Soil Water Content and Organic Carbon Availability Are Major Determinants of Soil Microbial Community Composition

Exploration of environmental factors governing soil microbial community composition is long overdue and now possible with improved methods for characterizing microbial communities. Previously, we observed that rice soil microbial communities were distinctly different from tomato soil microbial commu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microbial ecology 2004-11, Vol.48 (3), p.424-430
Hauptverfasser: Drenovsky, R. E., Vo, D., Graham, K. J., Scow, K. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 430
container_issue 3
container_start_page 424
container_title Microbial ecology
container_volume 48
creator Drenovsky, R. E.
Vo, D.
Graham, K. J.
Scow, K. M.
description Exploration of environmental factors governing soil microbial community composition is long overdue and now possible with improved methods for characterizing microbial communities. Previously, we observed that rice soil microbial communities were distinctly different from tomato soil microbial communities, despite management and seasonal variations within soil type. Potential contributing factors included types and amounts of organic inputs, organic carbon content, and timing and amounts of water inputs. Of these, both soil water content and organic carbon availability were highly correlated with observed differences in composition. We examined how organic carbon amendment (compost, vetch, or no amendment) and water additions (from air dry to flooded) affect microbial community composition. Using canonical correspondence analysis of phospholipid fatty acid data, we determined flooded, carbon-amended (+C) microcosm samples were distinctly different from other +C samples and unamended (-C) samples. Although flooding without organic carbon addition influenced composition some, organic carbon addition was necessary to substantially alter community composition. Organic carbon availability had the same general effects on microbial communities regardless of whether it was compost or vetch in origin. In addition, flooded samples, regardless of organic carbon inputs, had significantly lower ratios of fungal to bacterial biomarkers, whereas under drier conditions and increased organic carbon availability the microbial communities had higher proportions of fungal biomass. When comparing field and microcosm soil, flooded +C microcosm samples were most similar to field-collected rice soil, whereas all other treatments were more similar to field-collected tomato soil. Overall, manipulating water and carbon content selected for microbial communities similar to those observed when the same factors were manipulated at the field scale.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00248-003-1063-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67240269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25153124</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25153124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-616831cd026e4ee1ab42132fb1db274af7db7d79828e823cbf1b73f1ca2bf4c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModq3-AC-UULB3ozlJJsleLutHCy29UNG7kGQykmUm2SYzhf57M-5ioTe9OoHzvA-cvAi9BfIRCJGfCiGUq4YQ1gARrKHP0Ao4ow0o_vs5WhGybhsmqDpBr0rZEQJSUPYSnUAr1lQJukK331MY8C8z-Yy3KU4-TtjEDt_kPyYGh7cm2xTx5s6EwdgwhOkeb7LH12aXMv7sa24M0cSp4NTjf7Lr4HKywQxVOI5zXCL1tU8lTCHF1-hFb4bi3xznKfr59cuP7UVzdfPtcru5ahyX7dQIEIqB6wgVnnsPxnIKjPYWOkslN73srOzkWlHlFWXO9mAl68EZanvuCDtF5wfvPqfb2ZdJj6E4Pwwm-jQXLSTlVb5-EgTZSgUtreDZI3CX5hzrEVpRAJCS8wrBAaqfUEr2vd7nMJp8r4HopTV9aE3X1vTSml7E74_i2Y6-e0gca6rAhyNgijNDn010oTxwghMuxXLzuwO3K1PK__e0hZYB5ewv2G-pKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821117744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil Water Content and Organic Carbon Availability Are Major Determinants of Soil Microbial Community Composition</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Drenovsky, R. E. ; Vo, D. ; Graham, K. J. ; Scow, K. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Drenovsky, R. E. ; Vo, D. ; Graham, K. J. ; Scow, K. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Exploration of environmental factors governing soil microbial community composition is long overdue and now possible with improved methods for characterizing microbial communities. Previously, we observed that rice soil microbial communities were distinctly different from tomato soil microbial communities, despite management and seasonal variations within soil type. Potential contributing factors included types and amounts of organic inputs, organic carbon content, and timing and amounts of water inputs. Of these, both soil water content and organic carbon availability were highly correlated with observed differences in composition. We examined how organic carbon amendment (compost, vetch, or no amendment) and water additions (from air dry to flooded) affect microbial community composition. Using canonical correspondence analysis of phospholipid fatty acid data, we determined flooded, carbon-amended (+C) microcosm samples were distinctly different from other +C samples and unamended (-C) samples. Although flooding without organic carbon addition influenced composition some, organic carbon addition was necessary to substantially alter community composition. Organic carbon availability had the same general effects on microbial communities regardless of whether it was compost or vetch in origin. In addition, flooded samples, regardless of organic carbon inputs, had significantly lower ratios of fungal to bacterial biomarkers, whereas under drier conditions and increased organic carbon availability the microbial communities had higher proportions of fungal biomass. When comparing field and microcosm soil, flooded +C microcosm samples were most similar to field-collected rice soil, whereas all other treatments were more similar to field-collected tomato soil. Overall, manipulating water and carbon content selected for microbial communities similar to those observed when the same factors were manipulated at the field scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-3628</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-184X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00248-003-1063-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15692862</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MCBEBU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</publisher><subject>Acid soils ; Agricultural soils ; Agriculture ; Bacteria ; Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon ; Carbon - physiology ; Community composition ; Composts ; Environmental factors ; Fatty acids ; Fatty Acids - analysis ; Floods ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fungi ; Lycopersicon esculentum ; Microbial activity ; Microbiology ; Miscellaneous ; Moisture content ; Mycology ; Organic carbon ; Organic soils ; Oryza ; Oryza sativa ; Phospholipids - analysis ; Rice soils ; Seasonal variations ; Soil - analysis ; Soil composition ; Soil Microbiology ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil organic carbon ; Soil types ; Soil water ; Soil water content ; Soils ; Tomatoes ; Water - analysis ; Water content</subject><ispartof>Microbial ecology, 2004-11, Vol.48 (3), p.424-430</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-616831cd026e4ee1ab42132fb1db274af7db7d79828e823cbf1b73f1ca2bf4c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-616831cd026e4ee1ab42132fb1db274af7db7d79828e823cbf1b73f1ca2bf4c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25153124$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25153124$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16404760$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15692862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drenovsky, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vo, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scow, K. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Soil Water Content and Organic Carbon Availability Are Major Determinants of Soil Microbial Community Composition</title><title>Microbial ecology</title><addtitle>Microb Ecol</addtitle><description>Exploration of environmental factors governing soil microbial community composition is long overdue and now possible with improved methods for characterizing microbial communities. Previously, we observed that rice soil microbial communities were distinctly different from tomato soil microbial communities, despite management and seasonal variations within soil type. Potential contributing factors included types and amounts of organic inputs, organic carbon content, and timing and amounts of water inputs. Of these, both soil water content and organic carbon availability were highly correlated with observed differences in composition. We examined how organic carbon amendment (compost, vetch, or no amendment) and water additions (from air dry to flooded) affect microbial community composition. Using canonical correspondence analysis of phospholipid fatty acid data, we determined flooded, carbon-amended (+C) microcosm samples were distinctly different from other +C samples and unamended (-C) samples. Although flooding without organic carbon addition influenced composition some, organic carbon addition was necessary to substantially alter community composition. Organic carbon availability had the same general effects on microbial communities regardless of whether it was compost or vetch in origin. In addition, flooded samples, regardless of organic carbon inputs, had significantly lower ratios of fungal to bacterial biomarkers, whereas under drier conditions and increased organic carbon availability the microbial communities had higher proportions of fungal biomass. When comparing field and microcosm soil, flooded +C microcosm samples were most similar to field-collected rice soil, whereas all other treatments were more similar to field-collected tomato soil. Overall, manipulating water and carbon content selected for microbial communities similar to those observed when the same factors were manipulated at the field scale.</description><subject>Acid soils</subject><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon - physiology</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Composts</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Fatty Acids - analysis</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Lycopersicon esculentum</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Mycology</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Oryza</subject><subject>Oryza sativa</subject><subject>Phospholipids - analysis</subject><subject>Rice soils</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Soil - analysis</subject><subject>Soil composition</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil organic carbon</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soil water content</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><subject>Water - analysis</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>0095-3628</issn><issn>1432-184X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModq3-AC-UULB3ozlJJsleLutHCy29UNG7kGQykmUm2SYzhf57M-5ioTe9OoHzvA-cvAi9BfIRCJGfCiGUq4YQ1gARrKHP0Ao4ow0o_vs5WhGybhsmqDpBr0rZEQJSUPYSnUAr1lQJukK331MY8C8z-Yy3KU4-TtjEDt_kPyYGh7cm2xTx5s6EwdgwhOkeb7LH12aXMv7sa24M0cSp4NTjf7Lr4HKywQxVOI5zXCL1tU8lTCHF1-hFb4bi3xznKfr59cuP7UVzdfPtcru5ahyX7dQIEIqB6wgVnnsPxnIKjPYWOkslN73srOzkWlHlFWXO9mAl68EZanvuCDtF5wfvPqfb2ZdJj6E4Pwwm-jQXLSTlVb5-EgTZSgUtreDZI3CX5hzrEVpRAJCS8wrBAaqfUEr2vd7nMJp8r4HopTV9aE3X1vTSml7E74_i2Y6-e0gca6rAhyNgijNDn010oTxwghMuxXLzuwO3K1PK__e0hZYB5ewv2G-pKA</recordid><startdate>200411</startdate><enddate>200411</enddate><creator>Drenovsky, R. E.</creator><creator>Vo, D.</creator><creator>Graham, K. J.</creator><creator>Scow, K. M.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200411</creationdate><title>Soil Water Content and Organic Carbon Availability Are Major Determinants of Soil Microbial Community Composition</title><author>Drenovsky, R. E. ; Vo, D. ; Graham, K. J. ; Scow, K. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-616831cd026e4ee1ab42132fb1db274af7db7d79828e823cbf1b73f1ca2bf4c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Acid soils</topic><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon - physiology</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Composts</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Fatty Acids - analysis</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Lycopersicon esculentum</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Mycology</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Oryza</topic><topic>Oryza sativa</topic><topic>Phospholipids - analysis</topic><topic>Rice soils</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Soil - analysis</topic><topic>Soil composition</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil organic carbon</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soil water content</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><topic>Water - analysis</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drenovsky, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vo, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scow, K. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microbial ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drenovsky, R. E.</au><au>Vo, D.</au><au>Graham, K. J.</au><au>Scow, K. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil Water Content and Organic Carbon Availability Are Major Determinants of Soil Microbial Community Composition</atitle><jtitle>Microbial ecology</jtitle><addtitle>Microb Ecol</addtitle><date>2004-11</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>424</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>424-430</pages><issn>0095-3628</issn><eissn>1432-184X</eissn><coden>MCBEBU</coden><abstract>Exploration of environmental factors governing soil microbial community composition is long overdue and now possible with improved methods for characterizing microbial communities. Previously, we observed that rice soil microbial communities were distinctly different from tomato soil microbial communities, despite management and seasonal variations within soil type. Potential contributing factors included types and amounts of organic inputs, organic carbon content, and timing and amounts of water inputs. Of these, both soil water content and organic carbon availability were highly correlated with observed differences in composition. We examined how organic carbon amendment (compost, vetch, or no amendment) and water additions (from air dry to flooded) affect microbial community composition. Using canonical correspondence analysis of phospholipid fatty acid data, we determined flooded, carbon-amended (+C) microcosm samples were distinctly different from other +C samples and unamended (-C) samples. Although flooding without organic carbon addition influenced composition some, organic carbon addition was necessary to substantially alter community composition. Organic carbon availability had the same general effects on microbial communities regardless of whether it was compost or vetch in origin. In addition, flooded samples, regardless of organic carbon inputs, had significantly lower ratios of fungal to bacterial biomarkers, whereas under drier conditions and increased organic carbon availability the microbial communities had higher proportions of fungal biomass. When comparing field and microcosm soil, flooded +C microcosm samples were most similar to field-collected rice soil, whereas all other treatments were more similar to field-collected tomato soil. Overall, manipulating water and carbon content selected for microbial communities similar to those observed when the same factors were manipulated at the field scale.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</pub><pmid>15692862</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00248-003-1063-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-3628
ispartof Microbial ecology, 2004-11, Vol.48 (3), p.424-430
issn 0095-3628
1432-184X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67240269
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Acid soils
Agricultural soils
Agriculture
Bacteria
Bacteriology
Biological and medical sciences
Carbon
Carbon - physiology
Community composition
Composts
Environmental factors
Fatty acids
Fatty Acids - analysis
Floods
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fungi
Lycopersicon esculentum
Microbial activity
Microbiology
Miscellaneous
Moisture content
Mycology
Organic carbon
Organic soils
Oryza
Oryza sativa
Phospholipids - analysis
Rice soils
Seasonal variations
Soil - analysis
Soil composition
Soil Microbiology
Soil microorganisms
Soil organic carbon
Soil types
Soil water
Soil water content
Soils
Tomatoes
Water - analysis
Water content
title Soil Water Content and Organic Carbon Availability Are Major Determinants of Soil Microbial Community Composition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A37%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20Water%20Content%20and%20Organic%20Carbon%20Availability%20Are%20Major%20Determinants%20of%20Soil%20Microbial%20Community%20Composition&rft.jtitle=Microbial%20ecology&rft.au=Drenovsky,%20R.%20E.&rft.date=2004-11&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=424&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=424-430&rft.issn=0095-3628&rft.eissn=1432-184X&rft.coden=MCBEBU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00248-003-1063-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25153124%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821117744&rft_id=info:pmid/15692862&rft_jstor_id=25153124&rfr_iscdi=true