Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review
Intimates typically are positively biased in their relationship evaluations. Given this fact, how can intimates regulate their esteem needs about their relationships and still function effectively, without risking later regret and disappointment? We address this issue by first reviewing work showing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004-01, Vol.8 (4), p.322-338 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 338 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 322 |
container_title | Personality and Social Psychology Review |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Gagné, Faby M. Lydon, John E. |
description | Intimates typically are positively biased in their relationship evaluations. Given this fact, how can intimates regulate their esteem needs about their relationships and still function effectively, without risking later regret and disappointment? We address this issue by first reviewing work showing that because bias and accuracy are independent, they can co-exist. We next show how bias and accuracy are subject to different evaluative motives, relationship evaluations, and situations. It is argued that the pursuit of important goals is a time when people are motivated to feel good about their relationships. This is a time when relationship judgments are positively biased and relatively inaccurate. However, important choice points in the relationship are times when people are motivated to both accurately understand their relationships and to feel good about their relationships. These dual needs can be simultaneously met by becoming more accurate in epistemic-related relationship judgments while being more positively biased in esteem-related relationship judgments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67152515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1207_s15327957pspr0804_1</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67152515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-a7373fdf22be8e3db0600d95ebe2962c673011d9bbfee9bb5bebdab71de8696d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoTqe_QJDihXfVfCwf9Ubm8GMwEESvQ9Kczo6urUk72b83Y4OBiDcnhzfPeU_yInRB8A2hWN4GwhmVGZdtaD1WeKTJATrZiOlGPYw9VipVQrEBOg1hgTEWKiPHaEA4V1RxeYLuH0oTElO7ZJznvTf5OinrZFI1AZI3qExXNnX4LNtwl4zrZFp3MPdRXG1uVyV8n6GjwlQBznfnEH08Pb5PXtLZ6_N0Mp6l-YjJLjWSSVa4glILCpizWGDsMg4WaCZoLiTDhLjM2gIgVm7BOmMlcaBEJhwbouutb-ubrx5Cp5dlyKGqTA1NH7SQhFMePz9EV7_ARdP7Or5NU0awjImxCLEtlPsmBA-Fbn25NH6tCdabcPUf4capy511b5fg9jO7NCOAt0Awc9jv_c_zB8-thUk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231072793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gagné, Faby M. ; Lydon, John E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gagné, Faby M. ; Lydon, John E.</creatorcontrib><description>Intimates typically are positively biased in their relationship evaluations. Given this fact, how can intimates regulate their esteem needs about their relationships and still function effectively, without risking later regret and disappointment? We address this issue by first reviewing work showing that because bias and accuracy are independent, they can co-exist. We next show how bias and accuracy are subject to different evaluative motives, relationship evaluations, and situations. It is argued that the pursuit of important goals is a time when people are motivated to feel good about their relationships. This is a time when relationship judgments are positively biased and relatively inaccurate. However, important choice points in the relationship are times when people are motivated to both accurately understand their relationships and to feel good about their relationships. These dual needs can be simultaneously met by becoming more accurate in epistemic-related relationship judgments while being more positively biased in esteem-related relationship judgments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-8683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15582857</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSPRFG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Bias ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Judgment ; Motivation ; Perceptual Distortion ; Personal relationships ; Projection ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology ; Social Perception</subject><ispartof>Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2004-01, Vol.8 (4), p.322-338</ispartof><rights>Copyright Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 2004</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-a7373fdf22be8e3db0600d95ebe2962c673011d9bbfee9bb5bebdab71de8696d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-a7373fdf22be8e3db0600d95ebe2962c673011d9bbfee9bb5bebdab71de8696d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,21819,27922,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15582857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gagné, Faby M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lydon, John E.</creatorcontrib><title>Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review</title><title>Personality and Social Psychology Review</title><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>Intimates typically are positively biased in their relationship evaluations. Given this fact, how can intimates regulate their esteem needs about their relationships and still function effectively, without risking later regret and disappointment? We address this issue by first reviewing work showing that because bias and accuracy are independent, they can co-exist. We next show how bias and accuracy are subject to different evaluative motives, relationship evaluations, and situations. It is argued that the pursuit of important goals is a time when people are motivated to feel good about their relationships. This is a time when relationship judgments are positively biased and relatively inaccurate. However, important choice points in the relationship are times when people are motivated to both accurately understand their relationships and to feel good about their relationships. These dual needs can be simultaneously met by becoming more accurate in epistemic-related relationship judgments while being more positively biased in esteem-related relationship judgments.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Perceptual Distortion</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Projection</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><issn>1088-8683</issn><issn>1532-7957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoTqe_QJDihXfVfCwf9Ubm8GMwEESvQ9Kczo6urUk72b83Y4OBiDcnhzfPeU_yInRB8A2hWN4GwhmVGZdtaD1WeKTJATrZiOlGPYw9VipVQrEBOg1hgTEWKiPHaEA4V1RxeYLuH0oTElO7ZJznvTf5OinrZFI1AZI3qExXNnX4LNtwl4zrZFp3MPdRXG1uVyV8n6GjwlQBznfnEH08Pb5PXtLZ6_N0Mp6l-YjJLjWSSVa4glILCpizWGDsMg4WaCZoLiTDhLjM2gIgVm7BOmMlcaBEJhwbouutb-ubrx5Cp5dlyKGqTA1NH7SQhFMePz9EV7_ARdP7Or5NU0awjImxCLEtlPsmBA-Fbn25NH6tCdabcPUf4capy511b5fg9jO7NCOAt0Awc9jv_c_zB8-thUk</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Gagné, Faby M.</creator><creator>Lydon, John E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review</title><author>Gagné, Faby M. ; Lydon, John E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-a7373fdf22be8e3db0600d95ebe2962c673011d9bbfee9bb5bebdab71de8696d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Perceptual Distortion</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Projection</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gagné, Faby M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lydon, John E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Personality and Social Psychology Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gagné, Faby M.</au><au>Lydon, John E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review</atitle><jtitle>Personality and Social Psychology Review</jtitle><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>322</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>322-338</pages><issn>1088-8683</issn><eissn>1532-7957</eissn><coden>PSPRFG</coden><abstract>Intimates typically are positively biased in their relationship evaluations. Given this fact, how can intimates regulate their esteem needs about their relationships and still function effectively, without risking later regret and disappointment? We address this issue by first reviewing work showing that because bias and accuracy are independent, they can co-exist. We next show how bias and accuracy are subject to different evaluative motives, relationship evaluations, and situations. It is argued that the pursuit of important goals is a time when people are motivated to feel good about their relationships. This is a time when relationship judgments are positively biased and relatively inaccurate. However, important choice points in the relationship are times when people are motivated to both accurately understand their relationships and to feel good about their relationships. These dual needs can be simultaneously met by becoming more accurate in epistemic-related relationship judgments while being more positively biased in esteem-related relationship judgments.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>15582857</pmid><doi>10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1088-8683 |
ispartof | Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2004-01, Vol.8 (4), p.322-338 |
issn | 1088-8683 1532-7957 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67152515 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Accuracy Bias Humans Interpersonal Relations Judgment Motivation Perceptual Distortion Personal relationships Projection Psychological Theory Psychology Social Perception |
title | Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T12%3A03%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bias%20and%20Accuracy%20in%20Close%20Relationships:%20An%20Integrative%20Review&rft.jtitle=Personality%20and%20Social%20Psychology%20Review&rft.au=Gagn%C3%A9,%20Faby%20M.&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=322&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=322-338&rft.issn=1088-8683&rft.eissn=1532-7957&rft.coden=PSPRFG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67152515%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231072793&rft_id=info:pmid/15582857&rft_sage_id=10.1207_s15327957pspr0804_1&rfr_iscdi=true |