Antibiotic Susceptibility of Conjunctival Bacterial Isolates from Refractive Surgery Patients
Purpose To determine the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns of conjunctival bacterial flora isolated before surgery from patients undergoing refractive surgery. Design In vitro laboratory investigation. Participants One hundred five eyes from 105 patients scheduled for refractive surgery at...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2009-06, Vol.116 (6), p.1067-1074 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1074 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1067 |
container_title | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | Chung, Jae Lim, MD Seo, Kyoung Yul, MD Yong, Dong Eun, MD Mah, Francis S., MD Kim, Tae-im, MD Kim, Eung Kweon, MD Kim, Jin Kook, MD |
description | Purpose To determine the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns of conjunctival bacterial flora isolated before surgery from patients undergoing refractive surgery. Design In vitro laboratory investigation. Participants One hundred five eyes from 105 patients scheduled for refractive surgery at Balgensesang Ophthalmology Clinic between September 2005 and January 2006 were studied. Among 105 patients, 71 (67.6%) underwent LASIK using a femtosecond laser, 24 (22.9%) underwent LASIK using an automated microkeratome, 8 (7.6%) underwent LASEK, and 2 (1.9%) patients underwent phakic intraocular lens implantation. Methods Preoperative conjunctival swab samples were inoculated directly in culture media at the bedside before topical anesthetic or antibiotic application. Blood agar, chocolate agar, thioglycolate broth, Sabouraud dextrose agar, and Ogawa media were used for bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial cultures. Main Outcome Measures Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ofloxacin (OFX), levofloxacin (LEV), gatifloxacin (GAT), moxifloxacin (MOX), gemifloxacin (GEM), and other commonly used antibiotics were determined using an E test. Results From 105 patients, 73 (85%) coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 2 (2.3%) Staphylococcus aureus , 1 (1.2%) Streptococcus pneumoniae , and 5 (4.8%) gram-negative bacilli were isolated. No fungi or mycobacteria were isolated. The MIC that would inhibit the growth of 90% of the tested bacterial isolates (MIC90 ) of OFX, LEV, GAT, MOX, and GEM for methicillin-susceptible CNS (n = 46) were 0.5 μg/ml, 0.19 μg/ml, 0.094 μg/ml, 0.047 μg/ml, and 0.023 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC90 values for methicillin-resistant CNS (n = 27) were 32 μg/ml, 4 μg/ml, 1 μg/ml, 0.5 μg/ml, and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively ( P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.064 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67308637</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016164200801364X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67308637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-d8471bdb29f27a6ff862faee758d8f051a94dea49a821d4c3e2286955b21ef933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoMo7rj6D0R6o3et-Wqa3Ajr4MfCguIqeCMhTU_c1E4zm6QL8-9NnUHBm71KAs95c_LkIPSc4IZgIl6PTdjf5BvTUIxlQ2iDBX-ANqTlquYdYQ_RpmCkFpziM_QkpRFjLATjj9EZUUy1mMkN-nExZ9_7kL2trpdkYb8eJ58PVXDVNszjMtvs78xUvTU2Q_Rld5nCZDKkysWwq76Ai2ZloCTEnxAP1WeTPcw5PUWPnJkSPDut5-jb-3dftx_rq08fLrcXV7Xlncj1IEvD_dBT5WhnhHNSUGcAulYO0uGWGMUHMFwZScnALQNKpVBt21MCTjF2jl4dc_cx3C6Qst758pZpMjOEJWnRMSwF6-4FKe647FpVQH4EbQwpRXB6H_3OxIMmWK_-9aiP_vXqXxOqi_9S9uKUv_Q7GP4VnYQX4OUJMMmaqZibrU9_OUpahfkf7s2Rg6LtzkPUyRalFgYfwWY9BH9fJ_8H2MnPvtz5Cw6QxrDEuXyJJjqVAn29zso6KlhiwgT_zn4D8pi7qg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20748759</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibiotic Susceptibility of Conjunctival Bacterial Isolates from Refractive Surgery Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chung, Jae Lim, MD ; Seo, Kyoung Yul, MD ; Yong, Dong Eun, MD ; Mah, Francis S., MD ; Kim, Tae-im, MD ; Kim, Eung Kweon, MD ; Kim, Jin Kook, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Chung, Jae Lim, MD ; Seo, Kyoung Yul, MD ; Yong, Dong Eun, MD ; Mah, Francis S., MD ; Kim, Tae-im, MD ; Kim, Eung Kweon, MD ; Kim, Jin Kook, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns of conjunctival bacterial flora isolated before surgery from patients undergoing refractive surgery. Design In vitro laboratory investigation. Participants One hundred five eyes from 105 patients scheduled for refractive surgery at Balgensesang Ophthalmology Clinic between September 2005 and January 2006 were studied. Among 105 patients, 71 (67.6%) underwent LASIK using a femtosecond laser, 24 (22.9%) underwent LASIK using an automated microkeratome, 8 (7.6%) underwent LASEK, and 2 (1.9%) patients underwent phakic intraocular lens implantation. Methods Preoperative conjunctival swab samples were inoculated directly in culture media at the bedside before topical anesthetic or antibiotic application. Blood agar, chocolate agar, thioglycolate broth, Sabouraud dextrose agar, and Ogawa media were used for bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial cultures. Main Outcome Measures Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ofloxacin (OFX), levofloxacin (LEV), gatifloxacin (GAT), moxifloxacin (MOX), gemifloxacin (GEM), and other commonly used antibiotics were determined using an E test. Results From 105 patients, 73 (85%) coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 2 (2.3%) Staphylococcus aureus , 1 (1.2%) Streptococcus pneumoniae , and 5 (4.8%) gram-negative bacilli were isolated. No fungi or mycobacteria were isolated. The MIC that would inhibit the growth of 90% of the tested bacterial isolates (MIC90 ) of OFX, LEV, GAT, MOX, and GEM for methicillin-susceptible CNS (n = 46) were 0.5 μg/ml, 0.19 μg/ml, 0.094 μg/ml, 0.047 μg/ml, and 0.023 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC90 values for methicillin-resistant CNS (n = 27) were 32 μg/ml, 4 μg/ml, 1 μg/ml, 0.5 μg/ml, and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively ( P <0.001). Conclusions The most effective against conjunctival bacteria isolated from refractive surgery patients were GEM, MOX, and GAT; however, resistance to earlier-generation fluoroquinolones (OFX and LEV) is increasing among methicillin-resistant CNS. It may be a therapeutic option to use newer fluoroquinolones in patients undergoing refractive eye surgery to reduce such infections as methicillin-resistant CNS. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.064</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19395038</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OPHTDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Agar ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Bacteria ; Bacteriological Techniques ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conjunctiva - microbiology ; Female ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Gram-Positive Bacteria - drug effects ; Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Humans ; Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted ; Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ophthalmology ; Refractive Surgical Procedures ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2009-06, Vol.116 (6), p.1067-1074</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2009 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-d8471bdb29f27a6ff862faee758d8f051a94dea49a821d4c3e2286955b21ef933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-d8471bdb29f27a6ff862faee758d8f051a94dea49a821d4c3e2286955b21ef933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016164200801364X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21590438$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19395038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chung, Jae Lim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Kyoung Yul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yong, Dong Eun, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mah, Francis S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae-im, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Eung Kweon, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Kook, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Antibiotic Susceptibility of Conjunctival Bacterial Isolates from Refractive Surgery Patients</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns of conjunctival bacterial flora isolated before surgery from patients undergoing refractive surgery. Design In vitro laboratory investigation. Participants One hundred five eyes from 105 patients scheduled for refractive surgery at Balgensesang Ophthalmology Clinic between September 2005 and January 2006 were studied. Among 105 patients, 71 (67.6%) underwent LASIK using a femtosecond laser, 24 (22.9%) underwent LASIK using an automated microkeratome, 8 (7.6%) underwent LASEK, and 2 (1.9%) patients underwent phakic intraocular lens implantation. Methods Preoperative conjunctival swab samples were inoculated directly in culture media at the bedside before topical anesthetic or antibiotic application. Blood agar, chocolate agar, thioglycolate broth, Sabouraud dextrose agar, and Ogawa media were used for bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial cultures. Main Outcome Measures Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ofloxacin (OFX), levofloxacin (LEV), gatifloxacin (GAT), moxifloxacin (MOX), gemifloxacin (GEM), and other commonly used antibiotics were determined using an E test. Results From 105 patients, 73 (85%) coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 2 (2.3%) Staphylococcus aureus , 1 (1.2%) Streptococcus pneumoniae , and 5 (4.8%) gram-negative bacilli were isolated. No fungi or mycobacteria were isolated. The MIC that would inhibit the growth of 90% of the tested bacterial isolates (MIC90 ) of OFX, LEV, GAT, MOX, and GEM for methicillin-susceptible CNS (n = 46) were 0.5 μg/ml, 0.19 μg/ml, 0.094 μg/ml, 0.047 μg/ml, and 0.023 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC90 values for methicillin-resistant CNS (n = 27) were 32 μg/ml, 4 μg/ml, 1 μg/ml, 0.5 μg/ml, and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively ( P <0.001). Conclusions The most effective against conjunctival bacteria isolated from refractive surgery patients were GEM, MOX, and GAT; however, resistance to earlier-generation fluoroquinolones (OFX and LEV) is increasing among methicillin-resistant CNS. It may be a therapeutic option to use newer fluoroquinolones in patients undergoing refractive eye surgery to reduce such infections as methicillin-resistant CNS. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Agar</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conjunctiva - microbiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted</subject><subject>Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Refractive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoMo7rj6D0R6o3et-Wqa3Ajr4MfCguIqeCMhTU_c1E4zm6QL8-9NnUHBm71KAs95c_LkIPSc4IZgIl6PTdjf5BvTUIxlQ2iDBX-ANqTlquYdYQ_RpmCkFpziM_QkpRFjLATjj9EZUUy1mMkN-nExZ9_7kL2trpdkYb8eJ58PVXDVNszjMtvs78xUvTU2Q_Rld5nCZDKkysWwq76Ai2ZloCTEnxAP1WeTPcw5PUWPnJkSPDut5-jb-3dftx_rq08fLrcXV7Xlncj1IEvD_dBT5WhnhHNSUGcAulYO0uGWGMUHMFwZScnALQNKpVBt21MCTjF2jl4dc_cx3C6Qst758pZpMjOEJWnRMSwF6-4FKe647FpVQH4EbQwpRXB6H_3OxIMmWK_-9aiP_vXqXxOqi_9S9uKUv_Q7GP4VnYQX4OUJMMmaqZibrU9_OUpahfkf7s2Rg6LtzkPUyRalFgYfwWY9BH9fJ_8H2MnPvtz5Cw6QxrDEuXyJJjqVAn29zso6KlhiwgT_zn4D8pi7qg</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Chung, Jae Lim, MD</creator><creator>Seo, Kyoung Yul, MD</creator><creator>Yong, Dong Eun, MD</creator><creator>Mah, Francis S., MD</creator><creator>Kim, Tae-im, MD</creator><creator>Kim, Eung Kweon, MD</creator><creator>Kim, Jin Kook, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Antibiotic Susceptibility of Conjunctival Bacterial Isolates from Refractive Surgery Patients</title><author>Chung, Jae Lim, MD ; Seo, Kyoung Yul, MD ; Yong, Dong Eun, MD ; Mah, Francis S., MD ; Kim, Tae-im, MD ; Kim, Eung Kweon, MD ; Kim, Jin Kook, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-d8471bdb29f27a6ff862faee758d8f051a94dea49a821d4c3e2286955b21ef933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Agar</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conjunctiva - microbiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted</topic><topic>Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Refractive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chung, Jae Lim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Kyoung Yul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yong, Dong Eun, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mah, Francis S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae-im, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Eung Kweon, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Kook, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chung, Jae Lim, MD</au><au>Seo, Kyoung Yul, MD</au><au>Yong, Dong Eun, MD</au><au>Mah, Francis S., MD</au><au>Kim, Tae-im, MD</au><au>Kim, Eung Kweon, MD</au><au>Kim, Jin Kook, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibiotic Susceptibility of Conjunctival Bacterial Isolates from Refractive Surgery Patients</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1067</spage><epage>1074</epage><pages>1067-1074</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><coden>OPHTDG</coden><abstract>Purpose To determine the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns of conjunctival bacterial flora isolated before surgery from patients undergoing refractive surgery. Design In vitro laboratory investigation. Participants One hundred five eyes from 105 patients scheduled for refractive surgery at Balgensesang Ophthalmology Clinic between September 2005 and January 2006 were studied. Among 105 patients, 71 (67.6%) underwent LASIK using a femtosecond laser, 24 (22.9%) underwent LASIK using an automated microkeratome, 8 (7.6%) underwent LASEK, and 2 (1.9%) patients underwent phakic intraocular lens implantation. Methods Preoperative conjunctival swab samples were inoculated directly in culture media at the bedside before topical anesthetic or antibiotic application. Blood agar, chocolate agar, thioglycolate broth, Sabouraud dextrose agar, and Ogawa media were used for bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial cultures. Main Outcome Measures Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ofloxacin (OFX), levofloxacin (LEV), gatifloxacin (GAT), moxifloxacin (MOX), gemifloxacin (GEM), and other commonly used antibiotics were determined using an E test. Results From 105 patients, 73 (85%) coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 2 (2.3%) Staphylococcus aureus , 1 (1.2%) Streptococcus pneumoniae , and 5 (4.8%) gram-negative bacilli were isolated. No fungi or mycobacteria were isolated. The MIC that would inhibit the growth of 90% of the tested bacterial isolates (MIC90 ) of OFX, LEV, GAT, MOX, and GEM for methicillin-susceptible CNS (n = 46) were 0.5 μg/ml, 0.19 μg/ml, 0.094 μg/ml, 0.047 μg/ml, and 0.023 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC90 values for methicillin-resistant CNS (n = 27) were 32 μg/ml, 4 μg/ml, 1 μg/ml, 0.5 μg/ml, and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively ( P <0.001). Conclusions The most effective against conjunctival bacteria isolated from refractive surgery patients were GEM, MOX, and GAT; however, resistance to earlier-generation fluoroquinolones (OFX and LEV) is increasing among methicillin-resistant CNS. It may be a therapeutic option to use newer fluoroquinolones in patients undergoing refractive eye surgery to reduce such infections as methicillin-resistant CNS. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19395038</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.064</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-6420 |
ispartof | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2009-06, Vol.116 (6), p.1067-1074 |
issn | 0161-6420 1549-4713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67308637 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Agar Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Bacteria Bacteriological Techniques Biological and medical sciences Conjunctiva - microbiology Female Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification Gram-Positive Bacteria - drug effects Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation & purification Humans Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ Male Medical sciences Microbial Sensitivity Tests Middle Aged Miscellaneous Ophthalmology Refractive Surgical Procedures Young Adult |
title | Antibiotic Susceptibility of Conjunctival Bacterial Isolates from Refractive Surgery Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A26%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibiotic%20Susceptibility%20of%20Conjunctival%20Bacterial%20Isolates%20from%20Refractive%20Surgery%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Chung,%20Jae%20Lim,%20MD&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1067&rft.epage=1074&rft.pages=1067-1074&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft.coden=OPHTDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.064&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67308637%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20748759&rft_id=info:pmid/19395038&rft_els_id=S016164200801364X&rfr_iscdi=true |