Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation
Abstract Background and purpose This study compared lateral photon/electron plan (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan, and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy plan for total scalp irradiation. Materials and methods The techniques were planned on a patient with squamous cell carc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 2009-05, Vol.91 (2), p.255-260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 260 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 255 |
container_title | Radiotherapy and oncology |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Wojcicka, Jadwiga B Lasher, Donette E McAfee, Sandra S Fortier, Gregory A |
description | Abstract Background and purpose This study compared lateral photon/electron plan (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan, and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy plan for total scalp irradiation. Materials and methods The techniques were planned on a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp for a prescribed dose of 60 Gy. Conformity indexes and dose volume histograms were used for the comparison. Results Clinical target volume coverage factors for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR were 0.976, 0.998, and 0.967, and Conformation Numbers were 0.532, 0.713, and 0.761, respectively. The dose gradient across the target was 59–136%, 91–129%, and 58–242% for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR techniques, respectively. The 3DCRT and IMRT techniques produced low optical structure doses. 3DCRT produced hotspots in the brain, while IMRT produced brain sparing. HDR produced the highest integral doses to the brain and optical structures. Conclusions IMRT provided the best target dose homogeneity and coverage, and delivered clinically acceptable doses to normal structures. HDR produced the most conformal plan, but the total dose delivered is limited by doses to the brain and eyes. HDR is a clinically feasible alternative for less extensive lesions, lower prescription doses, and for patients who cannot lie on the treatment table. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67221811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0167814008004799</els_id><sourcerecordid>67221811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-9e652fc3e2f8cb430dc8fa2a3ee7f7ee058055d2b54afc75194501fd71d56c083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGOFCEQhonRuLOrb2BMn7x1W9DNABcTs6urySYe1DNhoMgydsMIzMZ9e2lnEhMvnqjDVz9VXxHyisJAgW7f7odsXIp2YAByADUAY0_IhkqhepBSPCWbhole0gkuyGUpewBgMIrn5IJKxSdF-YbYm1TCgjUH29m0HEwOJcUu-a7eZ8TOBe8xY6xdzWjq8qdCex_DzyOWLsQOf1WMJTxgV6yZD92MJbSEkNt4wdRWvyDPvJkLvjy_V-T7xw_frj_1d19uP1-_v-vtJGntFW4583ZE5qXdTSM4K71hZkQUXiACl8C5Yzs-GW8Fp2riQL0T1PGtBTlekTen3ENO63RVL6FYnGcTMR2L3grGqKS0gdMJtDmVktHrQw6LyY-agl7l6r0-ydWrXA1KN7mt7fU5_7hb0P1tOttswLsTgG3Lh4BZFxswWnQho63apfC_H_4NsHOIoXn9gY9Y9umYYzOoqS5Mg_66Hni9L0iASSg1_gaut6RB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67221811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B ; Lasher, Donette E ; McAfee, Sandra S ; Fortier, Gregory A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B ; Lasher, Donette E ; McAfee, Sandra S ; Fortier, Gregory A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background and purpose This study compared lateral photon/electron plan (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan, and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy plan for total scalp irradiation. Materials and methods The techniques were planned on a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp for a prescribed dose of 60 Gy. Conformity indexes and dose volume histograms were used for the comparison. Results Clinical target volume coverage factors for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR were 0.976, 0.998, and 0.967, and Conformation Numbers were 0.532, 0.713, and 0.761, respectively. The dose gradient across the target was 59–136%, 91–129%, and 58–242% for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR techniques, respectively. The 3DCRT and IMRT techniques produced low optical structure doses. 3DCRT produced hotspots in the brain, while IMRT produced brain sparing. HDR produced the highest integral doses to the brain and optical structures. Conclusions IMRT provided the best target dose homogeneity and coverage, and delivered clinically acceptable doses to normal structures. HDR produced the most conformal plan, but the total dose delivered is limited by doses to the brain and eyes. HDR is a clinically feasible alternative for less extensive lesions, lower prescription doses, and for patients who cannot lie on the treatment table.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18954915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Brachytherapy - methods ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; High dose rate brachytherapy ; Humans ; Intensity modulated radiotherapy ; Male ; Mold-based brachytherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Scalp - radiation effects ; Scalp irradiation ; Skin Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><ispartof>Radiotherapy and oncology, 2009-05, Vol.91 (2), p.255-260</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-9e652fc3e2f8cb430dc8fa2a3ee7f7ee058055d2b54afc75194501fd71d56c083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-9e652fc3e2f8cb430dc8fa2a3ee7f7ee058055d2b54afc75194501fd71d56c083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18954915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasher, Donette E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAfee, Sandra S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortier, Gregory A</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation</title><title>Radiotherapy and oncology</title><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background and purpose This study compared lateral photon/electron plan (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan, and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy plan for total scalp irradiation. Materials and methods The techniques were planned on a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp for a prescribed dose of 60 Gy. Conformity indexes and dose volume histograms were used for the comparison. Results Clinical target volume coverage factors for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR were 0.976, 0.998, and 0.967, and Conformation Numbers were 0.532, 0.713, and 0.761, respectively. The dose gradient across the target was 59–136%, 91–129%, and 58–242% for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR techniques, respectively. The 3DCRT and IMRT techniques produced low optical structure doses. 3DCRT produced hotspots in the brain, while IMRT produced brain sparing. HDR produced the highest integral doses to the brain and optical structures. Conclusions IMRT provided the best target dose homogeneity and coverage, and delivered clinically acceptable doses to normal structures. HDR produced the most conformal plan, but the total dose delivered is limited by doses to the brain and eyes. HDR is a clinically feasible alternative for less extensive lesions, lower prescription doses, and for patients who cannot lie on the treatment table.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - methods</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>High dose rate brachytherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiotherapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mold-based brachytherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Scalp - radiation effects</subject><subject>Scalp irradiation</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><issn>0167-8140</issn><issn>1879-0887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGOFCEQhonRuLOrb2BMn7x1W9DNABcTs6urySYe1DNhoMgydsMIzMZ9e2lnEhMvnqjDVz9VXxHyisJAgW7f7odsXIp2YAByADUAY0_IhkqhepBSPCWbhole0gkuyGUpewBgMIrn5IJKxSdF-YbYm1TCgjUH29m0HEwOJcUu-a7eZ8TOBe8xY6xdzWjq8qdCex_DzyOWLsQOf1WMJTxgV6yZD92MJbSEkNt4wdRWvyDPvJkLvjy_V-T7xw_frj_1d19uP1-_v-vtJGntFW4583ZE5qXdTSM4K71hZkQUXiACl8C5Yzs-GW8Fp2riQL0T1PGtBTlekTen3ENO63RVL6FYnGcTMR2L3grGqKS0gdMJtDmVktHrQw6LyY-agl7l6r0-ydWrXA1KN7mt7fU5_7hb0P1tOttswLsTgG3Lh4BZFxswWnQho63apfC_H_4NsHOIoXn9gY9Y9umYYzOoqS5Mg_66Hni9L0iASSg1_gaut6RB</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B</creator><creator>Lasher, Donette E</creator><creator>McAfee, Sandra S</creator><creator>Fortier, Gregory A</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation</title><author>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B ; Lasher, Donette E ; McAfee, Sandra S ; Fortier, Gregory A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-9e652fc3e2f8cb430dc8fa2a3ee7f7ee058055d2b54afc75194501fd71d56c083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - methods</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>High dose rate brachytherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiotherapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mold-based brachytherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Scalp - radiation effects</topic><topic>Scalp irradiation</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasher, Donette E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAfee, Sandra S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortier, Gregory A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B</au><au>Lasher, Donette E</au><au>McAfee, Sandra S</au><au>Fortier, Gregory A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation</atitle><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>255-260</pages><issn>0167-8140</issn><eissn>1879-0887</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background and purpose This study compared lateral photon/electron plan (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan, and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy plan for total scalp irradiation. Materials and methods The techniques were planned on a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp for a prescribed dose of 60 Gy. Conformity indexes and dose volume histograms were used for the comparison. Results Clinical target volume coverage factors for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR were 0.976, 0.998, and 0.967, and Conformation Numbers were 0.532, 0.713, and 0.761, respectively. The dose gradient across the target was 59–136%, 91–129%, and 58–242% for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR techniques, respectively. The 3DCRT and IMRT techniques produced low optical structure doses. 3DCRT produced hotspots in the brain, while IMRT produced brain sparing. HDR produced the highest integral doses to the brain and optical structures. Conclusions IMRT provided the best target dose homogeneity and coverage, and delivered clinically acceptable doses to normal structures. HDR produced the most conformal plan, but the total dose delivered is limited by doses to the brain and eyes. HDR is a clinically feasible alternative for less extensive lesions, lower prescription doses, and for patients who cannot lie on the treatment table.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>18954915</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.022</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-8140 |
ispartof | Radiotherapy and oncology, 2009-05, Vol.91 (2), p.255-260 |
issn | 0167-8140 1879-0887 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67221811 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Aged Brachytherapy - methods Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine High dose rate brachytherapy Humans Intensity modulated radiotherapy Male Mold-based brachytherapy Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods Scalp - radiation effects Scalp irradiation Skin Neoplasms - radiotherapy |
title | Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A59%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetric%20comparison%20of%20three%20different%20treatment%20techniques%20in%20extensive%20scalp%20lesion%20irradiation&rft.jtitle=Radiotherapy%20and%20oncology&rft.au=Wojcicka,%20Jadwiga%20B&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=255-260&rft.issn=0167-8140&rft.eissn=1879-0887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67221811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67221811&rft_id=info:pmid/18954915&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0167814008004799&rfr_iscdi=true |