Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction
1 University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Kinesiology, Chicago, Illinois; and 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, Atlanta, Georgia Submitted 27 April 2004 ; accepted in final form 9 September 2004 Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology 2005-01, Vol.288 (1), p.C185-C194 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | C194 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | C185 |
container_title | American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology |
container_volume | 288 |
creator | Hornberger, Troy A Armstrong, Dustin D Koh, Timothy J Burkholder, Thomas J Esser, Karyn A |
description | 1 University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Kinesiology, Chicago, Illinois; and 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, Atlanta, Georgia
Submitted 27 April 2004
; accepted in final form 9 September 2004
Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish between specific mechanical stimuli. To test this concept, we subjected C 2 C 12 myotubes to cyclic uniaxial or multiaxial stretch. Both types of stretch induced an increase in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) phosphorylation, but only multiaxial stretch induced ribosomal S6 kinase (p70 S6k ) phosphorylation. Further results demonstrated that the signaling events specific to multiaxial stretch (p70 S6k phosphorylation) were elicited by forces delivered through the elastic culture membrane and were not due to greater surface area deformations or localized regions of large tensile strain. Experiments performed using medium that was conditioned by multiaxial stretched myotubes indicated that a release of paracrine factors was not sufficient for the induction of signaling to p70 S6k . Furthermore, incubation with gadolinium(III) chloride (500 µM), genistein (250 µM), PD-98059 (250 µM), bisindolylmaleimide I (20 µM), or LY-294002 (100 µM ) did not block the multiaxial stretch-induced signaling to p70 S6k . However, disrupting the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D did block the multiaxial signaling to p70 S6k , with no effect on signaling to PKB/Akt. These results demonstrate that specific types of mechanical stretch activate distinct signaling pathways, and we propose that this occurs through direct mechanosensory-mechanotransduction mechanisms and not through previously defined growth factor/receptor binding pathways.
growth; hypertrophy; muscle; strain; tension
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Esser, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Kentucky, Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0298 (E-mail: karyn.esser{at}uky.edu ) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1152/ajpcell.00207.2004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67334088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67334088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-2f5fcb2c59f41e615f0b0a4703e0b490d793e628392591e1d34ce48362581d503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYe2L8ACecUug3_zww6NWqhUqZuytjyOPXHl2MF2YObtcZhAV4iVdXW_c6yrD4B3GG0x5uSjfJ6Udm6LEEHNliDEXoFNWZAK85q-BhtEa1rVmNFL8DalZ1QIUndvwCXmtMGEdxtwvPc5yqVmdjLCZA9eOusPME1aWWOVzSdoPYw6TcEnDXOAs7fyaKWDP9IWjrPL65hy1FkNn6AdJ2eVzLYkoAkRjloN0ofyk0_9rJbFNbgw0iV9s75X4Nvd7dPua_Xw-OV-9_mhUqytc0UMN2pPFO8Mw7rG3KA9kqxBVKM961DfdFTXpKVdOQdr3FOmNGtpTXiLe47oFfhw7p1i-D7rlMVo03Kv9DrMSdQNpQy17X9B3DS061BTQHIGVQwpRW3EFO0o40lgJBYxYhUjfosRi5gSer-2z_tR9y-R1UQBqjMw2MPw00YtpuGUbHDhcPpbSNpWYLHDLS9892_-bnbuSR_zn-BLTky9ob8AiU-ygA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17739907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Hornberger, Troy A ; Armstrong, Dustin D ; Koh, Timothy J ; Burkholder, Thomas J ; Esser, Karyn A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hornberger, Troy A ; Armstrong, Dustin D ; Koh, Timothy J ; Burkholder, Thomas J ; Esser, Karyn A</creatorcontrib><description>1 University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Kinesiology, Chicago, Illinois; and 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, Atlanta, Georgia
Submitted 27 April 2004
; accepted in final form 9 September 2004
Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish between specific mechanical stimuli. To test this concept, we subjected C 2 C 12 myotubes to cyclic uniaxial or multiaxial stretch. Both types of stretch induced an increase in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) phosphorylation, but only multiaxial stretch induced ribosomal S6 kinase (p70 S6k ) phosphorylation. Further results demonstrated that the signaling events specific to multiaxial stretch (p70 S6k phosphorylation) were elicited by forces delivered through the elastic culture membrane and were not due to greater surface area deformations or localized regions of large tensile strain. Experiments performed using medium that was conditioned by multiaxial stretched myotubes indicated that a release of paracrine factors was not sufficient for the induction of signaling to p70 S6k . Furthermore, incubation with gadolinium(III) chloride (500 µM), genistein (250 µM), PD-98059 (250 µM), bisindolylmaleimide I (20 µM), or LY-294002 (100 µM ) did not block the multiaxial stretch-induced signaling to p70 S6k . However, disrupting the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D did block the multiaxial signaling to p70 S6k , with no effect on signaling to PKB/Akt. These results demonstrate that specific types of mechanical stretch activate distinct signaling pathways, and we propose that this occurs through direct mechanosensory-mechanotransduction mechanisms and not through previously defined growth factor/receptor binding pathways.
growth; hypertrophy; muscle; strain; tension
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Esser, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Kentucky, Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0298 (E-mail: karyn.esser{at}uky.edu )</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-6143</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00207.2004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15371259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cells, Cultured ; Chromones - pharmacology ; Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology ; Flavonoids - pharmacology ; Gadolinium - pharmacology ; Genistein - pharmacology ; Indoles - pharmacology ; Maleimides - pharmacology ; Mechanoreceptors ; Mechanotransduction, Cellular - drug effects ; Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology ; Mice ; Morpholines - pharmacology ; Myoblasts, Skeletal - cytology ; Myoblasts, Skeletal - physiology ; Paracrine Communication - drug effects ; Paracrine Communication - physiology ; Phosphorylation ; Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases - metabolism ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins - metabolism ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt ; Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa - metabolism ; Signal Transduction - drug effects ; Signal Transduction - physiology ; Space life sciences ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tensile Strength - physiology</subject><ispartof>American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, 2005-01, Vol.288 (1), p.C185-C194</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-2f5fcb2c59f41e615f0b0a4703e0b490d793e628392591e1d34ce48362581d503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-2f5fcb2c59f41e615f0b0a4703e0b490d793e628392591e1d34ce48362581d503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3039,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15371259$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hornberger, Troy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Dustin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkholder, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esser, Karyn A</creatorcontrib><title>Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction</title><title>American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology</title><addtitle>Am J Physiol Cell Physiol</addtitle><description>1 University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Kinesiology, Chicago, Illinois; and 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, Atlanta, Georgia
Submitted 27 April 2004
; accepted in final form 9 September 2004
Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish between specific mechanical stimuli. To test this concept, we subjected C 2 C 12 myotubes to cyclic uniaxial or multiaxial stretch. Both types of stretch induced an increase in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) phosphorylation, but only multiaxial stretch induced ribosomal S6 kinase (p70 S6k ) phosphorylation. Further results demonstrated that the signaling events specific to multiaxial stretch (p70 S6k phosphorylation) were elicited by forces delivered through the elastic culture membrane and were not due to greater surface area deformations or localized regions of large tensile strain. Experiments performed using medium that was conditioned by multiaxial stretched myotubes indicated that a release of paracrine factors was not sufficient for the induction of signaling to p70 S6k . Furthermore, incubation with gadolinium(III) chloride (500 µM), genistein (250 µM), PD-98059 (250 µM), bisindolylmaleimide I (20 µM), or LY-294002 (100 µM ) did not block the multiaxial stretch-induced signaling to p70 S6k . However, disrupting the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D did block the multiaxial signaling to p70 S6k , with no effect on signaling to PKB/Akt. These results demonstrate that specific types of mechanical stretch activate distinct signaling pathways, and we propose that this occurs through direct mechanosensory-mechanotransduction mechanisms and not through previously defined growth factor/receptor binding pathways.
growth; hypertrophy; muscle; strain; tension
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Esser, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Kentucky, Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0298 (E-mail: karyn.esser{at}uky.edu )</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Chromones - pharmacology</subject><subject>Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology</subject><subject>Flavonoids - pharmacology</subject><subject>Gadolinium - pharmacology</subject><subject>Genistein - pharmacology</subject><subject>Indoles - pharmacology</subject><subject>Maleimides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Mechanoreceptors</subject><subject>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - drug effects</subject><subject>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Morpholines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Myoblasts, Skeletal - cytology</subject><subject>Myoblasts, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Paracrine Communication - drug effects</subject><subject>Paracrine Communication - physiology</subject><subject>Phosphorylation</subject><subject>Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases - metabolism</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt</subject><subject>Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa - metabolism</subject><subject>Signal Transduction - drug effects</subject><subject>Signal Transduction - physiology</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tensile Strength - physiology</subject><issn>0363-6143</issn><issn>1522-1563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYe2L8ACecUug3_zww6NWqhUqZuytjyOPXHl2MF2YObtcZhAV4iVdXW_c6yrD4B3GG0x5uSjfJ6Udm6LEEHNliDEXoFNWZAK85q-BhtEa1rVmNFL8DalZ1QIUndvwCXmtMGEdxtwvPc5yqVmdjLCZA9eOusPME1aWWOVzSdoPYw6TcEnDXOAs7fyaKWDP9IWjrPL65hy1FkNn6AdJ2eVzLYkoAkRjloN0ofyk0_9rJbFNbgw0iV9s75X4Nvd7dPua_Xw-OV-9_mhUqytc0UMN2pPFO8Mw7rG3KA9kqxBVKM961DfdFTXpKVdOQdr3FOmNGtpTXiLe47oFfhw7p1i-D7rlMVo03Kv9DrMSdQNpQy17X9B3DS061BTQHIGVQwpRW3EFO0o40lgJBYxYhUjfosRi5gSer-2z_tR9y-R1UQBqjMw2MPw00YtpuGUbHDhcPpbSNpWYLHDLS9892_-bnbuSR_zn-BLTky9ob8AiU-ygA</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Hornberger, Troy A</creator><creator>Armstrong, Dustin D</creator><creator>Koh, Timothy J</creator><creator>Burkholder, Thomas J</creator><creator>Esser, Karyn A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction</title><author>Hornberger, Troy A ; Armstrong, Dustin D ; Koh, Timothy J ; Burkholder, Thomas J ; Esser, Karyn A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-2f5fcb2c59f41e615f0b0a4703e0b490d793e628392591e1d34ce48362581d503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Chromones - pharmacology</topic><topic>Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology</topic><topic>Flavonoids - pharmacology</topic><topic>Gadolinium - pharmacology</topic><topic>Genistein - pharmacology</topic><topic>Indoles - pharmacology</topic><topic>Maleimides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Mechanoreceptors</topic><topic>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - drug effects</topic><topic>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Morpholines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Myoblasts, Skeletal - cytology</topic><topic>Myoblasts, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Paracrine Communication - drug effects</topic><topic>Paracrine Communication - physiology</topic><topic>Phosphorylation</topic><topic>Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases - metabolism</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt</topic><topic>Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa - metabolism</topic><topic>Signal Transduction - drug effects</topic><topic>Signal Transduction - physiology</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tensile Strength - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hornberger, Troy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Dustin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkholder, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esser, Karyn A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hornberger, Troy A</au><au>Armstrong, Dustin D</au><au>Koh, Timothy J</au><au>Burkholder, Thomas J</au><au>Esser, Karyn A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction</atitle><jtitle>American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Physiol Cell Physiol</addtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>288</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>C185</spage><epage>C194</epage><pages>C185-C194</pages><issn>0363-6143</issn><eissn>1522-1563</eissn><abstract>1 University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Kinesiology, Chicago, Illinois; and 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, Atlanta, Georgia
Submitted 27 April 2004
; accepted in final form 9 September 2004
Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish between specific mechanical stimuli. To test this concept, we subjected C 2 C 12 myotubes to cyclic uniaxial or multiaxial stretch. Both types of stretch induced an increase in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) phosphorylation, but only multiaxial stretch induced ribosomal S6 kinase (p70 S6k ) phosphorylation. Further results demonstrated that the signaling events specific to multiaxial stretch (p70 S6k phosphorylation) were elicited by forces delivered through the elastic culture membrane and were not due to greater surface area deformations or localized regions of large tensile strain. Experiments performed using medium that was conditioned by multiaxial stretched myotubes indicated that a release of paracrine factors was not sufficient for the induction of signaling to p70 S6k . Furthermore, incubation with gadolinium(III) chloride (500 µM), genistein (250 µM), PD-98059 (250 µM), bisindolylmaleimide I (20 µM), or LY-294002 (100 µM ) did not block the multiaxial stretch-induced signaling to p70 S6k . However, disrupting the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D did block the multiaxial signaling to p70 S6k , with no effect on signaling to PKB/Akt. These results demonstrate that specific types of mechanical stretch activate distinct signaling pathways, and we propose that this occurs through direct mechanosensory-mechanotransduction mechanisms and not through previously defined growth factor/receptor binding pathways.
growth; hypertrophy; muscle; strain; tension
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Esser, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Kentucky, Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0298 (E-mail: karyn.esser{at}uky.edu )</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>15371259</pmid><doi>10.1152/ajpcell.00207.2004</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-6143 |
ispartof | American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, 2005-01, Vol.288 (1), p.C185-C194 |
issn | 0363-6143 1522-1563 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67334088 |
source | MEDLINE; American Physiological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Animals Cells, Cultured Chromones - pharmacology Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology Flavonoids - pharmacology Gadolinium - pharmacology Genistein - pharmacology Indoles - pharmacology Maleimides - pharmacology Mechanoreceptors Mechanotransduction, Cellular - drug effects Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology Mice Morpholines - pharmacology Myoblasts, Skeletal - cytology Myoblasts, Skeletal - physiology Paracrine Communication - drug effects Paracrine Communication - physiology Phosphorylation Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases - metabolism Proto-Oncogene Proteins - metabolism Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa - metabolism Signal Transduction - drug effects Signal Transduction - physiology Space life sciences Stress, Mechanical Tensile Strength - physiology |
title | Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A18%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intracellular%20signaling%20specificity%20in%20response%20to%20uniaxial%20vs.%20multiaxial%20stretch:%20implications%20for%20mechanotransduction&rft.jtitle=American%20Journal%20of%20Physiology:%20Cell%20Physiology&rft.au=Hornberger,%20Troy%20A&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=288&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=C185&rft.epage=C194&rft.pages=C185-C194&rft.issn=0363-6143&rft.eissn=1522-1563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/ajpcell.00207.2004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67334088%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17739907&rft_id=info:pmid/15371259&rfr_iscdi=true |