Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke
Background. An inability to perform tasks involving reaching is a common problem following stroke. Evidence supports the use of robotic therapy and functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce upper limb impairments, but current systems may not encourage maximal voluntary contribution from the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 2009-07, Vol.23 (6), p.559-568 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 568 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 559 |
container_title | Neurorehabilitation and neural repair |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Hughes, A.M. Freeman, C.T. Burridge, J.H. Chappell, P.H. Lewin, P.L. Rogers, E. |
description | Background. An inability to perform tasks involving reaching is a common problem following stroke. Evidence supports the use of robotic therapy and functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce upper limb impairments, but current systems may not encourage maximal voluntary contribution from the participant because assistance is not responsive to performance. Objective. This study aimed to investigate whether iterative learning control (ILC) mediated by FES is a feasible intervention in upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Methods. Five hemiparetic participants with reduced upper limb function who were at least 6 months poststroke were recruited from the community. No participants withdrew. Intervention. Participants undertook supported tracking tasks using 27 different trajectories augmented by responsive FES to their triceps brachii muscle, with their hand movement constrained in a 2-dimensional plane by a robot. Eighteen 1-hour treatment sessions were used with 2 participants receiving an additional 7 treatment sessions. Outcome measures. The primary functional outcome measure was the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Impairment measures included the upper limb Fugl— Meyer Assessment (FMA), tests of motor control (tracking accuracy), and isometric force. Results. Compliance was excellent and there were no adverse events. Statistically significant improvements were measured (P ≤ .05) in FMA motor score, unassisted tracking for 3 out of 4 trajectories, and in isometric force over 5 out of 6 directions. Changes in ARAT were not statistically significant. Conclusion. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using ILC mediated by FES for upper limb stroke rehabilitation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1545968308328718 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67393388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1545968308328718</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67393388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3bf9c58efadbae8376d69bfc76da1e407132d5cfc1280144b9e6df47cd0a21253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAURoMovveuJCt31bzapEsZHBVGBB_rkqY3Gu00mqTC_HtTZkAQxNW98J17FvdD6ISSc0qlvKClKOtKcaI4U5KqLbRPy5IVlRJie9pFWUz5HjqI8Y0QxlVNdtEerWlNiJL76HMOOrrW9S6tsLf4NkHQyX0BXoAOgxte8MwPKfge30HndIIOtys8HweTnB90j696MCk4k9fH5JZjr6cAWx_wA2jzOikubdbmOPh3OEI7VvcRjjfzED3Pr55mN8Xi_vp2drkojCAqFby1tSkVWN21GhSXVVfVrTV5agqCSMpZVxprKFOECtHWUHVWSNMRzSgr-SE6W3s_gv8cIaZm6aKBvtcD-DE2leQ150r9CzIqMiVZBskaNMHHGMA2H8EtdVg1lDRTH83vPvLJ6cY9tkvofg42BWSgWANRv0Dz5seQfxr_Fn4DRu6UJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21488372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hughes, A.M. ; Freeman, C.T. ; Burridge, J.H. ; Chappell, P.H. ; Lewin, P.L. ; Rogers, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes, A.M. ; Freeman, C.T. ; Burridge, J.H. ; Chappell, P.H. ; Lewin, P.L. ; Rogers, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. An inability to perform tasks involving reaching is a common problem following stroke. Evidence supports the use of robotic therapy and functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce upper limb impairments, but current systems may not encourage maximal voluntary contribution from the participant because assistance is not responsive to performance. Objective. This study aimed to investigate whether iterative learning control (ILC) mediated by FES is a feasible intervention in upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Methods. Five hemiparetic participants with reduced upper limb function who were at least 6 months poststroke were recruited from the community. No participants withdrew. Intervention. Participants undertook supported tracking tasks using 27 different trajectories augmented by responsive FES to their triceps brachii muscle, with their hand movement constrained in a 2-dimensional plane by a robot. Eighteen 1-hour treatment sessions were used with 2 participants receiving an additional 7 treatment sessions. Outcome measures. The primary functional outcome measure was the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Impairment measures included the upper limb Fugl— Meyer Assessment (FMA), tests of motor control (tracking accuracy), and isometric force. Results. Compliance was excellent and there were no adverse events. Statistically significant improvements were measured (P ≤ .05) in FMA motor score, unassisted tracking for 3 out of 4 trajectories, and in isometric force over 5 out of 6 directions. Changes in ARAT were not statistically significant. Conclusion. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using ILC mediated by FES for upper limb stroke rehabilitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-9683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1545968308328718</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19190087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; Paresis - etiology ; Paresis - physiopathology ; Paresis - rehabilitation ; Recovery of Function ; Robotics - methods ; Robotics - utilization ; Stroke - complications ; Stroke - physiopathology ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; Treatment Outcome ; Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2009-07, Vol.23 (6), p.559-568</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3bf9c58efadbae8376d69bfc76da1e407132d5cfc1280144b9e6df47cd0a21253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3bf9c58efadbae8376d69bfc76da1e407132d5cfc1280144b9e6df47cd0a21253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1545968308328718$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1545968308328718$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19190087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, C.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burridge, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chappell, P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewin, P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke</title><title>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</title><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><description>Background. An inability to perform tasks involving reaching is a common problem following stroke. Evidence supports the use of robotic therapy and functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce upper limb impairments, but current systems may not encourage maximal voluntary contribution from the participant because assistance is not responsive to performance. Objective. This study aimed to investigate whether iterative learning control (ILC) mediated by FES is a feasible intervention in upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Methods. Five hemiparetic participants with reduced upper limb function who were at least 6 months poststroke were recruited from the community. No participants withdrew. Intervention. Participants undertook supported tracking tasks using 27 different trajectories augmented by responsive FES to their triceps brachii muscle, with their hand movement constrained in a 2-dimensional plane by a robot. Eighteen 1-hour treatment sessions were used with 2 participants receiving an additional 7 treatment sessions. Outcome measures. The primary functional outcome measure was the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Impairment measures included the upper limb Fugl— Meyer Assessment (FMA), tests of motor control (tracking accuracy), and isometric force. Results. Compliance was excellent and there were no adverse events. Statistically significant improvements were measured (P ≤ .05) in FMA motor score, unassisted tracking for 3 out of 4 trajectories, and in isometric force over 5 out of 6 directions. Changes in ARAT were not statistically significant. Conclusion. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using ILC mediated by FES for upper limb stroke rehabilitation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Paresis - etiology</subject><subject>Paresis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Paresis - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Robotics - methods</subject><subject>Robotics - utilization</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><issn>1545-9683</issn><issn>1552-6844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAURoMovveuJCt31bzapEsZHBVGBB_rkqY3Gu00mqTC_HtTZkAQxNW98J17FvdD6ISSc0qlvKClKOtKcaI4U5KqLbRPy5IVlRJie9pFWUz5HjqI8Y0QxlVNdtEerWlNiJL76HMOOrrW9S6tsLf4NkHQyX0BXoAOgxte8MwPKfge30HndIIOtys8HweTnB90j696MCk4k9fH5JZjr6cAWx_wA2jzOikubdbmOPh3OEI7VvcRjjfzED3Pr55mN8Xi_vp2drkojCAqFby1tSkVWN21GhSXVVfVrTV5agqCSMpZVxprKFOECtHWUHVWSNMRzSgr-SE6W3s_gv8cIaZm6aKBvtcD-DE2leQ150r9CzIqMiVZBskaNMHHGMA2H8EtdVg1lDRTH83vPvLJ6cY9tkvofg42BWSgWANRv0Dz5seQfxr_Fn4DRu6UJg</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Hughes, A.M.</creator><creator>Freeman, C.T.</creator><creator>Burridge, J.H.</creator><creator>Chappell, P.H.</creator><creator>Lewin, P.L.</creator><creator>Rogers, E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke</title><author>Hughes, A.M. ; Freeman, C.T. ; Burridge, J.H. ; Chappell, P.H. ; Lewin, P.L. ; Rogers, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3bf9c58efadbae8376d69bfc76da1e407132d5cfc1280144b9e6df47cd0a21253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Paresis - etiology</topic><topic>Paresis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Paresis - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Robotics - methods</topic><topic>Robotics - utilization</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, C.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burridge, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chappell, P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewin, P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes, A.M.</au><au>Freeman, C.T.</au><au>Burridge, J.H.</au><au>Chappell, P.H.</au><au>Lewin, P.L.</au><au>Rogers, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke</atitle><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</jtitle><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>559</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>559-568</pages><issn>1545-9683</issn><eissn>1552-6844</eissn><abstract>Background. An inability to perform tasks involving reaching is a common problem following stroke. Evidence supports the use of robotic therapy and functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce upper limb impairments, but current systems may not encourage maximal voluntary contribution from the participant because assistance is not responsive to performance. Objective. This study aimed to investigate whether iterative learning control (ILC) mediated by FES is a feasible intervention in upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Methods. Five hemiparetic participants with reduced upper limb function who were at least 6 months poststroke were recruited from the community. No participants withdrew. Intervention. Participants undertook supported tracking tasks using 27 different trajectories augmented by responsive FES to their triceps brachii muscle, with their hand movement constrained in a 2-dimensional plane by a robot. Eighteen 1-hour treatment sessions were used with 2 participants receiving an additional 7 treatment sessions. Outcome measures. The primary functional outcome measure was the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Impairment measures included the upper limb Fugl— Meyer Assessment (FMA), tests of motor control (tracking accuracy), and isometric force. Results. Compliance was excellent and there were no adverse events. Statistically significant improvements were measured (P ≤ .05) in FMA motor score, unassisted tracking for 3 out of 4 trajectories, and in isometric force over 5 out of 6 directions. Changes in ARAT were not statistically significant. Conclusion. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using ILC mediated by FES for upper limb stroke rehabilitation.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>19190087</pmid><doi>10.1177/1545968308328718</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1545-9683 |
ispartof | Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2009-07, Vol.23 (6), p.559-568 |
issn | 1545-9683 1552-6844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67393388 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods Female Humans Male Middle Aged Motor Activity Paresis - etiology Paresis - physiopathology Paresis - rehabilitation Recovery of Function Robotics - methods Robotics - utilization Stroke - complications Stroke - physiopathology Stroke Rehabilitation Treatment Outcome Upper Extremity - physiopathology |
title | Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A39%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20Iterative%20Learning%20Control%20Mediated%20by%20Functional%20Electrical%20Stimulation%20for%20Reaching%20After%20Stroke&rft.jtitle=Neurorehabilitation%20and%20neural%20repair&rft.au=Hughes,%20A.M.&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=559&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=559-568&rft.issn=1545-9683&rft.eissn=1552-6844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1545968308328718&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67393388%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21488372&rft_id=info:pmid/19190087&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1545968308328718&rfr_iscdi=true |