Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection–embryo transfer cycle

Objective To compare the efficacy of microdose GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) flare-up and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocols in patients who have a poor response to a long luteal GnRH-a protocol. Design Prospective, randomized, clinical study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Forty-two poor resp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2009-06, Vol.91 (6), p.2437-2444
Hauptverfasser: Kahraman, Korhan, M.D, Berker, Bulent, M.D, Atabekoglu, Cem Somer, M.D, Sonmezer, Murat, M.D, Cetinkaya, Esra, M.D, Aytac, Rusen, M.D, Satiroglu, Hakan, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2444
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2437
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 91
creator Kahraman, Korhan, M.D
Berker, Bulent, M.D
Atabekoglu, Cem Somer, M.D
Sonmezer, Murat, M.D
Cetinkaya, Esra, M.D
Aytac, Rusen, M.D
Satiroglu, Hakan, M.D
description Objective To compare the efficacy of microdose GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) flare-up and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocols in patients who have a poor response to a long luteal GnRH-a protocol. Design Prospective, randomized, clinical study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Forty-two poor responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)–embryo transfer cycle. Intervention(s) Twenty-one patients received microdose leuprolide acetate (LA) (50 μg twice daily) starting on the second day of withdrawal bleeding. The other 21 patients received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix daily when the leading follicle reached 14 mm in diameter. Main Outcome Measure(s) Serum E2 levels, number of growing follicles and mature oocytes, embryo quality, dose of gonadotropin used, cancellation, fertilization, implantation rate and pregnancy rate (PR). Result(s) The mean serum E2 concentration on the day of hCG administration was significantly higher in the microdose GnRH-a group than in the GnRH antagonist group (1,904 vs. 1,362 pg/mL). The clinical PRs per started cycle of microdose GnRH-a and GnRH antagonist groups were 14.2% and 9.5%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the other ovulation induction characteristics, fertilization and implantation rates. Conclusion(s) Microdose GnRH-a flare-up protocol and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol seem to have similar efficacy in improving treatment outcomes of poor responder patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.057
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67309959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028208007279</els_id><sourcerecordid>67309959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74f3fd60b2665f86f0d0fb07f6e00dee469d04522354553cb6db32adf44f613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks2OFCEUhStG44yjr2DY6K7aW1BQ1RsTnfiXjHEx7gkFl5a2CkqgJumd7-AT6pNIpduZxNVsuAl891w4h6oiDWwaaMSr_cZizD7lsm4oQL8BtgHePajOG85FzQVnD6tzgIbXQHt6Vj1JaQ8Aouno4-qs6TnnlPXn1e_PTsdgQkKyC16ZkGOYna8jjqiS8zvyLcQpeCSqnLuUiR1VxHqZyRxDDjqM5AZjWhKZljG7eURyLzWf_wne6jhP5hAiiZjm4E1RJctadmHtdD5HpQ85zKNKk9MkzRinsr1HnV3wf37-wmmIh0AK51MxiOiDHvFp9ciqMeGzU72ort-_-3r5sb768uHT5ZurWnNGc921llkjYKBCcNsLCwbsAJ0VCGAQW7E10HJKGW85Z3oQZmBUGdu2VjTsonp5VC2v-bFgynJySeM4Ko9hSVJ0DLZbvi1gfwSL7SlFtHKOblLxIBuQa7hyL-_ClWu4Epgs4ZbW56cZyzChuWs8pVmAFydAJa1GW3zQLt1ytBENhy0v3Nsjh8WPG4dRJu3QazQuFjOlCe4-t3n9n4genXdl7nc8YNqHJfrit2xkohLk9foZ178IPUBHuy37C6uO6IA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67309959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection–embryo transfer cycle</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kahraman, Korhan, M.D ; Berker, Bulent, M.D ; Atabekoglu, Cem Somer, M.D ; Sonmezer, Murat, M.D ; Cetinkaya, Esra, M.D ; Aytac, Rusen, M.D ; Satiroglu, Hakan, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Kahraman, Korhan, M.D ; Berker, Bulent, M.D ; Atabekoglu, Cem Somer, M.D ; Sonmezer, Murat, M.D ; Cetinkaya, Esra, M.D ; Aytac, Rusen, M.D ; Satiroglu, Hakan, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To compare the efficacy of microdose GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) flare-up and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocols in patients who have a poor response to a long luteal GnRH-a protocol. Design Prospective, randomized, clinical study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Forty-two poor responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)–embryo transfer cycle. Intervention(s) Twenty-one patients received microdose leuprolide acetate (LA) (50 μg twice daily) starting on the second day of withdrawal bleeding. The other 21 patients received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix daily when the leading follicle reached 14 mm in diameter. Main Outcome Measure(s) Serum E2 levels, number of growing follicles and mature oocytes, embryo quality, dose of gonadotropin used, cancellation, fertilization, implantation rate and pregnancy rate (PR). Result(s) The mean serum E2 concentration on the day of hCG administration was significantly higher in the microdose GnRH-a group than in the GnRH antagonist group (1,904 vs. 1,362 pg/mL). The clinical PRs per started cycle of microdose GnRH-a and GnRH antagonist groups were 14.2% and 9.5%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the other ovulation induction characteristics, fertilization and implantation rates. Conclusion(s) Microdose GnRH-a flare-up protocol and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol seem to have similar efficacy in improving treatment outcomes of poor responder patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18555238</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation ; Embryo Implantation - physiology ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Estradiol - blood ; Female ; flare-up protocol ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - blood ; GnRH agonist ; GnRH antagonist ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration &amp; dosage ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Hormone Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Leuprolide - therapeutic use ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Ovulation Induction - methods ; poor responder ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; recombinant FSH ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - methods</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2009-06, Vol.91 (6), p.2437-2444</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2009 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74f3fd60b2665f86f0d0fb07f6e00dee469d04522354553cb6db32adf44f613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74f3fd60b2665f86f0d0fb07f6e00dee469d04522354553cb6db32adf44f613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.057$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21615095$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18555238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kahraman, Korhan, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berker, Bulent, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atabekoglu, Cem Somer, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonmezer, Murat, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cetinkaya, Esra, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aytac, Rusen, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satiroglu, Hakan, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection–embryo transfer cycle</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To compare the efficacy of microdose GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) flare-up and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocols in patients who have a poor response to a long luteal GnRH-a protocol. Design Prospective, randomized, clinical study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Forty-two poor responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)–embryo transfer cycle. Intervention(s) Twenty-one patients received microdose leuprolide acetate (LA) (50 μg twice daily) starting on the second day of withdrawal bleeding. The other 21 patients received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix daily when the leading follicle reached 14 mm in diameter. Main Outcome Measure(s) Serum E2 levels, number of growing follicles and mature oocytes, embryo quality, dose of gonadotropin used, cancellation, fertilization, implantation rate and pregnancy rate (PR). Result(s) The mean serum E2 concentration on the day of hCG administration was significantly higher in the microdose GnRH-a group than in the GnRH antagonist group (1,904 vs. 1,362 pg/mL). The clinical PRs per started cycle of microdose GnRH-a and GnRH antagonist groups were 14.2% and 9.5%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the other ovulation induction characteristics, fertilization and implantation rates. Conclusion(s) Microdose GnRH-a flare-up protocol and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol seem to have similar efficacy in improving treatment outcomes of poor responder patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation - physiology</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Estradiol - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>flare-up protocol</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - blood</subject><subject>GnRH agonist</subject><subject>GnRH antagonist</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Hormone Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Leuprolide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - methods</subject><subject>poor responder</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>recombinant FSH</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - methods</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks2OFCEUhStG44yjr2DY6K7aW1BQ1RsTnfiXjHEx7gkFl5a2CkqgJumd7-AT6pNIpduZxNVsuAl891w4h6oiDWwaaMSr_cZizD7lsm4oQL8BtgHePajOG85FzQVnD6tzgIbXQHt6Vj1JaQ8Aouno4-qs6TnnlPXn1e_PTsdgQkKyC16ZkGOYna8jjqiS8zvyLcQpeCSqnLuUiR1VxHqZyRxDDjqM5AZjWhKZljG7eURyLzWf_wne6jhP5hAiiZjm4E1RJctadmHtdD5HpQ85zKNKk9MkzRinsr1HnV3wf37-wmmIh0AK51MxiOiDHvFp9ciqMeGzU72ort-_-3r5sb768uHT5ZurWnNGc921llkjYKBCcNsLCwbsAJ0VCGAQW7E10HJKGW85Z3oQZmBUGdu2VjTsonp5VC2v-bFgynJySeM4Ko9hSVJ0DLZbvi1gfwSL7SlFtHKOblLxIBuQa7hyL-_ClWu4Epgs4ZbW56cZyzChuWs8pVmAFydAJa1GW3zQLt1ytBENhy0v3Nsjh8WPG4dRJu3QazQuFjOlCe4-t3n9n4genXdl7nc8YNqHJfrit2xkohLk9foZ178IPUBHuy37C6uO6IA</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Kahraman, Korhan, M.D</creator><creator>Berker, Bulent, M.D</creator><creator>Atabekoglu, Cem Somer, M.D</creator><creator>Sonmezer, Murat, M.D</creator><creator>Cetinkaya, Esra, M.D</creator><creator>Aytac, Rusen, M.D</creator><creator>Satiroglu, Hakan, M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection–embryo transfer cycle</title><author>Kahraman, Korhan, M.D ; Berker, Bulent, M.D ; Atabekoglu, Cem Somer, M.D ; Sonmezer, Murat, M.D ; Cetinkaya, Esra, M.D ; Aytac, Rusen, M.D ; Satiroglu, Hakan, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-74f3fd60b2665f86f0d0fb07f6e00dee469d04522354553cb6db32adf44f613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation - physiology</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Estradiol - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>flare-up protocol</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - blood</topic><topic>GnRH agonist</topic><topic>GnRH antagonist</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Hormone Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Leuprolide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - methods</topic><topic>poor responder</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>recombinant FSH</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kahraman, Korhan, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berker, Bulent, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atabekoglu, Cem Somer, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonmezer, Murat, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cetinkaya, Esra, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aytac, Rusen, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satiroglu, Hakan, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kahraman, Korhan, M.D</au><au>Berker, Bulent, M.D</au><au>Atabekoglu, Cem Somer, M.D</au><au>Sonmezer, Murat, M.D</au><au>Cetinkaya, Esra, M.D</au><au>Aytac, Rusen, M.D</au><au>Satiroglu, Hakan, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection–embryo transfer cycle</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2437</spage><epage>2444</epage><pages>2437-2444</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To compare the efficacy of microdose GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) flare-up and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocols in patients who have a poor response to a long luteal GnRH-a protocol. Design Prospective, randomized, clinical study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Forty-two poor responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)–embryo transfer cycle. Intervention(s) Twenty-one patients received microdose leuprolide acetate (LA) (50 μg twice daily) starting on the second day of withdrawal bleeding. The other 21 patients received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix daily when the leading follicle reached 14 mm in diameter. Main Outcome Measure(s) Serum E2 levels, number of growing follicles and mature oocytes, embryo quality, dose of gonadotropin used, cancellation, fertilization, implantation rate and pregnancy rate (PR). Result(s) The mean serum E2 concentration on the day of hCG administration was significantly higher in the microdose GnRH-a group than in the GnRH antagonist group (1,904 vs. 1,362 pg/mL). The clinical PRs per started cycle of microdose GnRH-a and GnRH antagonist groups were 14.2% and 9.5%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the other ovulation induction characteristics, fertilization and implantation rates. Conclusion(s) Microdose GnRH-a flare-up protocol and multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol seem to have similar efficacy in improving treatment outcomes of poor responder patients.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18555238</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.057</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2009-06, Vol.91 (6), p.2437-2444
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67309959
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation
Embryo Implantation - physiology
Embryo Transfer - methods
Estradiol - blood
Female
flare-up protocol
Follicle Stimulating Hormone - blood
GnRH agonist
GnRH antagonist
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists & inhibitors
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Hormone Antagonists - therapeutic use
Humans
Internal Medicine
Leuprolide - therapeutic use
Medical sciences
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ovulation Induction - methods
poor responder
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
recombinant FSH
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic - methods
title Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection–embryo transfer cycle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microdose%20gonadotropin-releasing%20hormone%20agonist%20flare-up%20protocol%20versus%20multiple%20dose%20gonadotropin-releasing%20hormone%20antagonist%20protocol%20in%20poor%20responders%20undergoing%20intracytoplasmic%20sperm%20injection%E2%80%93embryo%20transfer%20cycle&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Kahraman,%20Korhan,%20M.D&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2437&rft.epage=2444&rft.pages=2437-2444&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67309959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67309959&rft_id=info:pmid/18555238&rft_els_id=S0015028208007279&rfr_iscdi=true