Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory

Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) eith...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cognition 2004-12, Vol.94 (2), p.149-166
Hauptverfasser: Burgess, Neil, Spiers, Hugo J., Paleologou, Eleni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 166
container_issue 2
container_start_page 149
container_title Cognition
container_volume 94
creator Burgess, Neil
Spiers, Hugo J.
Paleologou, Eleni
description Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) either alone or together. The subject then had to indicate which one of the five objects had been moved. A fully factorial design was used to detect the use of three types of representations of object location: (i) visual snapshots; (ii) egocentric representations updated by self-motion; and (iii) representations relative to the external cue. Improved performance was seen whenever the test array was oriented consistently with any of these stored representations. The influence of representations (i) and (ii) replicates previous work. The influence of representation (iii) is a novel finding which implies that allocentric representations play a role in spatial memory, even over short distances and times. The effect of the external cue was greater when initially experienced as stable. Females out-performed males except when the array was consistent with self-motion but not visual snapshots. These results enable a simple egocentric model of spatial memory to be extended to address large-scale navigation, including the effects of allocentric knowledge, landmark stability and gender.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67146971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ730219</ericid><els_id>S0010027704000472</els_id><sourcerecordid>38008476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c04454c07eeeb24769322ede70bf17055f1ac1676906c43a10260d9a0ada40d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v3CAQxVHVqtkm-QZV60t6sztgDHZvUZT-U6RckjNiYbxla8MW7Ej59sVaa3PMCTHv92ZG8wj5TKGiQMXXfWXCzrvJBV8xAF4BrQDoG7KhraxL2dbtW7LJFSiBSXlGPqS0hwwy2b4nZ7RpWiYY35D9fXToJ7100kMxah9wfoqYCueL6Q8WVse_3wrrUgrGZczvCj0MwWRTdKbQ3ha4O32d74cZvcn-4It0yIalK44hPl-Qd70eEl6u7zl5_H77cPOzvLv_8evm-q40vGun0gDnDTcgEXHLuBRdzRhalLDtqYSm6ak2VOQ6CMNrTYEJsJ0GbTUHy-pz8uXY9xDDvxnTpEaXDA6D9hjmpISkXHSSvgrWLUCbF8igPIImhpQi9uoQ3ajjs6KgljzUXp3yUEseCqjK18_OT-uIeTuiffGtAWTgagV0Mnroo_bGpRdO1HUrYeE-HjnMZz7Jt79lDYx2Wb5e5XzYJ4dRJeOWHKyLaCZlg3t11_9fK7fp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38008476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Burgess, Neil ; Spiers, Hugo J. ; Paleologou, Eleni</creator><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Neil ; Spiers, Hugo J. ; Paleologou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><description>Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) either alone or together. The subject then had to indicate which one of the five objects had been moved. A fully factorial design was used to detect the use of three types of representations of object location: (i) visual snapshots; (ii) egocentric representations updated by self-motion; and (iii) representations relative to the external cue. Improved performance was seen whenever the test array was oriented consistently with any of these stored representations. The influence of representations (i) and (ii) replicates previous work. The influence of representation (iii) is a novel finding which implies that allocentric representations play a role in spatial memory, even over short distances and times. The effect of the external cue was greater when initially experienced as stable. Females out-performed males except when the array was consistent with self-motion but not visual snapshots. These results enable a simple egocentric model of spatial memory to be extended to address large-scale navigation, including the effects of allocentric knowledge, landmark stability and gender.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15582624</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CGTNAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Awareness ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognitive Processes ; Cues ; Female ; Frame of reference ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Ideothetic ; Influences ; Landmark ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory ; Motion ; Motion Perception ; Psychological Patterns ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sex Factors ; Sight ; Space Perception ; Spatial Ability ; Spatial analysis ; Spatial updating ; Viewpoint ; Visual Perception ; Visual snapshot</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 2004-12, Vol.94 (2), p.149-166</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c04454c07eeeb24769322ede70bf17055f1ac1676906c43a10260d9a0ada40d23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027704000472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ730219$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16338704$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15582624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiers, Hugo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paleologou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><title>Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) either alone or together. The subject then had to indicate which one of the five objects had been moved. A fully factorial design was used to detect the use of three types of representations of object location: (i) visual snapshots; (ii) egocentric representations updated by self-motion; and (iii) representations relative to the external cue. Improved performance was seen whenever the test array was oriented consistently with any of these stored representations. The influence of representations (i) and (ii) replicates previous work. The influence of representation (iii) is a novel finding which implies that allocentric representations play a role in spatial memory, even over short distances and times. The effect of the external cue was greater when initially experienced as stable. Females out-performed males except when the array was consistent with self-motion but not visual snapshots. These results enable a simple egocentric model of spatial memory to be extended to address large-scale navigation, including the effects of allocentric knowledge, landmark stability and gender.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frame of reference</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ideothetic</subject><subject>Influences</subject><subject>Landmark</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Motion Perception</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Sight</subject><subject>Space Perception</subject><subject>Spatial Ability</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Spatial updating</subject><subject>Viewpoint</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual snapshot</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v3CAQxVHVqtkm-QZV60t6sztgDHZvUZT-U6RckjNiYbxla8MW7Ej59sVaa3PMCTHv92ZG8wj5TKGiQMXXfWXCzrvJBV8xAF4BrQDoG7KhraxL2dbtW7LJFSiBSXlGPqS0hwwy2b4nZ7RpWiYY35D9fXToJ7100kMxah9wfoqYCueL6Q8WVse_3wrrUgrGZczvCj0MwWRTdKbQ3ha4O32d74cZvcn-4It0yIalK44hPl-Qd70eEl6u7zl5_H77cPOzvLv_8evm-q40vGun0gDnDTcgEXHLuBRdzRhalLDtqYSm6ak2VOQ6CMNrTYEJsJ0GbTUHy-pz8uXY9xDDvxnTpEaXDA6D9hjmpISkXHSSvgrWLUCbF8igPIImhpQi9uoQ3ajjs6KgljzUXp3yUEseCqjK18_OT-uIeTuiffGtAWTgagV0Mnroo_bGpRdO1HUrYeE-HjnMZz7Jt79lDYx2Wb5e5XzYJ4dRJeOWHKyLaCZlg3t11_9fK7fp</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>Burgess, Neil</creator><creator>Spiers, Hugo J.</creator><creator>Paleologou, Eleni</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory</title><author>Burgess, Neil ; Spiers, Hugo J. ; Paleologou, Eleni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c04454c07eeeb24769322ede70bf17055f1ac1676906c43a10260d9a0ada40d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frame of reference</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ideothetic</topic><topic>Influences</topic><topic>Landmark</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Motion Perception</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Sight</topic><topic>Space Perception</topic><topic>Spatial Ability</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Spatial updating</topic><topic>Viewpoint</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual snapshot</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiers, Hugo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paleologou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burgess, Neil</au><au>Spiers, Hugo J.</au><au>Paleologou, Eleni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ730219</ericid><atitle>Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>149-166</pages><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><coden>CGTNAU</coden><abstract>Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) either alone or together. The subject then had to indicate which one of the five objects had been moved. A fully factorial design was used to detect the use of three types of representations of object location: (i) visual snapshots; (ii) egocentric representations updated by self-motion; and (iii) representations relative to the external cue. Improved performance was seen whenever the test array was oriented consistently with any of these stored representations. The influence of representations (i) and (ii) replicates previous work. The influence of representation (iii) is a novel finding which implies that allocentric representations play a role in spatial memory, even over short distances and times. The effect of the external cue was greater when initially experienced as stable. Females out-performed males except when the array was consistent with self-motion but not visual snapshots. These results enable a simple egocentric model of spatial memory to be extended to address large-scale navigation, including the effects of allocentric knowledge, landmark stability and gender.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15582624</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-0277
ispartof Cognition, 2004-12, Vol.94 (2), p.149-166
issn 0010-0277
1873-7838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67146971
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Awareness
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Cognitive Processes
Cues
Female
Frame of reference
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Ideothetic
Influences
Landmark
Learning. Memory
Male
Memory
Motion
Motion Perception
Psychological Patterns
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Sex Factors
Sight
Space Perception
Spatial Ability
Spatial analysis
Spatial updating
Viewpoint
Visual Perception
Visual snapshot
title Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T06%3A45%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Orientational%20manoeuvres%20in%20the%20dark:%20dissociating%20allocentric%20and%20egocentric%20influences%20on%20spatial%20memory&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Burgess,%20Neil&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=149-166&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft.coden=CGTNAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38008476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38008476&rft_id=info:pmid/15582624&rft_ericid=EJ730219&rft_els_id=S0010027704000472&rfr_iscdi=true