Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search
Previous research has indicated that saccade target selection during visual search is influenced by scanning history. Already inspected items are less likely to be chosen as saccade targets as long as the number intervening saccades is small. Here, we adapted Jacoby's (1991) process dissociatio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychonomic bulletin & review 2004-10, Vol.11 (5), p.854-861 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 861 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 854 |
| container_title | Psychonomic bulletin & review |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | BOOT, Walter R MCCARLEY, Jason S KRAMER, Arthur F PETERSON, Matthew S |
| description | Previous research has indicated that saccade target selection during visual search is influenced by scanning history. Already inspected items are less likely to be chosen as saccade targets as long as the number intervening saccades is small. Here, we adapted Jacoby's (1991) process dissociation procedure to assess the role of intentional and automatic processes in saccade target selection. Results indicate a large automatic component biasing participants to move their eyes to unexamined locations. However, an intentional component allowed participants to both reinspect old items and aid their selection of new items. A second experiment examined inhibition of return (IOR) as a candidate for the observed automatic component. IOR was found for items that had been previously examined. It is concluded that both automatic and intentional memory traces are available to guide the eyes during search. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3758/bf03196712 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67248560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>978683301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-14fb2ba096ba5ae85386751b748a0a7b8c434d7c1c333cfbddd1179bb94019913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0U1LAzEQBuAgiq3Viz9AFkEPwmq-s6GnWqwKBS96XpJsFrfsR83sCv33RrpS8JSBeRgm7yB0SfA9UyJ7sCVmREtF6BGaEsFIKhjFx7HGUqeaZXyCzgA2GGMhtTxFEyIUo1LzKZovhr5rTF-5xLRFUrW9b_uqa02dNL7pwi7Zhs55AA-xmXxXMMQWeBPc5zk6KU0N_mJ8Z-hj9fS-fEnXb8-vy8U6dZzTPiW8tNQarKU1wvhMsEwqQazimcFG2cxxxgvliGOMudIWRUGI0tZqjonWhM3Q7X5uXOVr8NDnTQXO17VpfTdALhXlmZA4wut_cNMNIf4Fcoq5xpoSGtHdHrnQAQRf5ttQNSbscoLz3zzzx9VfnhFfjRMH2_jiQMcAI7gZgQFn6jKY1lVwcJKLeAXBfgDR_Xtm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204909212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>BOOT, Walter R ; MCCARLEY, Jason S ; KRAMER, Arthur F ; PETERSON, Matthew S</creator><creatorcontrib>BOOT, Walter R ; MCCARLEY, Jason S ; KRAMER, Arthur F ; PETERSON, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has indicated that saccade target selection during visual search is influenced by scanning history. Already inspected items are less likely to be chosen as saccade targets as long as the number intervening saccades is small. Here, we adapted Jacoby's (1991) process dissociation procedure to assess the role of intentional and automatic processes in saccade target selection. Results indicate a large automatic component biasing participants to move their eyes to unexamined locations. However, an intentional component allowed participants to both reinspect old items and aid their selection of new items. A second experiment examined inhibition of return (IOR) as a candidate for the observed automatic component. IOR was found for items that had been previously examined. It is concluded that both automatic and intentional memory traces are available to guide the eyes during search.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/bf03196712</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15732694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Automatism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Eye movements ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Intention ; Memory ; Perception ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Vision ; Visual Perception ; Visual task performance</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2004-10, Vol.11 (5), p.854-861</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Oct 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-14fb2ba096ba5ae85386751b748a0a7b8c434d7c1c333cfbddd1179bb94019913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-14fb2ba096ba5ae85386751b748a0a7b8c434d7c1c333cfbddd1179bb94019913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16451065$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15732694$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BOOT, Walter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCARLEY, Jason S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRAMER, Arthur F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETERSON, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin & review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Previous research has indicated that saccade target selection during visual search is influenced by scanning history. Already inspected items are less likely to be chosen as saccade targets as long as the number intervening saccades is small. Here, we adapted Jacoby's (1991) process dissociation procedure to assess the role of intentional and automatic processes in saccade target selection. Results indicate a large automatic component biasing participants to move their eyes to unexamined locations. However, an intentional component allowed participants to both reinspect old items and aid their selection of new items. A second experiment examined inhibition of return (IOR) as a candidate for the observed automatic component. IOR was found for items that had been previously examined. It is concluded that both automatic and intentional memory traces are available to guide the eyes during search.</description><subject>Automatism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0U1LAzEQBuAgiq3Viz9AFkEPwmq-s6GnWqwKBS96XpJsFrfsR83sCv33RrpS8JSBeRgm7yB0SfA9UyJ7sCVmREtF6BGaEsFIKhjFx7HGUqeaZXyCzgA2GGMhtTxFEyIUo1LzKZovhr5rTF-5xLRFUrW9b_uqa02dNL7pwi7Zhs55AA-xmXxXMMQWeBPc5zk6KU0N_mJ8Z-hj9fS-fEnXb8-vy8U6dZzTPiW8tNQarKU1wvhMsEwqQazimcFG2cxxxgvliGOMudIWRUGI0tZqjonWhM3Q7X5uXOVr8NDnTQXO17VpfTdALhXlmZA4wut_cNMNIf4Fcoq5xpoSGtHdHrnQAQRf5ttQNSbscoLz3zzzx9VfnhFfjRMH2_jiQMcAI7gZgQFn6jKY1lVwcJKLeAXBfgDR_Xtm</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>BOOT, Walter R</creator><creator>MCCARLEY, Jason S</creator><creator>KRAMER, Arthur F</creator><creator>PETERSON, Matthew S</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search</title><author>BOOT, Walter R ; MCCARLEY, Jason S ; KRAMER, Arthur F ; PETERSON, Matthew S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-14fb2ba096ba5ae85386751b748a0a7b8c434d7c1c333cfbddd1179bb94019913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Automatism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BOOT, Walter R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCARLEY, Jason S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRAMER, Arthur F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETERSON, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BOOT, Walter R</au><au>MCCARLEY, Jason S</au><au>KRAMER, Arthur F</au><au>PETERSON, Matthew S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>854</spage><epage>861</epage><pages>854-861</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><abstract>Previous research has indicated that saccade target selection during visual search is influenced by scanning history. Already inspected items are less likely to be chosen as saccade targets as long as the number intervening saccades is small. Here, we adapted Jacoby's (1991) process dissociation procedure to assess the role of intentional and automatic processes in saccade target selection. Results indicate a large automatic component biasing participants to move their eyes to unexamined locations. However, an intentional component allowed participants to both reinspect old items and aid their selection of new items. A second experiment examined inhibition of return (IOR) as a candidate for the observed automatic component. IOR was found for items that had been previously examined. It is concluded that both automatic and intentional memory traces are available to guide the eyes during search.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>15732694</pmid><doi>10.3758/bf03196712</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1069-9384 |
| ispartof | Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2004-10, Vol.11 (5), p.854-861 |
| issn | 1069-9384 1531-5320 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67248560 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Automatism Biological and medical sciences Eye movements Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Intention Memory Perception Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Vision Visual Perception Visual task performance |
| title | Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A49%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20and%20intentional%20memory%20processes%20in%20visual%20search&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=BOOT,%20Walter%20R&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=854&rft.epage=861&rft.pages=854-861&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/bf03196712&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E978683301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204909212&rft_id=info:pmid/15732694&rfr_iscdi=true |