Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test
The Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT), a commonly applied neuropsychological test of visual spatial ability, is used for assessing patients with suspected right hemisphere, or parietal lobe involvement. A controversy has developed over whether the inferences of this test metric can be assumed to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2004-11, Vol.10 (7), p.939-947 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 947 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 939 |
container_title | Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | MORITZ, CHAD H. JOHNSON, STERLING C. MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M. HAUGHTON, VICTOR M. MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH |
description | The Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT), a commonly applied
neuropsychological test of visual spatial ability, is used for
assessing patients with suspected right hemisphere, or parietal lobe
involvement. A controversy has developed over whether the inferences of
this test metric can be assumed to involve global, lateralized, or
regional functionality. In this study, the characteristic visual
organization and object naming aspects of the VOT task presentation
were adapted to a functional MR imaging (fMRI) paradigm to probe the
neuroanatomic correlates of this neuropsychological test. Whole brain
fMRI mapping results are reported on a cohort of normal subjects.
Bilateral fMRI responses were found predominantly in the posterior
brain, in regions of superior parietal lobules, ventral
temporal-occipital cortex, and posterior visual association areas, and
to a lesser extent, the frontal eye fields bilaterally, and left
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The results indicate a general brain
region or network in which VOT impairment, due to its visuospatial and
object identification demands, is possible to be detected. Discussion
is made of interpretive limitations when adapting neuropsychological
tests to fMRI analysis. (JINS, 2004, 10,
939–947.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1355617704107042 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67269073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1355617704107042</cupid><sourcerecordid>20232250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7fc14cacd1edd585e33cbbdb626db3cf900d8e073633ff8063ec46a14c8f7cf03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMovn-AGyku3FVvmjZplzI4PvD92oY0vdFq24xJC-qvN8MMCoq4SQLnOycnuYRsUdijQMX-LWVZxqkQkFIIS7JAVmnKi1hwThfDOcjxVF8ha94_A1BGAZbJCs1yCJpYJRfjodN9bTvVROc3J1GHg7OqU71tax1p6xw2qkcfWRP1TxgdWztBFz3UfgiOS_eouvpDTQOiO_T9BlkyqvG4Od_Xyf348G50HJ9dHp2MDs5ineaij4XRNNVKVxSrKsszZEyXZVXyhFcl06YAqHIEwThjxuTAGeqUq-DJjdAG2DrZneVOnH0dwsWyrb3GplEd2sFLLhJeBP-_YAIJS5JsmrjzA3y2gwvfEhia50Uh0jRAdAZpZ713aOTE1a1y75KCnI5E_hpJ8GzPg4eyxerbMZ9BAOIZUPse37505V7CM5jIJD-6liBGKbs9vZLXgWfzEqotXV094nfVv2t8Au3ypHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218899744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test</title><source>Cambridge Core</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>MORITZ, CHAD H. ; JOHNSON, STERLING C. ; MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M. ; HAUGHTON, VICTOR M. ; MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</creator><creatorcontrib>MORITZ, CHAD H. ; JOHNSON, STERLING C. ; MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M. ; HAUGHTON, VICTOR M. ; MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</creatorcontrib><description>The Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT), a commonly applied
neuropsychological test of visual spatial ability, is used for
assessing patients with suspected right hemisphere, or parietal lobe
involvement. A controversy has developed over whether the inferences of
this test metric can be assumed to involve global, lateralized, or
regional functionality. In this study, the characteristic visual
organization and object naming aspects of the VOT task presentation
were adapted to a functional MR imaging (fMRI) paradigm to probe the
neuroanatomic correlates of this neuropsychological test. Whole brain
fMRI mapping results are reported on a cohort of normal subjects.
Bilateral fMRI responses were found predominantly in the posterior
brain, in regions of superior parietal lobules, ventral
temporal-occipital cortex, and posterior visual association areas, and
to a lesser extent, the frontal eye fields bilaterally, and left
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The results indicate a general brain
region or network in which VOT impairment, due to its visuospatial and
object identification demands, is possible to be detected. Discussion
is made of interpretive limitations when adapting neuropsychological
tests to fMRI analysis. (JINS, 2004, 10,
939–947.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-6177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1355617704107042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15803557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain Mapping ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cohort Studies ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Female ; fMRI ; Functional Laterality - physiology ; Functional neuroimaging ; Hooper Visual Organization Test ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Methods ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Sample size ; Sex Characteristics ; Studies ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2004-11, Vol.10 (7), p.939-947</ispartof><rights>2004 The International Neuropsychological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Nov 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7fc14cacd1edd585e33cbbdb626db3cf900d8e073633ff8063ec46a14c8f7cf03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7fc14cacd1edd585e33cbbdb626db3cf900d8e073633ff8063ec46a14c8f7cf03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355617704107042/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15803557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MORITZ, CHAD H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, STERLING C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAUGHTON, VICTOR M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</creatorcontrib><title>Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test</title><title>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</title><addtitle>J Int Neuropsychol Soc</addtitle><description>The Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT), a commonly applied
neuropsychological test of visual spatial ability, is used for
assessing patients with suspected right hemisphere, or parietal lobe
involvement. A controversy has developed over whether the inferences of
this test metric can be assumed to involve global, lateralized, or
regional functionality. In this study, the characteristic visual
organization and object naming aspects of the VOT task presentation
were adapted to a functional MR imaging (fMRI) paradigm to probe the
neuroanatomic correlates of this neuropsychological test. Whole brain
fMRI mapping results are reported on a cohort of normal subjects.
Bilateral fMRI responses were found predominantly in the posterior
brain, in regions of superior parietal lobules, ventral
temporal-occipital cortex, and posterior visual association areas, and
to a lesser extent, the frontal eye fields bilaterally, and left
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The results indicate a general brain
region or network in which VOT impairment, due to its visuospatial and
object identification demands, is possible to be detected. Discussion
is made of interpretive limitations when adapting neuropsychological
tests to fMRI analysis. (JINS, 2004, 10,
939–947.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Functional Laterality - physiology</subject><subject>Functional neuroimaging</subject><subject>Hooper Visual Organization Test</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>1355-6177</issn><issn>1469-7661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMovn-AGyku3FVvmjZplzI4PvD92oY0vdFq24xJC-qvN8MMCoq4SQLnOycnuYRsUdijQMX-LWVZxqkQkFIIS7JAVmnKi1hwThfDOcjxVF8ha94_A1BGAZbJCs1yCJpYJRfjodN9bTvVROc3J1GHg7OqU71tax1p6xw2qkcfWRP1TxgdWztBFz3UfgiOS_eouvpDTQOiO_T9BlkyqvG4Od_Xyf348G50HJ9dHp2MDs5ineaij4XRNNVKVxSrKsszZEyXZVXyhFcl06YAqHIEwThjxuTAGeqUq-DJjdAG2DrZneVOnH0dwsWyrb3GplEd2sFLLhJeBP-_YAIJS5JsmrjzA3y2gwvfEhia50Uh0jRAdAZpZ713aOTE1a1y75KCnI5E_hpJ8GzPg4eyxerbMZ9BAOIZUPse37505V7CM5jIJD-6liBGKbs9vZLXgWfzEqotXV094nfVv2t8Au3ypHA</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>MORITZ, CHAD H.</creator><creator>JOHNSON, STERLING C.</creator><creator>MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M.</creator><creator>HAUGHTON, VICTOR M.</creator><creator>MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test</title><author>MORITZ, CHAD H. ; JOHNSON, STERLING C. ; MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M. ; HAUGHTON, VICTOR M. ; MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7fc14cacd1edd585e33cbbdb626db3cf900d8e073633ff8063ec46a14c8f7cf03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Functional Laterality - physiology</topic><topic>Functional neuroimaging</topic><topic>Hooper Visual Organization Test</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MORITZ, CHAD H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, STERLING C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAUGHTON, VICTOR M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MORITZ, CHAD H.</au><au>JOHNSON, STERLING C.</au><au>MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M.</au><au>HAUGHTON, VICTOR M.</au><au>MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</jtitle><addtitle>J Int Neuropsychol Soc</addtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>939</spage><epage>947</epage><pages>939-947</pages><issn>1355-6177</issn><eissn>1469-7661</eissn><abstract>The Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT), a commonly applied
neuropsychological test of visual spatial ability, is used for
assessing patients with suspected right hemisphere, or parietal lobe
involvement. A controversy has developed over whether the inferences of
this test metric can be assumed to involve global, lateralized, or
regional functionality. In this study, the characteristic visual
organization and object naming aspects of the VOT task presentation
were adapted to a functional MR imaging (fMRI) paradigm to probe the
neuroanatomic correlates of this neuropsychological test. Whole brain
fMRI mapping results are reported on a cohort of normal subjects.
Bilateral fMRI responses were found predominantly in the posterior
brain, in regions of superior parietal lobules, ventral
temporal-occipital cortex, and posterior visual association areas, and
to a lesser extent, the frontal eye fields bilaterally, and left
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The results indicate a general brain
region or network in which VOT impairment, due to its visuospatial and
object identification demands, is possible to be detected. Discussion
is made of interpretive limitations when adapting neuropsychological
tests to fMRI analysis. (JINS, 2004, 10,
939–947.)</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>15803557</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1355617704107042</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1355-6177 |
ispartof | Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2004-11, Vol.10 (7), p.939-947 |
issn | 1355-6177 1469-7661 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67269073 |
source | Cambridge Core; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Brain Mapping Cognition & reasoning Cohort Studies Data Interpretation, Statistical Female fMRI Functional Laterality - physiology Functional neuroimaging Hooper Visual Organization Test Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Methods Neuropsychological Tests Sample size Sex Characteristics Studies Visual Perception - physiology |
title | Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T09%3A16%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20MRI%20neuroanatomic%20correlates%20of%20the%20Hooper%20Visual%20Organization%20Test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20International%20Neuropsychological%20Society&rft.au=MORITZ,%20CHAD%20H.&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=939&rft.epage=947&rft.pages=939-947&rft.issn=1355-6177&rft.eissn=1469-7661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1355617704107042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20232250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218899744&rft_id=info:pmid/15803557&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1355617704107042&rfr_iscdi=true |