aspects of a person's life including aesthetic appearance, relationships with others and psychological, social and physical functioning. Measurement of outcome in burns patients is therefore complex and multi-faceted. The increasing numbers of major burn survivors implies that understanding health outcomes in these patients has assumed high priority. This paper sets out a conceptual framework for unifying outcome measurement, which may be useful to all members of the multidisciplinary team who are contemplating outcome assessment in their burn patients. It outlines seven core domains of assessment which are (i) skin; (ii) neuromuscular function; (iii) sensory and pain; (iv) psychological function; (v) physical role function; (vi) community participation; and (vii) perceived quality of life. Within each domain, we present a brief clinical review of the most commonly administered measurement tools that have been, or potentially could be, used to assess aspects of these core domains. Where possible, the psychometric properties and clinical utility of these tools are presented. A concise discussion of key methodological issues which should be addressed in this assessment process is then provided, together with suggestions for future research.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19111399</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.burns.2008.09.002</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-4179 |
ispartof | Burns, 2009-08, Vol.35 (5), p.618-641 |
issn | 0305-4179 1879-1409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67397254 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Assessment Biological and medical sciences Burns Burns - psychology Burns - rehabilitation Burns(s) Critical Care Function Health Status Indicators Humans Measurement Medical sciences Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods Outcome(s) Quality of Life Recovery of Function Survivors - psychology Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents |
title | Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: A clinical overview |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T09%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Core%20outcomes%20for%20adult%20burn%20survivors:%20A%20clinical%20overview&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=Falder,%20Sian&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=618&rft.epage=641&rft.pages=618-641&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft.coden=BURND8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.burns.2008.09.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67397254%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67397254&rft_id=info:pmid/19111399&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0305417908002957&rfr_iscdi=true |