Analysis of staff reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities
The main goal of this study was to investigate whether staff members vary in their frequency reports on challenging behaviour concerning the same client. Because staff's approaches of challenging behaviour are affected by a range of staff characteristics, we hypothesised that these staff charac...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Research in developmental disabilities 2009-09, Vol.30 (5), p.863-872 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 872 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 863 |
| container_title | Research in developmental disabilities |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Lambrechts, Greet Maes, Bea |
| description | The main goal of this study was to investigate whether staff members vary in their frequency reports on challenging behaviour concerning the same client. Because staff's approaches of challenging behaviour are affected by a range of staff characteristics, we hypothesised that these staff characteristics could explain this variability between staff members. We used questionnaires to investigate the influence of staff's age, gender, experience in working with people with intellectual disabilities, working hours, professional qualifications, sort of education, and their emotional reactions and beliefs regarding the challenging behaviour. This study involved 152 staff members and 51 clients with severe or profound intellectual disabilities who displayed self-injurious behaviour, stereotyped behaviour, and/or aggressive/destructive behaviour. A part of the variability between staff's reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour was indeed explained by differences between the staff members. Working hours, internal attribution, gender, and experience in working with people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities turned out to be influencing variables. Summarising, staff members differ in their reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour. To get an accurate picture of a client's challenging behaviour, perceptions of several staff members are needed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.12.004 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67158055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ837543</ericid><els_id>S0891422208001819</els_id><sourcerecordid>67158055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-ab2c22467ef34ed225e8df1cb76e1081654ef7aad56fa74a5a4ff792d0fc25103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUQC0EotPCDyCEvKG7BD_jRGJTVeWlSmxgbTn2dcejTBzsZNCs-HU8TFR2IC8s-Z778D0IvaKkpoQ273Z1Cs7VjJC2pqwmRDxBG9oqXnGuuqdoQ9qOVoIxdoEuc94RQlU5z9EF7WgnW95t0K-b0QzHHDKOHufZeI8TTDHN5WHE8xawT_BjgdEeT4TdmmGA8SGMD7iHrTmEuCQcRjxBnAbAP8O8xRkOkADHhKcUfVxGV4gZSqKdFzNgF7LpwxDmAPkFeubNkOHlel-h7x_uvt1-qu6_fvx8e3NfWcGbuTI9s4yJRoHnAhxjElrnqe1VA5S0tJECvDLGycYbJYw0wnvVMUe8ZZISfoWuz3XLSOU7edb7kG2ZyYwQl6wbRWVLpPw_WBZMu4YWkJ1Bm2LOCbyeUtibdNSU6JMfvdMnP_rkR1Omi5-S9GatvvR7cH9TViEFeLsCJlsz-GRGG_Ijx6jgjP7p_vrMQQr2MXz3peVKCl7C79dw2ekhQNLZhiIRXEjFgnYx_GvM34OfunM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>61871961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of staff reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lambrechts, Greet ; Maes, Bea</creator><creatorcontrib>Lambrechts, Greet ; Maes, Bea</creatorcontrib><description>The main goal of this study was to investigate whether staff members vary in their frequency reports on challenging behaviour concerning the same client. Because staff's approaches of challenging behaviour are affected by a range of staff characteristics, we hypothesised that these staff characteristics could explain this variability between staff members. We used questionnaires to investigate the influence of staff's age, gender, experience in working with people with intellectual disabilities, working hours, professional qualifications, sort of education, and their emotional reactions and beliefs regarding the challenging behaviour. This study involved 152 staff members and 51 clients with severe or profound intellectual disabilities who displayed self-injurious behaviour, stereotyped behaviour, and/or aggressive/destructive behaviour. A part of the variability between staff's reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour was indeed explained by differences between the staff members. Working hours, internal attribution, gender, and experience in working with people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities turned out to be influencing variables. Summarising, staff members differ in their reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour. To get an accurate picture of a client's challenging behaviour, perceptions of several staff members are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0891-4222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.12.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19195839</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RDDIEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Allied Health Personnel ; Antisocial Behavior ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Behavior Problems ; Behavior Therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Challenging behaviour ; Employee Attitudes ; Evaluation Methods ; Feedback (Response) ; Female ; Health staff related problems. Vocational training ; Humans ; Individual Characteristics ; Learning Disorders - psychology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medical Staff - psychology ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Mental Health ; Mental Retardation ; Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology ; Middle Aged ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Qualifications ; Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology ; Self-Injurious Behavior - therapy ; Severe or profound intellectual disability ; Social Perception ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry ; Staff reports ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Research in developmental disabilities, 2009-09, Vol.30 (5), p.863-872</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-ab2c22467ef34ed225e8df1cb76e1081654ef7aad56fa74a5a4ff792d0fc25103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-ab2c22467ef34ed225e8df1cb76e1081654ef7aad56fa74a5a4ff792d0fc25103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2008.12.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ837543$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21432161$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19195839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lambrechts, Greet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, Bea</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of staff reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities</title><title>Research in developmental disabilities</title><addtitle>Res Dev Disabil</addtitle><description>The main goal of this study was to investigate whether staff members vary in their frequency reports on challenging behaviour concerning the same client. Because staff's approaches of challenging behaviour are affected by a range of staff characteristics, we hypothesised that these staff characteristics could explain this variability between staff members. We used questionnaires to investigate the influence of staff's age, gender, experience in working with people with intellectual disabilities, working hours, professional qualifications, sort of education, and their emotional reactions and beliefs regarding the challenging behaviour. This study involved 152 staff members and 51 clients with severe or profound intellectual disabilities who displayed self-injurious behaviour, stereotyped behaviour, and/or aggressive/destructive behaviour. A part of the variability between staff's reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour was indeed explained by differences between the staff members. Working hours, internal attribution, gender, and experience in working with people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities turned out to be influencing variables. Summarising, staff members differ in their reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour. To get an accurate picture of a client's challenging behaviour, perceptions of several staff members are needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Allied Health Personnel</subject><subject>Antisocial Behavior</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Challenging behaviour</subject><subject>Employee Attitudes</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health staff related problems. Vocational training</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Learning Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical Staff - psychology</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Mental Retardation</subject><subject>Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Qualifications</subject><subject>Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Self-Injurious Behavior - therapy</subject><subject>Severe or profound intellectual disability</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><subject>Staff reports</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0891-4222</issn><issn>1873-3379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUQC0EotPCDyCEvKG7BD_jRGJTVeWlSmxgbTn2dcejTBzsZNCs-HU8TFR2IC8s-Z778D0IvaKkpoQ273Z1Cs7VjJC2pqwmRDxBG9oqXnGuuqdoQ9qOVoIxdoEuc94RQlU5z9EF7WgnW95t0K-b0QzHHDKOHufZeI8TTDHN5WHE8xawT_BjgdEeT4TdmmGA8SGMD7iHrTmEuCQcRjxBnAbAP8O8xRkOkADHhKcUfVxGV4gZSqKdFzNgF7LpwxDmAPkFeubNkOHlel-h7x_uvt1-qu6_fvx8e3NfWcGbuTI9s4yJRoHnAhxjElrnqe1VA5S0tJECvDLGycYbJYw0wnvVMUe8ZZISfoWuz3XLSOU7edb7kG2ZyYwQl6wbRWVLpPw_WBZMu4YWkJ1Bm2LOCbyeUtibdNSU6JMfvdMnP_rkR1Omi5-S9GatvvR7cH9TViEFeLsCJlsz-GRGG_Ijx6jgjP7p_vrMQQr2MXz3peVKCl7C79dw2ekhQNLZhiIRXEjFgnYx_GvM34OfunM</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Lambrechts, Greet</creator><creator>Maes, Bea</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Analysis of staff reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities</title><author>Lambrechts, Greet ; Maes, Bea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-ab2c22467ef34ed225e8df1cb76e1081654ef7aad56fa74a5a4ff792d0fc25103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Allied Health Personnel</topic><topic>Antisocial Behavior</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Challenging behaviour</topic><topic>Employee Attitudes</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health staff related problems. Vocational training</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Learning Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical Staff - psychology</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Mental Retardation</topic><topic>Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Qualifications</topic><topic>Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Self-Injurious Behavior - therapy</topic><topic>Severe or profound intellectual disability</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><topic>Staff reports</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lambrechts, Greet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, Bea</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research in developmental disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lambrechts, Greet</au><au>Maes, Bea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ837543</ericid><atitle>Analysis of staff reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities</atitle><jtitle>Research in developmental disabilities</jtitle><addtitle>Res Dev Disabil</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>863</spage><epage>872</epage><pages>863-872</pages><issn>0891-4222</issn><eissn>1873-3379</eissn><coden>RDDIEF</coden><abstract>The main goal of this study was to investigate whether staff members vary in their frequency reports on challenging behaviour concerning the same client. Because staff's approaches of challenging behaviour are affected by a range of staff characteristics, we hypothesised that these staff characteristics could explain this variability between staff members. We used questionnaires to investigate the influence of staff's age, gender, experience in working with people with intellectual disabilities, working hours, professional qualifications, sort of education, and their emotional reactions and beliefs regarding the challenging behaviour. This study involved 152 staff members and 51 clients with severe or profound intellectual disabilities who displayed self-injurious behaviour, stereotyped behaviour, and/or aggressive/destructive behaviour. A part of the variability between staff's reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour was indeed explained by differences between the staff members. Working hours, internal attribution, gender, and experience in working with people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities turned out to be influencing variables. Summarising, staff members differ in their reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour. To get an accurate picture of a client's challenging behaviour, perceptions of several staff members are needed.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19195839</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ridd.2008.12.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0891-4222 |
| ispartof | Research in developmental disabilities, 2009-09, Vol.30 (5), p.863-872 |
| issn | 0891-4222 1873-3379 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67158055 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Adult Adults Allied Health Personnel Antisocial Behavior Attitude of Health Personnel Behavior Problems Behavior Therapy Biological and medical sciences Challenging behaviour Employee Attitudes Evaluation Methods Feedback (Response) Female Health staff related problems. Vocational training Humans Individual Characteristics Learning Disorders - psychology Male Medical sciences Medical Staff - psychology Mental Disorders - psychology Mental Disorders - therapy Mental Health Mental Retardation Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology Middle Aged Professional-Patient Relations Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Qualifications Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology Self-Injurious Behavior - therapy Severe or profound intellectual disability Social Perception Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry Staff reports Surveys and Questionnaires |
| title | Analysis of staff reports on the frequency of challenging behaviour in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A17%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20staff%20reports%20on%20the%20frequency%20of%20challenging%20behaviour%20in%20people%20with%20severe%20or%20profound%20intellectual%20disabilities&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20developmental%20disabilities&rft.au=Lambrechts,%20Greet&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=863&rft.epage=872&rft.pages=863-872&rft.issn=0891-4222&rft.eissn=1873-3379&rft.coden=RDDIEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ridd.2008.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67158055%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=61871961&rft_id=info:pmid/19195839&rft_ericid=EJ837543&rft_els_id=S0891422208001819&rfr_iscdi=true |