Perception of Scene Layout from Optical Contact, Shadows, and Motion

Kersten et al (1997 Perception 26 171−192) found that the perceived motion of an object in a 3-D scene was determined by the motion of a shadow. In the present study, we compared the effect of a shadow to that of a second object on the ground in determining the perceived position in depth of a float...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perception (London) 2004-01, Vol.33 (11), p.1305-1318
Hauptverfasser: Ni, Rui, Braunstein, Myron L, Andersen, George J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1318
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1305
container_title Perception (London)
container_volume 33
creator Ni, Rui
Braunstein, Myron L
Andersen, George J
description Kersten et al (1997 Perception 26 171−192) found that the perceived motion of an object in a 3-D scene was determined by the motion of a shadow. In the present study, we compared the effect of a shadow to that of a second object on the ground in determining the perceived position in depth of a floating object in both dynamic and stationary scenes. Changing the second (lower) object from textured to dark increased the influence of the second object on the judged position of the first object. Giving the second object zero thickness had this effect only if it was also dark. Variations in the height of the floating object were important with a second object but not with a shadow, in motion scenes. With alternative shadows present, the position of the floating object was determined primarily by matching speeds, with matching sizes as a secondary factor. These results show some similarities but important differences between the effect of a second object and that of a shadow.
doi_str_mv 10.1068/p5288
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67246022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1068_p5288</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67246022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-213ffe176d482f107cd92f78e311b1c43cdc55464d804b2d8c93ab1d85dbacd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtKw0AUQAdRbNX-ggyCrhqddyZLqU-oVKiuh8k8tCXJxJkE6d-b2oLg6i7uuQfuAWCC0TVGQt60nEh5AMaYCZkxQukhGCOKcIaQECNwktIaIcwKTo_BCHNRUJHTMbh7ddG4tluFBgYPl8Y1Ds71JvQd9DHUcDHsjK7gLDSdNt0ULj-1Dd9pCnVj4UvYXp6BI6-r5Cb7eQreH-7fZk_ZfPH4PLudZ4YWeZcRTL13OBeWSeIxyo0tiM-loxiX2DBqrOGcCWYlYiWx0hRUl9hKbkttLKen4GrnbWP46l3qVL1KxlWVblzokxI5YQIRMoCXO9DEkFJ0XrVxVeu4URipbS71m2vgzvfCvqyd_aP2fQbgYgck_eHUOvSxGR78Z_kBxrNudA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67246022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perception of Scene Layout from Optical Contact, Shadows, and Motion</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Ni, Rui ; Braunstein, Myron L ; Andersen, George J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ni, Rui ; Braunstein, Myron L ; Andersen, George J</creatorcontrib><description>Kersten et al (1997 Perception 26 171−192) found that the perceived motion of an object in a 3-D scene was determined by the motion of a shadow. In the present study, we compared the effect of a shadow to that of a second object on the ground in determining the perceived position in depth of a floating object in both dynamic and stationary scenes. Changing the second (lower) object from textured to dark increased the influence of the second object on the judged position of the first object. Giving the second object zero thickness had this effect only if it was also dark. Variations in the height of the floating object were important with a second object but not with a shadow, in motion scenes. With alternative shadows present, the position of the floating object was determined primarily by matching speeds, with matching sizes as a secondary factor. These results show some similarities but important differences between the effect of a second object and that of a shadow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-4233</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1068/p5288</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15693673</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Depth Perception - physiology ; Humans ; Lighting ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Psychophysics</subject><ispartof>Perception (London), 2004-01, Vol.33 (11), p.1305-1318</ispartof><rights>2004 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-213ffe176d482f107cd92f78e311b1c43cdc55464d804b2d8c93ab1d85dbacd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-213ffe176d482f107cd92f78e311b1c43cdc55464d804b2d8c93ab1d85dbacd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/p5288$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/p5288$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15693673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ni, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braunstein, Myron L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, George J</creatorcontrib><title>Perception of Scene Layout from Optical Contact, Shadows, and Motion</title><title>Perception (London)</title><addtitle>Perception</addtitle><description>Kersten et al (1997 Perception 26 171−192) found that the perceived motion of an object in a 3-D scene was determined by the motion of a shadow. In the present study, we compared the effect of a shadow to that of a second object on the ground in determining the perceived position in depth of a floating object in both dynamic and stationary scenes. Changing the second (lower) object from textured to dark increased the influence of the second object on the judged position of the first object. Giving the second object zero thickness had this effect only if it was also dark. Variations in the height of the floating object were important with a second object but not with a shadow, in motion scenes. With alternative shadows present, the position of the floating object was determined primarily by matching speeds, with matching sizes as a secondary factor. These results show some similarities but important differences between the effect of a second object and that of a shadow.</description><subject>Depth Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lighting</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><issn>0301-0066</issn><issn>1468-4233</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtKw0AUQAdRbNX-ggyCrhqddyZLqU-oVKiuh8k8tCXJxJkE6d-b2oLg6i7uuQfuAWCC0TVGQt60nEh5AMaYCZkxQukhGCOKcIaQECNwktIaIcwKTo_BCHNRUJHTMbh7ddG4tluFBgYPl8Y1Ds71JvQd9DHUcDHsjK7gLDSdNt0ULj-1Dd9pCnVj4UvYXp6BI6-r5Cb7eQreH-7fZk_ZfPH4PLudZ4YWeZcRTL13OBeWSeIxyo0tiM-loxiX2DBqrOGcCWYlYiWx0hRUl9hKbkttLKen4GrnbWP46l3qVL1KxlWVblzokxI5YQIRMoCXO9DEkFJ0XrVxVeu4URipbS71m2vgzvfCvqyd_aP2fQbgYgck_eHUOvSxGR78Z_kBxrNudA</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Ni, Rui</creator><creator>Braunstein, Myron L</creator><creator>Andersen, George J</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Perception of Scene Layout from Optical Contact, Shadows, and Motion</title><author>Ni, Rui ; Braunstein, Myron L ; Andersen, George J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-213ffe176d482f107cd92f78e311b1c43cdc55464d804b2d8c93ab1d85dbacd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Depth Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lighting</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ni, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braunstein, Myron L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, George J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Perception (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ni, Rui</au><au>Braunstein, Myron L</au><au>Andersen, George J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perception of Scene Layout from Optical Contact, Shadows, and Motion</atitle><jtitle>Perception (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Perception</addtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1305</spage><epage>1318</epage><pages>1305-1318</pages><issn>0301-0066</issn><eissn>1468-4233</eissn><abstract>Kersten et al (1997 Perception 26 171−192) found that the perceived motion of an object in a 3-D scene was determined by the motion of a shadow. In the present study, we compared the effect of a shadow to that of a second object on the ground in determining the perceived position in depth of a floating object in both dynamic and stationary scenes. Changing the second (lower) object from textured to dark increased the influence of the second object on the judged position of the first object. Giving the second object zero thickness had this effect only if it was also dark. Variations in the height of the floating object were important with a second object but not with a shadow, in motion scenes. With alternative shadows present, the position of the floating object was determined primarily by matching speeds, with matching sizes as a secondary factor. These results show some similarities but important differences between the effect of a second object and that of a shadow.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>15693673</pmid><doi>10.1068/p5288</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-0066
ispartof Perception (London), 2004-01, Vol.33 (11), p.1305-1318
issn 0301-0066
1468-4233
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67246022
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects Depth Perception - physiology
Humans
Lighting
Motion Perception - physiology
Psychophysics
title Perception of Scene Layout from Optical Contact, Shadows, and Motion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A29%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perception%20of%20Scene%20Layout%20from%20Optical%20Contact,%20Shadows,%20and%20Motion&rft.jtitle=Perception%20(London)&rft.au=Ni,%20Rui&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1305&rft.epage=1318&rft.pages=1305-1318&rft.issn=0301-0066&rft.eissn=1468-4233&rft_id=info:doi/10.1068/p5288&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67246022%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67246022&rft_id=info:pmid/15693673&rft_sage_id=10.1068_p5288&rfr_iscdi=true