Testing the Theoretical Design of a Health Risk Message: Reexamining the Major Tenets of the Extended Parallel Process Model
This study examined the fear control/danger control responses that are predicted by the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). In a campaign designed to inform college students about the symptoms and dangers of meningitis, participants were given either a high-threat/no-efficacy or high-efficacy/no...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Health education & behavior 2005-02, Vol.32 (1), p.27-41 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 41 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 27 |
| container_title | Health education & behavior |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Gore, Thomas D. Bracken, Cheryl Campanella |
| description | This study examined the fear control/danger control responses that are predicted by the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). In a campaign designed to inform college students about the symptoms and dangers of meningitis, participants were given either a high-threat/no-efficacy or high-efficacy/no-threat health risk message, thus testing the extreme assumptions of the EPPM. Although the study supports the main predictions of the EPPM in the context of meningitis, the results provide new evidence that only a marginal amount of threat is necessary in a health risk message to move the target audience toward the desired protective measures. In addition, the results also suggest that the messages containing only threat may only scare the target audience further into fear control. Implications and future research are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1090198104266901 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67352103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ824245</ericid><jstor_id>45055159</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1090198104266901</sage_id><sourcerecordid>45055159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-9a32b8bd319d4f5bc6ae20fe60c10593c7db263f017ad7e376e545d57334436c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxS1ERcvCnQMgC6ncAv52wg21WwrqiqpazpFjT3a9ZOPWzkqtxB-Po2xbVImTR36_9zyeQegNJZ8o1fozJRWhVUmJYErl8hk6olKyQlGmn-c6y8WoH6KXKW0IIRmSL9AhlUowLdkR-rOENPh-hYc14OUaQoTBW9PhU0h-1ePQYoPPwXTDGl_59BsvICWzgi_4CuDWbH1_b16YTYh4CT0MabSNd_PbAXoHDl-aaLoOOnwZg80JeBEcdK_QQWu6BK_35wz9OpsvT86Li5_fvp98vSisJHQoKsNZUzaO08qJVjZWGWCkBUUsJbLiVruGKd4Sqo3TwLUCKaSTmnMhuLJ8hj5Oudcx3Ozyh-utTxa6zvQQdqlWmktGCc_ghyfgJuxin3uraaV4KXV-Z4bIBNkYUorQ1tfRb028qympx7XUT9eSLe_3ubtmC-7RsN9DBo73gEl5-m00vfXpkVNK6pKXmXs7cRC9fZDnP0ommJBZLiZ5XNE_vf-_r3cTv0lDiA95QhIpaZ7sXwR3swk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196385726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing the Theoretical Design of a Health Risk Message: Reexamining the Major Tenets of the Extended Parallel Process Model</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gore, Thomas D. ; Bracken, Cheryl Campanella</creator><creatorcontrib>Gore, Thomas D. ; Bracken, Cheryl Campanella</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the fear control/danger control responses that are predicted by the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). In a campaign designed to inform college students about the symptoms and dangers of meningitis, participants were given either a high-threat/no-efficacy or high-efficacy/no-threat health risk message, thus testing the extreme assumptions of the EPPM. Although the study supports the main predictions of the EPPM in the context of meningitis, the results provide new evidence that only a marginal amount of threat is necessary in a health risk message to move the target audience toward the desired protective measures. In addition, the results also suggest that the messages containing only threat may only scare the target audience further into fear control. Implications and future research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-1981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1090198104266901</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15642752</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HEDBFS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; At Risk Students ; Audiences ; Biological and medical sciences ; College Students ; Defense Mechanisms ; Diseases ; Fear ; Fear - psychology ; Female ; Health Education ; Health Promotion - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Meningitis ; Meningitis, Bacterial - prevention & control ; Miscellaneous ; Models, Psychological ; Pretests Posttests ; Public Health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Management ; Risk-Taking ; Self Efficacy ; Students - psychology ; Studies ; Universities</subject><ispartof>Health education & behavior, 2005-02, Vol.32 (1), p.27-41</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Society for Public Health Education</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-9a32b8bd319d4f5bc6ae20fe60c10593c7db263f017ad7e376e545d57334436c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-9a32b8bd319d4f5bc6ae20fe60c10593c7db263f017ad7e376e545d57334436c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45055159$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45055159$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ824245$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16657838$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15642752$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gore, Thomas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bracken, Cheryl Campanella</creatorcontrib><title>Testing the Theoretical Design of a Health Risk Message: Reexamining the Major Tenets of the Extended Parallel Process Model</title><title>Health education & behavior</title><addtitle>Health Educ Behav</addtitle><description>This study examined the fear control/danger control responses that are predicted by the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). In a campaign designed to inform college students about the symptoms and dangers of meningitis, participants were given either a high-threat/no-efficacy or high-efficacy/no-threat health risk message, thus testing the extreme assumptions of the EPPM. Although the study supports the main predictions of the EPPM in the context of meningitis, the results provide new evidence that only a marginal amount of threat is necessary in a health risk message to move the target audience toward the desired protective measures. In addition, the results also suggest that the messages containing only threat may only scare the target audience further into fear control. Implications and future research are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>At Risk Students</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Defense Mechanisms</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Fear - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Education</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meningitis</subject><subject>Meningitis, Bacterial - prevention & control</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Management</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>1090-1981</issn><issn>1552-6127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxS1ERcvCnQMgC6ncAv52wg21WwrqiqpazpFjT3a9ZOPWzkqtxB-Po2xbVImTR36_9zyeQegNJZ8o1fozJRWhVUmJYErl8hk6olKyQlGmn-c6y8WoH6KXKW0IIRmSL9AhlUowLdkR-rOENPh-hYc14OUaQoTBW9PhU0h-1ePQYoPPwXTDGl_59BsvICWzgi_4CuDWbH1_b16YTYh4CT0MabSNd_PbAXoHDl-aaLoOOnwZg80JeBEcdK_QQWu6BK_35wz9OpsvT86Li5_fvp98vSisJHQoKsNZUzaO08qJVjZWGWCkBUUsJbLiVruGKd4Sqo3TwLUCKaSTmnMhuLJ8hj5Oudcx3Ozyh-utTxa6zvQQdqlWmktGCc_ghyfgJuxin3uraaV4KXV-Z4bIBNkYUorQ1tfRb028qympx7XUT9eSLe_3ubtmC-7RsN9DBo73gEl5-m00vfXpkVNK6pKXmXs7cRC9fZDnP0ommJBZLiZ5XNE_vf-_r3cTv0lDiA95QhIpaZ7sXwR3swk</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>Gore, Thomas D.</creator><creator>Bracken, Cheryl Campanella</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>Testing the Theoretical Design of a Health Risk Message: Reexamining the Major Tenets of the Extended Parallel Process Model</title><author>Gore, Thomas D. ; Bracken, Cheryl Campanella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-9a32b8bd319d4f5bc6ae20fe60c10593c7db263f017ad7e376e545d57334436c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>At Risk Students</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Defense Mechanisms</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Fear - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Education</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meningitis</topic><topic>Meningitis, Bacterial - prevention & control</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Management</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gore, Thomas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bracken, Cheryl Campanella</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health education & behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gore, Thomas D.</au><au>Bracken, Cheryl Campanella</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ824245</ericid><atitle>Testing the Theoretical Design of a Health Risk Message: Reexamining the Major Tenets of the Extended Parallel Process Model</atitle><jtitle>Health education & behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Health Educ Behav</addtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>27-41</pages><issn>1090-1981</issn><eissn>1552-6127</eissn><coden>HEDBFS</coden><abstract>This study examined the fear control/danger control responses that are predicted by the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). In a campaign designed to inform college students about the symptoms and dangers of meningitis, participants were given either a high-threat/no-efficacy or high-efficacy/no-threat health risk message, thus testing the extreme assumptions of the EPPM. Although the study supports the main predictions of the EPPM in the context of meningitis, the results provide new evidence that only a marginal amount of threat is necessary in a health risk message to move the target audience toward the desired protective measures. In addition, the results also suggest that the messages containing only threat may only scare the target audience further into fear control. Implications and future research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><pmid>15642752</pmid><doi>10.1177/1090198104266901</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1090-1981 |
| ispartof | Health education & behavior, 2005-02, Vol.32 (1), p.27-41 |
| issn | 1090-1981 1552-6127 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67352103 |
| source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult At Risk Students Audiences Biological and medical sciences College Students Defense Mechanisms Diseases Fear Fear - psychology Female Health Education Health Promotion - methods Humans Male Medical sciences Meningitis Meningitis, Bacterial - prevention & control Miscellaneous Models, Psychological Pretests Posttests Public Health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Risk Assessment Risk Management Risk-Taking Self Efficacy Students - psychology Studies Universities |
| title | Testing the Theoretical Design of a Health Risk Message: Reexamining the Major Tenets of the Extended Parallel Process Model |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T08%3A26%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20the%20Theoretical%20Design%20of%20a%20Health%20Risk%20Message:%20Reexamining%20the%20Major%20Tenets%20of%20the%20Extended%20Parallel%20Process%20Model&rft.jtitle=Health%20education%20&%20behavior&rft.au=Gore,%20Thomas%20D.&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=27-41&rft.issn=1090-1981&rft.eissn=1552-6127&rft.coden=HEDBFS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1090198104266901&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45055159%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196385726&rft_id=info:pmid/15642752&rft_ericid=EJ824245&rft_jstor_id=45055159&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1090198104266901&rfr_iscdi=true |