Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review

Intimates typically are positively biased in their relationship evaluations. Given this fact, how can intimates regulate their esteem needs about their relationships and still function effectively, without risking later regret and disappointment? We address this issue by first reviewing work showing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004-01, Vol.8 (4), p.322-338
Hauptverfasser: Gagné, Faby M., Lydon, John E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 338
container_issue 4
container_start_page 322
container_title Personality and Social Psychology Review
container_volume 8
creator Gagné, Faby M.
Lydon, John E.
description Intimates typically are positively biased in their relationship evaluations. Given this fact, how can intimates regulate their esteem needs about their relationships and still function effectively, without risking later regret and disappointment? We address this issue by first reviewing work showing that because bias and accuracy are independent, they can co-exist. We next show how bias and accuracy are subject to different evaluative motives, relationship evaluations, and situations. It is argued that the pursuit of important goals is a time when people are motivated to feel good about their relationships. This is a time when relationship judgments are positively biased and relatively inaccurate. However, important choice points in the relationship are times when people are motivated to both accurately understand their relationships and to feel good about their relationships. These dual needs can be simultaneously met by becoming more accurate in epistemic-related relationship judgments while being more positively biased in esteem-related relationship judgments.
doi_str_mv 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67152515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1207_s15327957pspr0804_1</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67152515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-a7373fdf22be8e3db0600d95ebe2962c673011d9bbfee9bb5bebdab71de8696d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoTqe_QJDihXfVfCwf9Ubm8GMwEESvQ9Kczo6urUk72b83Y4OBiDcnhzfPeU_yInRB8A2hWN4GwhmVGZdtaD1WeKTJATrZiOlGPYw9VipVQrEBOg1hgTEWKiPHaEA4V1RxeYLuH0oTElO7ZJznvTf5OinrZFI1AZI3qExXNnX4LNtwl4zrZFp3MPdRXG1uVyV8n6GjwlQBznfnEH08Pb5PXtLZ6_N0Mp6l-YjJLjWSSVa4glILCpizWGDsMg4WaCZoLiTDhLjM2gIgVm7BOmMlcaBEJhwbouutb-ubrx5Cp5dlyKGqTA1NH7SQhFMePz9EV7_ARdP7Or5NU0awjImxCLEtlPsmBA-Fbn25NH6tCdabcPUf4capy511b5fg9jO7NCOAt0Awc9jv_c_zB8-thUk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231072793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gagné, Faby M. ; Lydon, John E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gagné, Faby M. ; Lydon, John E.</creatorcontrib><description>Intimates typically are positively biased in their relationship evaluations. Given this fact, how can intimates regulate their esteem needs about their relationships and still function effectively, without risking later regret and disappointment? We address this issue by first reviewing work showing that because bias and accuracy are independent, they can co-exist. We next show how bias and accuracy are subject to different evaluative motives, relationship evaluations, and situations. It is argued that the pursuit of important goals is a time when people are motivated to feel good about their relationships. This is a time when relationship judgments are positively biased and relatively inaccurate. However, important choice points in the relationship are times when people are motivated to both accurately understand their relationships and to feel good about their relationships. These dual needs can be simultaneously met by becoming more accurate in epistemic-related relationship judgments while being more positively biased in esteem-related relationship judgments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-8683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15582857</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSPRFG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Bias ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Judgment ; Motivation ; Perceptual Distortion ; Personal relationships ; Projection ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology ; Social Perception</subject><ispartof>Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2004-01, Vol.8 (4), p.322-338</ispartof><rights>Copyright Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 2004</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-a7373fdf22be8e3db0600d95ebe2962c673011d9bbfee9bb5bebdab71de8696d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-a7373fdf22be8e3db0600d95ebe2962c673011d9bbfee9bb5bebdab71de8696d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,21819,27922,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15582857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gagné, Faby M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lydon, John E.</creatorcontrib><title>Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review</title><title>Personality and Social Psychology Review</title><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>Intimates typically are positively biased in their relationship evaluations. Given this fact, how can intimates regulate their esteem needs about their relationships and still function effectively, without risking later regret and disappointment? We address this issue by first reviewing work showing that because bias and accuracy are independent, they can co-exist. We next show how bias and accuracy are subject to different evaluative motives, relationship evaluations, and situations. It is argued that the pursuit of important goals is a time when people are motivated to feel good about their relationships. This is a time when relationship judgments are positively biased and relatively inaccurate. However, important choice points in the relationship are times when people are motivated to both accurately understand their relationships and to feel good about their relationships. These dual needs can be simultaneously met by becoming more accurate in epistemic-related relationship judgments while being more positively biased in esteem-related relationship judgments.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Perceptual Distortion</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Projection</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><issn>1088-8683</issn><issn>1532-7957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoTqe_QJDihXfVfCwf9Ubm8GMwEESvQ9Kczo6urUk72b83Y4OBiDcnhzfPeU_yInRB8A2hWN4GwhmVGZdtaD1WeKTJATrZiOlGPYw9VipVQrEBOg1hgTEWKiPHaEA4V1RxeYLuH0oTElO7ZJznvTf5OinrZFI1AZI3qExXNnX4LNtwl4zrZFp3MPdRXG1uVyV8n6GjwlQBznfnEH08Pb5PXtLZ6_N0Mp6l-YjJLjWSSVa4glILCpizWGDsMg4WaCZoLiTDhLjM2gIgVm7BOmMlcaBEJhwbouutb-ubrx5Cp5dlyKGqTA1NH7SQhFMePz9EV7_ARdP7Or5NU0awjImxCLEtlPsmBA-Fbn25NH6tCdabcPUf4capy511b5fg9jO7NCOAt0Awc9jv_c_zB8-thUk</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Gagné, Faby M.</creator><creator>Lydon, John E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review</title><author>Gagné, Faby M. ; Lydon, John E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-a7373fdf22be8e3db0600d95ebe2962c673011d9bbfee9bb5bebdab71de8696d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Perceptual Distortion</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Projection</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gagné, Faby M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lydon, John E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Personality and Social Psychology Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gagné, Faby M.</au><au>Lydon, John E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review</atitle><jtitle>Personality and Social Psychology Review</jtitle><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>322</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>322-338</pages><issn>1088-8683</issn><eissn>1532-7957</eissn><coden>PSPRFG</coden><abstract>Intimates typically are positively biased in their relationship evaluations. Given this fact, how can intimates regulate their esteem needs about their relationships and still function effectively, without risking later regret and disappointment? We address this issue by first reviewing work showing that because bias and accuracy are independent, they can co-exist. We next show how bias and accuracy are subject to different evaluative motives, relationship evaluations, and situations. It is argued that the pursuit of important goals is a time when people are motivated to feel good about their relationships. This is a time when relationship judgments are positively biased and relatively inaccurate. However, important choice points in the relationship are times when people are motivated to both accurately understand their relationships and to feel good about their relationships. These dual needs can be simultaneously met by becoming more accurate in epistemic-related relationship judgments while being more positively biased in esteem-related relationship judgments.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>15582857</pmid><doi>10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-8683
ispartof Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2004-01, Vol.8 (4), p.322-338
issn 1088-8683
1532-7957
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67152515
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Accuracy
Bias
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Judgment
Motivation
Perceptual Distortion
Personal relationships
Projection
Psychological Theory
Psychology
Social Perception
title Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T12%3A03%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bias%20and%20Accuracy%20in%20Close%20Relationships:%20An%20Integrative%20Review&rft.jtitle=Personality%20and%20Social%20Psychology%20Review&rft.au=Gagn%C3%A9,%20Faby%20M.&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=322&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=322-338&rft.issn=1088-8683&rft.eissn=1532-7957&rft.coden=PSPRFG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67152515%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231072793&rft_id=info:pmid/15582857&rft_sage_id=10.1207_s15327957pspr0804_1&rfr_iscdi=true