Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi

Abstract Variations in surface electromyography (SEMG) amplitude have been shown to be dependent on the dislocation of recording electrodes. Yet no literature is available about the effect of electrode dislocation on SEMG amplitude of the lower back muscles. In this project, the aim was to determine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electromyography and kinesiology 2009-08, Vol.19 (4), p.e257-e266
Hauptverfasser: De Nooij, R, Kallenberg, L.A.C, Hermens, H.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e266
container_issue 4
container_start_page e257
container_title Journal of electromyography and kinesiology
container_volume 19
creator De Nooij, R
Kallenberg, L.A.C
Hermens, H.J
description Abstract Variations in surface electromyography (SEMG) amplitude have been shown to be dependent on the dislocation of recording electrodes. Yet no literature is available about the effect of electrode dislocation on SEMG amplitude of the lower back muscles. In this project, the aim was to determine this effect by investigating changes in the SEMG root mean square (RMS), induced by a well-defined dislocation of the recording electrodes. Bipolar SEMG of the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles was measured in 16 healthy subjects undertaking five functional tasks (standing, forward flexion, re-extension, unsupported sitting and arm/leg lifting), and for eight of those subjects the experiment was repeated within two weeks. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to show the reliability of the RMS in relation to electrode dislocation, the repeatability of the tasks, and the test–retest reliability. Results showed that: (1) lateral dislocation causes a significant decrease (18%, p < 0.001) in RMS; (2) longitudinal dislocation does not change the RMS; and (3) the variability caused by electrode dislocation is comparable to the variability caused by repetitions of tasks or by electrode repositioning. Our conclusion is that positioning in the mediolateral direction should be exact to minimize changes in SEMG amplitude due to dislocation. However, precise longitudinal electrode positioning seems to be less critical in experimental setups which measure the SEMG of the lower back muscles.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67368838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1050641108000503</els_id><sourcerecordid>67368838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-d6a8277ab0f1d8dca795aca6a96e427ae007396b0ed6e555405c39a94ab79d253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhq0K1Ja2PwHkE7eEcbz-yAWEqqUgFXEAzpbXnhSnSRzspFL_PY52JSQuSJY8h-ed0TxDyGsGNQMm3_V1jwM-hqluAHQNvAbGz8gl04pXQjH2otQgoJI7xi7Iq5x7AKZAwzm5YFoI2TBxSdL-yQ6rXcL0QJdfSLHr0C00drR0d0uKHukQXQHiRMvLa-qsQ7r_ekftOA9hWQtR8C081hRTScVE8xwmi3SuS3p6CDmHcc3Ux5TDNXnZ2SHjzem_Ij8_7X_cfq7uv919uf14XznO-VJ5aXWjlD1Ax7z2zqpWWGelbSXuGmURQPFWHgC9RCHEDoTjrW139qBa3wh-Rd4e-84p_l4xL2YM2eEw2Anjmo1UXGrNdQHFEXQp5pywM3MKo03PhoHZZJvenGSbTbYBborskntzGrAeRvR_Uye7BfhwBLCs-RQwmewCTg592DQZH8N_R7z_p4MbwhScHR7xGXMf1zQVh4aZ3Bgw37eLbwcvZ4ZScv4HekGopA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67368838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>De Nooij, R ; Kallenberg, L.A.C ; Hermens, H.J</creator><creatorcontrib>De Nooij, R ; Kallenberg, L.A.C ; Hermens, H.J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Variations in surface electromyography (SEMG) amplitude have been shown to be dependent on the dislocation of recording electrodes. Yet no literature is available about the effect of electrode dislocation on SEMG amplitude of the lower back muscles. In this project, the aim was to determine this effect by investigating changes in the SEMG root mean square (RMS), induced by a well-defined dislocation of the recording electrodes. Bipolar SEMG of the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles was measured in 16 healthy subjects undertaking five functional tasks (standing, forward flexion, re-extension, unsupported sitting and arm/leg lifting), and for eight of those subjects the experiment was repeated within two weeks. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to show the reliability of the RMS in relation to electrode dislocation, the repeatability of the tasks, and the test–retest reliability. Results showed that: (1) lateral dislocation causes a significant decrease (18%, p &lt; 0.001) in RMS; (2) longitudinal dislocation does not change the RMS; and (3) the variability caused by electrode dislocation is comparable to the variability caused by repetitions of tasks or by electrode repositioning. Our conclusion is that positioning in the mediolateral direction should be exact to minimize changes in SEMG amplitude due to dislocation. However, precise longitudinal electrode positioning seems to be less critical in experimental setups which measure the SEMG of the lower back muscles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-6411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18556215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Back - physiology ; Electrode positioning ; Electrodes ; Electromyography - instrumentation ; Electromyography - methods ; Erector spinae ; Humans ; Lower back muscles ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surface electromyography</subject><ispartof>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2009-08, Vol.19 (4), p.e257-e266</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-d6a8277ab0f1d8dca795aca6a96e427ae007396b0ed6e555405c39a94ab79d253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-d6a8277ab0f1d8dca795aca6a96e427ae007396b0ed6e555405c39a94ab79d253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18556215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Nooij, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallenberg, L.A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermens, H.J</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi</title><title>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</title><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Variations in surface electromyography (SEMG) amplitude have been shown to be dependent on the dislocation of recording electrodes. Yet no literature is available about the effect of electrode dislocation on SEMG amplitude of the lower back muscles. In this project, the aim was to determine this effect by investigating changes in the SEMG root mean square (RMS), induced by a well-defined dislocation of the recording electrodes. Bipolar SEMG of the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles was measured in 16 healthy subjects undertaking five functional tasks (standing, forward flexion, re-extension, unsupported sitting and arm/leg lifting), and for eight of those subjects the experiment was repeated within two weeks. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to show the reliability of the RMS in relation to electrode dislocation, the repeatability of the tasks, and the test–retest reliability. Results showed that: (1) lateral dislocation causes a significant decrease (18%, p &lt; 0.001) in RMS; (2) longitudinal dislocation does not change the RMS; and (3) the variability caused by electrode dislocation is comparable to the variability caused by repetitions of tasks or by electrode repositioning. Our conclusion is that positioning in the mediolateral direction should be exact to minimize changes in SEMG amplitude due to dislocation. However, precise longitudinal electrode positioning seems to be less critical in experimental setups which measure the SEMG of the lower back muscles.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Back - physiology</subject><subject>Electrode positioning</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electromyography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Erector spinae</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lower back muscles</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surface electromyography</subject><issn>1050-6411</issn><issn>1873-5711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhq0K1Ja2PwHkE7eEcbz-yAWEqqUgFXEAzpbXnhSnSRzspFL_PY52JSQuSJY8h-ed0TxDyGsGNQMm3_V1jwM-hqluAHQNvAbGz8gl04pXQjH2otQgoJI7xi7Iq5x7AKZAwzm5YFoI2TBxSdL-yQ6rXcL0QJdfSLHr0C00drR0d0uKHukQXQHiRMvLa-qsQ7r_ekftOA9hWQtR8C081hRTScVE8xwmi3SuS3p6CDmHcc3Ux5TDNXnZ2SHjzem_Ij8_7X_cfq7uv919uf14XznO-VJ5aXWjlD1Ax7z2zqpWWGelbSXuGmURQPFWHgC9RCHEDoTjrW139qBa3wh-Rd4e-84p_l4xL2YM2eEw2Anjmo1UXGrNdQHFEXQp5pywM3MKo03PhoHZZJvenGSbTbYBborskntzGrAeRvR_Uye7BfhwBLCs-RQwmewCTg592DQZH8N_R7z_p4MbwhScHR7xGXMf1zQVh4aZ3Bgw37eLbwcvZ4ZScv4HekGopA</recordid><startdate>200908</startdate><enddate>200908</enddate><creator>De Nooij, R</creator><creator>Kallenberg, L.A.C</creator><creator>Hermens, H.J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200908</creationdate><title>Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi</title><author>De Nooij, R ; Kallenberg, L.A.C ; Hermens, H.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-d6a8277ab0f1d8dca795aca6a96e427ae007396b0ed6e555405c39a94ab79d253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Back - physiology</topic><topic>Electrode positioning</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electromyography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Erector spinae</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lower back muscles</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surface electromyography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Nooij, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallenberg, L.A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermens, H.J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Nooij, R</au><au>Kallenberg, L.A.C</au><au>Hermens, H.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><date>2009-08</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e257</spage><epage>e266</epage><pages>e257-e266</pages><issn>1050-6411</issn><eissn>1873-5711</eissn><abstract>Abstract Variations in surface electromyography (SEMG) amplitude have been shown to be dependent on the dislocation of recording electrodes. Yet no literature is available about the effect of electrode dislocation on SEMG amplitude of the lower back muscles. In this project, the aim was to determine this effect by investigating changes in the SEMG root mean square (RMS), induced by a well-defined dislocation of the recording electrodes. Bipolar SEMG of the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles was measured in 16 healthy subjects undertaking five functional tasks (standing, forward flexion, re-extension, unsupported sitting and arm/leg lifting), and for eight of those subjects the experiment was repeated within two weeks. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to show the reliability of the RMS in relation to electrode dislocation, the repeatability of the tasks, and the test–retest reliability. Results showed that: (1) lateral dislocation causes a significant decrease (18%, p &lt; 0.001) in RMS; (2) longitudinal dislocation does not change the RMS; and (3) the variability caused by electrode dislocation is comparable to the variability caused by repetitions of tasks or by electrode repositioning. Our conclusion is that positioning in the mediolateral direction should be exact to minimize changes in SEMG amplitude due to dislocation. However, precise longitudinal electrode positioning seems to be less critical in experimental setups which measure the SEMG of the lower back muscles.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18556215</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.013</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-6411
ispartof Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2009-08, Vol.19 (4), p.e257-e266
issn 1050-6411
1873-5711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67368838
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Back - physiology
Electrode positioning
Electrodes
Electromyography - instrumentation
Electromyography - methods
Erector spinae
Humans
Lower back muscles
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surface electromyography
title Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T18%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20effect%20of%20electrode%20location%20on%20surface%20EMG%20amplitude%20of%20the%20m.%20erector%20spinae%20p.%20longissimus%20dorsi&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electromyography%20and%20kinesiology&rft.au=De%20Nooij,%20R&rft.date=2009-08&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e257&rft.epage=e266&rft.pages=e257-e266&rft.issn=1050-6411&rft.eissn=1873-5711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67368838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67368838&rft_id=info:pmid/18556215&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1050641108000503&rfr_iscdi=true