In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics

The objective of the current study was to use fluoroscopy to accurately determine the three-dimensional (3D), in vivo, weight-bearing kinematics of 10 normal and five anterior cruciate ligament deficient (ACLD) knees. Patient-specific bone models were derived from computed tomography (CT) data. 3D c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanics 2005-02, Vol.38 (2), p.241-253
Hauptverfasser: Dennis, Douglas A., Mahfouz, Mohamed R., Komistek, Richard D., Hoff, William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 253
container_issue 2
container_start_page 241
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 38
creator Dennis, Douglas A.
Mahfouz, Mohamed R.
Komistek, Richard D.
Hoff, William
description The objective of the current study was to use fluoroscopy to accurately determine the three-dimensional (3D), in vivo, weight-bearing kinematics of 10 normal and five anterior cruciate ligament deficient (ACLD) knees. Patient-specific bone models were derived from computed tomography (CT) data. 3D computer bone models of each subject's femur, tibia, and fibula were recreated from the CT 3D bone density data. Using a model-based 3D-to-2D imaging technique registered CT images were precisely fit onto fluoroscopic images, the full six degrees of freedom motion of the bones was measured from the images. The computer-generated 3D models of each subject's femur and tibia were precisely registered to the 2D digital fluoroscopic images using an optimization algorithm that automatically adjusts the pose of the model at various flexion/extension angles. Each subject performed a weight-bearing deep knee bend while under dynamic fluoroscopic surveillance. All 10 normal knees experienced posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle and minimal change in position of the medial condyle with progressive knee flexion. The average amount of posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle was 21.07 mm, whereas the average medial condyle translation was 1.94 mm, in the posterior direction. In contrast, all five ACLD knees experienced considerable change in the position of the medial condyle. The average amount of posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle was 17.00 mm, while the medial condyle translation was 4.65 mm, in the posterior direction. In addition, the helical axis of motion was determined between maximum flexion and extension. A considerable difference was found between the center of rotation locations of the normal and ACLD subjects, with ACLD subjects exhibiting substantially higher variance in kinematic patterns.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67342306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002192900400082X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67342306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-e6aa3a7e2ed96e4d2ddbca55a1489f0aca40c5647fd935384b4fae884187bd783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LHTEQhoO01KP2L0ig0LtdJx_7ddciWgXBGwvehWwya7PuJjbZPeC_N4dzSsEbL8IE8sw7mYeQcwYlA1ZfjOXYuzCj-VNyAFkCL0HyI7JhbSMKLlr4RDYAnBUd7-CYnKQ0AkAjm-4LOWZV1bWygg15vPV067aBWlwwzs7rxQVPw0B9iLOeqPY2n_zmQqQmrsbpBenknvSMfiksDs64fKPPHpE-O49zjjDpjHwe9JTw66Gekt_XVw-XN8Xd_a_by593hZE1LAXWWgvdIEfb1Sgtt7Y3uqo0k203gDZagqlq2Qy2E5VoZS8HjW0r8569bVpxSr7vc19i-LtiWtTsksFp0h7DmlTdCMkF1Bn89g4cwxp9_ptiICrGOJM7qt5TJoaUIg7qJbpZx9cMqZ15Nap_5tXOvAKusvnceH6IX_sZ7f-2g-oM_NgDmG1sHUaVduIMWhfRLMoG99GMN99DmOY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035112146</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Dennis, Douglas A. ; Mahfouz, Mohamed R. ; Komistek, Richard D. ; Hoff, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Douglas A. ; Mahfouz, Mohamed R. ; Komistek, Richard D. ; Hoff, William</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the current study was to use fluoroscopy to accurately determine the three-dimensional (3D), in vivo, weight-bearing kinematics of 10 normal and five anterior cruciate ligament deficient (ACLD) knees. Patient-specific bone models were derived from computed tomography (CT) data. 3D computer bone models of each subject's femur, tibia, and fibula were recreated from the CT 3D bone density data. Using a model-based 3D-to-2D imaging technique registered CT images were precisely fit onto fluoroscopic images, the full six degrees of freedom motion of the bones was measured from the images. The computer-generated 3D models of each subject's femur and tibia were precisely registered to the 2D digital fluoroscopic images using an optimization algorithm that automatically adjusts the pose of the model at various flexion/extension angles. Each subject performed a weight-bearing deep knee bend while under dynamic fluoroscopic surveillance. All 10 normal knees experienced posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle and minimal change in position of the medial condyle with progressive knee flexion. The average amount of posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle was 21.07 mm, whereas the average medial condyle translation was 1.94 mm, in the posterior direction. In contrast, all five ACLD knees experienced considerable change in the position of the medial condyle. The average amount of posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle was 17.00 mm, while the medial condyle translation was 4.65 mm, in the posterior direction. In addition, the helical axis of motion was determined between maximum flexion and extension. A considerable difference was found between the center of rotation locations of the normal and ACLD subjects, with ACLD subjects exhibiting substantially higher variance in kinematic patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15598450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology ; Anterior cruciate ligament deficient ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries ; Biomechanical Phenomena - methods ; Computer Simulation ; Fluoroscopy ; Helical axis ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging ; Joint Instability - physiopathology ; Kinematics ; Knee Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Injuries - physiopathology ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; Movement ; Normal knee ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Registration ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2005-02, Vol.38 (2), p.241-253</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-e6aa3a7e2ed96e4d2ddbca55a1489f0aca40c5647fd935384b4fae884187bd783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-e6aa3a7e2ed96e4d2ddbca55a1489f0aca40c5647fd935384b4fae884187bd783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1035112146?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994,64384,64386,64388,72240</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15598450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfouz, Mohamed R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komistek, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoff, William</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>The objective of the current study was to use fluoroscopy to accurately determine the three-dimensional (3D), in vivo, weight-bearing kinematics of 10 normal and five anterior cruciate ligament deficient (ACLD) knees. Patient-specific bone models were derived from computed tomography (CT) data. 3D computer bone models of each subject's femur, tibia, and fibula were recreated from the CT 3D bone density data. Using a model-based 3D-to-2D imaging technique registered CT images were precisely fit onto fluoroscopic images, the full six degrees of freedom motion of the bones was measured from the images. The computer-generated 3D models of each subject's femur and tibia were precisely registered to the 2D digital fluoroscopic images using an optimization algorithm that automatically adjusts the pose of the model at various flexion/extension angles. Each subject performed a weight-bearing deep knee bend while under dynamic fluoroscopic surveillance. All 10 normal knees experienced posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle and minimal change in position of the medial condyle with progressive knee flexion. The average amount of posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle was 21.07 mm, whereas the average medial condyle translation was 1.94 mm, in the posterior direction. In contrast, all five ACLD knees experienced considerable change in the position of the medial condyle. The average amount of posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle was 17.00 mm, while the medial condyle translation was 4.65 mm, in the posterior direction. In addition, the helical axis of motion was determined between maximum flexion and extension. A considerable difference was found between the center of rotation locations of the normal and ACLD subjects, with ACLD subjects exhibiting substantially higher variance in kinematic patterns.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology</subject><subject>Anterior cruciate ligament deficient</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Helical axis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Joint Instability - physiopathology</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Knee Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Normal knee</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LHTEQhoO01KP2L0ig0LtdJx_7ddciWgXBGwvehWwya7PuJjbZPeC_N4dzSsEbL8IE8sw7mYeQcwYlA1ZfjOXYuzCj-VNyAFkCL0HyI7JhbSMKLlr4RDYAnBUd7-CYnKQ0AkAjm-4LOWZV1bWygg15vPV067aBWlwwzs7rxQVPw0B9iLOeqPY2n_zmQqQmrsbpBenknvSMfiksDs64fKPPHpE-O49zjjDpjHwe9JTw66Gekt_XVw-XN8Xd_a_by593hZE1LAXWWgvdIEfb1Sgtt7Y3uqo0k203gDZagqlq2Qy2E5VoZS8HjW0r8569bVpxSr7vc19i-LtiWtTsksFp0h7DmlTdCMkF1Bn89g4cwxp9_ptiICrGOJM7qt5TJoaUIg7qJbpZx9cMqZ15Nap_5tXOvAKusvnceH6IX_sZ7f-2g-oM_NgDmG1sHUaVduIMWhfRLMoG99GMN99DmOY</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>Dennis, Douglas A.</creator><creator>Mahfouz, Mohamed R.</creator><creator>Komistek, Richard D.</creator><creator>Hoff, William</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics</title><author>Dennis, Douglas A. ; Mahfouz, Mohamed R. ; Komistek, Richard D. ; Hoff, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-e6aa3a7e2ed96e4d2ddbca55a1489f0aca40c5647fd935384b4fae884187bd783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology</topic><topic>Anterior cruciate ligament deficient</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Helical axis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Joint Instability - physiopathology</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Knee Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Normal knee</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfouz, Mohamed R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komistek, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoff, William</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dennis, Douglas A.</au><au>Mahfouz, Mohamed R.</au><au>Komistek, Richard D.</au><au>Hoff, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>241-253</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>The objective of the current study was to use fluoroscopy to accurately determine the three-dimensional (3D), in vivo, weight-bearing kinematics of 10 normal and five anterior cruciate ligament deficient (ACLD) knees. Patient-specific bone models were derived from computed tomography (CT) data. 3D computer bone models of each subject's femur, tibia, and fibula were recreated from the CT 3D bone density data. Using a model-based 3D-to-2D imaging technique registered CT images were precisely fit onto fluoroscopic images, the full six degrees of freedom motion of the bones was measured from the images. The computer-generated 3D models of each subject's femur and tibia were precisely registered to the 2D digital fluoroscopic images using an optimization algorithm that automatically adjusts the pose of the model at various flexion/extension angles. Each subject performed a weight-bearing deep knee bend while under dynamic fluoroscopic surveillance. All 10 normal knees experienced posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle and minimal change in position of the medial condyle with progressive knee flexion. The average amount of posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle was 21.07 mm, whereas the average medial condyle translation was 1.94 mm, in the posterior direction. In contrast, all five ACLD knees experienced considerable change in the position of the medial condyle. The average amount of posterior femoral translation of the lateral condyle was 17.00 mm, while the medial condyle translation was 4.65 mm, in the posterior direction. In addition, the helical axis of motion was determined between maximum flexion and extension. A considerable difference was found between the center of rotation locations of the normal and ACLD subjects, with ACLD subjects exhibiting substantially higher variance in kinematic patterns.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15598450</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.042</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2005-02, Vol.38 (2), p.241-253
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67342306
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Adult
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology
Anterior cruciate ligament deficient
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Biomechanical Phenomena - methods
Computer Simulation
Fluoroscopy
Helical axis
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging
Joint Instability - physiopathology
Kinematics
Knee Injuries - diagnostic imaging
Knee Injuries - physiopathology
Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging
Knee Joint - physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Biological
Movement
Normal knee
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Range of Motion, Articular
Registration
Weight-Bearing
title In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A39%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20determination%20of%20normal%20and%20anterior%20cruciate%20ligament-deficient%20knee%20kinematics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Dennis,%20Douglas%20A.&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=241-253&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67342306%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035112146&rft_id=info:pmid/15598450&rft_els_id=S002192900400082X&rfr_iscdi=true