Grading of Aortic Valve Stenosis at 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography: Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography And Calibration Against Cardiac Catheterization

PURPOSE:We sought to determine the accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for assessing of aortic valve stenosis and to establish threshold values of the planimetric aortic valve orifice area (AVA) that best separate between different grades of stenosis severity. MATERIALS AND METH...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative radiology 2009-06, Vol.44 (6), p.360-368
Hauptverfasser: Lembcke, Alexander, Woinke, Michael, Borges, Adrian C, Dohmen, Pascal M, Lachnitt, André, Westermann, Yvonne, Geigenmueller, Anja, Hermann, Kay G. A, Butler, Craig, Thiele, Holger, Kivelitz, Dietmar E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 368
container_issue 6
container_start_page 360
container_title Investigative radiology
container_volume 44
creator Lembcke, Alexander
Woinke, Michael
Borges, Adrian C
Dohmen, Pascal M
Lachnitt, André
Westermann, Yvonne
Geigenmueller, Anja
Hermann, Kay G. A
Butler, Craig
Thiele, Holger
Kivelitz, Dietmar E
description PURPOSE:We sought to determine the accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for assessing of aortic valve stenosis and to establish threshold values of the planimetric aortic valve orifice area (AVA) that best separate between different grades of stenosis severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 202 patients (among them 160 patients with aortic valve stenosis) underwent MSCT, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac catheterization (CATH). Planimetric AVA measurements at MSCT were compared with calculations based on Doppler flow velocity measurements by TTE (using the continuity equation) and pressure gradient measurements by CATH (using the Gorlin formula). RESULTS:Series of AVA measurements correlated well between MSCT and TTE (r = 0.86) and between MSCT and CATH (r = 0.90). However, AVA at MSCT (0.98 ± 0.47 cm) was significantly larger than AVA at TTE (0.81 ± 0.36 cm; P < 0.05) and CATH (0.80 ± 0.39 cm; P < 0.05). For severity grades 0 through IV the AVAs at MSCT were 2.69 ± 0.75, 1.86 ± 0.30, 1.48 ± 0.17, 0.95 ± 0.20, and 0.68 ± 0.20 cm, respectively. For separating, the 5 severity grades optimal thresholds at MSCT were 2.1, 1.6, 1.2, and 0.9 cm. Using these adjusted thresholds there was perfect agreement in classification between MSCT and CATH in 156 (77%), but a mismatch by 1 grade in 43 (21.5%) and 2 grades in 3 (1.5%) patients (κw = 0.86). CONCLUSION:Planimetric AVA measurements on MSCT allows for an accurate grading of aortic valve stenosis severity. However, AVA measurements on MSCT are usually larger than measurements on TTE and CATH. Consequently, the thresholds for discriminating between different severity grades have to be adjusted in MSCT.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181a64d76
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67275461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67275461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3036-278f4cdd4e42ce7f15f266a09675dde2e23dff9641b33ec92c92807218915e3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV-L1DAUxYMo7uzqNxDJk29d86dNW9-GYV0XBgR31Mdym9xOo5mmJqnL-oX8mht3BgQfhMAl5_7Ogcsh5BVnl5y19dtP25tL1jMuUfKGgypNrZ6QFa-kKpjg7ClZMSZY0batOiPnMX5j-V8z-Zyc8bbkgvNqRX5fBzB22lM_0LUPyWr6BdxPpLcJJx9tpJCoKotbZ3UWZxvA0Y0_zEtCQ3f-4PcB5vH-3aMIwUY_0a82jXQXYIpp9AF0Dr3So9cQjD3xdD0ZugFn-wDJZs96DzbzWcsQ6DzTiAmD_fW4f0GeDeAivjzNC_L5_dVu86HYfry-2ay3hZYsHy7qZii1MSWWQmM98GoQSgFrVV0ZgwKFNMPQqpL3UqJuRX4NqwVvWl6h7OUFeXPMnYP_sWBM3cFGjc7BhH6JnapFXZWKZ7A8gjr4GAMO3RzsAcJ9x1n3p6AuF9T9W1C2vT7lL_0BzV_TqZEMNEfgzrt8fvzuljsM3Yjg0vj_7AeN3qHm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67275461</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grading of Aortic Valve Stenosis at 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography: Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography And Calibration Against Cardiac Catheterization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Lembcke, Alexander ; Woinke, Michael ; Borges, Adrian C ; Dohmen, Pascal M ; Lachnitt, André ; Westermann, Yvonne ; Geigenmueller, Anja ; Hermann, Kay G. A ; Butler, Craig ; Thiele, Holger ; Kivelitz, Dietmar E</creator><creatorcontrib>Lembcke, Alexander ; Woinke, Michael ; Borges, Adrian C ; Dohmen, Pascal M ; Lachnitt, André ; Westermann, Yvonne ; Geigenmueller, Anja ; Hermann, Kay G. A ; Butler, Craig ; Thiele, Holger ; Kivelitz, Dietmar E</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE:We sought to determine the accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for assessing of aortic valve stenosis and to establish threshold values of the planimetric aortic valve orifice area (AVA) that best separate between different grades of stenosis severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 202 patients (among them 160 patients with aortic valve stenosis) underwent MSCT, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac catheterization (CATH). Planimetric AVA measurements at MSCT were compared with calculations based on Doppler flow velocity measurements by TTE (using the continuity equation) and pressure gradient measurements by CATH (using the Gorlin formula). RESULTS:Series of AVA measurements correlated well between MSCT and TTE (r = 0.86) and between MSCT and CATH (r = 0.90). However, AVA at MSCT (0.98 ± 0.47 cm) was significantly larger than AVA at TTE (0.81 ± 0.36 cm; P &lt; 0.05) and CATH (0.80 ± 0.39 cm; P &lt; 0.05). For severity grades 0 through IV the AVAs at MSCT were 2.69 ± 0.75, 1.86 ± 0.30, 1.48 ± 0.17, 0.95 ± 0.20, and 0.68 ± 0.20 cm, respectively. For separating, the 5 severity grades optimal thresholds at MSCT were 2.1, 1.6, 1.2, and 0.9 cm. Using these adjusted thresholds there was perfect agreement in classification between MSCT and CATH in 156 (77%), but a mismatch by 1 grade in 43 (21.5%) and 2 grades in 3 (1.5%) patients (κw = 0.86). CONCLUSION:Planimetric AVA measurements on MSCT allows for an accurate grading of aortic valve stenosis severity. However, AVA measurements on MSCT are usually larger than measurements on TTE and CATH. Consequently, the thresholds for discriminating between different severity grades have to be adjusted in MSCT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-9996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181a64d76</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19412115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - classification ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Aortography - methods ; Aortography - standards ; Cardiac Catheterization - methods ; Cardiac Catheterization - standards ; Echocardiography - methods ; Echocardiography - standards ; Humans ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><ispartof>Investigative radiology, 2009-06, Vol.44 (6), p.360-368</ispartof><rights>2009 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3036-278f4cdd4e42ce7f15f266a09675dde2e23dff9641b33ec92c92807218915e3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19412115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lembcke, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woinke, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Adrian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohmen, Pascal M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lachnitt, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westermann, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geigenmueller, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Kay G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivelitz, Dietmar E</creatorcontrib><title>Grading of Aortic Valve Stenosis at 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography: Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography And Calibration Against Cardiac Catheterization</title><title>Investigative radiology</title><addtitle>Invest Radiol</addtitle><description>PURPOSE:We sought to determine the accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for assessing of aortic valve stenosis and to establish threshold values of the planimetric aortic valve orifice area (AVA) that best separate between different grades of stenosis severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 202 patients (among them 160 patients with aortic valve stenosis) underwent MSCT, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac catheterization (CATH). Planimetric AVA measurements at MSCT were compared with calculations based on Doppler flow velocity measurements by TTE (using the continuity equation) and pressure gradient measurements by CATH (using the Gorlin formula). RESULTS:Series of AVA measurements correlated well between MSCT and TTE (r = 0.86) and between MSCT and CATH (r = 0.90). However, AVA at MSCT (0.98 ± 0.47 cm) was significantly larger than AVA at TTE (0.81 ± 0.36 cm; P &lt; 0.05) and CATH (0.80 ± 0.39 cm; P &lt; 0.05). For severity grades 0 through IV the AVAs at MSCT were 2.69 ± 0.75, 1.86 ± 0.30, 1.48 ± 0.17, 0.95 ± 0.20, and 0.68 ± 0.20 cm, respectively. For separating, the 5 severity grades optimal thresholds at MSCT were 2.1, 1.6, 1.2, and 0.9 cm. Using these adjusted thresholds there was perfect agreement in classification between MSCT and CATH in 156 (77%), but a mismatch by 1 grade in 43 (21.5%) and 2 grades in 3 (1.5%) patients (κw = 0.86). CONCLUSION:Planimetric AVA measurements on MSCT allows for an accurate grading of aortic valve stenosis severity. However, AVA measurements on MSCT are usually larger than measurements on TTE and CATH. Consequently, the thresholds for discriminating between different severity grades have to be adjusted in MSCT.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - classification</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortography - methods</subject><subject>Aortography - standards</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - methods</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - standards</subject><subject>Echocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Echocardiography - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><issn>0020-9996</issn><issn>1536-0210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV-L1DAUxYMo7uzqNxDJk29d86dNW9-GYV0XBgR31Mdym9xOo5mmJqnL-oX8mht3BgQfhMAl5_7Ogcsh5BVnl5y19dtP25tL1jMuUfKGgypNrZ6QFa-kKpjg7ClZMSZY0batOiPnMX5j-V8z-Zyc8bbkgvNqRX5fBzB22lM_0LUPyWr6BdxPpLcJJx9tpJCoKotbZ3UWZxvA0Y0_zEtCQ3f-4PcB5vH-3aMIwUY_0a82jXQXYIpp9AF0Dr3So9cQjD3xdD0ZugFn-wDJZs96DzbzWcsQ6DzTiAmD_fW4f0GeDeAivjzNC_L5_dVu86HYfry-2ay3hZYsHy7qZii1MSWWQmM98GoQSgFrVV0ZgwKFNMPQqpL3UqJuRX4NqwVvWl6h7OUFeXPMnYP_sWBM3cFGjc7BhH6JnapFXZWKZ7A8gjr4GAMO3RzsAcJ9x1n3p6AuF9T9W1C2vT7lL_0BzV_TqZEMNEfgzrt8fvzuljsM3Yjg0vj_7AeN3qHm</recordid><startdate>200906</startdate><enddate>200906</enddate><creator>Lembcke, Alexander</creator><creator>Woinke, Michael</creator><creator>Borges, Adrian C</creator><creator>Dohmen, Pascal M</creator><creator>Lachnitt, André</creator><creator>Westermann, Yvonne</creator><creator>Geigenmueller, Anja</creator><creator>Hermann, Kay G. A</creator><creator>Butler, Craig</creator><creator>Thiele, Holger</creator><creator>Kivelitz, Dietmar E</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200906</creationdate><title>Grading of Aortic Valve Stenosis at 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography: Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography And Calibration Against Cardiac Catheterization</title><author>Lembcke, Alexander ; Woinke, Michael ; Borges, Adrian C ; Dohmen, Pascal M ; Lachnitt, André ; Westermann, Yvonne ; Geigenmueller, Anja ; Hermann, Kay G. A ; Butler, Craig ; Thiele, Holger ; Kivelitz, Dietmar E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3036-278f4cdd4e42ce7f15f266a09675dde2e23dff9641b33ec92c92807218915e3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - classification</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortography - methods</topic><topic>Aortography - standards</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - methods</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - standards</topic><topic>Echocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Echocardiography - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lembcke, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woinke, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Adrian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohmen, Pascal M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lachnitt, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westermann, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geigenmueller, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Kay G. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivelitz, Dietmar E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Investigative radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lembcke, Alexander</au><au>Woinke, Michael</au><au>Borges, Adrian C</au><au>Dohmen, Pascal M</au><au>Lachnitt, André</au><au>Westermann, Yvonne</au><au>Geigenmueller, Anja</au><au>Hermann, Kay G. A</au><au>Butler, Craig</au><au>Thiele, Holger</au><au>Kivelitz, Dietmar E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Grading of Aortic Valve Stenosis at 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography: Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography And Calibration Against Cardiac Catheterization</atitle><jtitle>Investigative radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Radiol</addtitle><date>2009-06</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>360</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>360-368</pages><issn>0020-9996</issn><eissn>1536-0210</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE:We sought to determine the accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for assessing of aortic valve stenosis and to establish threshold values of the planimetric aortic valve orifice area (AVA) that best separate between different grades of stenosis severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 202 patients (among them 160 patients with aortic valve stenosis) underwent MSCT, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac catheterization (CATH). Planimetric AVA measurements at MSCT were compared with calculations based on Doppler flow velocity measurements by TTE (using the continuity equation) and pressure gradient measurements by CATH (using the Gorlin formula). RESULTS:Series of AVA measurements correlated well between MSCT and TTE (r = 0.86) and between MSCT and CATH (r = 0.90). However, AVA at MSCT (0.98 ± 0.47 cm) was significantly larger than AVA at TTE (0.81 ± 0.36 cm; P &lt; 0.05) and CATH (0.80 ± 0.39 cm; P &lt; 0.05). For severity grades 0 through IV the AVAs at MSCT were 2.69 ± 0.75, 1.86 ± 0.30, 1.48 ± 0.17, 0.95 ± 0.20, and 0.68 ± 0.20 cm, respectively. For separating, the 5 severity grades optimal thresholds at MSCT were 2.1, 1.6, 1.2, and 0.9 cm. Using these adjusted thresholds there was perfect agreement in classification between MSCT and CATH in 156 (77%), but a mismatch by 1 grade in 43 (21.5%) and 2 grades in 3 (1.5%) patients (κw = 0.86). CONCLUSION:Planimetric AVA measurements on MSCT allows for an accurate grading of aortic valve stenosis severity. However, AVA measurements on MSCT are usually larger than measurements on TTE and CATH. Consequently, the thresholds for discriminating between different severity grades have to be adjusted in MSCT.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>19412115</pmid><doi>10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181a64d76</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-9996
ispartof Investigative radiology, 2009-06, Vol.44 (6), p.360-368
issn 0020-9996
1536-0210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67275461
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Aortic Valve Stenosis - classification
Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Aortography - methods
Aortography - standards
Cardiac Catheterization - methods
Cardiac Catheterization - standards
Echocardiography - methods
Echocardiography - standards
Humans
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards
title Grading of Aortic Valve Stenosis at 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography: Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography And Calibration Against Cardiac Catheterization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T22%3A34%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grading%20of%20Aortic%20Valve%20Stenosis%20at%2064-Slice%20Spiral%20Computed%20Tomography:%20Comparison%20With%20Transthoracic%20Echocardiography%20And%20Calibration%20Against%20Cardiac%20Catheterization&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20radiology&rft.au=Lembcke,%20Alexander&rft.date=2009-06&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=360&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=360-368&rft.issn=0020-9996&rft.eissn=1536-0210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181a64d76&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67275461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67275461&rft_id=info:pmid/19412115&rfr_iscdi=true