Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities
Standardization of laboratory results allows for the use of common reference intervals and can be achieved via calibration of field methods with secondary reference materials. These harmonization materials should be commutable, i.e., they produce identical numerical results independent of assay prin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2004-01, Vol.42 (12), p.1401-1407 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1407 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1401 |
container_title | Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Scharnhorst, Volkher Apperloo, Joke Baadenhuijsen, Henk Vader, Huib L. |
description | Standardization of laboratory results allows for the use of common reference intervals and can be achieved via calibration of field methods with secondary reference materials. These harmonization materials should be commutable, i.e., they produce identical numerical results independent of assay principle or platform. This study assessed the commutability of a cryolyoprotectant-containing harmonization material, obtained from the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Clinical Laboratories, that is intended to harmonize measurements of enzyme activities within the Dutch project “Calibration 2000”. The catalytic concentrations of alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, γ-glutamyltransferase and creatine kinase were analyzed in pooled patient sera and in the reference material in 14 laboratories. On liquid chemistry analyzers the harmonization material behaves like patient material. The enzyme activities measured in it fall on the regression lines calculated from activities measured in serum samples. For dry chemistry analyzers the activities of all enzymes measured in the harmonizator differ from the serum-based regression line. We show that this is due to the sucrose-containing cryolyoprotectant in the harmonization material. For each enzyme, correction factors were calculated that compensated for the bias and proved to be constant between reagent lots. Depending on the enzyme activity measured, application of these factors leads to 2- to 10-fold reduction of between-laboratory percentage coefficient of variation. Thus, additives to (potential) reference materials may alter their matrix in a way that interferes with analysis on certain test systems. The bias caused may be quantifiable and correctable. Establishment of correction factors leads to analytical uncertainties and costs. Therefore, matrix-based materials without additives should be selected as reference materials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/CCLM.2004.261 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67144398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67144398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a82ee5366919ca6af26c2da98c799a928bf3cb4493d38d2fc9d4a3f0b1bb5edf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1v1DAQhiNERUvhyBXlArds_RUnOXBAEV_SVgW0qEdr4oypSxIvtlPY_nocdtW99DSj0TOvZp4se0XJipa0vGjb9eWKESJWTNIn2RkVvCoE5_Tp_14UUjJ6mj0P4ZYQWpaiepadplpJTvhZFi_nIVqNU0Sf4x0MM0TrptyZPN5grt04zhE6O9i4W4aQb11MtIUh92jQ46QxHyGtLyPjfH4DfnSTvX8Iwul-N2IOOto7Gy2GF9mJgSHgy0M9z358_LBpPxfrq09f2vfrQgvKYwE1Qyy5lA1tNEgwTGrWQ1PrqmmgYXVnuO6EaHjP654Z3fQCuCEd7boSe8PPs7f73K13v2cMUY02aBwGmNDNQcmKCsGbOoHFHtTehZD-UltvR_A7RYlaNKtFs1o0q6Q58a8PwXM3Yn-kD14T8OYAQNAwGA-TtuHISS4ZqUni3u25PzAkhT3-9PMuNerWzX5Kbh4_QDDKqCD0eLgNEf8-5IP_lZ7jVam-bYS6rq-_txvaqq_8HzTbqvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67144398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Scharnhorst, Volkher ; Apperloo, Joke ; Baadenhuijsen, Henk ; Vader, Huib L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scharnhorst, Volkher ; Apperloo, Joke ; Baadenhuijsen, Henk ; Vader, Huib L.</creatorcontrib><description>Standardization of laboratory results allows for the use of common reference intervals and can be achieved via calibration of field methods with secondary reference materials. These harmonization materials should be commutable, i.e., they produce identical numerical results independent of assay principle or platform. This study assessed the commutability of a cryolyoprotectant-containing harmonization material, obtained from the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Clinical Laboratories, that is intended to harmonize measurements of enzyme activities within the Dutch project “Calibration 2000”. The catalytic concentrations of alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, γ-glutamyltransferase and creatine kinase were analyzed in pooled patient sera and in the reference material in 14 laboratories. On liquid chemistry analyzers the harmonization material behaves like patient material. The enzyme activities measured in it fall on the regression lines calculated from activities measured in serum samples. For dry chemistry analyzers the activities of all enzymes measured in the harmonizator differ from the serum-based regression line. We show that this is due to the sucrose-containing cryolyoprotectant in the harmonization material. For each enzyme, correction factors were calculated that compensated for the bias and proved to be constant between reagent lots. Depending on the enzyme activity measured, application of these factors leads to 2- to 10-fold reduction of between-laboratory percentage coefficient of variation. Thus, additives to (potential) reference materials may alter their matrix in a way that interferes with analysis on certain test systems. The bias caused may be quantifiable and correctable. Establishment of correction factors leads to analytical uncertainties and costs. Therefore, matrix-based materials without additives should be selected as reference materials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-6621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-4331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.261</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15576303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Walter de Gruyter</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Specimen Collection ; Catalysis ; catalytic enzyme concentration ; Clinical Enzyme Tests - methods ; Clinical Enzyme Tests - standards ; dry chemistry analyzers ; Enzymes - blood ; General aspects ; harmonization ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Linear Models ; matrix effect ; Medical sciences ; reference materials ; Reference Standards ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sucrose - chemistry ; traceability</subject><ispartof>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2004-01, Vol.42 (12), p.1401-1407</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a82ee5366919ca6af26c2da98c799a928bf3cb4493d38d2fc9d4a3f0b1bb5edf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a82ee5366919ca6af26c2da98c799a928bf3cb4493d38d2fc9d4a3f0b1bb5edf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2004.261/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2004.261/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66725,68509</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16362080$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15576303$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scharnhorst, Volkher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apperloo, Joke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baadenhuijsen, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vader, Huib L.</creatorcontrib><title>Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities</title><title>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine</addtitle><description>Standardization of laboratory results allows for the use of common reference intervals and can be achieved via calibration of field methods with secondary reference materials. These harmonization materials should be commutable, i.e., they produce identical numerical results independent of assay principle or platform. This study assessed the commutability of a cryolyoprotectant-containing harmonization material, obtained from the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Clinical Laboratories, that is intended to harmonize measurements of enzyme activities within the Dutch project “Calibration 2000”. The catalytic concentrations of alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, γ-glutamyltransferase and creatine kinase were analyzed in pooled patient sera and in the reference material in 14 laboratories. On liquid chemistry analyzers the harmonization material behaves like patient material. The enzyme activities measured in it fall on the regression lines calculated from activities measured in serum samples. For dry chemistry analyzers the activities of all enzymes measured in the harmonizator differ from the serum-based regression line. We show that this is due to the sucrose-containing cryolyoprotectant in the harmonization material. For each enzyme, correction factors were calculated that compensated for the bias and proved to be constant between reagent lots. Depending on the enzyme activity measured, application of these factors leads to 2- to 10-fold reduction of between-laboratory percentage coefficient of variation. Thus, additives to (potential) reference materials may alter their matrix in a way that interferes with analysis on certain test systems. The bias caused may be quantifiable and correctable. Establishment of correction factors leads to analytical uncertainties and costs. Therefore, matrix-based materials without additives should be selected as reference materials.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection</subject><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>catalytic enzyme concentration</subject><subject>Clinical Enzyme Tests - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Enzyme Tests - standards</subject><subject>dry chemistry analyzers</subject><subject>Enzymes - blood</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>harmonization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>matrix effect</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>reference materials</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sucrose - chemistry</subject><subject>traceability</subject><issn>1434-6621</issn><issn>1437-4331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1v1DAQhiNERUvhyBXlArds_RUnOXBAEV_SVgW0qEdr4oypSxIvtlPY_nocdtW99DSj0TOvZp4se0XJipa0vGjb9eWKESJWTNIn2RkVvCoE5_Tp_14UUjJ6mj0P4ZYQWpaiepadplpJTvhZFi_nIVqNU0Sf4x0MM0TrptyZPN5grt04zhE6O9i4W4aQb11MtIUh92jQ46QxHyGtLyPjfH4DfnSTvX8Iwul-N2IOOto7Gy2GF9mJgSHgy0M9z358_LBpPxfrq09f2vfrQgvKYwE1Qyy5lA1tNEgwTGrWQ1PrqmmgYXVnuO6EaHjP654Z3fQCuCEd7boSe8PPs7f73K13v2cMUY02aBwGmNDNQcmKCsGbOoHFHtTehZD-UltvR_A7RYlaNKtFs1o0q6Q58a8PwXM3Yn-kD14T8OYAQNAwGA-TtuHISS4ZqUni3u25PzAkhT3-9PMuNerWzX5Kbh4_QDDKqCD0eLgNEf8-5IP_lZ7jVam-bYS6rq-_txvaqq_8HzTbqvw</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Scharnhorst, Volkher</creator><creator>Apperloo, Joke</creator><creator>Baadenhuijsen, Henk</creator><creator>Vader, Huib L.</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter</general><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities</title><author>Scharnhorst, Volkher ; Apperloo, Joke ; Baadenhuijsen, Henk ; Vader, Huib L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a82ee5366919ca6af26c2da98c799a928bf3cb4493d38d2fc9d4a3f0b1bb5edf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection</topic><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>catalytic enzyme concentration</topic><topic>Clinical Enzyme Tests - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Enzyme Tests - standards</topic><topic>dry chemistry analyzers</topic><topic>Enzymes - blood</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>harmonization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>matrix effect</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>reference materials</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sucrose - chemistry</topic><topic>traceability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scharnhorst, Volkher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apperloo, Joke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baadenhuijsen, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vader, Huib L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scharnhorst, Volkher</au><au>Apperloo, Joke</au><au>Baadenhuijsen, Henk</au><au>Vader, Huib L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities</atitle><jtitle>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine</addtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1401</spage><epage>1407</epage><pages>1401-1407</pages><issn>1434-6621</issn><eissn>1437-4331</eissn><abstract>Standardization of laboratory results allows for the use of common reference intervals and can be achieved via calibration of field methods with secondary reference materials. These harmonization materials should be commutable, i.e., they produce identical numerical results independent of assay principle or platform. This study assessed the commutability of a cryolyoprotectant-containing harmonization material, obtained from the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Clinical Laboratories, that is intended to harmonize measurements of enzyme activities within the Dutch project “Calibration 2000”. The catalytic concentrations of alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, γ-glutamyltransferase and creatine kinase were analyzed in pooled patient sera and in the reference material in 14 laboratories. On liquid chemistry analyzers the harmonization material behaves like patient material. The enzyme activities measured in it fall on the regression lines calculated from activities measured in serum samples. For dry chemistry analyzers the activities of all enzymes measured in the harmonizator differ from the serum-based regression line. We show that this is due to the sucrose-containing cryolyoprotectant in the harmonization material. For each enzyme, correction factors were calculated that compensated for the bias and proved to be constant between reagent lots. Depending on the enzyme activity measured, application of these factors leads to 2- to 10-fold reduction of between-laboratory percentage coefficient of variation. Thus, additives to (potential) reference materials may alter their matrix in a way that interferes with analysis on certain test systems. The bias caused may be quantifiable and correctable. Establishment of correction factors leads to analytical uncertainties and costs. Therefore, matrix-based materials without additives should be selected as reference materials.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Walter de Gruyter</pub><pmid>15576303</pmid><doi>10.1515/CCLM.2004.261</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1434-6621 |
ispartof | Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2004-01, Vol.42 (12), p.1401-1407 |
issn | 1434-6621 1437-4331 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67144398 |
source | MEDLINE; De Gruyter journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Blood Specimen Collection Catalysis catalytic enzyme concentration Clinical Enzyme Tests - methods Clinical Enzyme Tests - standards dry chemistry analyzers Enzymes - blood General aspects harmonization Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Linear Models matrix effect Medical sciences reference materials Reference Standards Sensitivity and Specificity Sucrose - chemistry traceability |
title | Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T01%3A12%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter%20evaluation%20of%20the%20commutability%20of%20a%20potential%20reference%20material%20for%20harmonization%20of%20enzyme%20activities&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20chemistry%20and%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=Scharnhorst,%20Volkher&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1401&rft.epage=1407&rft.pages=1401-1407&rft.issn=1434-6621&rft.eissn=1437-4331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/CCLM.2004.261&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67144398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67144398&rft_id=info:pmid/15576303&rfr_iscdi=true |