Spondyloarthropathy with entheseal pain. A prospective study in 33 patients

Objectives. – To identify objective features individualizing spondyloarthropathy with isolated entheseal pain and distinguishing this condition from fibromyalgia. Patients and methods. – Thirty-three patients presenting with entheseal pain were studied prospectively. The diagnoses were psoriatic art...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme, 2004-11, Vol.71 (6), p.557-562
Hauptverfasser: Godfrin, Bertrand, Zabraniecki, Laurent, Lamboley, Valérie, Bertrand-Latour, Frédérique, Sans, Nicolas, Fournié, Bernard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 562
container_issue 6
container_start_page 557
container_title Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme
container_volume 71
creator Godfrin, Bertrand
Zabraniecki, Laurent
Lamboley, Valérie
Bertrand-Latour, Frédérique
Sans, Nicolas
Fournié, Bernard
description Objectives. – To identify objective features individualizing spondyloarthropathy with isolated entheseal pain and distinguishing this condition from fibromyalgia. Patients and methods. – Thirty-three patients presenting with entheseal pain were studied prospectively. The diagnoses were psoriatic arthritis in six patients and ankylosing spondylitis in seven patients; among the 20 remaining patients, in whom entheseal pain was the only symptom, 11 responded to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and were diagnosed with entheseal spondyloarthropathy whereas the nine unresponsive patients were diagnosed with fibromyalgia. A physical examination, laboratory tests, plain radiographs, and radionuclide scan and resonance imaging (MRI) scan of a painful enthesis were done in each patient. Results. – Among the 11 patients with entheseal spondyloarthropathy, two experienced inflammatory joint symptoms during the 4–6-month follow-up and three patients had radionuclide scanning and MRI evidence of entheseal inflammation similar to that in nine patients with definite spondyloarthropathy (ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis). The feature that best discriminated between entheseal spondyloarthropathy and fibromyalgia was responsiveness to NSAIDs. Conclusion. – These preliminary data suggest that isolated entheseal pain may indicate spondyloarthropathy in some patients. The imaging methods used in this study lacked sensitivity for enthesitis, which may therefore have been missed in some patients. The development of bone and joint ultrasonography may provide additional insights into the entheseal abnormalities present in patients with isolated entheseal pain.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbspin.2003.10.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67171008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1297319X0300229X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67171008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2d001a0092442098de5b767beba57624d55f397d1c5664f7318c2f37c705aee83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9KwzAUh3OhuDl9A5Feebd50jTNeiOM4T8YeKGCdyFNTmlK19Ymm-xtfBafzJQOvPMqcPL9fjn5CLmisKBA09tqUeWus80iBmBhtAAKJ2RK40zMGc0-JuTcuQrCZczTMzKhnC-zhGVTsnnt2sYc6lb1vuzbTvnyEH1ZX0bY-BIdqjrqVGiOVlHXt65D7e0eI-d35hDZJmLs5zukbMDdBTktVO3w8njOyPvD_dv6ab55eXxerzZzzVLw89gAUAWQxUkSQ7Y0yHORihxzxUUaJ4bzgmXCUM3TNCkEo0sdF0xoAVwhLtmM3Iy9YaPPHTovt9ZprGvVYLtzMhVUUIABTEZQh9Vdj4XsertV_UFSkIM5WcnRnBzMDdNgLsSuj_27fIvmL3TUFoC7EcDwy73FXjodDGg0tg-CpGnt_y_8AnPrg-Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67171008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spondyloarthropathy with entheseal pain. A prospective study in 33 patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Godfrin, Bertrand ; Zabraniecki, Laurent ; Lamboley, Valérie ; Bertrand-Latour, Frédérique ; Sans, Nicolas ; Fournié, Bernard</creator><creatorcontrib>Godfrin, Bertrand ; Zabraniecki, Laurent ; Lamboley, Valérie ; Bertrand-Latour, Frédérique ; Sans, Nicolas ; Fournié, Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. – To identify objective features individualizing spondyloarthropathy with isolated entheseal pain and distinguishing this condition from fibromyalgia. Patients and methods. – Thirty-three patients presenting with entheseal pain were studied prospectively. The diagnoses were psoriatic arthritis in six patients and ankylosing spondylitis in seven patients; among the 20 remaining patients, in whom entheseal pain was the only symptom, 11 responded to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and were diagnosed with entheseal spondyloarthropathy whereas the nine unresponsive patients were diagnosed with fibromyalgia. A physical examination, laboratory tests, plain radiographs, and radionuclide scan and resonance imaging (MRI) scan of a painful enthesis were done in each patient. Results. – Among the 11 patients with entheseal spondyloarthropathy, two experienced inflammatory joint symptoms during the 4–6-month follow-up and three patients had radionuclide scanning and MRI evidence of entheseal inflammation similar to that in nine patients with definite spondyloarthropathy (ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis). The feature that best discriminated between entheseal spondyloarthropathy and fibromyalgia was responsiveness to NSAIDs. Conclusion. – These preliminary data suggest that isolated entheseal pain may indicate spondyloarthropathy in some patients. The imaging methods used in this study lacked sensitivity for enthesitis, which may therefore have been missed in some patients. The development of bone and joint ultrasonography may provide additional insights into the entheseal abnormalities present in patients with isolated entheseal pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1297-319X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2003.10.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15589439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier SAS</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use ; Arthritis, Psoriatic - complications ; Arthritis, Psoriatic - pathology ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Enthesis ; Female ; Fibromyalgia ; Fibromyalgia - pathology ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain - drug therapy ; Pain - etiology ; Pain - pathology ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Spondylarthropathies - drug therapy ; Spondylarthropathies - etiology ; Spondylarthropathies - pathology ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing - complications ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing - pathology ; Spondyloarthropathy</subject><ispartof>Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme, 2004-11, Vol.71 (6), p.557-562</ispartof><rights>2003 Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2d001a0092442098de5b767beba57624d55f397d1c5664f7318c2f37c705aee83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2d001a0092442098de5b767beba57624d55f397d1c5664f7318c2f37c705aee83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2003.10.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15589439$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Godfrin, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabraniecki, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamboley, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand-Latour, Frédérique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sans, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournié, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>Spondyloarthropathy with entheseal pain. A prospective study in 33 patients</title><title>Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme</title><addtitle>Joint Bone Spine</addtitle><description>Objectives. – To identify objective features individualizing spondyloarthropathy with isolated entheseal pain and distinguishing this condition from fibromyalgia. Patients and methods. – Thirty-three patients presenting with entheseal pain were studied prospectively. The diagnoses were psoriatic arthritis in six patients and ankylosing spondylitis in seven patients; among the 20 remaining patients, in whom entheseal pain was the only symptom, 11 responded to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and were diagnosed with entheseal spondyloarthropathy whereas the nine unresponsive patients were diagnosed with fibromyalgia. A physical examination, laboratory tests, plain radiographs, and radionuclide scan and resonance imaging (MRI) scan of a painful enthesis were done in each patient. Results. – Among the 11 patients with entheseal spondyloarthropathy, two experienced inflammatory joint symptoms during the 4–6-month follow-up and three patients had radionuclide scanning and MRI evidence of entheseal inflammation similar to that in nine patients with definite spondyloarthropathy (ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis). The feature that best discriminated between entheseal spondyloarthropathy and fibromyalgia was responsiveness to NSAIDs. Conclusion. – These preliminary data suggest that isolated entheseal pain may indicate spondyloarthropathy in some patients. The imaging methods used in this study lacked sensitivity for enthesitis, which may therefore have been missed in some patients. The development of bone and joint ultrasonography may provide additional insights into the entheseal abnormalities present in patients with isolated entheseal pain.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arthritis, Psoriatic - complications</subject><subject>Arthritis, Psoriatic - pathology</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Enthesis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibromyalgia</subject><subject>Fibromyalgia - pathology</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain - pathology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Spondylarthropathies - drug therapy</subject><subject>Spondylarthropathies - etiology</subject><subject>Spondylarthropathies - pathology</subject><subject>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - complications</subject><subject>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - pathology</subject><subject>Spondyloarthropathy</subject><issn>1297-319X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN9KwzAUh3OhuDl9A5Feebd50jTNeiOM4T8YeKGCdyFNTmlK19Ymm-xtfBafzJQOvPMqcPL9fjn5CLmisKBA09tqUeWus80iBmBhtAAKJ2RK40zMGc0-JuTcuQrCZczTMzKhnC-zhGVTsnnt2sYc6lb1vuzbTvnyEH1ZX0bY-BIdqjrqVGiOVlHXt65D7e0eI-d35hDZJmLs5zukbMDdBTktVO3w8njOyPvD_dv6ab55eXxerzZzzVLw89gAUAWQxUkSQ7Y0yHORihxzxUUaJ4bzgmXCUM3TNCkEo0sdF0xoAVwhLtmM3Iy9YaPPHTovt9ZprGvVYLtzMhVUUIABTEZQh9Vdj4XsertV_UFSkIM5WcnRnBzMDdNgLsSuj_27fIvmL3TUFoC7EcDwy73FXjodDGg0tg-CpGnt_y_8AnPrg-Y</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>Godfrin, Bertrand</creator><creator>Zabraniecki, Laurent</creator><creator>Lamboley, Valérie</creator><creator>Bertrand-Latour, Frédérique</creator><creator>Sans, Nicolas</creator><creator>Fournié, Bernard</creator><general>Elsevier SAS</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>Spondyloarthropathy with entheseal pain. A prospective study in 33 patients</title><author>Godfrin, Bertrand ; Zabraniecki, Laurent ; Lamboley, Valérie ; Bertrand-Latour, Frédérique ; Sans, Nicolas ; Fournié, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2d001a0092442098de5b767beba57624d55f397d1c5664f7318c2f37c705aee83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arthritis, Psoriatic - complications</topic><topic>Arthritis, Psoriatic - pathology</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Enthesis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibromyalgia</topic><topic>Fibromyalgia - pathology</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain - pathology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Spondylarthropathies - drug therapy</topic><topic>Spondylarthropathies - etiology</topic><topic>Spondylarthropathies - pathology</topic><topic>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - complications</topic><topic>Spondylitis, Ankylosing - pathology</topic><topic>Spondyloarthropathy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Godfrin, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabraniecki, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamboley, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand-Latour, Frédérique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sans, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournié, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Godfrin, Bertrand</au><au>Zabraniecki, Laurent</au><au>Lamboley, Valérie</au><au>Bertrand-Latour, Frédérique</au><au>Sans, Nicolas</au><au>Fournié, Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spondyloarthropathy with entheseal pain. A prospective study in 33 patients</atitle><jtitle>Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme</jtitle><addtitle>Joint Bone Spine</addtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>557</spage><epage>562</epage><pages>557-562</pages><issn>1297-319X</issn><abstract>Objectives. – To identify objective features individualizing spondyloarthropathy with isolated entheseal pain and distinguishing this condition from fibromyalgia. Patients and methods. – Thirty-three patients presenting with entheseal pain were studied prospectively. The diagnoses were psoriatic arthritis in six patients and ankylosing spondylitis in seven patients; among the 20 remaining patients, in whom entheseal pain was the only symptom, 11 responded to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and were diagnosed with entheseal spondyloarthropathy whereas the nine unresponsive patients were diagnosed with fibromyalgia. A physical examination, laboratory tests, plain radiographs, and radionuclide scan and resonance imaging (MRI) scan of a painful enthesis were done in each patient. Results. – Among the 11 patients with entheseal spondyloarthropathy, two experienced inflammatory joint symptoms during the 4–6-month follow-up and three patients had radionuclide scanning and MRI evidence of entheseal inflammation similar to that in nine patients with definite spondyloarthropathy (ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis). The feature that best discriminated between entheseal spondyloarthropathy and fibromyalgia was responsiveness to NSAIDs. Conclusion. – These preliminary data suggest that isolated entheseal pain may indicate spondyloarthropathy in some patients. The imaging methods used in this study lacked sensitivity for enthesitis, which may therefore have been missed in some patients. The development of bone and joint ultrasonography may provide additional insights into the entheseal abnormalities present in patients with isolated entheseal pain.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier SAS</pub><pmid>15589439</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbspin.2003.10.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1297-319X
ispartof Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme, 2004-11, Vol.71 (6), p.557-562
issn 1297-319X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67171008
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use
Arthritis, Psoriatic - complications
Arthritis, Psoriatic - pathology
Diagnosis, Differential
Enthesis
Female
Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia - pathology
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Pain - drug therapy
Pain - etiology
Pain - pathology
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Spondylarthropathies - drug therapy
Spondylarthropathies - etiology
Spondylarthropathies - pathology
Spondylitis, Ankylosing - complications
Spondylitis, Ankylosing - pathology
Spondyloarthropathy
title Spondyloarthropathy with entheseal pain. A prospective study in 33 patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A40%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spondyloarthropathy%20with%20entheseal%20pain.%20A%20prospective%20study%20in%2033%C2%A0patients&rft.jtitle=Joint,%20bone,%20spine%20:%20revue%20du%20rhumatisme&rft.au=Godfrin,%20Bertrand&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=557&rft.epage=562&rft.pages=557-562&rft.issn=1297-319X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbspin.2003.10.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67171008%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67171008&rft_id=info:pmid/15589439&rft_els_id=S1297319X0300229X&rfr_iscdi=true