Validation of the Lie/Bet Screen for Pathological Gambling on Two Normal Population Data Sets

The validity of the Lie/Bet Screen was tested on two community population samples, one adult (n = 2,014) and one adolescent sample (n = 3,237), in Norway. With positive responses on at least one of the questions on Lie/Bet Screen used as the cutoff point the screen showed high both sensitivity and s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Psychological reports 2004-12, Vol.95 (3), p.1009-1013
Hauptverfasser:	Götestam, K. Gunnar, Johansson, Agneta, Wenzel, Hanne Gro, Simonsen, Inge-Ernald
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adolescent Child Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - diagnosis Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - psychology Female Gambling - psychology Humans Male Mass Screening - methods Population Surveillance - methods Predictive Value of Tests Surveys and Questionnaires
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	1013
container_issue	3
container_start_page	1009
container_title	Psychological reports
container_volume	95
creator	Götestam, K. Gunnar Johansson, Agneta Wenzel, Hanne Gro Simonsen, Inge-Ernald
description	The validity of the Lie/Bet Screen was tested on two community population samples, one adult (n = 2,014) and one adolescent sample (n = 3,237), in Norway. With positive responses on at least one of the questions on Lie/Bet Screen used as the cutoff point the screen showed high both sensitivity and specificity. The negative predictive value was also high, but the positive predictive value was comparatively lower. A prediction of probable pathological gambling or “At-risk gambling” based on both Lie/Bet questions identified a valid screening in the two samples (0.54% in adults, 5.6% in adolescents). Compared to the use of the full DSM–IV this is pretty close, with the figures 0.45% and 5.22%. It is concluded that the Lie/Bet Screen may function as a good screening device for pathological gambling plus At-risk gambling in normal community samples.
doi_str_mv	10.2466/pr0.95.3.1009-1013
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67232050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2466_pr0.95.3.1009-1013</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67232050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-97af5f5adb9d54de8c4968665b3f8ff4a0d7463527f9a17ea50aef33a42dbf1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBeSK-_aJU2TNpd-TmHoYFO8kXDaJltH28ykRfz3dnTgnVeHc3jeB86L0CUlYRQLMd05EkoespASIgNKKDtCY8p5GghJP47RmBDGgkjGdITOvN_2KyUsOUUjyoUQMk7H6PMdqrKAtrQNtga3G43npZ7e6hYvc6d1g411eAHtxlZ2XeZQ4RnUWVU2a9xHVt8Wv1hX9-eF3XXVILqHFvBSt_4cnRiovL44zAl6e3xY3T0F89fZ893NPMgjLtpAJmC44VBksuBxodM8liIVgmfMpMbEQIokFoxHiZFAEw2cgDaMQRwVmaEFm6Drwbtz9qvTvlV16XNdVdBo23klkohFhJMejAYwd9Z7p43aubIG96MoUftS-50oyRVT-1LVvtQ-dHWwd1mti7_IocUemA6Ah7VWW9u5pv_2P-Uvs3WB7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67232050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Lie/Bet Screen for Pathological Gambling on Two Normal Population Data Sets</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Götestam, K. Gunnar ; Johansson, Agneta ; Wenzel, Hanne Gro ; Simonsen, Inge-Ernald</creator><creatorcontrib>Götestam, K. Gunnar ; Johansson, Agneta ; Wenzel, Hanne Gro ; Simonsen, Inge-Ernald</creatorcontrib><description>The validity of the Lie/Bet Screen was tested on two community population samples, one adult (n = 2,014) and one adolescent sample (n = 3,237), in Norway. With positive responses on at least one of the questions on Lie/Bet Screen used as the cutoff point the screen showed high both sensitivity and specificity. The negative predictive value was also high, but the positive predictive value was comparatively lower. A prediction of probable pathological gambling or “At-risk gambling” based on both Lie/Bet questions identified a valid screening in the two samples (0.54% in adults, 5.6% in adolescents). Compared to the use of the full DSM–IV this is pretty close, with the figures 0.45% and 5.22%. It is concluded that the Lie/Bet Screen may function as a good screening device for pathological gambling plus At-risk gambling in normal community samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-691X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2466/pr0.95.3.1009-1013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15666948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - diagnosis ; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - psychology ; Female ; Gambling - psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Population Surveillance - methods ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Psychological reports, 2004-12, Vol.95 (3), p.1009-1013</ispartof><rights>2004 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-97af5f5adb9d54de8c4968665b3f8ff4a0d7463527f9a17ea50aef33a42dbf1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-97af5f5adb9d54de8c4968665b3f8ff4a0d7463527f9a17ea50aef33a42dbf1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/pr0.95.3.1009-1013$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/pr0.95.3.1009-1013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15666948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Götestam, K. Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Agneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Hanne Gro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Inge-Ernald</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Lie/Bet Screen for Pathological Gambling on Two Normal Population Data Sets</title><title>Psychological reports</title><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><description>The validity of the Lie/Bet Screen was tested on two community population samples, one adult (n = 2,014) and one adolescent sample (n = 3,237), in Norway. With positive responses on at least one of the questions on Lie/Bet Screen used as the cutoff point the screen showed high both sensitivity and specificity. The negative predictive value was also high, but the positive predictive value was comparatively lower. A prediction of probable pathological gambling or “At-risk gambling” based on both Lie/Bet questions identified a valid screening in the two samples (0.54% in adults, 5.6% in adolescents). Compared to the use of the full DSM–IV this is pretty close, with the figures 0.45% and 5.22%. It is concluded that the Lie/Bet Screen may function as a good screening device for pathological gambling plus At-risk gambling in normal community samples.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gambling - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Population Surveillance - methods</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0033-2941</issn><issn>1558-691X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBeSK-_aJU2TNpd-TmHoYFO8kXDaJltH28ykRfz3dnTgnVeHc3jeB86L0CUlYRQLMd05EkoespASIgNKKDtCY8p5GghJP47RmBDGgkjGdITOvN_2KyUsOUUjyoUQMk7H6PMdqrKAtrQNtga3G43npZ7e6hYvc6d1g411eAHtxlZ2XeZQ4RnUWVU2a9xHVt8Wv1hX9-eF3XXVILqHFvBSt_4cnRiovL44zAl6e3xY3T0F89fZ893NPMgjLtpAJmC44VBksuBxodM8liIVgmfMpMbEQIokFoxHiZFAEw2cgDaMQRwVmaEFm6Drwbtz9qvTvlV16XNdVdBo23klkohFhJMejAYwd9Z7p43aubIG96MoUftS-50oyRVT-1LVvtQ-dHWwd1mti7_IocUemA6Ah7VWW9u5pv_2P-Uvs3WB7g</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Götestam, K. Gunnar</creator><creator>Johansson, Agneta</creator><creator>Wenzel, Hanne Gro</creator><creator>Simonsen, Inge-Ernald</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>Validation of the Lie/Bet Screen for Pathological Gambling on Two Normal Population Data Sets</title><author>Götestam, K. Gunnar ; Johansson, Agneta ; Wenzel, Hanne Gro ; Simonsen, Inge-Ernald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-97af5f5adb9d54de8c4968665b3f8ff4a0d7463527f9a17ea50aef33a42dbf1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gambling - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Population Surveillance - methods</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Götestam, K. Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansson, Agneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Hanne Gro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Inge-Ernald</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Götestam, K. Gunnar</au><au>Johansson, Agneta</au><au>Wenzel, Hanne Gro</au><au>Simonsen, Inge-Ernald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Lie/Bet Screen for Pathological Gambling on Two Normal Population Data Sets</atitle><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1009</spage><epage>1013</epage><pages>1009-1013</pages><issn>0033-2941</issn><eissn>1558-691X</eissn><abstract>The validity of the Lie/Bet Screen was tested on two community population samples, one adult (n = 2,014) and one adolescent sample (n = 3,237), in Norway. With positive responses on at least one of the questions on Lie/Bet Screen used as the cutoff point the screen showed high both sensitivity and specificity. The negative predictive value was also high, but the positive predictive value was comparatively lower. A prediction of probable pathological gambling or “At-risk gambling” based on both Lie/Bet questions identified a valid screening in the two samples (0.54% in adults, 5.6% in adolescents). Compared to the use of the full DSM–IV this is pretty close, with the figures 0.45% and 5.22%. It is concluded that the Lie/Bet Screen may function as a good screening device for pathological gambling plus At-risk gambling in normal community samples.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>15666948</pmid><doi>10.2466/pr0.95.3.1009-1013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0033-2941
ispartof	Psychological reports, 2004-12, Vol.95 (3), p.1009-1013
issn	0033-2941 1558-691X
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67232050
source	Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects	Adolescent Child Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - diagnosis Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders - psychology Female Gambling - psychology Humans Male Mass Screening - methods Population Surveillance - methods Predictive Value of Tests Surveys and Questionnaires
title	Validation of the Lie/Bet Screen for Pathological Gambling on Two Normal Population Data Sets
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T06%3A14%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Lie/Bet%20Screen%20for%20Pathological%20Gambling%20on%20Two%20Normal%20Population%20Data%20Sets&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20reports&rft.au=G%C3%B6testam,%20K.%20Gunnar&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1009&rft.epage=1013&rft.pages=1009-1013&rft.issn=0033-2941&rft.eissn=1558-691X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2466/pr0.95.3.1009-1013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67232050%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67232050&rft_id=info:pmid/15666948&rft_sage_id=10.2466_pr0.95.3.1009-1013&rfr_iscdi=true