Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction

1 University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Kinesiology, Chicago, Illinois; and 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, Atlanta, Georgia Submitted 27 April 2004 ; accepted in final form 9 September 2004 Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology 2005-01, Vol.288 (1), p.C185-C194
Hauptverfasser: Hornberger, Troy A, Armstrong, Dustin D, Koh, Timothy J, Burkholder, Thomas J, Esser, Karyn A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page C194
container_issue 1
container_start_page C185
container_title American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology
container_volume 288
creator Hornberger, Troy A
Armstrong, Dustin D
Koh, Timothy J
Burkholder, Thomas J
Esser, Karyn A
description 1 University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Kinesiology, Chicago, Illinois; and 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, Atlanta, Georgia Submitted 27 April 2004 ; accepted in final form 9 September 2004 Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish between specific mechanical stimuli. To test this concept, we subjected C 2 C 12 myotubes to cyclic uniaxial or multiaxial stretch. Both types of stretch induced an increase in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) phosphorylation, but only multiaxial stretch induced ribosomal S6 kinase (p70 S6k ) phosphorylation. Further results demonstrated that the signaling events specific to multiaxial stretch (p70 S6k phosphorylation) were elicited by forces delivered through the elastic culture membrane and were not due to greater surface area deformations or localized regions of large tensile strain. Experiments performed using medium that was conditioned by multiaxial stretched myotubes indicated that a release of paracrine factors was not sufficient for the induction of signaling to p70 S6k . Furthermore, incubation with gadolinium(III) chloride (500 µM), genistein (250 µM), PD-98059 (250 µM), bisindolylmaleimide I (20 µM), or LY-294002 (100 µM ) did not block the multiaxial stretch-induced signaling to p70 S6k . However, disrupting the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D did block the multiaxial signaling to p70 S6k , with no effect on signaling to PKB/Akt. These results demonstrate that specific types of mechanical stretch activate distinct signaling pathways, and we propose that this occurs through direct mechanosensory-mechanotransduction mechanisms and not through previously defined growth factor/receptor binding pathways. growth; hypertrophy; muscle; strain; tension Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Esser, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Kentucky, Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0298 (E-mail: karyn.esser{at}uky.edu )
doi_str_mv 10.1152/ajpcell.00207.2004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67334088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67334088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-2f5fcb2c59f41e615f0b0a4703e0b490d793e628392591e1d34ce48362581d503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYe2L8ACecUug3_zww6NWqhUqZuytjyOPXHl2MF2YObtcZhAV4iVdXW_c6yrD4B3GG0x5uSjfJ6Udm6LEEHNliDEXoFNWZAK85q-BhtEa1rVmNFL8DalZ1QIUndvwCXmtMGEdxtwvPc5yqVmdjLCZA9eOusPME1aWWOVzSdoPYw6TcEnDXOAs7fyaKWDP9IWjrPL65hy1FkNn6AdJ2eVzLYkoAkRjloN0ofyk0_9rJbFNbgw0iV9s75X4Nvd7dPua_Xw-OV-9_mhUqytc0UMN2pPFO8Mw7rG3KA9kqxBVKM961DfdFTXpKVdOQdr3FOmNGtpTXiLe47oFfhw7p1i-D7rlMVo03Kv9DrMSdQNpQy17X9B3DS061BTQHIGVQwpRW3EFO0o40lgJBYxYhUjfosRi5gSer-2z_tR9y-R1UQBqjMw2MPw00YtpuGUbHDhcPpbSNpWYLHDLS9892_-bnbuSR_zn-BLTky9ob8AiU-ygA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17739907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Hornberger, Troy A ; Armstrong, Dustin D ; Koh, Timothy J ; Burkholder, Thomas J ; Esser, Karyn A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hornberger, Troy A ; Armstrong, Dustin D ; Koh, Timothy J ; Burkholder, Thomas J ; Esser, Karyn A</creatorcontrib><description>1 University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Kinesiology, Chicago, Illinois; and 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, Atlanta, Georgia Submitted 27 April 2004 ; accepted in final form 9 September 2004 Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish between specific mechanical stimuli. To test this concept, we subjected C 2 C 12 myotubes to cyclic uniaxial or multiaxial stretch. Both types of stretch induced an increase in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) phosphorylation, but only multiaxial stretch induced ribosomal S6 kinase (p70 S6k ) phosphorylation. Further results demonstrated that the signaling events specific to multiaxial stretch (p70 S6k phosphorylation) were elicited by forces delivered through the elastic culture membrane and were not due to greater surface area deformations or localized regions of large tensile strain. Experiments performed using medium that was conditioned by multiaxial stretched myotubes indicated that a release of paracrine factors was not sufficient for the induction of signaling to p70 S6k . Furthermore, incubation with gadolinium(III) chloride (500 µM), genistein (250 µM), PD-98059 (250 µM), bisindolylmaleimide I (20 µM), or LY-294002 (100 µM ) did not block the multiaxial stretch-induced signaling to p70 S6k . However, disrupting the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D did block the multiaxial signaling to p70 S6k , with no effect on signaling to PKB/Akt. These results demonstrate that specific types of mechanical stretch activate distinct signaling pathways, and we propose that this occurs through direct mechanosensory-mechanotransduction mechanisms and not through previously defined growth factor/receptor binding pathways. growth; hypertrophy; muscle; strain; tension Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Esser, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Kentucky, Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0298 (E-mail: karyn.esser{at}uky.edu )</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-6143</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00207.2004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15371259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cells, Cultured ; Chromones - pharmacology ; Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology ; Flavonoids - pharmacology ; Gadolinium - pharmacology ; Genistein - pharmacology ; Indoles - pharmacology ; Maleimides - pharmacology ; Mechanoreceptors ; Mechanotransduction, Cellular - drug effects ; Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology ; Mice ; Morpholines - pharmacology ; Myoblasts, Skeletal - cytology ; Myoblasts, Skeletal - physiology ; Paracrine Communication - drug effects ; Paracrine Communication - physiology ; Phosphorylation ; Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases - metabolism ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins - metabolism ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt ; Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa - metabolism ; Signal Transduction - drug effects ; Signal Transduction - physiology ; Space life sciences ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tensile Strength - physiology</subject><ispartof>American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, 2005-01, Vol.288 (1), p.C185-C194</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-2f5fcb2c59f41e615f0b0a4703e0b490d793e628392591e1d34ce48362581d503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-2f5fcb2c59f41e615f0b0a4703e0b490d793e628392591e1d34ce48362581d503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3039,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15371259$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hornberger, Troy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Dustin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkholder, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esser, Karyn A</creatorcontrib><title>Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction</title><title>American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology</title><addtitle>Am J Physiol Cell Physiol</addtitle><description>1 University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Kinesiology, Chicago, Illinois; and 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, Atlanta, Georgia Submitted 27 April 2004 ; accepted in final form 9 September 2004 Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish between specific mechanical stimuli. To test this concept, we subjected C 2 C 12 myotubes to cyclic uniaxial or multiaxial stretch. Both types of stretch induced an increase in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) phosphorylation, but only multiaxial stretch induced ribosomal S6 kinase (p70 S6k ) phosphorylation. Further results demonstrated that the signaling events specific to multiaxial stretch (p70 S6k phosphorylation) were elicited by forces delivered through the elastic culture membrane and were not due to greater surface area deformations or localized regions of large tensile strain. Experiments performed using medium that was conditioned by multiaxial stretched myotubes indicated that a release of paracrine factors was not sufficient for the induction of signaling to p70 S6k . Furthermore, incubation with gadolinium(III) chloride (500 µM), genistein (250 µM), PD-98059 (250 µM), bisindolylmaleimide I (20 µM), or LY-294002 (100 µM ) did not block the multiaxial stretch-induced signaling to p70 S6k . However, disrupting the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D did block the multiaxial signaling to p70 S6k , with no effect on signaling to PKB/Akt. These results demonstrate that specific types of mechanical stretch activate distinct signaling pathways, and we propose that this occurs through direct mechanosensory-mechanotransduction mechanisms and not through previously defined growth factor/receptor binding pathways. growth; hypertrophy; muscle; strain; tension Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Esser, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Kentucky, Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0298 (E-mail: karyn.esser{at}uky.edu )</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Chromones - pharmacology</subject><subject>Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology</subject><subject>Flavonoids - pharmacology</subject><subject>Gadolinium - pharmacology</subject><subject>Genistein - pharmacology</subject><subject>Indoles - pharmacology</subject><subject>Maleimides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Mechanoreceptors</subject><subject>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - drug effects</subject><subject>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Morpholines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Myoblasts, Skeletal - cytology</subject><subject>Myoblasts, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Paracrine Communication - drug effects</subject><subject>Paracrine Communication - physiology</subject><subject>Phosphorylation</subject><subject>Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases - metabolism</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt</subject><subject>Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa - metabolism</subject><subject>Signal Transduction - drug effects</subject><subject>Signal Transduction - physiology</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tensile Strength - physiology</subject><issn>0363-6143</issn><issn>1522-1563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYe2L8ACecUug3_zww6NWqhUqZuytjyOPXHl2MF2YObtcZhAV4iVdXW_c6yrD4B3GG0x5uSjfJ6Udm6LEEHNliDEXoFNWZAK85q-BhtEa1rVmNFL8DalZ1QIUndvwCXmtMGEdxtwvPc5yqVmdjLCZA9eOusPME1aWWOVzSdoPYw6TcEnDXOAs7fyaKWDP9IWjrPL65hy1FkNn6AdJ2eVzLYkoAkRjloN0ofyk0_9rJbFNbgw0iV9s75X4Nvd7dPua_Xw-OV-9_mhUqytc0UMN2pPFO8Mw7rG3KA9kqxBVKM961DfdFTXpKVdOQdr3FOmNGtpTXiLe47oFfhw7p1i-D7rlMVo03Kv9DrMSdQNpQy17X9B3DS061BTQHIGVQwpRW3EFO0o40lgJBYxYhUjfosRi5gSer-2z_tR9y-R1UQBqjMw2MPw00YtpuGUbHDhcPpbSNpWYLHDLS9892_-bnbuSR_zn-BLTky9ob8AiU-ygA</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Hornberger, Troy A</creator><creator>Armstrong, Dustin D</creator><creator>Koh, Timothy J</creator><creator>Burkholder, Thomas J</creator><creator>Esser, Karyn A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction</title><author>Hornberger, Troy A ; Armstrong, Dustin D ; Koh, Timothy J ; Burkholder, Thomas J ; Esser, Karyn A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-2f5fcb2c59f41e615f0b0a4703e0b490d793e628392591e1d34ce48362581d503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Chromones - pharmacology</topic><topic>Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology</topic><topic>Flavonoids - pharmacology</topic><topic>Gadolinium - pharmacology</topic><topic>Genistein - pharmacology</topic><topic>Indoles - pharmacology</topic><topic>Maleimides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Mechanoreceptors</topic><topic>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - drug effects</topic><topic>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Morpholines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Myoblasts, Skeletal - cytology</topic><topic>Myoblasts, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Paracrine Communication - drug effects</topic><topic>Paracrine Communication - physiology</topic><topic>Phosphorylation</topic><topic>Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases - metabolism</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt</topic><topic>Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa - metabolism</topic><topic>Signal Transduction - drug effects</topic><topic>Signal Transduction - physiology</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tensile Strength - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hornberger, Troy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Dustin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkholder, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esser, Karyn A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hornberger, Troy A</au><au>Armstrong, Dustin D</au><au>Koh, Timothy J</au><au>Burkholder, Thomas J</au><au>Esser, Karyn A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction</atitle><jtitle>American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Physiol Cell Physiol</addtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>288</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>C185</spage><epage>C194</epage><pages>C185-C194</pages><issn>0363-6143</issn><eissn>1522-1563</eissn><abstract>1 University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Kinesiology, Chicago, Illinois; and 2 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, Atlanta, Georgia Submitted 27 April 2004 ; accepted in final form 9 September 2004 Several lines of evidence suggest that muscle cells can distinguish between specific mechanical stimuli. To test this concept, we subjected C 2 C 12 myotubes to cyclic uniaxial or multiaxial stretch. Both types of stretch induced an increase in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) phosphorylation, but only multiaxial stretch induced ribosomal S6 kinase (p70 S6k ) phosphorylation. Further results demonstrated that the signaling events specific to multiaxial stretch (p70 S6k phosphorylation) were elicited by forces delivered through the elastic culture membrane and were not due to greater surface area deformations or localized regions of large tensile strain. Experiments performed using medium that was conditioned by multiaxial stretched myotubes indicated that a release of paracrine factors was not sufficient for the induction of signaling to p70 S6k . Furthermore, incubation with gadolinium(III) chloride (500 µM), genistein (250 µM), PD-98059 (250 µM), bisindolylmaleimide I (20 µM), or LY-294002 (100 µM ) did not block the multiaxial stretch-induced signaling to p70 S6k . However, disrupting the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D did block the multiaxial signaling to p70 S6k , with no effect on signaling to PKB/Akt. These results demonstrate that specific types of mechanical stretch activate distinct signaling pathways, and we propose that this occurs through direct mechanosensory-mechanotransduction mechanisms and not through previously defined growth factor/receptor binding pathways. growth; hypertrophy; muscle; strain; tension Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Esser, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Kentucky, Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0298 (E-mail: karyn.esser{at}uky.edu )</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>15371259</pmid><doi>10.1152/ajpcell.00207.2004</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-6143
ispartof American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, 2005-01, Vol.288 (1), p.C185-C194
issn 0363-6143
1522-1563
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67334088
source MEDLINE; American Physiological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animals
Cells, Cultured
Chromones - pharmacology
Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology
Flavonoids - pharmacology
Gadolinium - pharmacology
Genistein - pharmacology
Indoles - pharmacology
Maleimides - pharmacology
Mechanoreceptors
Mechanotransduction, Cellular - drug effects
Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology
Mice
Morpholines - pharmacology
Myoblasts, Skeletal - cytology
Myoblasts, Skeletal - physiology
Paracrine Communication - drug effects
Paracrine Communication - physiology
Phosphorylation
Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases - metabolism
Proto-Oncogene Proteins - metabolism
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt
Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa - metabolism
Signal Transduction - drug effects
Signal Transduction - physiology
Space life sciences
Stress, Mechanical
Tensile Strength - physiology
title Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A18%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intracellular%20signaling%20specificity%20in%20response%20to%20uniaxial%20vs.%20multiaxial%20stretch:%20implications%20for%20mechanotransduction&rft.jtitle=American%20Journal%20of%20Physiology:%20Cell%20Physiology&rft.au=Hornberger,%20Troy%20A&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=288&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=C185&rft.epage=C194&rft.pages=C185-C194&rft.issn=0363-6143&rft.eissn=1522-1563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/ajpcell.00207.2004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67334088%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17739907&rft_id=info:pmid/15371259&rfr_iscdi=true