Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi
Abstract Variations in surface electromyography (SEMG) amplitude have been shown to be dependent on the dislocation of recording electrodes. Yet no literature is available about the effect of electrode dislocation on SEMG amplitude of the lower back muscles. In this project, the aim was to determine...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of electromyography and kinesiology 2009-08, Vol.19 (4), p.e257-e266 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e266 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e257 |
container_title | Journal of electromyography and kinesiology |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | De Nooij, R Kallenberg, L.A.C Hermens, H.J |
description | Abstract Variations in surface electromyography (SEMG) amplitude have been shown to be dependent on the dislocation of recording electrodes. Yet no literature is available about the effect of electrode dislocation on SEMG amplitude of the lower back muscles. In this project, the aim was to determine this effect by investigating changes in the SEMG root mean square (RMS), induced by a well-defined dislocation of the recording electrodes. Bipolar SEMG of the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles was measured in 16 healthy subjects undertaking five functional tasks (standing, forward flexion, re-extension, unsupported sitting and arm/leg lifting), and for eight of those subjects the experiment was repeated within two weeks. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to show the reliability of the RMS in relation to electrode dislocation, the repeatability of the tasks, and the test–retest reliability. Results showed that: (1) lateral dislocation causes a significant decrease (18%, p < 0.001) in RMS; (2) longitudinal dislocation does not change the RMS; and (3) the variability caused by electrode dislocation is comparable to the variability caused by repetitions of tasks or by electrode repositioning. Our conclusion is that positioning in the mediolateral direction should be exact to minimize changes in SEMG amplitude due to dislocation. However, precise longitudinal electrode positioning seems to be less critical in experimental setups which measure the SEMG of the lower back muscles. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67368838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1050641108000503</els_id><sourcerecordid>67368838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-d6a8277ab0f1d8dca795aca6a96e427ae007396b0ed6e555405c39a94ab79d253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhq0K1Ja2PwHkE7eEcbz-yAWEqqUgFXEAzpbXnhSnSRzspFL_PY52JSQuSJY8h-ed0TxDyGsGNQMm3_V1jwM-hqluAHQNvAbGz8gl04pXQjH2otQgoJI7xi7Iq5x7AKZAwzm5YFoI2TBxSdL-yQ6rXcL0QJdfSLHr0C00drR0d0uKHukQXQHiRMvLa-qsQ7r_ekftOA9hWQtR8C081hRTScVE8xwmi3SuS3p6CDmHcc3Ux5TDNXnZ2SHjzem_Ij8_7X_cfq7uv919uf14XznO-VJ5aXWjlD1Ax7z2zqpWWGelbSXuGmURQPFWHgC9RCHEDoTjrW139qBa3wh-Rd4e-84p_l4xL2YM2eEw2Anjmo1UXGrNdQHFEXQp5pywM3MKo03PhoHZZJvenGSbTbYBborskntzGrAeRvR_Uye7BfhwBLCs-RQwmewCTg592DQZH8N_R7z_p4MbwhScHR7xGXMf1zQVh4aZ3Bgw37eLbwcvZ4ZScv4HekGopA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67368838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>De Nooij, R ; Kallenberg, L.A.C ; Hermens, H.J</creator><creatorcontrib>De Nooij, R ; Kallenberg, L.A.C ; Hermens, H.J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Variations in surface electromyography (SEMG) amplitude have been shown to be dependent on the dislocation of recording electrodes. Yet no literature is available about the effect of electrode dislocation on SEMG amplitude of the lower back muscles. In this project, the aim was to determine this effect by investigating changes in the SEMG root mean square (RMS), induced by a well-defined dislocation of the recording electrodes. Bipolar SEMG of the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles was measured in 16 healthy subjects undertaking five functional tasks (standing, forward flexion, re-extension, unsupported sitting and arm/leg lifting), and for eight of those subjects the experiment was repeated within two weeks. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to show the reliability of the RMS in relation to electrode dislocation, the repeatability of the tasks, and the test–retest reliability. Results showed that: (1) lateral dislocation causes a significant decrease (18%, p < 0.001) in RMS; (2) longitudinal dislocation does not change the RMS; and (3) the variability caused by electrode dislocation is comparable to the variability caused by repetitions of tasks or by electrode repositioning. Our conclusion is that positioning in the mediolateral direction should be exact to minimize changes in SEMG amplitude due to dislocation. However, precise longitudinal electrode positioning seems to be less critical in experimental setups which measure the SEMG of the lower back muscles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-6411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18556215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Back - physiology ; Electrode positioning ; Electrodes ; Electromyography - instrumentation ; Electromyography - methods ; Erector spinae ; Humans ; Lower back muscles ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surface electromyography</subject><ispartof>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2009-08, Vol.19 (4), p.e257-e266</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-d6a8277ab0f1d8dca795aca6a96e427ae007396b0ed6e555405c39a94ab79d253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-d6a8277ab0f1d8dca795aca6a96e427ae007396b0ed6e555405c39a94ab79d253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18556215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Nooij, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallenberg, L.A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermens, H.J</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi</title><title>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</title><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Variations in surface electromyography (SEMG) amplitude have been shown to be dependent on the dislocation of recording electrodes. Yet no literature is available about the effect of electrode dislocation on SEMG amplitude of the lower back muscles. In this project, the aim was to determine this effect by investigating changes in the SEMG root mean square (RMS), induced by a well-defined dislocation of the recording electrodes. Bipolar SEMG of the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles was measured in 16 healthy subjects undertaking five functional tasks (standing, forward flexion, re-extension, unsupported sitting and arm/leg lifting), and for eight of those subjects the experiment was repeated within two weeks. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to show the reliability of the RMS in relation to electrode dislocation, the repeatability of the tasks, and the test–retest reliability. Results showed that: (1) lateral dislocation causes a significant decrease (18%, p < 0.001) in RMS; (2) longitudinal dislocation does not change the RMS; and (3) the variability caused by electrode dislocation is comparable to the variability caused by repetitions of tasks or by electrode repositioning. Our conclusion is that positioning in the mediolateral direction should be exact to minimize changes in SEMG amplitude due to dislocation. However, precise longitudinal electrode positioning seems to be less critical in experimental setups which measure the SEMG of the lower back muscles.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Back - physiology</subject><subject>Electrode positioning</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electromyography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Erector spinae</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lower back muscles</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surface electromyography</subject><issn>1050-6411</issn><issn>1873-5711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhq0K1Ja2PwHkE7eEcbz-yAWEqqUgFXEAzpbXnhSnSRzspFL_PY52JSQuSJY8h-ed0TxDyGsGNQMm3_V1jwM-hqluAHQNvAbGz8gl04pXQjH2otQgoJI7xi7Iq5x7AKZAwzm5YFoI2TBxSdL-yQ6rXcL0QJdfSLHr0C00drR0d0uKHukQXQHiRMvLa-qsQ7r_ekftOA9hWQtR8C081hRTScVE8xwmi3SuS3p6CDmHcc3Ux5TDNXnZ2SHjzem_Ij8_7X_cfq7uv919uf14XznO-VJ5aXWjlD1Ax7z2zqpWWGelbSXuGmURQPFWHgC9RCHEDoTjrW139qBa3wh-Rd4e-84p_l4xL2YM2eEw2Anjmo1UXGrNdQHFEXQp5pywM3MKo03PhoHZZJvenGSbTbYBborskntzGrAeRvR_Uye7BfhwBLCs-RQwmewCTg592DQZH8N_R7z_p4MbwhScHR7xGXMf1zQVh4aZ3Bgw37eLbwcvZ4ZScv4HekGopA</recordid><startdate>200908</startdate><enddate>200908</enddate><creator>De Nooij, R</creator><creator>Kallenberg, L.A.C</creator><creator>Hermens, H.J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200908</creationdate><title>Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi</title><author>De Nooij, R ; Kallenberg, L.A.C ; Hermens, H.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-d6a8277ab0f1d8dca795aca6a96e427ae007396b0ed6e555405c39a94ab79d253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Back - physiology</topic><topic>Electrode positioning</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electromyography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Erector spinae</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lower back muscles</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surface electromyography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Nooij, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallenberg, L.A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermens, H.J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Nooij, R</au><au>Kallenberg, L.A.C</au><au>Hermens, H.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><date>2009-08</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e257</spage><epage>e266</epage><pages>e257-e266</pages><issn>1050-6411</issn><eissn>1873-5711</eissn><abstract>Abstract Variations in surface electromyography (SEMG) amplitude have been shown to be dependent on the dislocation of recording electrodes. Yet no literature is available about the effect of electrode dislocation on SEMG amplitude of the lower back muscles. In this project, the aim was to determine this effect by investigating changes in the SEMG root mean square (RMS), induced by a well-defined dislocation of the recording electrodes. Bipolar SEMG of the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles was measured in 16 healthy subjects undertaking five functional tasks (standing, forward flexion, re-extension, unsupported sitting and arm/leg lifting), and for eight of those subjects the experiment was repeated within two weeks. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to show the reliability of the RMS in relation to electrode dislocation, the repeatability of the tasks, and the test–retest reliability. Results showed that: (1) lateral dislocation causes a significant decrease (18%, p < 0.001) in RMS; (2) longitudinal dislocation does not change the RMS; and (3) the variability caused by electrode dislocation is comparable to the variability caused by repetitions of tasks or by electrode repositioning. Our conclusion is that positioning in the mediolateral direction should be exact to minimize changes in SEMG amplitude due to dislocation. However, precise longitudinal electrode positioning seems to be less critical in experimental setups which measure the SEMG of the lower back muscles.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18556215</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.013</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-6411 |
ispartof | Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2009-08, Vol.19 (4), p.e257-e266 |
issn | 1050-6411 1873-5711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67368838 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Back - physiology Electrode positioning Electrodes Electromyography - instrumentation Electromyography - methods Erector spinae Humans Lower back muscles Muscle Contraction - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reliability Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Surface electromyography |
title | Evaluating the effect of electrode location on surface EMG amplitude of the m. erector spinae p. longissimus dorsi |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T18%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20effect%20of%20electrode%20location%20on%20surface%20EMG%20amplitude%20of%20the%20m.%20erector%20spinae%20p.%20longissimus%20dorsi&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electromyography%20and%20kinesiology&rft.au=De%20Nooij,%20R&rft.date=2009-08&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e257&rft.epage=e266&rft.pages=e257-e266&rft.issn=1050-6411&rft.eissn=1873-5711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67368838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67368838&rft_id=info:pmid/18556215&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1050641108000503&rfr_iscdi=true |