A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss
Estimates of waterfowl demographic parameters often come from resighting studies where birds fit with individually identifiable neck collars are resighted at a distance. Concerns have been raised about the effects of collar loss on parameter estimates, and the reliability of extrapolating from colla...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biometrics 2004-12, Vol.60 (4), p.900-909 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 909 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 900 |
container_title | Biometrics |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Conn, Paul B. Kendall, William L. Samuel, Michael D. |
description | Estimates of waterfowl demographic parameters often come from resighting studies where birds fit with individually identifiable neck collars are resighted at a distance. Concerns have been raised about the effects of collar loss on parameter estimates, and the reliability of extrapolating from collared individuals to the population. Models previously proposed to account for collar loss do not allow survival or harvest parameters to depend on neck collar presence or absence. Also, few models have incorporated recent advances in mark-recapture theory that allow for multiple states or auxiliary encounters such as band recoveries. We propose a multistate model for tag loss in which the presence or absence of a collar is considered as a state variable. In this framework, demographic parameters are corrected for tag loss and questions related to collar effects on survival and recovery rates can be addressed. Encounters of individuals between closed sampling periods also can be incorporated in the analysis. We discuss data requirements for answering questions related to tag loss and sampling designs that lend themselves to this purpose. We illustrate the application of our model using a study of lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00245.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67194181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3695469</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3695469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5085-9485e8427b2b20433663c86cef62b1a16b7169a7ca643c14244b5e25bfbfae263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwDRCyeOBpKf4f54GHbkC3qWViGmJvlpPedAlpXOwE2m-PQ0qReMIPtq_v71zJ5yCEKZnSuN7WU0KISrig91NGiIglE3K6e4QmVAqaEMHIYzQ5QifoWQh1LDNJ2FN0QqUiSlAyQesZnkML3jZ46VbQ4NJ53D0AnrW22YcqYFfipfXfklsI1fqhO_tTFXbb9R7OsG1X-Dxuw5v7AX6P39vO4r5dgcd3do0XLoTn6ElpmwAvDucp-vLxw93FZbK4mV9dzBZJIYmWSSa0BC1YmrOcEcG5UrzQqoBSsZxaqvKUqsymhVWCF1QwIXIJTOZlXlpgip-iN-PcrXffewid2VShgKaxLbg-GJXSTFBNI_j6H7B2vY-fDkZrTYXiTEdIj1Dh4x88lGbrq431e0OJGZIwtRlMNoPJZkjC_E7C7KL01WF-n29g9Vd4sD4C70bgZ9XA_r8Hm_Orm2W8Rf3LUV-HzvmjnqtMCpXFdjK2q9DB7tiO2UUPeCrN109z8_la3N8yeWmu-S8aJ60p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>888146328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Conn, Paul B. ; Kendall, William L. ; Samuel, Michael D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Conn, Paul B. ; Kendall, William L. ; Samuel, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><description>Estimates of waterfowl demographic parameters often come from resighting studies where birds fit with individually identifiable neck collars are resighted at a distance. Concerns have been raised about the effects of collar loss on parameter estimates, and the reliability of extrapolating from collared individuals to the population. Models previously proposed to account for collar loss do not allow survival or harvest parameters to depend on neck collar presence or absence. Also, few models have incorporated recent advances in mark-recapture theory that allow for multiple states or auxiliary encounters such as band recoveries. We propose a multistate model for tag loss in which the presence or absence of a collar is considered as a state variable. In this framework, demographic parameters are corrected for tag loss and questions related to collar effects on survival and recovery rates can be addressed. Encounters of individuals between closed sampling periods also can be incorporated in the analysis. We discuss data requirements for answering questions related to tag loss and sampling designs that lend themselves to this purpose. We illustrate the application of our model using a study of lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-341X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0420</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00245.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15606410</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOMA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , U.S.A , and P.O. Box 1354, 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2DQ , U.K: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Animals ; Band recovery ; Barker model ; Biometrics ; Biometry ; Biotelemetry ; Bird banding ; Birds ; Collar retention ; Data analysis ; Geese ; Mark release recapture ; Mark-recapture ; Mark-resight ; Modeling ; Models, Statistical ; Parametric models ; Population Dynamics ; Simulation ; Survival ; Survival rates ; Tag loss ; Waterfowl ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife biology ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Biometrics, 2004-12, Vol.60 (4), p.900-909</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 The International Biometric Society</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5085-9485e8427b2b20433663c86cef62b1a16b7169a7ca643c14244b5e25bfbfae263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5085-9485e8427b2b20433663c86cef62b1a16b7169a7ca643c14244b5e25bfbfae263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3695469$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3695469$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,832,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58021,58250,58254</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15606410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conn, Paul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><title>A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss</title><title>Biometrics</title><addtitle>Biometrics</addtitle><description>Estimates of waterfowl demographic parameters often come from resighting studies where birds fit with individually identifiable neck collars are resighted at a distance. Concerns have been raised about the effects of collar loss on parameter estimates, and the reliability of extrapolating from collared individuals to the population. Models previously proposed to account for collar loss do not allow survival or harvest parameters to depend on neck collar presence or absence. Also, few models have incorporated recent advances in mark-recapture theory that allow for multiple states or auxiliary encounters such as band recoveries. We propose a multistate model for tag loss in which the presence or absence of a collar is considered as a state variable. In this framework, demographic parameters are corrected for tag loss and questions related to collar effects on survival and recovery rates can be addressed. Encounters of individuals between closed sampling periods also can be incorporated in the analysis. We discuss data requirements for answering questions related to tag loss and sampling designs that lend themselves to this purpose. We illustrate the application of our model using a study of lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens).</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Band recovery</subject><subject>Barker model</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Biometry</subject><subject>Biotelemetry</subject><subject>Bird banding</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Collar retention</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Geese</subject><subject>Mark release recapture</subject><subject>Mark-recapture</subject><subject>Mark-resight</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival rates</subject><subject>Tag loss</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife biology</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0006-341X</issn><issn>1541-0420</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwDRCyeOBpKf4f54GHbkC3qWViGmJvlpPedAlpXOwE2m-PQ0qReMIPtq_v71zJ5yCEKZnSuN7WU0KISrig91NGiIglE3K6e4QmVAqaEMHIYzQ5QifoWQh1LDNJ2FN0QqUiSlAyQesZnkML3jZ46VbQ4NJ53D0AnrW22YcqYFfipfXfklsI1fqhO_tTFXbb9R7OsG1X-Dxuw5v7AX6P39vO4r5dgcd3do0XLoTn6ElpmwAvDucp-vLxw93FZbK4mV9dzBZJIYmWSSa0BC1YmrOcEcG5UrzQqoBSsZxaqvKUqsymhVWCF1QwIXIJTOZlXlpgip-iN-PcrXffewid2VShgKaxLbg-GJXSTFBNI_j6H7B2vY-fDkZrTYXiTEdIj1Dh4x88lGbrq431e0OJGZIwtRlMNoPJZkjC_E7C7KL01WF-n29g9Vd4sD4C70bgZ9XA_r8Hm_Orm2W8Rf3LUV-HzvmjnqtMCpXFdjK2q9DB7tiO2UUPeCrN109z8_la3N8yeWmu-S8aJ60p</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Conn, Paul B.</creator><creator>Kendall, William L.</creator><creator>Samuel, Michael D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>International Biometric Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss</title><author>Conn, Paul B. ; Kendall, William L. ; Samuel, Michael D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5085-9485e8427b2b20433663c86cef62b1a16b7169a7ca643c14244b5e25bfbfae263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Band recovery</topic><topic>Barker model</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Biometry</topic><topic>Biotelemetry</topic><topic>Bird banding</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Collar retention</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Geese</topic><topic>Mark release recapture</topic><topic>Mark-recapture</topic><topic>Mark-resight</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival rates</topic><topic>Tag loss</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife biology</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conn, Paul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conn, Paul B.</au><au>Kendall, William L.</au><au>Samuel, Michael D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss</atitle><jtitle>Biometrics</jtitle><addtitle>Biometrics</addtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>900</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>900-909</pages><issn>0006-341X</issn><eissn>1541-0420</eissn><coden>BIOMA5</coden><abstract>Estimates of waterfowl demographic parameters often come from resighting studies where birds fit with individually identifiable neck collars are resighted at a distance. Concerns have been raised about the effects of collar loss on parameter estimates, and the reliability of extrapolating from collared individuals to the population. Models previously proposed to account for collar loss do not allow survival or harvest parameters to depend on neck collar presence or absence. Also, few models have incorporated recent advances in mark-recapture theory that allow for multiple states or auxiliary encounters such as band recoveries. We propose a multistate model for tag loss in which the presence or absence of a collar is considered as a state variable. In this framework, demographic parameters are corrected for tag loss and questions related to collar effects on survival and recovery rates can be addressed. Encounters of individuals between closed sampling periods also can be incorporated in the analysis. We discuss data requirements for answering questions related to tag loss and sampling designs that lend themselves to this purpose. We illustrate the application of our model using a study of lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens).</abstract><cop>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , U.S.A , and P.O. Box 1354, 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2DQ , U.K</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><pmid>15606410</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00245.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-341X |
ispartof | Biometrics, 2004-12, Vol.60 (4), p.900-909 |
issn | 0006-341X 1541-0420 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67194181 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Animals Band recovery Barker model Biometrics Biometry Biotelemetry Bird banding Birds Collar retention Data analysis Geese Mark release recapture Mark-recapture Mark-resight Modeling Models, Statistical Parametric models Population Dynamics Simulation Survival Survival rates Tag loss Waterfowl Wildfowl Wildlife biology Wildlife management |
title | A General Model for the Analysis of Mark-Resight, Mark-Recapture, and Band-Recovery Data under Tag Loss |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A02%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20General%20Model%20for%20the%20Analysis%20of%20Mark-Resight,%20Mark-Recapture,%20and%20Band-Recovery%20Data%20under%20Tag%20Loss&rft.jtitle=Biometrics&rft.au=Conn,%20Paul%20B.&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=900&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=900-909&rft.issn=0006-341X&rft.eissn=1541-0420&rft.coden=BIOMA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00245.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3695469%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=888146328&rft_id=info:pmid/15606410&rft_jstor_id=3695469&rfr_iscdi=true |