How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition?

Abstract Objective Memory complaints are a common finding in outpatients, especially in psychosomatic and neurological practice. In a substantial group of patients persistent memory complaints are found in the absence of abnormal neuropsychology. Different labels such as “functional memory complaint...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psychosomatic research 2009-05, Vol.66 (5), p.435-444
Hauptverfasser: Metternich, Birgitta, Schmidtke, Klaus, Hüll, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 444
container_issue 5
container_start_page 435
container_title Journal of psychosomatic research
container_volume 66
creator Metternich, Birgitta
Schmidtke, Klaus
Hüll, Michael
description Abstract Objective Memory complaints are a common finding in outpatients, especially in psychosomatic and neurological practice. In a substantial group of patients persistent memory complaints are found in the absence of abnormal neuropsychology. Different labels such as “functional memory complaint” have been suggested for this phenomenon. We characterise a group of patients with such memory complaints, which we termed functional memory disorder (FMD). The aim of the present study is to describe patients with FMD. Methods Thirty-nine patients with FMD were compared to 38 control subjects. Data were collected on the German version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning test and the Zahlenverbindungstest (cognitive speed), subscales of the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire (MIA), the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), the Global Severity Index (GSI) of the Symptom Checklist, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and other psychological questionnaire measures. Results We found significant group differences on all psychological questionnaire measures, with more pathological scores in the patient group. GSI and PSQ were the best predictors of memory self-efficacy. MIA-Memory Self-Efficacy (MSE), MIA-Achievement, and BDI were the best predictors of group membership (FMD vs. control group). When MSE was excluded, MIA-Achievement and BDI or GSI were the only predictors of group membership. Neuropsychological measures predicted neither MSE nor group membership. Conclusions Pathological scores on measures of metamemory, stress, and depression are typical of FMD. Low MSE and a high memory-related achievement motivation seem to be key features of FMD. Other important features are increased perceived stress, general psychosomatic complaint, and elevated depression scores. Neuropsychological test performance is not associated with FMD symptoms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67155360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022399908003619</els_id><sourcerecordid>67155360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6457419345fe1e7d04cf139fdbe21ae397270ab01a2a033cd572682c93990e603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUsFu1DAQtRCILoVfQD5xImFsJ3Z8AdEKKFIlDsDZ8toTcEjixU5A-_c42kWVuNCTJc97b97MG0Iog5oBk6-Gejjko_seE-aaA3Q1qBqgfUB2rFO6YkLCQ7ID4LwSWusL8iTnAQCk5u1jcsG0UFpL2JHDTfxNbUI64RTTkbo4HUYb5iXTMNN-nd0S4mzHv3UfckweE0042gU9XWIp2bwWJzT21PY9uuVl-VvsmWJnX2S_zWFTevOUPOrtmPHZ-b0kX9-_-3J9U91--vDx-u1t5ZpOL5VsWtUUm03bI0PloXE9E7r3e-TMotCKK7B7YJZbEML5VnHZcafLuIASxCV5cdI9pPhzxbyYKWSH42hnjGs2UrG2FfcAtkpAJ6X4L5BDy5tGbcDuBHQp5pywN4cUJpuOhoHZ8jODucvPbPkZUKbkV6jPzz3W_YT-jngOrACuTgAsu_sVMJnsAs4OfUhl8cbHcJ8ur_8RcWOYg7PjDzxiHuKaSuTZMJO5AfN5u6PtjKADELJ4-QNlL8c3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20524473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Metternich, Birgitta ; Schmidtke, Klaus ; Hüll, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Metternich, Birgitta ; Schmidtke, Klaus ; Hüll, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Memory complaints are a common finding in outpatients, especially in psychosomatic and neurological practice. In a substantial group of patients persistent memory complaints are found in the absence of abnormal neuropsychology. Different labels such as “functional memory complaint” have been suggested for this phenomenon. We characterise a group of patients with such memory complaints, which we termed functional memory disorder (FMD). The aim of the present study is to describe patients with FMD. Methods Thirty-nine patients with FMD were compared to 38 control subjects. Data were collected on the German version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning test and the Zahlenverbindungstest (cognitive speed), subscales of the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire (MIA), the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), the Global Severity Index (GSI) of the Symptom Checklist, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and other psychological questionnaire measures. Results We found significant group differences on all psychological questionnaire measures, with more pathological scores in the patient group. GSI and PSQ were the best predictors of memory self-efficacy. MIA-Memory Self-Efficacy (MSE), MIA-Achievement, and BDI were the best predictors of group membership (FMD vs. control group). When MSE was excluded, MIA-Achievement and BDI or GSI were the only predictors of group membership. Neuropsychological measures predicted neither MSE nor group membership. Conclusions Pathological scores on measures of metamemory, stress, and depression are typical of FMD. Low MSE and a high memory-related achievement motivation seem to be key features of FMD. Other important features are increased perceived stress, general psychosomatic complaint, and elevated depression scores. Neuropsychological test performance is not associated with FMD symptoms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19379960</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPCRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Affect ; Aged ; Case-Control Studies ; Cognition ; Complaints ; Depression ; Depression - complications ; Functional memory complaints ; Germany ; Humans ; Memory ; Memory Disorders - diagnosis ; Memory Disorders - psychology ; Metamemory ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Neuropsychology ; Outpatients ; Psychiatry ; Somatoform ; Somatoform disorders ; Stress ; Stress, Psychological - complications ; Subjective memory ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Verbal Learning</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychosomatic research, 2009-05, Vol.66 (5), p.435-444</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6457419345fe1e7d04cf139fdbe21ae397270ab01a2a033cd572682c93990e603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6457419345fe1e7d04cf139fdbe21ae397270ab01a2a033cd572682c93990e603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,31000,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19379960$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Metternich, Birgitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidtke, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hüll, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition?</title><title>Journal of psychosomatic research</title><addtitle>J Psychosom Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Memory complaints are a common finding in outpatients, especially in psychosomatic and neurological practice. In a substantial group of patients persistent memory complaints are found in the absence of abnormal neuropsychology. Different labels such as “functional memory complaint” have been suggested for this phenomenon. We characterise a group of patients with such memory complaints, which we termed functional memory disorder (FMD). The aim of the present study is to describe patients with FMD. Methods Thirty-nine patients with FMD were compared to 38 control subjects. Data were collected on the German version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning test and the Zahlenverbindungstest (cognitive speed), subscales of the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire (MIA), the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), the Global Severity Index (GSI) of the Symptom Checklist, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and other psychological questionnaire measures. Results We found significant group differences on all psychological questionnaire measures, with more pathological scores in the patient group. GSI and PSQ were the best predictors of memory self-efficacy. MIA-Memory Self-Efficacy (MSE), MIA-Achievement, and BDI were the best predictors of group membership (FMD vs. control group). When MSE was excluded, MIA-Achievement and BDI or GSI were the only predictors of group membership. Neuropsychological measures predicted neither MSE nor group membership. Conclusions Pathological scores on measures of metamemory, stress, and depression are typical of FMD. Low MSE and a high memory-related achievement motivation seem to be key features of FMD. Other important features are increased perceived stress, general psychosomatic complaint, and elevated depression scores. Neuropsychological test performance is not associated with FMD symptoms.</description><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Complaints</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depression - complications</subject><subject>Functional memory complaints</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Metamemory</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Outpatients</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Somatoform</subject><subject>Somatoform disorders</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - complications</subject><subject>Subjective memory</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><issn>0022-3999</issn><issn>1879-1360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUsFu1DAQtRCILoVfQD5xImFsJ3Z8AdEKKFIlDsDZ8toTcEjixU5A-_c42kWVuNCTJc97b97MG0Iog5oBk6-Gejjko_seE-aaA3Q1qBqgfUB2rFO6YkLCQ7ID4LwSWusL8iTnAQCk5u1jcsG0UFpL2JHDTfxNbUI64RTTkbo4HUYb5iXTMNN-nd0S4mzHv3UfckweE0042gU9XWIp2bwWJzT21PY9uuVl-VvsmWJnX2S_zWFTevOUPOrtmPHZ-b0kX9-_-3J9U91--vDx-u1t5ZpOL5VsWtUUm03bI0PloXE9E7r3e-TMotCKK7B7YJZbEML5VnHZcafLuIASxCV5cdI9pPhzxbyYKWSH42hnjGs2UrG2FfcAtkpAJ6X4L5BDy5tGbcDuBHQp5pywN4cUJpuOhoHZ8jODucvPbPkZUKbkV6jPzz3W_YT-jngOrACuTgAsu_sVMJnsAs4OfUhl8cbHcJ8ur_8RcWOYg7PjDzxiHuKaSuTZMJO5AfN5u6PtjKADELJ4-QNlL8c3</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Metternich, Birgitta</creator><creator>Schmidtke, Klaus</creator><creator>Hüll, Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition?</title><author>Metternich, Birgitta ; Schmidtke, Klaus ; Hüll, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6457419345fe1e7d04cf139fdbe21ae397270ab01a2a033cd572682c93990e603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Complaints</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depression - complications</topic><topic>Functional memory complaints</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Metamemory</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Outpatients</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Somatoform</topic><topic>Somatoform disorders</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - complications</topic><topic>Subjective memory</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Metternich, Birgitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidtke, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hüll, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychosomatic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Metternich, Birgitta</au><au>Schmidtke, Klaus</au><au>Hüll, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychosomatic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Psychosom Res</addtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>444</epage><pages>435-444</pages><issn>0022-3999</issn><eissn>1879-1360</eissn><coden>JPCRAT</coden><abstract>Abstract Objective Memory complaints are a common finding in outpatients, especially in psychosomatic and neurological practice. In a substantial group of patients persistent memory complaints are found in the absence of abnormal neuropsychology. Different labels such as “functional memory complaint” have been suggested for this phenomenon. We characterise a group of patients with such memory complaints, which we termed functional memory disorder (FMD). The aim of the present study is to describe patients with FMD. Methods Thirty-nine patients with FMD were compared to 38 control subjects. Data were collected on the German version of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning test and the Zahlenverbindungstest (cognitive speed), subscales of the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire (MIA), the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), the Global Severity Index (GSI) of the Symptom Checklist, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and other psychological questionnaire measures. Results We found significant group differences on all psychological questionnaire measures, with more pathological scores in the patient group. GSI and PSQ were the best predictors of memory self-efficacy. MIA-Memory Self-Efficacy (MSE), MIA-Achievement, and BDI were the best predictors of group membership (FMD vs. control group). When MSE was excluded, MIA-Achievement and BDI or GSI were the only predictors of group membership. Neuropsychological measures predicted neither MSE nor group membership. Conclusions Pathological scores on measures of metamemory, stress, and depression are typical of FMD. Low MSE and a high memory-related achievement motivation seem to be key features of FMD. Other important features are increased perceived stress, general psychosomatic complaint, and elevated depression scores. Neuropsychological test performance is not associated with FMD symptoms.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19379960</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3999
ispartof Journal of psychosomatic research, 2009-05, Vol.66 (5), p.435-444
issn 0022-3999
1879-1360
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67155360
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Affect
Aged
Case-Control Studies
Cognition
Complaints
Depression
Depression - complications
Functional memory complaints
Germany
Humans
Memory
Memory Disorders - diagnosis
Memory Disorders - psychology
Metamemory
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Neuropsychology
Outpatients
Psychiatry
Somatoform
Somatoform disorders
Stress
Stress, Psychological - complications
Subjective memory
Surveys and Questionnaires
Verbal Learning
title How are memory complaints in functional memory disorder related to measures of affect, metamemory and cognition?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A50%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20are%20memory%20complaints%20in%20functional%20memory%20disorder%20related%20to%20measures%20of%20affect,%20metamemory%20and%20cognition?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychosomatic%20research&rft.au=Metternich,%20Birgitta&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=444&rft.pages=435-444&rft.issn=0022-3999&rft.eissn=1879-1360&rft.coden=JPCRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67155360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20524473&rft_id=info:pmid/19379960&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022399908003619&rfr_iscdi=true