A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss

Estimates of waterfowl demographic parameters often come from resighting studies where birds fit with individually identifiable neck collars are resighted at a distance. Concerns have been raised about the effects of collar loss on parameter estimates, and the reliability of extrapolating from colla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biometrics 2004-12, Vol.60 (4), p.900-909
Hauptverfasser: Conn, Paul B., Kendall, William L., Samuel, Michael D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 909
container_issue 4
container_start_page 900
container_title Biometrics
container_volume 60
creator Conn, Paul B.
Kendall, William L.
Samuel, Michael D.
description Estimates of waterfowl demographic parameters often come from resighting studies where birds fit with individually identifiable neck collars are resighted at a distance. Concerns have been raised about the effects of collar loss on parameter estimates, and the reliability of extrapolating from collared individuals to the population. Models previously proposed to account for collar loss do not allow survival or harvest parameters to depend on neck collar presence or absence. Also, few models have incorporated recent advances in mark-recapture theory that allow for multiple states or auxiliary encounters such as band recoveries. We propose a multistate model for tag loss in which the presence or absence of a collar is considered as a state variable. In this framework, demographic parameters are corrected for tag loss and questions related to collar effects on survival and recovery rates can be addressed. Encounters of individuals between closed sampling periods also can be incorporated in the analysis. We discuss data requirements for answering questions related to tag loss and sampling designs that lend themselves to this purpose. We illustrate the application of our model using a study of lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00245.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67194181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3695469</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3695469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5085-9485e8427b2b20433663c86cef62b1a16b7169a7ca643c14244b5e25bfbfae263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwDRCyeOBpKf4f54GHbkC3qWViGmJvlpPedAlpXOwE2m-PQ0qReMIPtq_v71zJ5yCEKZnSuN7WU0KISrig91NGiIglE3K6e4QmVAqaEMHIYzQ5QifoWQh1LDNJ2FN0QqUiSlAyQesZnkML3jZ46VbQ4NJ53D0AnrW22YcqYFfipfXfklsI1fqhO_tTFXbb9R7OsG1X-Dxuw5v7AX6P39vO4r5dgcd3do0XLoTn6ElpmwAvDucp-vLxw93FZbK4mV9dzBZJIYmWSSa0BC1YmrOcEcG5UrzQqoBSsZxaqvKUqsymhVWCF1QwIXIJTOZlXlpgip-iN-PcrXffewid2VShgKaxLbg-GJXSTFBNI_j6H7B2vY-fDkZrTYXiTEdIj1Dh4x88lGbrq431e0OJGZIwtRlMNoPJZkjC_E7C7KL01WF-n29g9Vd4sD4C70bgZ9XA_r8Hm_Orm2W8Rf3LUV-HzvmjnqtMCpXFdjK2q9DB7tiO2UUPeCrN109z8_la3N8yeWmu-S8aJ60p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>888146328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Mathematics &amp; Statistics</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Conn, Paul B. ; Kendall, William L. ; Samuel, Michael D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Conn, Paul B. ; Kendall, William L. ; Samuel, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><description>Estimates of waterfowl demographic parameters often come from resighting studies where birds fit with individually identifiable neck collars are resighted at a distance. Concerns have been raised about the effects of collar loss on parameter estimates, and the reliability of extrapolating from collared individuals to the population. Models previously proposed to account for collar loss do not allow survival or harvest parameters to depend on neck collar presence or absence. Also, few models have incorporated recent advances in mark-recapture theory that allow for multiple states or auxiliary encounters such as band recoveries. We propose a multistate model for tag loss in which the presence or absence of a collar is considered as a state variable. In this framework, demographic parameters are corrected for tag loss and questions related to collar effects on survival and recovery rates can be addressed. Encounters of individuals between closed sampling periods also can be incorporated in the analysis. We discuss data requirements for answering questions related to tag loss and sampling designs that lend themselves to this purpose. We illustrate the application of our model using a study of lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-341X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0420</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00245.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15606410</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOMA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , U.S.A , and P.O. Box 1354, 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2DQ , U.K: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Animals ; Band recovery ; Barker model ; Biometrics ; Biometry ; Biotelemetry ; Bird banding ; Birds ; Collar retention ; Data analysis ; Geese ; Mark release recapture ; Mark-recapture ; Mark-resight ; Modeling ; Models, Statistical ; Parametric models ; Population Dynamics ; Simulation ; Survival ; Survival rates ; Tag loss ; Waterfowl ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife biology ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Biometrics, 2004-12, Vol.60 (4), p.900-909</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 The International Biometric Society</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5085-9485e8427b2b20433663c86cef62b1a16b7169a7ca643c14244b5e25bfbfae263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5085-9485e8427b2b20433663c86cef62b1a16b7169a7ca643c14244b5e25bfbfae263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3695469$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3695469$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,832,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58021,58250,58254</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15606410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conn, Paul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><title>A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss</title><title>Biometrics</title><addtitle>Biometrics</addtitle><description>Estimates of waterfowl demographic parameters often come from resighting studies where birds fit with individually identifiable neck collars are resighted at a distance. Concerns have been raised about the effects of collar loss on parameter estimates, and the reliability of extrapolating from collared individuals to the population. Models previously proposed to account for collar loss do not allow survival or harvest parameters to depend on neck collar presence or absence. Also, few models have incorporated recent advances in mark-recapture theory that allow for multiple states or auxiliary encounters such as band recoveries. We propose a multistate model for tag loss in which the presence or absence of a collar is considered as a state variable. In this framework, demographic parameters are corrected for tag loss and questions related to collar effects on survival and recovery rates can be addressed. Encounters of individuals between closed sampling periods also can be incorporated in the analysis. We discuss data requirements for answering questions related to tag loss and sampling designs that lend themselves to this purpose. We illustrate the application of our model using a study of lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens).</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Band recovery</subject><subject>Barker model</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Biometry</subject><subject>Biotelemetry</subject><subject>Bird banding</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Collar retention</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Geese</subject><subject>Mark release recapture</subject><subject>Mark-recapture</subject><subject>Mark-resight</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival rates</subject><subject>Tag loss</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife biology</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0006-341X</issn><issn>1541-0420</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwDRCyeOBpKf4f54GHbkC3qWViGmJvlpPedAlpXOwE2m-PQ0qReMIPtq_v71zJ5yCEKZnSuN7WU0KISrig91NGiIglE3K6e4QmVAqaEMHIYzQ5QifoWQh1LDNJ2FN0QqUiSlAyQesZnkML3jZ46VbQ4NJ53D0AnrW22YcqYFfipfXfklsI1fqhO_tTFXbb9R7OsG1X-Dxuw5v7AX6P39vO4r5dgcd3do0XLoTn6ElpmwAvDucp-vLxw93FZbK4mV9dzBZJIYmWSSa0BC1YmrOcEcG5UrzQqoBSsZxaqvKUqsymhVWCF1QwIXIJTOZlXlpgip-iN-PcrXffewid2VShgKaxLbg-GJXSTFBNI_j6H7B2vY-fDkZrTYXiTEdIj1Dh4x88lGbrq431e0OJGZIwtRlMNoPJZkjC_E7C7KL01WF-n29g9Vd4sD4C70bgZ9XA_r8Hm_Orm2W8Rf3LUV-HzvmjnqtMCpXFdjK2q9DB7tiO2UUPeCrN109z8_la3N8yeWmu-S8aJ60p</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Conn, Paul B.</creator><creator>Kendall, William L.</creator><creator>Samuel, Michael D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>International Biometric Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss</title><author>Conn, Paul B. ; Kendall, William L. ; Samuel, Michael D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5085-9485e8427b2b20433663c86cef62b1a16b7169a7ca643c14244b5e25bfbfae263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Band recovery</topic><topic>Barker model</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Biometry</topic><topic>Biotelemetry</topic><topic>Bird banding</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Collar retention</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Geese</topic><topic>Mark release recapture</topic><topic>Mark-recapture</topic><topic>Mark-resight</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival rates</topic><topic>Tag loss</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife biology</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conn, Paul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conn, Paul B.</au><au>Kendall, William L.</au><au>Samuel, Michael D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss</atitle><jtitle>Biometrics</jtitle><addtitle>Biometrics</addtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>900</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>900-909</pages><issn>0006-341X</issn><eissn>1541-0420</eissn><coden>BIOMA5</coden><abstract>Estimates of waterfowl demographic parameters often come from resighting studies where birds fit with individually identifiable neck collars are resighted at a distance. Concerns have been raised about the effects of collar loss on parameter estimates, and the reliability of extrapolating from collared individuals to the population. Models previously proposed to account for collar loss do not allow survival or harvest parameters to depend on neck collar presence or absence. Also, few models have incorporated recent advances in mark-recapture theory that allow for multiple states or auxiliary encounters such as band recoveries. We propose a multistate model for tag loss in which the presence or absence of a collar is considered as a state variable. In this framework, demographic parameters are corrected for tag loss and questions related to collar effects on survival and recovery rates can be addressed. Encounters of individuals between closed sampling periods also can be incorporated in the analysis. We discuss data requirements for answering questions related to tag loss and sampling designs that lend themselves to this purpose. We illustrate the application of our model using a study of lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens).</abstract><cop>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , U.S.A , and P.O. Box 1354, 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2DQ , U.K</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><pmid>15606410</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00245.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-341X
ispartof Biometrics, 2004-12, Vol.60 (4), p.900-909
issn 0006-341X
1541-0420
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67194181
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animals
Band recovery
Barker model
Biometrics
Biometry
Biotelemetry
Bird banding
Birds
Collar retention
Data analysis
Geese
Mark release recapture
Mark-recapture
Mark-resight
Modeling
Models, Statistical
Parametric models
Population Dynamics
Simulation
Survival
Survival rates
Tag loss
Waterfowl
Wildfowl
Wildlife biology
Wildlife management
title A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A02%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20General%20Model%20for%20the%20Analysis%20of%20Mark-Resight,%20Mark-Recapture,%20and%20Band-Recovery%20Data%20under%20Tag%20Loss&rft.jtitle=Biometrics&rft.au=Conn,%20Paul%20B.&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=900&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=900-909&rft.issn=0006-341X&rft.eissn=1541-0420&rft.coden=BIOMA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00245.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3695469%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=888146328&rft_id=info:pmid/15606410&rft_jstor_id=3695469&rfr_iscdi=true