How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach
Aims To assess how and why hydrodistension of the bladder is performed by UK urologists and to compare this practise with the published literature on distension. To suggest a standardised technique for hydrodistension to allow comparison of diagnostic and therapeutic studies. Methods A questionnaire...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurourology and urodynamics 2005, Vol.24 (1), p.74-76 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 76 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 74 |
container_title | Neurourology and urodynamics |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Turner, Kevin J. Stewart, Laurence H. |
description | Aims
To assess how and why hydrodistension of the bladder is performed by UK urologists and to compare this practise with the published literature on distension. To suggest a standardised technique for hydrodistension to allow comparison of diagnostic and therapeutic studies.
Methods
A questionnaire was sent to all UK consultant urologists. Questions addressed the indications for short bladder distension (SBD), details of technique, evaluation of outcome, and awareness of evidence base. The literature on bladder distension was reviewed.
Results
The majority of respondents perform SBD, principally in the diagnosis and therapy of interstitial cystitis (IC). There was considerable variation in the duration of distension, repetition of distension, the pressure used for distension, and the measurement of bladder capacity. The literature on the technique of hydrodistension is imprecise and no respondent was able to cite literature to support his or her practice. We suggest a simple, more objective technique for performing hydrodistension.
Conclusions
SBD is widely used. There is marked variability in technique and little more than anecdotal evidence to support any particular approach. Research into the evaluation and treatment of painful bladder syndrome in general and IC in particular would be facilitated by the adoption of a standardised technique. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/nau.20074 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67320722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67320722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-4890aaf5c478fc6e3ccf3933d31c6a02b95e96279c589139bd25eb66a080b2093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LwzAchoMoOv8c_AKSkyBYTZM2aU4yhjpRFMSheAlp-itW22YmrXPf3sxNPXkK5H3eJ-FFaD8mJzEh9LTV_QklRCRraBCnlERcCLGOBkQwFtGEiy207f0rISRjidxEW3GaZFwm2QDNxnaGC4vntse-c9CZF6xxXuuiAHeGh9j37gPm2JZ4co2nTpuuMnAcmLrqwOmud4AdfFQwC5dtEQIHxjYNtIXuKtsumjqoQ6ZdiKdTZ7V52UUbpa497K3OHTS5OH8YjaObu8ur0fAmMkzyJEoySbQuU5OIrDQcmDElk4wVLDZcE5rLFCSnQpo0kzGTeUFTyHmIMpJTItkOOlx6w7PvPfhONZU3UNe6Bdt7xQWjRFAawKMlaJz13kGppq5qtJurmKjFyiqsrL5XDuzBStrnDRR_5GrWAJwugVlVw_x_k7odTn6U0bJR-Q4-fxvavS2-KFL1eHupHp-fBOPjeyXYF-dHlUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67320722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Turner, Kevin J. ; Stewart, Laurence H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kevin J. ; Stewart, Laurence H.</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
To assess how and why hydrodistension of the bladder is performed by UK urologists and to compare this practise with the published literature on distension. To suggest a standardised technique for hydrodistension to allow comparison of diagnostic and therapeutic studies.
Methods
A questionnaire was sent to all UK consultant urologists. Questions addressed the indications for short bladder distension (SBD), details of technique, evaluation of outcome, and awareness of evidence base. The literature on bladder distension was reviewed.
Results
The majority of respondents perform SBD, principally in the diagnosis and therapy of interstitial cystitis (IC). There was considerable variation in the duration of distension, repetition of distension, the pressure used for distension, and the measurement of bladder capacity. The literature on the technique of hydrodistension is imprecise and no respondent was able to cite literature to support his or her practice. We suggest a simple, more objective technique for performing hydrodistension.
Conclusions
SBD is widely used. There is marked variability in technique and little more than anecdotal evidence to support any particular approach. Research into the evaluation and treatment of painful bladder syndrome in general and IC in particular would be facilitated by the adoption of a standardised technique. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.20074</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15486948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Cystitis, Interstitial - diagnosis ; Cystitis, Interstitial - therapy ; Data Collection ; Dilatation - methods ; Humans ; hydrodistension ; interstitial cystitis ; painful bladder syndrome ; Professional Practice ; Urinary Bladder ; Urology - methods</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2005, Vol.24 (1), p.74-76</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-4890aaf5c478fc6e3ccf3933d31c6a02b95e96279c589139bd25eb66a080b2093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-4890aaf5c478fc6e3ccf3933d31c6a02b95e96279c589139bd25eb66a080b2093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.20074$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.20074$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15486948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Laurence H.</creatorcontrib><title>How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodyn</addtitle><description>Aims
To assess how and why hydrodistension of the bladder is performed by UK urologists and to compare this practise with the published literature on distension. To suggest a standardised technique for hydrodistension to allow comparison of diagnostic and therapeutic studies.
Methods
A questionnaire was sent to all UK consultant urologists. Questions addressed the indications for short bladder distension (SBD), details of technique, evaluation of outcome, and awareness of evidence base. The literature on bladder distension was reviewed.
Results
The majority of respondents perform SBD, principally in the diagnosis and therapy of interstitial cystitis (IC). There was considerable variation in the duration of distension, repetition of distension, the pressure used for distension, and the measurement of bladder capacity. The literature on the technique of hydrodistension is imprecise and no respondent was able to cite literature to support his or her practice. We suggest a simple, more objective technique for performing hydrodistension.
Conclusions
SBD is widely used. There is marked variability in technique and little more than anecdotal evidence to support any particular approach. Research into the evaluation and treatment of painful bladder syndrome in general and IC in particular would be facilitated by the adoption of a standardised technique. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Cystitis, Interstitial - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cystitis, Interstitial - therapy</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Dilatation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hydrodistension</subject><subject>interstitial cystitis</subject><subject>painful bladder syndrome</subject><subject>Professional Practice</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder</subject><subject>Urology - methods</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LwzAchoMoOv8c_AKSkyBYTZM2aU4yhjpRFMSheAlp-itW22YmrXPf3sxNPXkK5H3eJ-FFaD8mJzEh9LTV_QklRCRraBCnlERcCLGOBkQwFtGEiy207f0rISRjidxEW3GaZFwm2QDNxnaGC4vntse-c9CZF6xxXuuiAHeGh9j37gPm2JZ4co2nTpuuMnAcmLrqwOmud4AdfFQwC5dtEQIHxjYNtIXuKtsumjqoQ6ZdiKdTZ7V52UUbpa497K3OHTS5OH8YjaObu8ur0fAmMkzyJEoySbQuU5OIrDQcmDElk4wVLDZcE5rLFCSnQpo0kzGTeUFTyHmIMpJTItkOOlx6w7PvPfhONZU3UNe6Bdt7xQWjRFAawKMlaJz13kGppq5qtJurmKjFyiqsrL5XDuzBStrnDRR_5GrWAJwugVlVw_x_k7odTn6U0bJR-Q4-fxvavS2-KFL1eHupHp-fBOPjeyXYF-dHlUc</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Turner, Kevin J.</creator><creator>Stewart, Laurence H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach</title><author>Turner, Kevin J. ; Stewart, Laurence H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-4890aaf5c478fc6e3ccf3933d31c6a02b95e96279c589139bd25eb66a080b2093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Cystitis, Interstitial - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cystitis, Interstitial - therapy</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Dilatation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hydrodistension</topic><topic>interstitial cystitis</topic><topic>painful bladder syndrome</topic><topic>Professional Practice</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder</topic><topic>Urology - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Laurence H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turner, Kevin J.</au><au>Stewart, Laurence H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodyn</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>74-76</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Aims
To assess how and why hydrodistension of the bladder is performed by UK urologists and to compare this practise with the published literature on distension. To suggest a standardised technique for hydrodistension to allow comparison of diagnostic and therapeutic studies.
Methods
A questionnaire was sent to all UK consultant urologists. Questions addressed the indications for short bladder distension (SBD), details of technique, evaluation of outcome, and awareness of evidence base. The literature on bladder distension was reviewed.
Results
The majority of respondents perform SBD, principally in the diagnosis and therapy of interstitial cystitis (IC). There was considerable variation in the duration of distension, repetition of distension, the pressure used for distension, and the measurement of bladder capacity. The literature on the technique of hydrodistension is imprecise and no respondent was able to cite literature to support his or her practice. We suggest a simple, more objective technique for performing hydrodistension.
Conclusions
SBD is widely used. There is marked variability in technique and little more than anecdotal evidence to support any particular approach. Research into the evaluation and treatment of painful bladder syndrome in general and IC in particular would be facilitated by the adoption of a standardised technique. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15486948</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.20074</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-2467 |
ispartof | Neurourology and urodynamics, 2005, Vol.24 (1), p.74-76 |
issn | 0733-2467 1520-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67320722 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Cystitis, Interstitial - diagnosis Cystitis, Interstitial - therapy Data Collection Dilatation - methods Humans hydrodistension interstitial cystitis painful bladder syndrome Professional Practice Urinary Bladder Urology - methods |
title | How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A12%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20you%20stretch%20a%20bladder?%20A%20survey%20of%20UK%20practice,%20a%20literature%20review,%20and%20a%20recommendation%20of%20a%20standard%20approach&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Turner,%20Kevin%20J.&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=74-76&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.20074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67320722%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67320722&rft_id=info:pmid/15486948&rfr_iscdi=true |