Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke

Background. An inability to perform tasks involving reaching is a common problem following stroke. Evidence supports the use of robotic therapy and functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce upper limb impairments, but current systems may not encourage maximal voluntary contribution from the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 2009-07, Vol.23 (6), p.559-568
Hauptverfasser: Hughes, A.M., Freeman, C.T., Burridge, J.H., Chappell, P.H., Lewin, P.L., Rogers, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 568
container_issue 6
container_start_page 559
container_title Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
container_volume 23
creator Hughes, A.M.
Freeman, C.T.
Burridge, J.H.
Chappell, P.H.
Lewin, P.L.
Rogers, E.
description Background. An inability to perform tasks involving reaching is a common problem following stroke. Evidence supports the use of robotic therapy and functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce upper limb impairments, but current systems may not encourage maximal voluntary contribution from the participant because assistance is not responsive to performance. Objective. This study aimed to investigate whether iterative learning control (ILC) mediated by FES is a feasible intervention in upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Methods. Five hemiparetic participants with reduced upper limb function who were at least 6 months poststroke were recruited from the community. No participants withdrew. Intervention. Participants undertook supported tracking tasks using 27 different trajectories augmented by responsive FES to their triceps brachii muscle, with their hand movement constrained in a 2-dimensional plane by a robot. Eighteen 1-hour treatment sessions were used with 2 participants receiving an additional 7 treatment sessions. Outcome measures. The primary functional outcome measure was the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Impairment measures included the upper limb Fugl— Meyer Assessment (FMA), tests of motor control (tracking accuracy), and isometric force. Results. Compliance was excellent and there were no adverse events. Statistically significant improvements were measured (P ≤ .05) in FMA motor score, unassisted tracking for 3 out of 4 trajectories, and in isometric force over 5 out of 6 directions. Changes in ARAT were not statistically significant. Conclusion. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using ILC mediated by FES for upper limb stroke rehabilitation.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1545968308328718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67393388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1545968308328718</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67393388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3bf9c58efadbae8376d69bfc76da1e407132d5cfc1280144b9e6df47cd0a21253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAURoMovveuJCt31bzapEsZHBVGBB_rkqY3Gu00mqTC_HtTZkAQxNW98J17FvdD6ISSc0qlvKClKOtKcaI4U5KqLbRPy5IVlRJie9pFWUz5HjqI8Y0QxlVNdtEerWlNiJL76HMOOrrW9S6tsLf4NkHQyX0BXoAOgxte8MwPKfge30HndIIOtys8HweTnB90j696MCk4k9fH5JZjr6cAWx_wA2jzOikubdbmOPh3OEI7VvcRjjfzED3Pr55mN8Xi_vp2drkojCAqFby1tSkVWN21GhSXVVfVrTV5agqCSMpZVxprKFOECtHWUHVWSNMRzSgr-SE6W3s_gv8cIaZm6aKBvtcD-DE2leQ150r9CzIqMiVZBskaNMHHGMA2H8EtdVg1lDRTH83vPvLJ6cY9tkvofg42BWSgWANRv0Dz5seQfxr_Fn4DRu6UJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21488372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hughes, A.M. ; Freeman, C.T. ; Burridge, J.H. ; Chappell, P.H. ; Lewin, P.L. ; Rogers, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes, A.M. ; Freeman, C.T. ; Burridge, J.H. ; Chappell, P.H. ; Lewin, P.L. ; Rogers, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. An inability to perform tasks involving reaching is a common problem following stroke. Evidence supports the use of robotic therapy and functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce upper limb impairments, but current systems may not encourage maximal voluntary contribution from the participant because assistance is not responsive to performance. Objective. This study aimed to investigate whether iterative learning control (ILC) mediated by FES is a feasible intervention in upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Methods. Five hemiparetic participants with reduced upper limb function who were at least 6 months poststroke were recruited from the community. No participants withdrew. Intervention. Participants undertook supported tracking tasks using 27 different trajectories augmented by responsive FES to their triceps brachii muscle, with their hand movement constrained in a 2-dimensional plane by a robot. Eighteen 1-hour treatment sessions were used with 2 participants receiving an additional 7 treatment sessions. Outcome measures. The primary functional outcome measure was the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Impairment measures included the upper limb Fugl— Meyer Assessment (FMA), tests of motor control (tracking accuracy), and isometric force. Results. Compliance was excellent and there were no adverse events. Statistically significant improvements were measured (P ≤ .05) in FMA motor score, unassisted tracking for 3 out of 4 trajectories, and in isometric force over 5 out of 6 directions. Changes in ARAT were not statistically significant. Conclusion. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using ILC mediated by FES for upper limb stroke rehabilitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-9683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1545968308328718</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19190087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; Paresis - etiology ; Paresis - physiopathology ; Paresis - rehabilitation ; Recovery of Function ; Robotics - methods ; Robotics - utilization ; Stroke - complications ; Stroke - physiopathology ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; Treatment Outcome ; Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2009-07, Vol.23 (6), p.559-568</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3bf9c58efadbae8376d69bfc76da1e407132d5cfc1280144b9e6df47cd0a21253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3bf9c58efadbae8376d69bfc76da1e407132d5cfc1280144b9e6df47cd0a21253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1545968308328718$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1545968308328718$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19190087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, C.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burridge, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chappell, P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewin, P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke</title><title>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</title><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><description>Background. An inability to perform tasks involving reaching is a common problem following stroke. Evidence supports the use of robotic therapy and functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce upper limb impairments, but current systems may not encourage maximal voluntary contribution from the participant because assistance is not responsive to performance. Objective. This study aimed to investigate whether iterative learning control (ILC) mediated by FES is a feasible intervention in upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Methods. Five hemiparetic participants with reduced upper limb function who were at least 6 months poststroke were recruited from the community. No participants withdrew. Intervention. Participants undertook supported tracking tasks using 27 different trajectories augmented by responsive FES to their triceps brachii muscle, with their hand movement constrained in a 2-dimensional plane by a robot. Eighteen 1-hour treatment sessions were used with 2 participants receiving an additional 7 treatment sessions. Outcome measures. The primary functional outcome measure was the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Impairment measures included the upper limb Fugl— Meyer Assessment (FMA), tests of motor control (tracking accuracy), and isometric force. Results. Compliance was excellent and there were no adverse events. Statistically significant improvements were measured (P ≤ .05) in FMA motor score, unassisted tracking for 3 out of 4 trajectories, and in isometric force over 5 out of 6 directions. Changes in ARAT were not statistically significant. Conclusion. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using ILC mediated by FES for upper limb stroke rehabilitation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Paresis - etiology</subject><subject>Paresis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Paresis - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Robotics - methods</subject><subject>Robotics - utilization</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</subject><issn>1545-9683</issn><issn>1552-6844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAURoMovveuJCt31bzapEsZHBVGBB_rkqY3Gu00mqTC_HtTZkAQxNW98J17FvdD6ISSc0qlvKClKOtKcaI4U5KqLbRPy5IVlRJie9pFWUz5HjqI8Y0QxlVNdtEerWlNiJL76HMOOrrW9S6tsLf4NkHQyX0BXoAOgxte8MwPKfge30HndIIOtys8HweTnB90j696MCk4k9fH5JZjr6cAWx_wA2jzOikubdbmOPh3OEI7VvcRjjfzED3Pr55mN8Xi_vp2drkojCAqFby1tSkVWN21GhSXVVfVrTV5agqCSMpZVxprKFOECtHWUHVWSNMRzSgr-SE6W3s_gv8cIaZm6aKBvtcD-DE2leQ150r9CzIqMiVZBskaNMHHGMA2H8EtdVg1lDRTH83vPvLJ6cY9tkvofg42BWSgWANRv0Dz5seQfxr_Fn4DRu6UJg</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Hughes, A.M.</creator><creator>Freeman, C.T.</creator><creator>Burridge, J.H.</creator><creator>Chappell, P.H.</creator><creator>Lewin, P.L.</creator><creator>Rogers, E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke</title><author>Hughes, A.M. ; Freeman, C.T. ; Burridge, J.H. ; Chappell, P.H. ; Lewin, P.L. ; Rogers, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3bf9c58efadbae8376d69bfc76da1e407132d5cfc1280144b9e6df47cd0a21253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Paresis - etiology</topic><topic>Paresis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Paresis - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Robotics - methods</topic><topic>Robotics - utilization</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, C.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burridge, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chappell, P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewin, P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes, A.M.</au><au>Freeman, C.T.</au><au>Burridge, J.H.</au><au>Chappell, P.H.</au><au>Lewin, P.L.</au><au>Rogers, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke</atitle><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</jtitle><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>559</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>559-568</pages><issn>1545-9683</issn><eissn>1552-6844</eissn><abstract>Background. An inability to perform tasks involving reaching is a common problem following stroke. Evidence supports the use of robotic therapy and functional electrical stimulation (FES) to reduce upper limb impairments, but current systems may not encourage maximal voluntary contribution from the participant because assistance is not responsive to performance. Objective. This study aimed to investigate whether iterative learning control (ILC) mediated by FES is a feasible intervention in upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Methods. Five hemiparetic participants with reduced upper limb function who were at least 6 months poststroke were recruited from the community. No participants withdrew. Intervention. Participants undertook supported tracking tasks using 27 different trajectories augmented by responsive FES to their triceps brachii muscle, with their hand movement constrained in a 2-dimensional plane by a robot. Eighteen 1-hour treatment sessions were used with 2 participants receiving an additional 7 treatment sessions. Outcome measures. The primary functional outcome measure was the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Impairment measures included the upper limb Fugl— Meyer Assessment (FMA), tests of motor control (tracking accuracy), and isometric force. Results. Compliance was excellent and there were no adverse events. Statistically significant improvements were measured (P ≤ .05) in FMA motor score, unassisted tracking for 3 out of 4 trajectories, and in isometric force over 5 out of 6 directions. Changes in ARAT were not statistically significant. Conclusion. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using ILC mediated by FES for upper limb stroke rehabilitation.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>19190087</pmid><doi>10.1177/1545968308328718</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1545-9683
ispartof Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2009-07, Vol.23 (6), p.559-568
issn 1545-9683
1552-6844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67393388
source MEDLINE; SAGE Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motor Activity
Paresis - etiology
Paresis - physiopathology
Paresis - rehabilitation
Recovery of Function
Robotics - methods
Robotics - utilization
Stroke - complications
Stroke - physiopathology
Stroke Rehabilitation
Treatment Outcome
Upper Extremity - physiopathology
title Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A39%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20Iterative%20Learning%20Control%20Mediated%20by%20Functional%20Electrical%20Stimulation%20for%20Reaching%20After%20Stroke&rft.jtitle=Neurorehabilitation%20and%20neural%20repair&rft.au=Hughes,%20A.M.&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=559&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=559-568&rft.issn=1545-9683&rft.eissn=1552-6844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1545968308328718&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67393388%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21488372&rft_id=info:pmid/19190087&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1545968308328718&rfr_iscdi=true