Ethnic differences in the use of regular mammography: the multiethnic cohort

Women's regular use of mammography over a 6 year interval was examined among women aged 45-75 in the Hawaii and Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort (MEC). The analyses included 81,722 African American, Japanese, Latina, Native Hawaiian, and White females using self-reported mammography history from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2009-05, Vol.115 (1), p.163-170
Hauptverfasser: Edwards, Quannetta T, Li, Arthur X, Pike, Malcolm C, Kolonel, Laurence N, Ursin, Giske, Henderson, Brian E, McKean-Cowdin, Roberta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 170
container_issue 1
container_start_page 163
container_title Breast cancer research and treatment
container_volume 115
creator Edwards, Quannetta T
Li, Arthur X
Pike, Malcolm C
Kolonel, Laurence N
Ursin, Giske
Henderson, Brian E
McKean-Cowdin, Roberta
description Women's regular use of mammography over a 6 year interval was examined among women aged 45-75 in the Hawaii and Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort (MEC). The analyses included 81,722 African American, Japanese, Latina, Native Hawaiian, and White females using self-reported mammography history from 1993 to 1998. Ninety-one percent of MEC women reported ever having a mammogram, however only 36% reported regular annual and 48% reported regular biennial mammography over the interval. Mammography was lowest among women who were obese, had a high school education or less, or who were aged 70 and over. Regular mammography use during follow-up was low compared to prior studies reporting on recent mammography. African American, Latina, and Native Hawaiian women had significantly lower annual and biennial mammography use compared to White women even after controlling for age, education, family history, body mass index and hormone therapy indicating that gaps exist in mammography that remain unexplained by known predictors of screening behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10549-008-0049-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67150005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1686407361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-3c18f03b7db27f480993d883b159914ba4e54a128dd2b28c28fe77a8aed5c0cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EokvhB3CBqBLcUmbsOHa4oaotSCv1AD1bjjPeTZXEi50c-u_xNisqceAwsqX53pvxM2PvES4RQH1JCLJqSgCdK1_UC7ZBqUSpOKqXbANYq7LWUJ-xNyk9AECjoHnNzlBXjci1YdvreT_1ruh67ynS5CgV_VTMeyqWREXwRaTdMthYjHYcwy7aw_7x61N_XIa5p1Xuwj7E-S175e2Q6N3pPGf3N9e_rr6X27vbH1fftqWruJhL4VB7EK3qWq58paFpRKe1aFE2DVatrUhWFrnuOt5y7bj2pJTVljrpwDlxzj6vvocYfi-UZjP2ydEw2InCkkytUObHygxe_AM-hCVOeTfDkVc5Jq0yhCvkYkgpkjeH2I82PhoEc8zZrDmbnLM55myOmg8n46UdqXtWnILNwKcTYJOzg492cn36y_G8YC3l0YivXMqtaUfxecP_Tf-4irwNxu5iNr7_yQFF_nDOFWrxB7PfnZk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212472187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethnic differences in the use of regular mammography: the multiethnic cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Edwards, Quannetta T ; Li, Arthur X ; Pike, Malcolm C ; Kolonel, Laurence N ; Ursin, Giske ; Henderson, Brian E ; McKean-Cowdin, Roberta</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Quannetta T ; Li, Arthur X ; Pike, Malcolm C ; Kolonel, Laurence N ; Ursin, Giske ; Henderson, Brian E ; McKean-Cowdin, Roberta</creatorcontrib><description>Women's regular use of mammography over a 6 year interval was examined among women aged 45-75 in the Hawaii and Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort (MEC). The analyses included 81,722 African American, Japanese, Latina, Native Hawaiian, and White females using self-reported mammography history from 1993 to 1998. Ninety-one percent of MEC women reported ever having a mammogram, however only 36% reported regular annual and 48% reported regular biennial mammography over the interval. Mammography was lowest among women who were obese, had a high school education or less, or who were aged 70 and over. Regular mammography use during follow-up was low compared to prior studies reporting on recent mammography. African American, Latina, and Native Hawaiian women had significantly lower annual and biennial mammography use compared to White women even after controlling for age, education, family history, body mass index and hormone therapy indicating that gaps exist in mammography that remain unexplained by known predictors of screening behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0049-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18493849</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BCTRD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Boston : Springer US</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Cancer research ; Cancer therapies ; Cohort Studies ; Early Detection of Cancer ; education ; Epidemiology ; Ethnic Groups ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health Behavior ; Health disparities ; Healthcare Disparities ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; Mammography ; Mammography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Mammography - utilization ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical Oncology - methods ; Medical sciences ; Medical screening ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metabolic diseases ; Middle Aged ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Multiethnic cohort ; nationalities and ethnic groups ; Obesity ; Oncology ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2009-05, Vol.115 (1), p.163-170</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-3c18f03b7db27f480993d883b159914ba4e54a128dd2b28c28fe77a8aed5c0cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-3c18f03b7db27f480993d883b159914ba4e54a128dd2b28c28fe77a8aed5c0cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10549-008-0049-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10549-008-0049-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21506557$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18493849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Quannetta T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Arthur X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pike, Malcolm C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolonel, Laurence N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ursin, Giske</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Brian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKean-Cowdin, Roberta</creatorcontrib><title>Ethnic differences in the use of regular mammography: the multiethnic cohort</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>Women's regular use of mammography over a 6 year interval was examined among women aged 45-75 in the Hawaii and Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort (MEC). The analyses included 81,722 African American, Japanese, Latina, Native Hawaiian, and White females using self-reported mammography history from 1993 to 1998. Ninety-one percent of MEC women reported ever having a mammogram, however only 36% reported regular annual and 48% reported regular biennial mammography over the interval. Mammography was lowest among women who were obese, had a high school education or less, or who were aged 70 and over. Regular mammography use during follow-up was low compared to prior studies reporting on recent mammography. African American, Latina, and Native Hawaiian women had significantly lower annual and biennial mammography use compared to White women even after controlling for age, education, family history, body mass index and hormone therapy indicating that gaps exist in mammography that remain unexplained by known predictors of screening behavior.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Mammography - utilization</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolic diseases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Multiethnic cohort</subject><subject>nationalities and ethnic groups</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EokvhB3CBqBLcUmbsOHa4oaotSCv1AD1bjjPeTZXEi50c-u_xNisqceAwsqX53pvxM2PvES4RQH1JCLJqSgCdK1_UC7ZBqUSpOKqXbANYq7LWUJ-xNyk9AECjoHnNzlBXjci1YdvreT_1ruh67ynS5CgV_VTMeyqWREXwRaTdMthYjHYcwy7aw_7x61N_XIa5p1Xuwj7E-S175e2Q6N3pPGf3N9e_rr6X27vbH1fftqWruJhL4VB7EK3qWq58paFpRKe1aFE2DVatrUhWFrnuOt5y7bj2pJTVljrpwDlxzj6vvocYfi-UZjP2ydEw2InCkkytUObHygxe_AM-hCVOeTfDkVc5Jq0yhCvkYkgpkjeH2I82PhoEc8zZrDmbnLM55myOmg8n46UdqXtWnILNwKcTYJOzg492cn36y_G8YC3l0YivXMqtaUfxecP_Tf-4irwNxu5iNr7_yQFF_nDOFWrxB7PfnZk</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Edwards, Quannetta T</creator><creator>Li, Arthur X</creator><creator>Pike, Malcolm C</creator><creator>Kolonel, Laurence N</creator><creator>Ursin, Giske</creator><creator>Henderson, Brian E</creator><creator>McKean-Cowdin, Roberta</creator><general>Boston : Springer US</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Ethnic differences in the use of regular mammography: the multiethnic cohort</title><author>Edwards, Quannetta T ; Li, Arthur X ; Pike, Malcolm C ; Kolonel, Laurence N ; Ursin, Giske ; Henderson, Brian E ; McKean-Cowdin, Roberta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-3c18f03b7db27f480993d883b159914ba4e54a128dd2b28c28fe77a8aed5c0cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Mammography - utilization</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolic diseases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Multiethnic cohort</topic><topic>nationalities and ethnic groups</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Quannetta T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Arthur X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pike, Malcolm C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolonel, Laurence N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ursin, Giske</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Brian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKean-Cowdin, Roberta</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Quannetta T</au><au>Li, Arthur X</au><au>Pike, Malcolm C</au><au>Kolonel, Laurence N</au><au>Ursin, Giske</au><au>Henderson, Brian E</au><au>McKean-Cowdin, Roberta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethnic differences in the use of regular mammography: the multiethnic cohort</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>163-170</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><coden>BCTRD6</coden><abstract>Women's regular use of mammography over a 6 year interval was examined among women aged 45-75 in the Hawaii and Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort (MEC). The analyses included 81,722 African American, Japanese, Latina, Native Hawaiian, and White females using self-reported mammography history from 1993 to 1998. Ninety-one percent of MEC women reported ever having a mammogram, however only 36% reported regular annual and 48% reported regular biennial mammography over the interval. Mammography was lowest among women who were obese, had a high school education or less, or who were aged 70 and over. Regular mammography use during follow-up was low compared to prior studies reporting on recent mammography. African American, Latina, and Native Hawaiian women had significantly lower annual and biennial mammography use compared to White women even after controlling for age, education, family history, body mass index and hormone therapy indicating that gaps exist in mammography that remain unexplained by known predictors of screening behavior.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Boston : Springer US</pub><pmid>18493849</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10549-008-0049-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6806
ispartof Breast cancer research and treatment, 2009-05, Vol.115 (1), p.163-170
issn 0167-6806
1573-7217
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67150005
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Breast cancer
Cancer research
Cancer therapies
Cohort Studies
Early Detection of Cancer
education
Epidemiology
Ethnic Groups
Ethnicity
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Health Behavior
Health disparities
Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Mammary gland diseases
Mammography
Mammography - statistics & numerical data
Mammography - utilization
Mass Screening - methods
Medical Oncology - methods
Medical sciences
Medical screening
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metabolic diseases
Middle Aged
Minority & ethnic groups
Multiethnic cohort
nationalities and ethnic groups
Obesity
Oncology
Socioeconomic Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tumors
title Ethnic differences in the use of regular mammography: the multiethnic cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A38%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethnic%20differences%20in%20the%20use%20of%20regular%20mammography:%20the%20multiethnic%20cohort&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Edwards,%20Quannetta%20T&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=163-170&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft.coden=BCTRD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-008-0049-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1686407361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212472187&rft_id=info:pmid/18493849&rfr_iscdi=true