Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation

Abstract Background and purpose This study compared lateral photon/electron plan (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan, and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy plan for total scalp irradiation. Materials and methods The techniques were planned on a patient with squamous cell carc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiotherapy and oncology 2009-05, Vol.91 (2), p.255-260
Hauptverfasser: Wojcicka, Jadwiga B, Lasher, Donette E, McAfee, Sandra S, Fortier, Gregory A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 260
container_issue 2
container_start_page 255
container_title Radiotherapy and oncology
container_volume 91
creator Wojcicka, Jadwiga B
Lasher, Donette E
McAfee, Sandra S
Fortier, Gregory A
description Abstract Background and purpose This study compared lateral photon/electron plan (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan, and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy plan for total scalp irradiation. Materials and methods The techniques were planned on a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp for a prescribed dose of 60 Gy. Conformity indexes and dose volume histograms were used for the comparison. Results Clinical target volume coverage factors for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR were 0.976, 0.998, and 0.967, and Conformation Numbers were 0.532, 0.713, and 0.761, respectively. The dose gradient across the target was 59–136%, 91–129%, and 58–242% for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR techniques, respectively. The 3DCRT and IMRT techniques produced low optical structure doses. 3DCRT produced hotspots in the brain, while IMRT produced brain sparing. HDR produced the highest integral doses to the brain and optical structures. Conclusions IMRT provided the best target dose homogeneity and coverage, and delivered clinically acceptable doses to normal structures. HDR produced the most conformal plan, but the total dose delivered is limited by doses to the brain and eyes. HDR is a clinically feasible alternative for less extensive lesions, lower prescription doses, and for patients who cannot lie on the treatment table.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67221811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0167814008004799</els_id><sourcerecordid>67221811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-9e652fc3e2f8cb430dc8fa2a3ee7f7ee058055d2b54afc75194501fd71d56c083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGOFCEQhonRuLOrb2BMn7x1W9DNABcTs6urySYe1DNhoMgydsMIzMZ9e2lnEhMvnqjDVz9VXxHyisJAgW7f7odsXIp2YAByADUAY0_IhkqhepBSPCWbhole0gkuyGUpewBgMIrn5IJKxSdF-YbYm1TCgjUH29m0HEwOJcUu-a7eZ8TOBe8xY6xdzWjq8qdCex_DzyOWLsQOf1WMJTxgV6yZD92MJbSEkNt4wdRWvyDPvJkLvjy_V-T7xw_frj_1d19uP1-_v-vtJGntFW4583ZE5qXdTSM4K71hZkQUXiACl8C5Yzs-GW8Fp2riQL0T1PGtBTlekTen3ENO63RVL6FYnGcTMR2L3grGqKS0gdMJtDmVktHrQw6LyY-agl7l6r0-ydWrXA1KN7mt7fU5_7hb0P1tOttswLsTgG3Lh4BZFxswWnQho63apfC_H_4NsHOIoXn9gY9Y9umYYzOoqS5Mg_66Hni9L0iASSg1_gaut6RB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67221811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B ; Lasher, Donette E ; McAfee, Sandra S ; Fortier, Gregory A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B ; Lasher, Donette E ; McAfee, Sandra S ; Fortier, Gregory A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background and purpose This study compared lateral photon/electron plan (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan, and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy plan for total scalp irradiation. Materials and methods The techniques were planned on a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp for a prescribed dose of 60 Gy. Conformity indexes and dose volume histograms were used for the comparison. Results Clinical target volume coverage factors for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR were 0.976, 0.998, and 0.967, and Conformation Numbers were 0.532, 0.713, and 0.761, respectively. The dose gradient across the target was 59–136%, 91–129%, and 58–242% for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR techniques, respectively. The 3DCRT and IMRT techniques produced low optical structure doses. 3DCRT produced hotspots in the brain, while IMRT produced brain sparing. HDR produced the highest integral doses to the brain and optical structures. Conclusions IMRT provided the best target dose homogeneity and coverage, and delivered clinically acceptable doses to normal structures. HDR produced the most conformal plan, but the total dose delivered is limited by doses to the brain and eyes. HDR is a clinically feasible alternative for less extensive lesions, lower prescription doses, and for patients who cannot lie on the treatment table.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18954915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Brachytherapy - methods ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; High dose rate brachytherapy ; Humans ; Intensity modulated radiotherapy ; Male ; Mold-based brachytherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Scalp - radiation effects ; Scalp irradiation ; Skin Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><ispartof>Radiotherapy and oncology, 2009-05, Vol.91 (2), p.255-260</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-9e652fc3e2f8cb430dc8fa2a3ee7f7ee058055d2b54afc75194501fd71d56c083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-9e652fc3e2f8cb430dc8fa2a3ee7f7ee058055d2b54afc75194501fd71d56c083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18954915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasher, Donette E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAfee, Sandra S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortier, Gregory A</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation</title><title>Radiotherapy and oncology</title><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background and purpose This study compared lateral photon/electron plan (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan, and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy plan for total scalp irradiation. Materials and methods The techniques were planned on a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp for a prescribed dose of 60 Gy. Conformity indexes and dose volume histograms were used for the comparison. Results Clinical target volume coverage factors for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR were 0.976, 0.998, and 0.967, and Conformation Numbers were 0.532, 0.713, and 0.761, respectively. The dose gradient across the target was 59–136%, 91–129%, and 58–242% for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR techniques, respectively. The 3DCRT and IMRT techniques produced low optical structure doses. 3DCRT produced hotspots in the brain, while IMRT produced brain sparing. HDR produced the highest integral doses to the brain and optical structures. Conclusions IMRT provided the best target dose homogeneity and coverage, and delivered clinically acceptable doses to normal structures. HDR produced the most conformal plan, but the total dose delivered is limited by doses to the brain and eyes. HDR is a clinically feasible alternative for less extensive lesions, lower prescription doses, and for patients who cannot lie on the treatment table.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - methods</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>High dose rate brachytherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiotherapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mold-based brachytherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Scalp - radiation effects</subject><subject>Scalp irradiation</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><issn>0167-8140</issn><issn>1879-0887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGOFCEQhonRuLOrb2BMn7x1W9DNABcTs6urySYe1DNhoMgydsMIzMZ9e2lnEhMvnqjDVz9VXxHyisJAgW7f7odsXIp2YAByADUAY0_IhkqhepBSPCWbhole0gkuyGUpewBgMIrn5IJKxSdF-YbYm1TCgjUH29m0HEwOJcUu-a7eZ8TOBe8xY6xdzWjq8qdCex_DzyOWLsQOf1WMJTxgV6yZD92MJbSEkNt4wdRWvyDPvJkLvjy_V-T7xw_frj_1d19uP1-_v-vtJGntFW4583ZE5qXdTSM4K71hZkQUXiACl8C5Yzs-GW8Fp2riQL0T1PGtBTlekTen3ENO63RVL6FYnGcTMR2L3grGqKS0gdMJtDmVktHrQw6LyY-agl7l6r0-ydWrXA1KN7mt7fU5_7hb0P1tOttswLsTgG3Lh4BZFxswWnQho63apfC_H_4NsHOIoXn9gY9Y9umYYzOoqS5Mg_66Hni9L0iASSg1_gaut6RB</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B</creator><creator>Lasher, Donette E</creator><creator>McAfee, Sandra S</creator><creator>Fortier, Gregory A</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation</title><author>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B ; Lasher, Donette E ; McAfee, Sandra S ; Fortier, Gregory A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-9e652fc3e2f8cb430dc8fa2a3ee7f7ee058055d2b54afc75194501fd71d56c083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - methods</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>High dose rate brachytherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiotherapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mold-based brachytherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Scalp - radiation effects</topic><topic>Scalp irradiation</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasher, Donette E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAfee, Sandra S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortier, Gregory A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wojcicka, Jadwiga B</au><au>Lasher, Donette E</au><au>McAfee, Sandra S</au><au>Fortier, Gregory A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation</atitle><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>255-260</pages><issn>0167-8140</issn><eissn>1879-0887</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background and purpose This study compared lateral photon/electron plan (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan, and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy plan for total scalp irradiation. Materials and methods The techniques were planned on a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp for a prescribed dose of 60 Gy. Conformity indexes and dose volume histograms were used for the comparison. Results Clinical target volume coverage factors for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR were 0.976, 0.998, and 0.967, and Conformation Numbers were 0.532, 0.713, and 0.761, respectively. The dose gradient across the target was 59–136%, 91–129%, and 58–242% for 3DCRT, IMRT, and HDR techniques, respectively. The 3DCRT and IMRT techniques produced low optical structure doses. 3DCRT produced hotspots in the brain, while IMRT produced brain sparing. HDR produced the highest integral doses to the brain and optical structures. Conclusions IMRT provided the best target dose homogeneity and coverage, and delivered clinically acceptable doses to normal structures. HDR produced the most conformal plan, but the total dose delivered is limited by doses to the brain and eyes. HDR is a clinically feasible alternative for less extensive lesions, lower prescription doses, and for patients who cannot lie on the treatment table.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>18954915</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.022</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8140
ispartof Radiotherapy and oncology, 2009-05, Vol.91 (2), p.255-260
issn 0167-8140
1879-0887
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67221811
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aged
Brachytherapy - methods
Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
High dose rate brachytherapy
Humans
Intensity modulated radiotherapy
Male
Mold-based brachytherapy
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Scalp - radiation effects
Scalp irradiation
Skin Neoplasms - radiotherapy
title Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment techniques in extensive scalp lesion irradiation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A59%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetric%20comparison%20of%20three%20different%20treatment%20techniques%20in%20extensive%20scalp%20lesion%20irradiation&rft.jtitle=Radiotherapy%20and%20oncology&rft.au=Wojcicka,%20Jadwiga%20B&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=255-260&rft.issn=0167-8140&rft.eissn=1879-0887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67221811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67221811&rft_id=info:pmid/18954915&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0167814008004799&rfr_iscdi=true