Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory
Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) eith...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognition 2004-12, Vol.94 (2), p.149-166 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 166 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 149 |
container_title | Cognition |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Burgess, Neil Spiers, Hugo J. Paleologou, Eleni |
description | Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) either alone or together. The subject then had to indicate which one of the five objects had been moved. A fully factorial design was used to detect the use of three types of representations of object location: (i) visual snapshots; (ii) egocentric representations updated by self-motion; and (iii) representations relative to the external cue. Improved performance was seen whenever the test array was oriented consistently with any of these stored representations. The influence of representations (i) and (ii) replicates previous work. The influence of representation (iii) is a novel finding which implies that allocentric representations play a role in spatial memory, even over short distances and times. The effect of the external cue was greater when initially experienced as stable. Females out-performed males except when the array was consistent with self-motion but not visual snapshots. These results enable a simple egocentric model of spatial memory to be extended to address large-scale navigation, including the effects of allocentric knowledge, landmark stability and gender. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67146971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ730219</ericid><els_id>S0010027704000472</els_id><sourcerecordid>38008476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c04454c07eeeb24769322ede70bf17055f1ac1676906c43a10260d9a0ada40d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v3CAQxVHVqtkm-QZV60t6sztgDHZvUZT-U6RckjNiYbxla8MW7Ej59sVaa3PMCTHv92ZG8wj5TKGiQMXXfWXCzrvJBV8xAF4BrQDoG7KhraxL2dbtW7LJFSiBSXlGPqS0hwwy2b4nZ7RpWiYY35D9fXToJ7100kMxah9wfoqYCueL6Q8WVse_3wrrUgrGZczvCj0MwWRTdKbQ3ha4O32d74cZvcn-4It0yIalK44hPl-Qd70eEl6u7zl5_H77cPOzvLv_8evm-q40vGun0gDnDTcgEXHLuBRdzRhalLDtqYSm6ak2VOQ6CMNrTYEJsJ0GbTUHy-pz8uXY9xDDvxnTpEaXDA6D9hjmpISkXHSSvgrWLUCbF8igPIImhpQi9uoQ3ajjs6KgljzUXp3yUEseCqjK18_OT-uIeTuiffGtAWTgagV0Mnroo_bGpRdO1HUrYeE-HjnMZz7Jt79lDYx2Wb5e5XzYJ4dRJeOWHKyLaCZlg3t11_9fK7fp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38008476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Burgess, Neil ; Spiers, Hugo J. ; Paleologou, Eleni</creator><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Neil ; Spiers, Hugo J. ; Paleologou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><description>Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) either alone or together. The subject then had to indicate which one of the five objects had been moved. A fully factorial design was used to detect the use of three types of representations of object location: (i) visual snapshots; (ii) egocentric representations updated by self-motion; and (iii) representations relative to the external cue. Improved performance was seen whenever the test array was oriented consistently with any of these stored representations. The influence of representations (i) and (ii) replicates previous work. The influence of representation (iii) is a novel finding which implies that allocentric representations play a role in spatial memory, even over short distances and times. The effect of the external cue was greater when initially experienced as stable. Females out-performed males except when the array was consistent with self-motion but not visual snapshots. These results enable a simple egocentric model of spatial memory to be extended to address large-scale navigation, including the effects of allocentric knowledge, landmark stability and gender.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15582624</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CGTNAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Awareness ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognitive Processes ; Cues ; Female ; Frame of reference ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Ideothetic ; Influences ; Landmark ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory ; Motion ; Motion Perception ; Psychological Patterns ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sex Factors ; Sight ; Space Perception ; Spatial Ability ; Spatial analysis ; Spatial updating ; Viewpoint ; Visual Perception ; Visual snapshot</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 2004-12, Vol.94 (2), p.149-166</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c04454c07eeeb24769322ede70bf17055f1ac1676906c43a10260d9a0ada40d23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027704000472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ730219$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16338704$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15582624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiers, Hugo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paleologou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><title>Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) either alone or together. The subject then had to indicate which one of the five objects had been moved. A fully factorial design was used to detect the use of three types of representations of object location: (i) visual snapshots; (ii) egocentric representations updated by self-motion; and (iii) representations relative to the external cue. Improved performance was seen whenever the test array was oriented consistently with any of these stored representations. The influence of representations (i) and (ii) replicates previous work. The influence of representation (iii) is a novel finding which implies that allocentric representations play a role in spatial memory, even over short distances and times. The effect of the external cue was greater when initially experienced as stable. Females out-performed males except when the array was consistent with self-motion but not visual snapshots. These results enable a simple egocentric model of spatial memory to be extended to address large-scale navigation, including the effects of allocentric knowledge, landmark stability and gender.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frame of reference</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ideothetic</subject><subject>Influences</subject><subject>Landmark</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Motion Perception</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Sight</subject><subject>Space Perception</subject><subject>Spatial Ability</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Spatial updating</subject><subject>Viewpoint</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual snapshot</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v3CAQxVHVqtkm-QZV60t6sztgDHZvUZT-U6RckjNiYbxla8MW7Ej59sVaa3PMCTHv92ZG8wj5TKGiQMXXfWXCzrvJBV8xAF4BrQDoG7KhraxL2dbtW7LJFSiBSXlGPqS0hwwy2b4nZ7RpWiYY35D9fXToJ7100kMxah9wfoqYCueL6Q8WVse_3wrrUgrGZczvCj0MwWRTdKbQ3ha4O32d74cZvcn-4It0yIalK44hPl-Qd70eEl6u7zl5_H77cPOzvLv_8evm-q40vGun0gDnDTcgEXHLuBRdzRhalLDtqYSm6ak2VOQ6CMNrTYEJsJ0GbTUHy-pz8uXY9xDDvxnTpEaXDA6D9hjmpISkXHSSvgrWLUCbF8igPIImhpQi9uoQ3ajjs6KgljzUXp3yUEseCqjK18_OT-uIeTuiffGtAWTgagV0Mnroo_bGpRdO1HUrYeE-HjnMZz7Jt79lDYx2Wb5e5XzYJ4dRJeOWHKyLaCZlg3t11_9fK7fp</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>Burgess, Neil</creator><creator>Spiers, Hugo J.</creator><creator>Paleologou, Eleni</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory</title><author>Burgess, Neil ; Spiers, Hugo J. ; Paleologou, Eleni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-c04454c07eeeb24769322ede70bf17055f1ac1676906c43a10260d9a0ada40d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frame of reference</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ideothetic</topic><topic>Influences</topic><topic>Landmark</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Motion Perception</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Sight</topic><topic>Space Perception</topic><topic>Spatial Ability</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Spatial updating</topic><topic>Viewpoint</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual snapshot</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiers, Hugo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paleologou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burgess, Neil</au><au>Spiers, Hugo J.</au><au>Paleologou, Eleni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ730219</ericid><atitle>Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>149-166</pages><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><coden>CGTNAU</coden><abstract>Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) either alone or together. The subject then had to indicate which one of the five objects had been moved. A fully factorial design was used to detect the use of three types of representations of object location: (i) visual snapshots; (ii) egocentric representations updated by self-motion; and (iii) representations relative to the external cue. Improved performance was seen whenever the test array was oriented consistently with any of these stored representations. The influence of representations (i) and (ii) replicates previous work. The influence of representation (iii) is a novel finding which implies that allocentric representations play a role in spatial memory, even over short distances and times. The effect of the external cue was greater when initially experienced as stable. Females out-performed males except when the array was consistent with self-motion but not visual snapshots. These results enable a simple egocentric model of spatial memory to be extended to address large-scale navigation, including the effects of allocentric knowledge, landmark stability and gender.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15582624</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-0277 |
ispartof | Cognition, 2004-12, Vol.94 (2), p.149-166 |
issn | 0010-0277 1873-7838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67146971 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Awareness Biological and medical sciences Cognition Cognitive Processes Cues Female Frame of reference Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Ideothetic Influences Landmark Learning. Memory Male Memory Motion Motion Perception Psychological Patterns Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Sex Factors Sight Space Perception Spatial Ability Spatial analysis Spatial updating Viewpoint Visual Perception Visual snapshot |
title | Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T06%3A45%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Orientational%20manoeuvres%20in%20the%20dark:%20dissociating%20allocentric%20and%20egocentric%20influences%20on%20spatial%20memory&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Burgess,%20Neil&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=149-166&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft.coden=CGTNAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38008476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38008476&rft_id=info:pmid/15582624&rft_ericid=EJ730219&rft_els_id=S0010027704000472&rfr_iscdi=true |