The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control?
Identification of the second of two targets is impaired if it is presented less than about 500 ms after the first. Theoretical accounts of this second-target deficit, known as attentional blink (AB), have relied on some form of limited attentional resource that is allocated to the leading target at...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological research 2005-01, Vol.69 (3), p.191-200 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 200 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 191 |
container_title | Psychological research |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Di Lollo, Vincent Kawahara, Jun-ichiro Shahab Ghorashi, S M Enns, James T |
description | Identification of the second of two targets is impaired if it is presented less than about 500 ms after the first. Theoretical accounts of this second-target deficit, known as attentional blink (AB), have relied on some form of limited attentional resource that is allocated to the leading target at the expense of the trailing target. Three experiments in the present study reveal a failure of resource-limitation accounts to explain why the AB is absent when the targets consist of a stream of three items belonging to the same category (e.g., letters or digits). The AB is reinstated, however, if an item from a different category is inserted in the target string. This result, and all major results in the AB literature, is explained by the hypothesis that the AB arises from a temporary loss of control over the prevailing attentional set. This lapse in control renders the observer vulnerable to an exogenously-triggered switch in attentional set. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00426-004-0173-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67322593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67322593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d5b88effdb1a24716548a66acb9916051834c8d45eb32d881fa607f37b33a6973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMozjj6A9xIcOEumleT1I3I4AsG3IzrkLYpdkybmqQw_nszzIDg4p67uN-5cA4AlwTfEozlXcSYU4GyIkwkQ9sjMCecYUSlpMdgjhnHCEsqZ-Asxg3OkBDyFMxIUZSSKD4HL-tPC01KdkidH4yDleuGr3sYbPRTqC1s7Ojs7gZ9gMn2ow8m_EDnY4S-hbUfUvDu4RyctMZFe3HYC_Dx_LRevqLV-8vb8nGFalbShJqiUsq2bVMRQ7kkouDKCGHqqiyJwAVRjNeq4YWtGG2UIq0RWLZMVowZUUq2ADf7v2Pw35ONSfddrK1zZrB-ilpIRmlRsgxe_wM3OVBOGDVlAiuRJ0NkD9Uh5wm21WPo-pxPE6x3Fet9xTqr3lWst9lzdXg8Vb1t_hyHTtkv2nB2YA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236086608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Di Lollo, Vincent ; Kawahara, Jun-ichiro ; Shahab Ghorashi, S M ; Enns, James T</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Lollo, Vincent ; Kawahara, Jun-ichiro ; Shahab Ghorashi, S M ; Enns, James T</creatorcontrib><description>Identification of the second of two targets is impaired if it is presented less than about 500 ms after the first. Theoretical accounts of this second-target deficit, known as attentional blink (AB), have relied on some form of limited attentional resource that is allocated to the leading target at the expense of the trailing target. Three experiments in the present study reveal a failure of resource-limitation accounts to explain why the AB is absent when the targets consist of a stream of three items belonging to the same category (e.g., letters or digits). The AB is reinstated, however, if an item from a different category is inserted in the target string. This result, and all major results in the AB literature, is explained by the hypothesis that the AB arises from a temporary loss of control over the prevailing attentional set. This lapse in control renders the observer vulnerable to an exogenously-triggered switch in attentional set.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-0727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1430-2772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00426-004-0173-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15597184</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSREDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Attention ; British Columbia ; Experiments ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Models, Psychological ; Perceptual Masking ; Trends ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Psychological research, 2005-01, Vol.69 (3), p.191-200</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d5b88effdb1a24716548a66acb9916051834c8d45eb32d881fa607f37b33a6973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d5b88effdb1a24716548a66acb9916051834c8d45eb32d881fa607f37b33a6973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15597184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Lollo, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, Jun-ichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahab Ghorashi, S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enns, James T</creatorcontrib><title>The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control?</title><title>Psychological research</title><addtitle>Psychol Res</addtitle><description>Identification of the second of two targets is impaired if it is presented less than about 500 ms after the first. Theoretical accounts of this second-target deficit, known as attentional blink (AB), have relied on some form of limited attentional resource that is allocated to the leading target at the expense of the trailing target. Three experiments in the present study reveal a failure of resource-limitation accounts to explain why the AB is absent when the targets consist of a stream of three items belonging to the same category (e.g., letters or digits). The AB is reinstated, however, if an item from a different category is inserted in the target string. This result, and all major results in the AB literature, is explained by the hypothesis that the AB arises from a temporary loss of control over the prevailing attentional set. This lapse in control renders the observer vulnerable to an exogenously-triggered switch in attentional set.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>British Columbia</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>0340-0727</issn><issn>1430-2772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMozjj6A9xIcOEumleT1I3I4AsG3IzrkLYpdkybmqQw_nszzIDg4p67uN-5cA4AlwTfEozlXcSYU4GyIkwkQ9sjMCecYUSlpMdgjhnHCEsqZ-Asxg3OkBDyFMxIUZSSKD4HL-tPC01KdkidH4yDleuGr3sYbPRTqC1s7Ojs7gZ9gMn2ow8m_EDnY4S-hbUfUvDu4RyctMZFe3HYC_Dx_LRevqLV-8vb8nGFalbShJqiUsq2bVMRQ7kkouDKCGHqqiyJwAVRjNeq4YWtGG2UIq0RWLZMVowZUUq2ADf7v2Pw35ONSfddrK1zZrB-ilpIRmlRsgxe_wM3OVBOGDVlAiuRJ0NkD9Uh5wm21WPo-pxPE6x3Fet9xTqr3lWst9lzdXg8Vb1t_hyHTtkv2nB2YA</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Di Lollo, Vincent</creator><creator>Kawahara, Jun-ichiro</creator><creator>Shahab Ghorashi, S M</creator><creator>Enns, James T</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control?</title><author>Di Lollo, Vincent ; Kawahara, Jun-ichiro ; Shahab Ghorashi, S M ; Enns, James T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d5b88effdb1a24716548a66acb9916051834c8d45eb32d881fa607f37b33a6973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>British Columbia</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Lollo, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, Jun-ichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahab Ghorashi, S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enns, James T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Lollo, Vincent</au><au>Kawahara, Jun-ichiro</au><au>Shahab Ghorashi, S M</au><au>Enns, James T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control?</atitle><jtitle>Psychological research</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Res</addtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>191-200</pages><issn>0340-0727</issn><eissn>1430-2772</eissn><coden>PSREDJ</coden><abstract>Identification of the second of two targets is impaired if it is presented less than about 500 ms after the first. Theoretical accounts of this second-target deficit, known as attentional blink (AB), have relied on some form of limited attentional resource that is allocated to the leading target at the expense of the trailing target. Three experiments in the present study reveal a failure of resource-limitation accounts to explain why the AB is absent when the targets consist of a stream of three items belonging to the same category (e.g., letters or digits). The AB is reinstated, however, if an item from a different category is inserted in the target string. This result, and all major results in the AB literature, is explained by the hypothesis that the AB arises from a temporary loss of control over the prevailing attentional set. This lapse in control renders the observer vulnerable to an exogenously-triggered switch in attentional set.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15597184</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00426-004-0173-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-0727 |
ispartof | Psychological research, 2005-01, Vol.69 (3), p.191-200 |
issn | 0340-0727 1430-2772 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67322593 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Attention British Columbia Experiments Humans Hypotheses Models, Psychological Perceptual Masking Trends Visual Perception |
title | The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A41%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20attentional%20blink:%20resource%20depletion%20or%20temporary%20loss%20of%20control?&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20research&rft.au=Di%20Lollo,%20Vincent&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=191-200&rft.issn=0340-0727&rft.eissn=1430-2772&rft.coden=PSREDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00426-004-0173-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67322593%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236086608&rft_id=info:pmid/15597184&rfr_iscdi=true |