Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the double-plate appliance (DPA) and the facemask (FM) in treating skeletal Class III malocclusions. Data were based on the pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 28 subjects with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusions. In the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2004-12, Vol.126 (6), p.672-679 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 679 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 672 |
container_title | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Üçem, Tuba Tortop Üçüncü, Neslihan Yüksel, Sema |
description | The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the double-plate appliance (DPA) and the facemask (FM) in treating skeletal Class III malocclusions. Data were based on the pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 28 subjects with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusions. In the first group (7 girls, 7 boys; mean age, 10 years 3 months), each subject wore a DPA with 2 Class III elastics, which exerted a force of 350-400 g day and night except for meals. In the second group (7 girls, 7 boys; mean age, 10 years 5 months), each subject wore a Delaire-type FM with a removable intraoral appliance with a total force of 600 g. The patients were instructed to wear the appliance approximately 16 hours a day. An untreated control group (6 girls, 8 boys; mean age, 9 years 8 months) was formed that matched the treatment groups according to sagittal skeletal and dental classifications. Thirteen angular and 14 linear measurements were evaluated. The increase in ANB angle and the decrease in maxillomandibular differential in the treated groups showed significant differences compared with the control group (
P < .05). The increases in ANB and SNA angles in the FM group were significantly greater than in the DPA group (
P < .05). The increases in lower facial height and Me-ANS in the FM group were significantly different compared with the other groups (
P < .05). The overjet increased significantly in both treatment groups (
P < .001), but, in the DPA group, overjet was significantly greater than in the FM group (
P < .05). Protrusion of the maxillary incisors and retrusion of the mandibular incisors in the DPA group showed significant differences compared with the other groups (
P < .05). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.035 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67168520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S088954060400561X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67168520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f005acb51a5efe1373ac1ec36b4b0c508bec3e8e6eb70463f72b76b1865adf2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi1URJfCEyAhn3pLGMexkxw4VKsCK63EBY7IGjsT8OLEwU6Q-vZN2ZV64zQz0vfPaD7G3gkoBQj94VTiKfaxrABkCV0JUr1gOwFdU-hGVVdsB23bFaoGfc1e53wCgK6u4BW7Fkp1VSXqHfuxj-OMyec48TjwPq42UDEHXIjjPAePk9u6qecDOhox_-bLL0o4P3A_8SURLn76yV3AnPnhcOAjhuhcWLOPU37DXg4YMr291Bv2_dP9t_2X4vj182F_dyycVM1SDAAKnVUCFQ0kZCPRCXJS29qCU9DabaCWNNkGai2HprKNtqLVCvuhQnnDbs975xT_rJQXM_rsKAScKK7Z6EboVlWwgfIMuhRzTjSYOfkR04MRYJ6smpP5Z9U8WTXQmc3qlnp_Wb_akfrnzEXjBnw8A7Q9-ddTMtl52sz1PpFbTB_9fw88Aj62iyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67168520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Üçem, Tuba Tortop ; Üçüncü, Neslihan ; Yüksel, Sema</creator><creatorcontrib>Üçem, Tuba Tortop ; Üçüncü, Neslihan ; Yüksel, Sema</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the double-plate appliance (DPA) and the facemask (FM) in treating skeletal Class III malocclusions. Data were based on the pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 28 subjects with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusions. In the first group (7 girls, 7 boys; mean age, 10 years 3 months), each subject wore a DPA with 2 Class III elastics, which exerted a force of 350-400 g day and night except for meals. In the second group (7 girls, 7 boys; mean age, 10 years 5 months), each subject wore a Delaire-type FM with a removable intraoral appliance with a total force of 600 g. The patients were instructed to wear the appliance approximately 16 hours a day. An untreated control group (6 girls, 8 boys; mean age, 9 years 8 months) was formed that matched the treatment groups according to sagittal skeletal and dental classifications. Thirteen angular and 14 linear measurements were evaluated. The increase in ANB angle and the decrease in maxillomandibular differential in the treated groups showed significant differences compared with the control group (
P < .05). The increases in ANB and SNA angles in the FM group were significantly greater than in the DPA group (
P < .05). The increases in lower facial height and Me-ANS in the FM group were significantly different compared with the other groups (
P < .05). The overjet increased significantly in both treatment groups (
P < .001), but, in the DPA group, overjet was significantly greater than in the FM group (
P < .05). Protrusion of the maxillary incisors and retrusion of the mandibular incisors in the DPA group showed significant differences compared with the other groups (
P < .05).]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15592214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Case-Control Studies ; Cephalometry ; Child ; Dentistry ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Incisor - pathology ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III - pathology ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III - therapy ; Mandible - pathology ; Maxilla - pathology ; Nose - pathology ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontic Appliances ; Sella Turcica - pathology ; Vertical Dimension</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2004-12, Vol.126 (6), p.672-679</ispartof><rights>2004 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f005acb51a5efe1373ac1ec36b4b0c508bec3e8e6eb70463f72b76b1865adf2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f005acb51a5efe1373ac1ec36b4b0c508bec3e8e6eb70463f72b76b1865adf2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15592214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Üçem, Tuba Tortop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Üçüncü, Neslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yüksel, Sema</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the double-plate appliance (DPA) and the facemask (FM) in treating skeletal Class III malocclusions. Data were based on the pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 28 subjects with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusions. In the first group (7 girls, 7 boys; mean age, 10 years 3 months), each subject wore a DPA with 2 Class III elastics, which exerted a force of 350-400 g day and night except for meals. In the second group (7 girls, 7 boys; mean age, 10 years 5 months), each subject wore a Delaire-type FM with a removable intraoral appliance with a total force of 600 g. The patients were instructed to wear the appliance approximately 16 hours a day. An untreated control group (6 girls, 8 boys; mean age, 9 years 8 months) was formed that matched the treatment groups according to sagittal skeletal and dental classifications. Thirteen angular and 14 linear measurements were evaluated. The increase in ANB angle and the decrease in maxillomandibular differential in the treated groups showed significant differences compared with the control group (
P < .05). The increases in ANB and SNA angles in the FM group were significantly greater than in the DPA group (
P < .05). The increases in lower facial height and Me-ANS in the FM group were significantly different compared with the other groups (
P < .05). The overjet increased significantly in both treatment groups (
P < .001), but, in the DPA group, overjet was significantly greater than in the FM group (
P < .05). Protrusion of the maxillary incisors and retrusion of the mandibular incisors in the DPA group showed significant differences compared with the other groups (
P < .05).]]></description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Extraoral Traction Appliances</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Incisor - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - pathology</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - therapy</subject><subject>Mandible - pathology</subject><subject>Maxilla - pathology</subject><subject>Nose - pathology</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliance Design</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliances</subject><subject>Sella Turcica - pathology</subject><subject>Vertical Dimension</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi1URJfCEyAhn3pLGMexkxw4VKsCK63EBY7IGjsT8OLEwU6Q-vZN2ZV64zQz0vfPaD7G3gkoBQj94VTiKfaxrABkCV0JUr1gOwFdU-hGVVdsB23bFaoGfc1e53wCgK6u4BW7Fkp1VSXqHfuxj-OMyec48TjwPq42UDEHXIjjPAePk9u6qecDOhox_-bLL0o4P3A_8SURLn76yV3AnPnhcOAjhuhcWLOPU37DXg4YMr291Bv2_dP9t_2X4vj182F_dyycVM1SDAAKnVUCFQ0kZCPRCXJS29qCU9DabaCWNNkGai2HprKNtqLVCvuhQnnDbs975xT_rJQXM_rsKAScKK7Z6EboVlWwgfIMuhRzTjSYOfkR04MRYJ6smpP5Z9U8WTXQmc3qlnp_Wb_akfrnzEXjBnw8A7Q9-ddTMtl52sz1PpFbTB_9fw88Aj62iyw</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>Üçem, Tuba Tortop</creator><creator>Üçüncü, Neslihan</creator><creator>Yüksel, Sema</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions</title><author>Üçem, Tuba Tortop ; Üçüncü, Neslihan ; Yüksel, Sema</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f005acb51a5efe1373ac1ec36b4b0c508bec3e8e6eb70463f72b76b1865adf2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Extraoral Traction Appliances</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Incisor - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - pathology</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - therapy</topic><topic>Mandible - pathology</topic><topic>Maxilla - pathology</topic><topic>Nose - pathology</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliance Design</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliances</topic><topic>Sella Turcica - pathology</topic><topic>Vertical Dimension</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Üçem, Tuba Tortop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Üçüncü, Neslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yüksel, Sema</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Üçem, Tuba Tortop</au><au>Üçüncü, Neslihan</au><au>Yüksel, Sema</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>672</spage><epage>679</epage><pages>672-679</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the double-plate appliance (DPA) and the facemask (FM) in treating skeletal Class III malocclusions. Data were based on the pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 28 subjects with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusions. In the first group (7 girls, 7 boys; mean age, 10 years 3 months), each subject wore a DPA with 2 Class III elastics, which exerted a force of 350-400 g day and night except for meals. In the second group (7 girls, 7 boys; mean age, 10 years 5 months), each subject wore a Delaire-type FM with a removable intraoral appliance with a total force of 600 g. The patients were instructed to wear the appliance approximately 16 hours a day. An untreated control group (6 girls, 8 boys; mean age, 9 years 8 months) was formed that matched the treatment groups according to sagittal skeletal and dental classifications. Thirteen angular and 14 linear measurements were evaluated. The increase in ANB angle and the decrease in maxillomandibular differential in the treated groups showed significant differences compared with the control group (
P < .05). The increases in ANB and SNA angles in the FM group were significantly greater than in the DPA group (
P < .05). The increases in lower facial height and Me-ANS in the FM group were significantly different compared with the other groups (
P < .05). The overjet increased significantly in both treatment groups (
P < .001), but, in the DPA group, overjet was significantly greater than in the FM group (
P < .05). Protrusion of the maxillary incisors and retrusion of the mandibular incisors in the DPA group showed significant differences compared with the other groups (
P < .05).]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>15592214</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.035</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0889-5406 |
ispartof | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2004-12, Vol.126 (6), p.672-679 |
issn | 0889-5406 1097-6752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67168520 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Biomechanical Phenomena Case-Control Studies Cephalometry Child Dentistry Extraoral Traction Appliances Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Incisor - pathology Male Malocclusion, Angle Class III - pathology Malocclusion, Angle Class III - therapy Mandible - pathology Maxilla - pathology Nose - pathology Orthodontic Appliance Design Orthodontic Appliances Sella Turcica - pathology Vertical Dimension |
title | Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A18%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20double-plate%20appliance%20and%20facemask%20therapy%20in%20treating%20class%20III%20malocclusions&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=%C3%9C%C3%A7em,%20Tuba%20Tortop&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=672&rft.epage=679&rft.pages=672-679&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67168520%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67168520&rft_id=info:pmid/15592214&rft_els_id=S088954060400561X&rfr_iscdi=true |