How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition?
Abstract Objective Memory complaints are a common finding in outpatients, especially in psychosomatic and neurological practice. In a substantial group of patients persistent memory complaints are found in the absence of abnormal neuropsychology. Different labels such as “functional memory complaint...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of psychosomatic research 2009-05, Vol.66 (5), p.435-444 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 444 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 435 |
container_title | Journal of psychosomatic research |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Metternich, Birgitta Schmidtke, Klaus Hüll, Michael |
description | Abstract Objective Memory complaints are a common finding in outpatients, especially in psychosomatic and neurological practice. In a substantial group of patients persistent memory complaints are found in the absence of abnormal neuropsychology. Different labels such as “functional memory complaint” have been suggested for this phenomenon. We characterise a group of patients with such memory complaints, which we termed functional memory disorder (FMD). The aim of the present study is to describe patients with FMD. Methods Thirty-nine patients with FMD were compared to 38 control subjects. Data were collected on the German version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning test and the Zahlenverbindungstest (cognitive speed), subscales of the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire (MIA), the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), the Global Severity Index (GSI) of the Symptom Checklist, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and other psychological questionnaire measures. Results We found significant group differences on all psychological questionnaire measures, with more pathological scores in the patient group. GSI and PSQ were the best predictors of memory self-efficacy. MIA-Memory Self-Efficacy (MSE), MIA-Achievement, and BDI were the best predictors of group membership (FMD vs. control group). When MSE was excluded, MIA-Achievement and BDI or GSI were the only predictors of group membership. Neuropsychological measures predicted neither MSE nor group membership. Conclusions Pathological scores on measures of metamemory, stress, and depression are typical of FMD. Low MSE and a high memory-related achievement motivation seem to be key features of FMD. Other important features are increased perceived stress, general psychosomatic complaint, and elevated depression scores. Neuropsychological test performance is not associated with FMD symptoms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67155360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022399908003619</els_id><sourcerecordid>67155360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6457419345fe1e7d04cf139fdbe21ae397270ab01a2a033cd572682c93990e603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUsFu1DAQtRCILoVfQD5xImFsJ3Z8AdEKKFIlDsDZ8toTcEjixU5A-_c42kWVuNCTJc97b97MG0Iog5oBk6-Gejjko_seE-aaA3Q1qBqgfUB2rFO6YkLCQ7ID4LwSWusL8iTnAQCk5u1jcsG0UFpL2JHDTfxNbUI64RTTkbo4HUYb5iXTMNN-nd0S4mzHv3UfckweE0042gU9XWIp2bwWJzT21PY9uuVl-VvsmWJnX2S_zWFTevOUPOrtmPHZ-b0kX9-_-3J9U91--vDx-u1t5ZpOL5VsWtUUm03bI0PloXE9E7r3e-TMotCKK7B7YJZbEML5VnHZcafLuIASxCV5cdI9pPhzxbyYKWSH42hnjGs2UrG2FfcAtkpAJ6X4L5BDy5tGbcDuBHQp5pywN4cUJpuOhoHZ8jODucvPbPkZUKbkV6jPzz3W_YT-jngOrACuTgAsu_sVMJnsAs4OfUhl8cbHcJ8ur_8RcWOYg7PjDzxiHuKaSuTZMJO5AfN5u6PtjKADELJ4-QNlL8c3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20524473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Metternich, Birgitta ; Schmidtke, Klaus ; Hüll, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Metternich, Birgitta ; Schmidtke, Klaus ; Hüll, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Memory complaints are a common finding in outpatients, especially in psychosomatic and neurological practice. In a substantial group of patients persistent memory complaints are found in the absence of abnormal neuropsychology. Different labels such as “functional memory complaint” have been suggested for this phenomenon. We characterise a group of patients with such memory complaints, which we termed functional memory disorder (FMD). The aim of the present study is to describe patients with FMD. Methods Thirty-nine patients with FMD were compared to 38 control subjects. Data were collected on the German version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning test and the Zahlenverbindungstest (cognitive speed), subscales of the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire (MIA), the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), the Global Severity Index (GSI) of the Symptom Checklist, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and other psychological questionnaire measures. Results We found significant group differences on all psychological questionnaire measures, with more pathological scores in the patient group. GSI and PSQ were the best predictors of memory self-efficacy. MIA-Memory Self-Efficacy (MSE), MIA-Achievement, and BDI were the best predictors of group membership (FMD vs. control group). When MSE was excluded, MIA-Achievement and BDI or GSI were the only predictors of group membership. Neuropsychological measures predicted neither MSE nor group membership. Conclusions Pathological scores on measures of metamemory, stress, and depression are typical of FMD. Low MSE and a high memory-related achievement motivation seem to be key features of FMD. Other important features are increased perceived stress, general psychosomatic complaint, and elevated depression scores. Neuropsychological test performance is not associated with FMD symptoms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19379960</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPCRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Affect ; Aged ; Case-Control Studies ; Cognition ; Complaints ; Depression ; Depression - complications ; Functional memory complaints ; Germany ; Humans ; Memory ; Memory Disorders - diagnosis ; Memory Disorders - psychology ; Metamemory ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Neuropsychology ; Outpatients ; Psychiatry ; Somatoform ; Somatoform disorders ; Stress ; Stress, Psychological - complications ; Subjective memory ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Verbal Learning</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychosomatic research, 2009-05, Vol.66 (5), p.435-444</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6457419345fe1e7d04cf139fdbe21ae397270ab01a2a033cd572682c93990e603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6457419345fe1e7d04cf139fdbe21ae397270ab01a2a033cd572682c93990e603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,31000,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19379960$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Metternich, Birgitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidtke, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hüll, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition?</title><title>Journal of psychosomatic research</title><addtitle>J Psychosom Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Memory complaints are a common finding in outpatients, especially in psychosomatic and neurological practice. In a substantial group of patients persistent memory complaints are found in the absence of abnormal neuropsychology. Different labels such as “functional memory complaint” have been suggested for this phenomenon. We characterise a group of patients with such memory complaints, which we termed functional memory disorder (FMD). The aim of the present study is to describe patients with FMD. Methods Thirty-nine patients with FMD were compared to 38 control subjects. Data were collected on the German version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning test and the Zahlenverbindungstest (cognitive speed), subscales of the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire (MIA), the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), the Global Severity Index (GSI) of the Symptom Checklist, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and other psychological questionnaire measures. Results We found significant group differences on all psychological questionnaire measures, with more pathological scores in the patient group. GSI and PSQ were the best predictors of memory self-efficacy. MIA-Memory Self-Efficacy (MSE), MIA-Achievement, and BDI were the best predictors of group membership (FMD vs. control group). When MSE was excluded, MIA-Achievement and BDI or GSI were the only predictors of group membership. Neuropsychological measures predicted neither MSE nor group membership. Conclusions Pathological scores on measures of metamemory, stress, and depression are typical of FMD. Low MSE and a high memory-related achievement motivation seem to be key features of FMD. Other important features are increased perceived stress, general psychosomatic complaint, and elevated depression scores. Neuropsychological test performance is not associated with FMD symptoms.</description><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Complaints</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depression - complications</subject><subject>Functional memory complaints</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Metamemory</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Outpatients</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Somatoform</subject><subject>Somatoform disorders</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - complications</subject><subject>Subjective memory</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><issn>0022-3999</issn><issn>1879-1360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUsFu1DAQtRCILoVfQD5xImFsJ3Z8AdEKKFIlDsDZ8toTcEjixU5A-_c42kWVuNCTJc97b97MG0Iog5oBk6-Gejjko_seE-aaA3Q1qBqgfUB2rFO6YkLCQ7ID4LwSWusL8iTnAQCk5u1jcsG0UFpL2JHDTfxNbUI64RTTkbo4HUYb5iXTMNN-nd0S4mzHv3UfckweE0042gU9XWIp2bwWJzT21PY9uuVl-VvsmWJnX2S_zWFTevOUPOrtmPHZ-b0kX9-_-3J9U91--vDx-u1t5ZpOL5VsWtUUm03bI0PloXE9E7r3e-TMotCKK7B7YJZbEML5VnHZcafLuIASxCV5cdI9pPhzxbyYKWSH42hnjGs2UrG2FfcAtkpAJ6X4L5BDy5tGbcDuBHQp5pywN4cUJpuOhoHZ8jODucvPbPkZUKbkV6jPzz3W_YT-jngOrACuTgAsu_sVMJnsAs4OfUhl8cbHcJ8ur_8RcWOYg7PjDzxiHuKaSuTZMJO5AfN5u6PtjKADELJ4-QNlL8c3</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Metternich, Birgitta</creator><creator>Schmidtke, Klaus</creator><creator>Hüll, Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition?</title><author>Metternich, Birgitta ; Schmidtke, Klaus ; Hüll, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6457419345fe1e7d04cf139fdbe21ae397270ab01a2a033cd572682c93990e603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Complaints</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depression - complications</topic><topic>Functional memory complaints</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Metamemory</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Outpatients</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Somatoform</topic><topic>Somatoform disorders</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - complications</topic><topic>Subjective memory</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Metternich, Birgitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidtke, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hüll, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychosomatic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Metternich, Birgitta</au><au>Schmidtke, Klaus</au><au>Hüll, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychosomatic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Psychosom Res</addtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>444</epage><pages>435-444</pages><issn>0022-3999</issn><eissn>1879-1360</eissn><coden>JPCRAT</coden><abstract>Abstract Objective Memory complaints are a common finding in outpatients, especially in psychosomatic and neurological practice. In a substantial group of patients persistent memory complaints are found in the absence of abnormal neuropsychology. Different labels such as “functional memory complaint” have been suggested for this phenomenon. We characterise a group of patients with such memory complaints, which we termed functional memory disorder (FMD). The aim of the present study is to describe patients with FMD. Methods Thirty-nine patients with FMD were compared to 38 control subjects. Data were collected on the German version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning test and the Zahlenverbindungstest (cognitive speed), subscales of the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire (MIA), the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), the Global Severity Index (GSI) of the Symptom Checklist, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and other psychological questionnaire measures. Results We found significant group differences on all psychological questionnaire measures, with more pathological scores in the patient group. GSI and PSQ were the best predictors of memory self-efficacy. MIA-Memory Self-Efficacy (MSE), MIA-Achievement, and BDI were the best predictors of group membership (FMD vs. control group). When MSE was excluded, MIA-Achievement and BDI or GSI were the only predictors of group membership. Neuropsychological measures predicted neither MSE nor group membership. Conclusions Pathological scores on measures of metamemory, stress, and depression are typical of FMD. Low MSE and a high memory-related achievement motivation seem to be key features of FMD. Other important features are increased perceived stress, general psychosomatic complaint, and elevated depression scores. Neuropsychological test performance is not associated with FMD symptoms.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19379960</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3999 |
ispartof | Journal of psychosomatic research, 2009-05, Vol.66 (5), p.435-444 |
issn | 0022-3999 1879-1360 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67155360 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Affect Aged Case-Control Studies Cognition Complaints Depression Depression - complications Functional memory complaints Germany Humans Memory Memory Disorders - diagnosis Memory Disorders - psychology Metamemory Middle Aged Neuropsychological Tests Neuropsychology Outpatients Psychiatry Somatoform Somatoform disorders Stress Stress, Psychological - complications Subjective memory Surveys and Questionnaires Verbal Learning |
title | How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A50%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20are%20memory%20complaints%20in%20functional%20memory%20disorder%20related%20to%20measures%20of%20affect,%20metamemory%20and%20cognition?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychosomatic%20research&rft.au=Metternich,%20Birgitta&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=444&rft.pages=435-444&rft.issn=0022-3999&rft.eissn=1879-1360&rft.coden=JPCRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67155360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20524473&rft_id=info:pmid/19379960&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022399908003619&rfr_iscdi=true |