How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach

Aims To assess how and why hydrodistension of the bladder is performed by UK urologists and to compare this practise with the published literature on distension. To suggest a standardised technique for hydrodistension to allow comparison of diagnostic and therapeutic studies. Methods A questionnaire...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 2005, Vol.24 (1), p.74-76
Hauptverfasser: Turner, Kevin J., Stewart, Laurence H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 1
container_start_page 74
container_title Neurourology and urodynamics
container_volume 24
creator Turner, Kevin J.
Stewart, Laurence H.
description Aims To assess how and why hydrodistension of the bladder is performed by UK urologists and to compare this practise with the published literature on distension. To suggest a standardised technique for hydrodistension to allow comparison of diagnostic and therapeutic studies. Methods A questionnaire was sent to all UK consultant urologists. Questions addressed the indications for short bladder distension (SBD), details of technique, evaluation of outcome, and awareness of evidence base. The literature on bladder distension was reviewed. Results The majority of respondents perform SBD, principally in the diagnosis and therapy of interstitial cystitis (IC). There was considerable variation in the duration of distension, repetition of distension, the pressure used for distension, and the measurement of bladder capacity. The literature on the technique of hydrodistension is imprecise and no respondent was able to cite literature to support his or her practice. We suggest a simple, more objective technique for performing hydrodistension. Conclusions SBD is widely used. There is marked variability in technique and little more than anecdotal evidence to support any particular approach. Research into the evaluation and treatment of painful bladder syndrome in general and IC in particular would be facilitated by the adoption of a standardised technique. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nau.20074
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67320722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67320722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-4890aaf5c478fc6e3ccf3933d31c6a02b95e96279c589139bd25eb66a080b2093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LwzAchoMoOv8c_AKSkyBYTZM2aU4yhjpRFMSheAlp-itW22YmrXPf3sxNPXkK5H3eJ-FFaD8mJzEh9LTV_QklRCRraBCnlERcCLGOBkQwFtGEiy207f0rISRjidxEW3GaZFwm2QDNxnaGC4vntse-c9CZF6xxXuuiAHeGh9j37gPm2JZ4co2nTpuuMnAcmLrqwOmud4AdfFQwC5dtEQIHxjYNtIXuKtsumjqoQ6ZdiKdTZ7V52UUbpa497K3OHTS5OH8YjaObu8ur0fAmMkzyJEoySbQuU5OIrDQcmDElk4wVLDZcE5rLFCSnQpo0kzGTeUFTyHmIMpJTItkOOlx6w7PvPfhONZU3UNe6Bdt7xQWjRFAawKMlaJz13kGppq5qtJurmKjFyiqsrL5XDuzBStrnDRR_5GrWAJwugVlVw_x_k7odTn6U0bJR-Q4-fxvavS2-KFL1eHupHp-fBOPjeyXYF-dHlUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67320722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Turner, Kevin J. ; Stewart, Laurence H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kevin J. ; Stewart, Laurence H.</creatorcontrib><description>Aims To assess how and why hydrodistension of the bladder is performed by UK urologists and to compare this practise with the published literature on distension. To suggest a standardised technique for hydrodistension to allow comparison of diagnostic and therapeutic studies. Methods A questionnaire was sent to all UK consultant urologists. Questions addressed the indications for short bladder distension (SBD), details of technique, evaluation of outcome, and awareness of evidence base. The literature on bladder distension was reviewed. Results The majority of respondents perform SBD, principally in the diagnosis and therapy of interstitial cystitis (IC). There was considerable variation in the duration of distension, repetition of distension, the pressure used for distension, and the measurement of bladder capacity. The literature on the technique of hydrodistension is imprecise and no respondent was able to cite literature to support his or her practice. We suggest a simple, more objective technique for performing hydrodistension. Conclusions SBD is widely used. There is marked variability in technique and little more than anecdotal evidence to support any particular approach. Research into the evaluation and treatment of painful bladder syndrome in general and IC in particular would be facilitated by the adoption of a standardised technique. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.20074</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15486948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Cystitis, Interstitial - diagnosis ; Cystitis, Interstitial - therapy ; Data Collection ; Dilatation - methods ; Humans ; hydrodistension ; interstitial cystitis ; painful bladder syndrome ; Professional Practice ; Urinary Bladder ; Urology - methods</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2005, Vol.24 (1), p.74-76</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-4890aaf5c478fc6e3ccf3933d31c6a02b95e96279c589139bd25eb66a080b2093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-4890aaf5c478fc6e3ccf3933d31c6a02b95e96279c589139bd25eb66a080b2093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.20074$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.20074$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15486948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Laurence H.</creatorcontrib><title>How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodyn</addtitle><description>Aims To assess how and why hydrodistension of the bladder is performed by UK urologists and to compare this practise with the published literature on distension. To suggest a standardised technique for hydrodistension to allow comparison of diagnostic and therapeutic studies. Methods A questionnaire was sent to all UK consultant urologists. Questions addressed the indications for short bladder distension (SBD), details of technique, evaluation of outcome, and awareness of evidence base. The literature on bladder distension was reviewed. Results The majority of respondents perform SBD, principally in the diagnosis and therapy of interstitial cystitis (IC). There was considerable variation in the duration of distension, repetition of distension, the pressure used for distension, and the measurement of bladder capacity. The literature on the technique of hydrodistension is imprecise and no respondent was able to cite literature to support his or her practice. We suggest a simple, more objective technique for performing hydrodistension. Conclusions SBD is widely used. There is marked variability in technique and little more than anecdotal evidence to support any particular approach. Research into the evaluation and treatment of painful bladder syndrome in general and IC in particular would be facilitated by the adoption of a standardised technique. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Cystitis, Interstitial - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cystitis, Interstitial - therapy</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Dilatation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hydrodistension</subject><subject>interstitial cystitis</subject><subject>painful bladder syndrome</subject><subject>Professional Practice</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder</subject><subject>Urology - methods</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LwzAchoMoOv8c_AKSkyBYTZM2aU4yhjpRFMSheAlp-itW22YmrXPf3sxNPXkK5H3eJ-FFaD8mJzEh9LTV_QklRCRraBCnlERcCLGOBkQwFtGEiy207f0rISRjidxEW3GaZFwm2QDNxnaGC4vntse-c9CZF6xxXuuiAHeGh9j37gPm2JZ4co2nTpuuMnAcmLrqwOmud4AdfFQwC5dtEQIHxjYNtIXuKtsumjqoQ6ZdiKdTZ7V52UUbpa497K3OHTS5OH8YjaObu8ur0fAmMkzyJEoySbQuU5OIrDQcmDElk4wVLDZcE5rLFCSnQpo0kzGTeUFTyHmIMpJTItkOOlx6w7PvPfhONZU3UNe6Bdt7xQWjRFAawKMlaJz13kGppq5qtJurmKjFyiqsrL5XDuzBStrnDRR_5GrWAJwugVlVw_x_k7odTn6U0bJR-Q4-fxvavS2-KFL1eHupHp-fBOPjeyXYF-dHlUc</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Turner, Kevin J.</creator><creator>Stewart, Laurence H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach</title><author>Turner, Kevin J. ; Stewart, Laurence H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-4890aaf5c478fc6e3ccf3933d31c6a02b95e96279c589139bd25eb66a080b2093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Cystitis, Interstitial - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cystitis, Interstitial - therapy</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Dilatation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hydrodistension</topic><topic>interstitial cystitis</topic><topic>painful bladder syndrome</topic><topic>Professional Practice</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder</topic><topic>Urology - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Laurence H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turner, Kevin J.</au><au>Stewart, Laurence H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodyn</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>74-76</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Aims To assess how and why hydrodistension of the bladder is performed by UK urologists and to compare this practise with the published literature on distension. To suggest a standardised technique for hydrodistension to allow comparison of diagnostic and therapeutic studies. Methods A questionnaire was sent to all UK consultant urologists. Questions addressed the indications for short bladder distension (SBD), details of technique, evaluation of outcome, and awareness of evidence base. The literature on bladder distension was reviewed. Results The majority of respondents perform SBD, principally in the diagnosis and therapy of interstitial cystitis (IC). There was considerable variation in the duration of distension, repetition of distension, the pressure used for distension, and the measurement of bladder capacity. The literature on the technique of hydrodistension is imprecise and no respondent was able to cite literature to support his or her practice. We suggest a simple, more objective technique for performing hydrodistension. Conclusions SBD is widely used. There is marked variability in technique and little more than anecdotal evidence to support any particular approach. Research into the evaluation and treatment of painful bladder syndrome in general and IC in particular would be facilitated by the adoption of a standardised technique. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15486948</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.20074</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-2467
ispartof Neurourology and urodynamics, 2005, Vol.24 (1), p.74-76
issn 0733-2467
1520-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67320722
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cystitis, Interstitial - diagnosis
Cystitis, Interstitial - therapy
Data Collection
Dilatation - methods
Humans
hydrodistension
interstitial cystitis
painful bladder syndrome
Professional Practice
Urinary Bladder
Urology - methods
title How do you stretch a bladder? A survey of UK practice, a literature review, and a recommendation of a standard approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A12%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20you%20stretch%20a%20bladder?%20A%20survey%20of%20UK%20practice,%20a%20literature%20review,%20and%20a%20recommendation%20of%20a%20standard%20approach&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Turner,%20Kevin%20J.&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=74-76&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.20074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67320722%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67320722&rft_id=info:pmid/15486948&rfr_iscdi=true