Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test

The Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT), a commonly applied neuropsychological test of visual spatial ability, is used for assessing patients with suspected right hemisphere, or parietal lobe involvement. A controversy has developed over whether the inferences of this test metric can be assumed to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2004-11, Vol.10 (7), p.939-947
Hauptverfasser: MORITZ, CHAD H., JOHNSON, STERLING C., MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M., HAUGHTON, VICTOR M., MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 947
container_issue 7
container_start_page 939
container_title Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
container_volume 10
creator MORITZ, CHAD H.
JOHNSON, STERLING C.
MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M.
HAUGHTON, VICTOR M.
MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH
description The Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT), a commonly applied neuropsychological test of visual spatial ability, is used for assessing patients with suspected right hemisphere, or parietal lobe involvement. A controversy has developed over whether the inferences of this test metric can be assumed to involve global, lateralized, or regional functionality. In this study, the characteristic visual organization and object naming aspects of the VOT task presentation were adapted to a functional MR imaging (fMRI) paradigm to probe the neuroanatomic correlates of this neuropsychological test. Whole brain fMRI mapping results are reported on a cohort of normal subjects. Bilateral fMRI responses were found predominantly in the posterior brain, in regions of superior parietal lobules, ventral temporal-occipital cortex, and posterior visual association areas, and to a lesser extent, the frontal eye fields bilaterally, and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The results indicate a general brain region or network in which VOT impairment, due to its visuospatial and object identification demands, is possible to be detected. Discussion is made of interpretive limitations when adapting neuropsychological tests to fMRI analysis. (JINS, 2004, 10, 939–947.)
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1355617704107042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67269073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1355617704107042</cupid><sourcerecordid>20232250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7fc14cacd1edd585e33cbbdb626db3cf900d8e073633ff8063ec46a14c8f7cf03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMovn-AGyku3FVvmjZplzI4PvD92oY0vdFq24xJC-qvN8MMCoq4SQLnOycnuYRsUdijQMX-LWVZxqkQkFIIS7JAVmnKi1hwThfDOcjxVF8ha94_A1BGAZbJCs1yCJpYJRfjodN9bTvVROc3J1GHg7OqU71tax1p6xw2qkcfWRP1TxgdWztBFz3UfgiOS_eouvpDTQOiO_T9BlkyqvG4Od_Xyf348G50HJ9dHp2MDs5ineaij4XRNNVKVxSrKsszZEyXZVXyhFcl06YAqHIEwThjxuTAGeqUq-DJjdAG2DrZneVOnH0dwsWyrb3GplEd2sFLLhJeBP-_YAIJS5JsmrjzA3y2gwvfEhia50Uh0jRAdAZpZ713aOTE1a1y75KCnI5E_hpJ8GzPg4eyxerbMZ9BAOIZUPse37505V7CM5jIJD-6liBGKbs9vZLXgWfzEqotXV094nfVv2t8Au3ypHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218899744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test</title><source>Cambridge Core</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>MORITZ, CHAD H. ; JOHNSON, STERLING C. ; MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M. ; HAUGHTON, VICTOR M. ; MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</creator><creatorcontrib>MORITZ, CHAD H. ; JOHNSON, STERLING C. ; MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M. ; HAUGHTON, VICTOR M. ; MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</creatorcontrib><description>The Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT), a commonly applied neuropsychological test of visual spatial ability, is used for assessing patients with suspected right hemisphere, or parietal lobe involvement. A controversy has developed over whether the inferences of this test metric can be assumed to involve global, lateralized, or regional functionality. In this study, the characteristic visual organization and object naming aspects of the VOT task presentation were adapted to a functional MR imaging (fMRI) paradigm to probe the neuroanatomic correlates of this neuropsychological test. Whole brain fMRI mapping results are reported on a cohort of normal subjects. Bilateral fMRI responses were found predominantly in the posterior brain, in regions of superior parietal lobules, ventral temporal-occipital cortex, and posterior visual association areas, and to a lesser extent, the frontal eye fields bilaterally, and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The results indicate a general brain region or network in which VOT impairment, due to its visuospatial and object identification demands, is possible to be detected. Discussion is made of interpretive limitations when adapting neuropsychological tests to fMRI analysis. (JINS, 2004, 10, 939–947.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-6177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1355617704107042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15803557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain Mapping ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cohort Studies ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Female ; fMRI ; Functional Laterality - physiology ; Functional neuroimaging ; Hooper Visual Organization Test ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Methods ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Sample size ; Sex Characteristics ; Studies ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2004-11, Vol.10 (7), p.939-947</ispartof><rights>2004 The International Neuropsychological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Nov 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7fc14cacd1edd585e33cbbdb626db3cf900d8e073633ff8063ec46a14c8f7cf03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7fc14cacd1edd585e33cbbdb626db3cf900d8e073633ff8063ec46a14c8f7cf03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355617704107042/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15803557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MORITZ, CHAD H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, STERLING C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAUGHTON, VICTOR M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</creatorcontrib><title>Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test</title><title>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</title><addtitle>J Int Neuropsychol Soc</addtitle><description>The Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT), a commonly applied neuropsychological test of visual spatial ability, is used for assessing patients with suspected right hemisphere, or parietal lobe involvement. A controversy has developed over whether the inferences of this test metric can be assumed to involve global, lateralized, or regional functionality. In this study, the characteristic visual organization and object naming aspects of the VOT task presentation were adapted to a functional MR imaging (fMRI) paradigm to probe the neuroanatomic correlates of this neuropsychological test. Whole brain fMRI mapping results are reported on a cohort of normal subjects. Bilateral fMRI responses were found predominantly in the posterior brain, in regions of superior parietal lobules, ventral temporal-occipital cortex, and posterior visual association areas, and to a lesser extent, the frontal eye fields bilaterally, and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The results indicate a general brain region or network in which VOT impairment, due to its visuospatial and object identification demands, is possible to be detected. Discussion is made of interpretive limitations when adapting neuropsychological tests to fMRI analysis. (JINS, 2004, 10, 939–947.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Functional Laterality - physiology</subject><subject>Functional neuroimaging</subject><subject>Hooper Visual Organization Test</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>1355-6177</issn><issn>1469-7661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMovn-AGyku3FVvmjZplzI4PvD92oY0vdFq24xJC-qvN8MMCoq4SQLnOycnuYRsUdijQMX-LWVZxqkQkFIIS7JAVmnKi1hwThfDOcjxVF8ha94_A1BGAZbJCs1yCJpYJRfjodN9bTvVROc3J1GHg7OqU71tax1p6xw2qkcfWRP1TxgdWztBFz3UfgiOS_eouvpDTQOiO_T9BlkyqvG4Od_Xyf348G50HJ9dHp2MDs5ineaij4XRNNVKVxSrKsszZEyXZVXyhFcl06YAqHIEwThjxuTAGeqUq-DJjdAG2DrZneVOnH0dwsWyrb3GplEd2sFLLhJeBP-_YAIJS5JsmrjzA3y2gwvfEhia50Uh0jRAdAZpZ713aOTE1a1y75KCnI5E_hpJ8GzPg4eyxerbMZ9BAOIZUPse37505V7CM5jIJD-6liBGKbs9vZLXgWfzEqotXV094nfVv2t8Au3ypHA</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>MORITZ, CHAD H.</creator><creator>JOHNSON, STERLING C.</creator><creator>MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M.</creator><creator>HAUGHTON, VICTOR M.</creator><creator>MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test</title><author>MORITZ, CHAD H. ; JOHNSON, STERLING C. ; MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M. ; HAUGHTON, VICTOR M. ; MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-7fc14cacd1edd585e33cbbdb626db3cf900d8e073633ff8063ec46a14c8f7cf03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Functional Laterality - physiology</topic><topic>Functional neuroimaging</topic><topic>Hooper Visual Organization Test</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MORITZ, CHAD H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, STERLING C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAUGHTON, VICTOR M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MORITZ, CHAD H.</au><au>JOHNSON, STERLING C.</au><au>MCMILLAN, KATHRYN M.</au><au>HAUGHTON, VICTOR M.</au><au>MEYERAND, M. ELIZABETH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</jtitle><addtitle>J Int Neuropsychol Soc</addtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>939</spage><epage>947</epage><pages>939-947</pages><issn>1355-6177</issn><eissn>1469-7661</eissn><abstract>The Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT), a commonly applied neuropsychological test of visual spatial ability, is used for assessing patients with suspected right hemisphere, or parietal lobe involvement. A controversy has developed over whether the inferences of this test metric can be assumed to involve global, lateralized, or regional functionality. In this study, the characteristic visual organization and object naming aspects of the VOT task presentation were adapted to a functional MR imaging (fMRI) paradigm to probe the neuroanatomic correlates of this neuropsychological test. Whole brain fMRI mapping results are reported on a cohort of normal subjects. Bilateral fMRI responses were found predominantly in the posterior brain, in regions of superior parietal lobules, ventral temporal-occipital cortex, and posterior visual association areas, and to a lesser extent, the frontal eye fields bilaterally, and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The results indicate a general brain region or network in which VOT impairment, due to its visuospatial and object identification demands, is possible to be detected. Discussion is made of interpretive limitations when adapting neuropsychological tests to fMRI analysis. (JINS, 2004, 10, 939–947.)</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>15803557</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1355617704107042</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-6177
ispartof Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2004-11, Vol.10 (7), p.939-947
issn 1355-6177
1469-7661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67269073
source Cambridge Core; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Brain Mapping
Cognition & reasoning
Cohort Studies
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Female
fMRI
Functional Laterality - physiology
Functional neuroimaging
Hooper Visual Organization Test
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Methods
Neuropsychological Tests
Sample size
Sex Characteristics
Studies
Visual Perception - physiology
title Functional MRI neuroanatomic correlates of the Hooper Visual Organization Test
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T09%3A16%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20MRI%20neuroanatomic%20correlates%20of%20the%20Hooper%20Visual%20Organization%20Test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20International%20Neuropsychological%20Society&rft.au=MORITZ,%20CHAD%20H.&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=939&rft.epage=947&rft.pages=939-947&rft.issn=1355-6177&rft.eissn=1469-7661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1355617704107042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20232250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218899744&rft_id=info:pmid/15803557&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1355617704107042&rfr_iscdi=true