Fipronil Resistance in the Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Inheritance and Number of Genes Involved
Bioassays (at generation 1, G1) using fipronil, spinosad, indoxacarb, and Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca with a newly collected field population of Plutella xylostella (L.) from farmers fields in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia, indicated a resistance ratio of ≈400-, 1,170-, 330-, 2...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic entomology 2004-12, Vol.97 (6), p.2043-2050 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2050 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2043 |
container_title | Journal of economic entomology |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Sayyed, Ali H. Wright, Denis J. |
description | Bioassays (at generation 1, G1) using fipronil, spinosad, indoxacarb, and Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca with a newly collected field population of Plutella xylostella (L.) from farmers fields in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia, indicated a resistance ratio of ≈400-, 1,170-, 330-, 2,840-, and 1,410-fold, respectively, compared with a laboratory-susceptible population of P. xylostella (ROTH). At G3, the field-derived population was divided into two subpopulations, one was selected (G3 to G7) with fipronil (fip-SEL), whereas the second was left unselected (UNSEL). Bioassays at G8 found that selection with fipronil gave a resistance ratio of ≈490 compared with UNSEL and ≈770 compared with ROTH. The resistance ratio for fipronil, spinosad, indoxacarb, Cry1Ac, and Cry1Ca in the UNSEL population declined significantly by G8. Logit regression analysis of F1 reciprocal crosses between fip-SEL (at G8) and UNSEL indicated that resistance to fipronil in the fip-SEL population was inherited as an autosomal, incompletely recessive (DLC = 0.37) trait. At the highest dose of fipronil tested, resistance was completely recessive, whereas at the lowest dose it was incompletely recessive. A direct test of monogenic inheritance based on a backcross of F1 progeny with fip-SEL suggested that resistance to fipronil was controlled by a single locus. The fip-SEL population at G8 showed little change in its response to spinosad and indoxacarb compared with G1, whereas its susceptibility to Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca increased markedly over the selection period. This suggests that there may be some low level of cross-resistance between fipronil, spinosad, and indoxacarb. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1603/0022-0493-97.6.2043 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67228193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67228193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b466t-7298361d28e66efe2ade23b83e522ee42420139c37afa20d242b50ea1963d3153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0cFu1DAQBmALUdGl8ARI4EsRPWQZ29lJ3BsqtFRaWgRU4mY58YQ1JHGIk0q8PY52oSfL8ufRzPyMvRCwFgjqLYCUGeRaZbpY41pCrh6xldCqzKQW3x-z1X9xzJ7G-BNAoBTwhB2LDSIWqFZsuPTDGHrf8i8UfZxsXxP3PZ92xN9724XeVbb-xT-FacffbGnwLgwTjfacf27nidrWO0tn5_y639Ho9_9t7_jN3FU08tDwK-oppvf70N6Te8aOGttGen44T9jd5YdvFx-z7e3V9cW7bVbliFNWSF0qFE6WhEgNSetIqqpUtJGSKJe5BKF0rQrbWAku3asNkBUalVNio07Y633dNN7vmeJkOh_r1K_tKczRYCFlmZaV4MsDnKuOnBlG39nxj_m3owROD8DG2rbNmGb08cGhKrQESO7V3jU2GPtjTObu69IlgMYSUCch9qLyIfT0UALMkqhZ8jJLXkYXBs2SqPoLXZ2NgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67228193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fipronil Resistance in the Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Inheritance and Number of Genes Involved</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Sayyed, Ali H. ; Wright, Denis J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sayyed, Ali H. ; Wright, Denis J.</creatorcontrib><description>Bioassays (at generation 1, G1) using fipronil, spinosad, indoxacarb, and Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca with a newly collected field population of Plutella xylostella (L.) from farmers fields in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia, indicated a resistance ratio of ≈400-, 1,170-, 330-, 2,840-, and 1,410-fold, respectively, compared with a laboratory-susceptible population of P. xylostella (ROTH). At G3, the field-derived population was divided into two subpopulations, one was selected (G3 to G7) with fipronil (fip-SEL), whereas the second was left unselected (UNSEL). Bioassays at G8 found that selection with fipronil gave a resistance ratio of ≈490 compared with UNSEL and ≈770 compared with ROTH. The resistance ratio for fipronil, spinosad, indoxacarb, Cry1Ac, and Cry1Ca in the UNSEL population declined significantly by G8. Logit regression analysis of F1 reciprocal crosses between fip-SEL (at G8) and UNSEL indicated that resistance to fipronil in the fip-SEL population was inherited as an autosomal, incompletely recessive (DLC = 0.37) trait. At the highest dose of fipronil tested, resistance was completely recessive, whereas at the lowest dose it was incompletely recessive. A direct test of monogenic inheritance based on a backcross of F1 progeny with fip-SEL suggested that resistance to fipronil was controlled by a single locus. The fip-SEL population at G8 showed little change in its response to spinosad and indoxacarb compared with G1, whereas its susceptibility to Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca increased markedly over the selection period. This suggests that there may be some low level of cross-resistance between fipronil, spinosad, and indoxacarb.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-97.6.2043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15666763</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacillus thuringiensis ; Bacterial Proteins ; Bacterial Toxins ; Biological and medical sciences ; Control ; cross resistance ; Crosses, Genetic ; Cry1Ac toxin ; Cry1Ca toxin ; crystal proteins ; delta-endotoxins ; diamondback moth ; Drug Combinations ; Endotoxins ; fipronil ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities ; genetic resistance ; Hemolysin Proteins ; indoxacarb ; inheritance (genetics) ; insecticide resistance ; Insecticide Resistance - genetics ; INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE AND RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT ; Macrolides ; monogenic inheritance ; Moths - genetics ; Oxazines ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plutella xylostella ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Pyrazoles ; recessive genes ; Regression Analysis ; resistance ; resistance selection ; selection response ; spinosad</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2004-12, Vol.97 (6), p.2043-2050</ispartof><rights>Entomological Society of America</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b466t-7298361d28e66efe2ade23b83e522ee42420139c37afa20d242b50ea1963d3153</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1603/0022-0493-97.6.2043$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,26977,27923,27924,52362</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16379200$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15666763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sayyed, Ali H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Denis J.</creatorcontrib><title>Fipronil Resistance in the Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Inheritance and Number of Genes Involved</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>Bioassays (at generation 1, G1) using fipronil, spinosad, indoxacarb, and Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca with a newly collected field population of Plutella xylostella (L.) from farmers fields in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia, indicated a resistance ratio of ≈400-, 1,170-, 330-, 2,840-, and 1,410-fold, respectively, compared with a laboratory-susceptible population of P. xylostella (ROTH). At G3, the field-derived population was divided into two subpopulations, one was selected (G3 to G7) with fipronil (fip-SEL), whereas the second was left unselected (UNSEL). Bioassays at G8 found that selection with fipronil gave a resistance ratio of ≈490 compared with UNSEL and ≈770 compared with ROTH. The resistance ratio for fipronil, spinosad, indoxacarb, Cry1Ac, and Cry1Ca in the UNSEL population declined significantly by G8. Logit regression analysis of F1 reciprocal crosses between fip-SEL (at G8) and UNSEL indicated that resistance to fipronil in the fip-SEL population was inherited as an autosomal, incompletely recessive (DLC = 0.37) trait. At the highest dose of fipronil tested, resistance was completely recessive, whereas at the lowest dose it was incompletely recessive. A direct test of monogenic inheritance based on a backcross of F1 progeny with fip-SEL suggested that resistance to fipronil was controlled by a single locus. The fip-SEL population at G8 showed little change in its response to spinosad and indoxacarb compared with G1, whereas its susceptibility to Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca increased markedly over the selection period. This suggests that there may be some low level of cross-resistance between fipronil, spinosad, and indoxacarb.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacillus thuringiensis</subject><subject>Bacterial Proteins</subject><subject>Bacterial Toxins</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>cross resistance</subject><subject>Crosses, Genetic</subject><subject>Cry1Ac toxin</subject><subject>Cry1Ca toxin</subject><subject>crystal proteins</subject><subject>delta-endotoxins</subject><subject>diamondback moth</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Endotoxins</subject><subject>fipronil</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>genetic resistance</subject><subject>Hemolysin Proteins</subject><subject>indoxacarb</subject><subject>inheritance (genetics)</subject><subject>insecticide resistance</subject><subject>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</subject><subject>INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE AND RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Macrolides</subject><subject>monogenic inheritance</subject><subject>Moths - genetics</subject><subject>Oxazines</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plutella xylostella</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Pyrazoles</subject><subject>recessive genes</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>resistance</subject><subject>resistance selection</subject><subject>selection response</subject><subject>spinosad</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0cFu1DAQBmALUdGl8ARI4EsRPWQZ29lJ3BsqtFRaWgRU4mY58YQ1JHGIk0q8PY52oSfL8ufRzPyMvRCwFgjqLYCUGeRaZbpY41pCrh6xldCqzKQW3x-z1X9xzJ7G-BNAoBTwhB2LDSIWqFZsuPTDGHrf8i8UfZxsXxP3PZ92xN9724XeVbb-xT-FacffbGnwLgwTjfacf27nidrWO0tn5_y639Ho9_9t7_jN3FU08tDwK-oppvf70N6Te8aOGttGen44T9jd5YdvFx-z7e3V9cW7bVbliFNWSF0qFE6WhEgNSetIqqpUtJGSKJe5BKF0rQrbWAku3asNkBUalVNio07Y633dNN7vmeJkOh_r1K_tKczRYCFlmZaV4MsDnKuOnBlG39nxj_m3owROD8DG2rbNmGb08cGhKrQESO7V3jU2GPtjTObu69IlgMYSUCch9qLyIfT0UALMkqhZ8jJLXkYXBs2SqPoLXZ2NgA</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>Sayyed, Ali H.</creator><creator>Wright, Denis J.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>Fipronil Resistance in the Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Inheritance and Number of Genes Involved</title><author>Sayyed, Ali H. ; Wright, Denis J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b466t-7298361d28e66efe2ade23b83e522ee42420139c37afa20d242b50ea1963d3153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacillus thuringiensis</topic><topic>Bacterial Proteins</topic><topic>Bacterial Toxins</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>cross resistance</topic><topic>Crosses, Genetic</topic><topic>Cry1Ac toxin</topic><topic>Cry1Ca toxin</topic><topic>crystal proteins</topic><topic>delta-endotoxins</topic><topic>diamondback moth</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Endotoxins</topic><topic>fipronil</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>genetic resistance</topic><topic>Hemolysin Proteins</topic><topic>indoxacarb</topic><topic>inheritance (genetics)</topic><topic>insecticide resistance</topic><topic>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</topic><topic>INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE AND RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Macrolides</topic><topic>monogenic inheritance</topic><topic>Moths - genetics</topic><topic>Oxazines</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plutella xylostella</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Pyrazoles</topic><topic>recessive genes</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>resistance</topic><topic>resistance selection</topic><topic>selection response</topic><topic>spinosad</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sayyed, Ali H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Denis J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sayyed, Ali H.</au><au>Wright, Denis J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fipronil Resistance in the Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Inheritance and Number of Genes Involved</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2043</spage><epage>2050</epage><pages>2043-2050</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>Bioassays (at generation 1, G1) using fipronil, spinosad, indoxacarb, and Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca with a newly collected field population of Plutella xylostella (L.) from farmers fields in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia, indicated a resistance ratio of ≈400-, 1,170-, 330-, 2,840-, and 1,410-fold, respectively, compared with a laboratory-susceptible population of P. xylostella (ROTH). At G3, the field-derived population was divided into two subpopulations, one was selected (G3 to G7) with fipronil (fip-SEL), whereas the second was left unselected (UNSEL). Bioassays at G8 found that selection with fipronil gave a resistance ratio of ≈490 compared with UNSEL and ≈770 compared with ROTH. The resistance ratio for fipronil, spinosad, indoxacarb, Cry1Ac, and Cry1Ca in the UNSEL population declined significantly by G8. Logit regression analysis of F1 reciprocal crosses between fip-SEL (at G8) and UNSEL indicated that resistance to fipronil in the fip-SEL population was inherited as an autosomal, incompletely recessive (DLC = 0.37) trait. At the highest dose of fipronil tested, resistance was completely recessive, whereas at the lowest dose it was incompletely recessive. A direct test of monogenic inheritance based on a backcross of F1 progeny with fip-SEL suggested that resistance to fipronil was controlled by a single locus. The fip-SEL population at G8 showed little change in its response to spinosad and indoxacarb compared with G1, whereas its susceptibility to Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca increased markedly over the selection period. This suggests that there may be some low level of cross-resistance between fipronil, spinosad, and indoxacarb.</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>15666763</pmid><doi>10.1603/0022-0493-97.6.2043</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0493 |
ispartof | Journal of economic entomology, 2004-12, Vol.97 (6), p.2043-2050 |
issn | 0022-0493 1938-291X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67228193 |
source | MEDLINE; BioOne Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Animals Bacillus thuringiensis Bacterial Proteins Bacterial Toxins Biological and medical sciences Control cross resistance Crosses, Genetic Cry1Ac toxin Cry1Ca toxin crystal proteins delta-endotoxins diamondback moth Drug Combinations Endotoxins fipronil Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Generalities genetic resistance Hemolysin Proteins indoxacarb inheritance (genetics) insecticide resistance Insecticide Resistance - genetics INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE AND RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT Macrolides monogenic inheritance Moths - genetics Oxazines Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Plutella xylostella Protozoa. Invertebrates Pyrazoles recessive genes Regression Analysis resistance resistance selection selection response spinosad |
title | Fipronil Resistance in the Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Inheritance and Number of Genes Involved |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T13%3A11%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fipronil%20Resistance%20in%20the%20Diamondback%20Moth%20(Lepidoptera:%20Plutellidae):%20Inheritance%20and%20Number%20of%20Genes%20Involved&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Sayyed,%20Ali%20H.&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2043&rft.epage=2050&rft.pages=2043-2050&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/0022-0493-97.6.2043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67228193%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67228193&rft_id=info:pmid/15666763&rfr_iscdi=true |