Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities

Standardization of laboratory results allows for the use of common reference intervals and can be achieved via calibration of field methods with secondary reference materials. These harmonization materials should be commutable, i.e., they produce identical numerical results independent of assay prin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2004-01, Vol.42 (12), p.1401-1407
Hauptverfasser: Scharnhorst, Volkher, Apperloo, Joke, Baadenhuijsen, Henk, Vader, Huib L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1407
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1401
container_title Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
container_volume 42
creator Scharnhorst, Volkher
Apperloo, Joke
Baadenhuijsen, Henk
Vader, Huib L.
description Standardization of laboratory results allows for the use of common reference intervals and can be achieved via calibration of field methods with secondary reference materials. These harmonization materials should be commutable, i.e., they produce identical numerical results independent of assay principle or platform. This study assessed the commutability of a cryolyoprotectant-containing harmonization material, obtained from the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Clinical Laboratories, that is intended to harmonize measurements of enzyme activities within the Dutch project “Calibration 2000”. The catalytic concentrations of alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, γ-glutamyltransferase and creatine kinase were analyzed in pooled patient sera and in the reference material in 14 laboratories. On liquid chemistry analyzers the harmonization material behaves like patient material. The enzyme activities measured in it fall on the regression lines calculated from activities measured in serum samples. For dry chemistry analyzers the activities of all enzymes measured in the harmonizator differ from the serum-based regression line. We show that this is due to the sucrose-containing cryolyoprotectant in the harmonization material. For each enzyme, correction factors were calculated that compensated for the bias and proved to be constant between reagent lots. Depending on the enzyme activity measured, application of these factors leads to 2- to 10-fold reduction of between-laboratory percentage coefficient of variation. Thus, additives to (potential) reference materials may alter their matrix in a way that interferes with analysis on certain test systems. The bias caused may be quantifiable and correctable. Establishment of correction factors leads to analytical uncertainties and costs. Therefore, matrix-based materials without additives should be selected as reference materials.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/CCLM.2004.261
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67144398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67144398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a82ee5366919ca6af26c2da98c799a928bf3cb4493d38d2fc9d4a3f0b1bb5edf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1v1DAQhiNERUvhyBXlArds_RUnOXBAEV_SVgW0qEdr4oypSxIvtlPY_nocdtW99DSj0TOvZp4se0XJipa0vGjb9eWKESJWTNIn2RkVvCoE5_Tp_14UUjJ6mj0P4ZYQWpaiepadplpJTvhZFi_nIVqNU0Sf4x0MM0TrptyZPN5grt04zhE6O9i4W4aQb11MtIUh92jQ46QxHyGtLyPjfH4DfnSTvX8Iwul-N2IOOto7Gy2GF9mJgSHgy0M9z358_LBpPxfrq09f2vfrQgvKYwE1Qyy5lA1tNEgwTGrWQ1PrqmmgYXVnuO6EaHjP654Z3fQCuCEd7boSe8PPs7f73K13v2cMUY02aBwGmNDNQcmKCsGbOoHFHtTehZD-UltvR_A7RYlaNKtFs1o0q6Q58a8PwXM3Yn-kD14T8OYAQNAwGA-TtuHISS4ZqUni3u25PzAkhT3-9PMuNerWzX5Kbh4_QDDKqCD0eLgNEf8-5IP_lZ7jVam-bYS6rq-_txvaqq_8HzTbqvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67144398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Scharnhorst, Volkher ; Apperloo, Joke ; Baadenhuijsen, Henk ; Vader, Huib L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scharnhorst, Volkher ; Apperloo, Joke ; Baadenhuijsen, Henk ; Vader, Huib L.</creatorcontrib><description>Standardization of laboratory results allows for the use of common reference intervals and can be achieved via calibration of field methods with secondary reference materials. These harmonization materials should be commutable, i.e., they produce identical numerical results independent of assay principle or platform. This study assessed the commutability of a cryolyoprotectant-containing harmonization material, obtained from the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Clinical Laboratories, that is intended to harmonize measurements of enzyme activities within the Dutch project “Calibration 2000”. The catalytic concentrations of alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, γ-glutamyltransferase and creatine kinase were analyzed in pooled patient sera and in the reference material in 14 laboratories. On liquid chemistry analyzers the harmonization material behaves like patient material. The enzyme activities measured in it fall on the regression lines calculated from activities measured in serum samples. For dry chemistry analyzers the activities of all enzymes measured in the harmonizator differ from the serum-based regression line. We show that this is due to the sucrose-containing cryolyoprotectant in the harmonization material. For each enzyme, correction factors were calculated that compensated for the bias and proved to be constant between reagent lots. Depending on the enzyme activity measured, application of these factors leads to 2- to 10-fold reduction of between-laboratory percentage coefficient of variation. Thus, additives to (potential) reference materials may alter their matrix in a way that interferes with analysis on certain test systems. The bias caused may be quantifiable and correctable. Establishment of correction factors leads to analytical uncertainties and costs. Therefore, matrix-based materials without additives should be selected as reference materials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-6621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-4331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.261</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15576303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Walter de Gruyter</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Specimen Collection ; Catalysis ; catalytic enzyme concentration ; Clinical Enzyme Tests - methods ; Clinical Enzyme Tests - standards ; dry chemistry analyzers ; Enzymes - blood ; General aspects ; harmonization ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Linear Models ; matrix effect ; Medical sciences ; reference materials ; Reference Standards ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sucrose - chemistry ; traceability</subject><ispartof>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2004-01, Vol.42 (12), p.1401-1407</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a82ee5366919ca6af26c2da98c799a928bf3cb4493d38d2fc9d4a3f0b1bb5edf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a82ee5366919ca6af26c2da98c799a928bf3cb4493d38d2fc9d4a3f0b1bb5edf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2004.261/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2004.261/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66725,68509</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16362080$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15576303$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scharnhorst, Volkher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apperloo, Joke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baadenhuijsen, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vader, Huib L.</creatorcontrib><title>Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities</title><title>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine</addtitle><description>Standardization of laboratory results allows for the use of common reference intervals and can be achieved via calibration of field methods with secondary reference materials. These harmonization materials should be commutable, i.e., they produce identical numerical results independent of assay principle or platform. This study assessed the commutability of a cryolyoprotectant-containing harmonization material, obtained from the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Clinical Laboratories, that is intended to harmonize measurements of enzyme activities within the Dutch project “Calibration 2000”. The catalytic concentrations of alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, γ-glutamyltransferase and creatine kinase were analyzed in pooled patient sera and in the reference material in 14 laboratories. On liquid chemistry analyzers the harmonization material behaves like patient material. The enzyme activities measured in it fall on the regression lines calculated from activities measured in serum samples. For dry chemistry analyzers the activities of all enzymes measured in the harmonizator differ from the serum-based regression line. We show that this is due to the sucrose-containing cryolyoprotectant in the harmonization material. For each enzyme, correction factors were calculated that compensated for the bias and proved to be constant between reagent lots. Depending on the enzyme activity measured, application of these factors leads to 2- to 10-fold reduction of between-laboratory percentage coefficient of variation. Thus, additives to (potential) reference materials may alter their matrix in a way that interferes with analysis on certain test systems. The bias caused may be quantifiable and correctable. Establishment of correction factors leads to analytical uncertainties and costs. Therefore, matrix-based materials without additives should be selected as reference materials.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection</subject><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>catalytic enzyme concentration</subject><subject>Clinical Enzyme Tests - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Enzyme Tests - standards</subject><subject>dry chemistry analyzers</subject><subject>Enzymes - blood</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>harmonization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>matrix effect</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>reference materials</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sucrose - chemistry</subject><subject>traceability</subject><issn>1434-6621</issn><issn>1437-4331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1v1DAQhiNERUvhyBXlArds_RUnOXBAEV_SVgW0qEdr4oypSxIvtlPY_nocdtW99DSj0TOvZp4se0XJipa0vGjb9eWKESJWTNIn2RkVvCoE5_Tp_14UUjJ6mj0P4ZYQWpaiepadplpJTvhZFi_nIVqNU0Sf4x0MM0TrptyZPN5grt04zhE6O9i4W4aQb11MtIUh92jQ46QxHyGtLyPjfH4DfnSTvX8Iwul-N2IOOto7Gy2GF9mJgSHgy0M9z358_LBpPxfrq09f2vfrQgvKYwE1Qyy5lA1tNEgwTGrWQ1PrqmmgYXVnuO6EaHjP654Z3fQCuCEd7boSe8PPs7f73K13v2cMUY02aBwGmNDNQcmKCsGbOoHFHtTehZD-UltvR_A7RYlaNKtFs1o0q6Q58a8PwXM3Yn-kD14T8OYAQNAwGA-TtuHISS4ZqUni3u25PzAkhT3-9PMuNerWzX5Kbh4_QDDKqCD0eLgNEf8-5IP_lZ7jVam-bYS6rq-_txvaqq_8HzTbqvw</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Scharnhorst, Volkher</creator><creator>Apperloo, Joke</creator><creator>Baadenhuijsen, Henk</creator><creator>Vader, Huib L.</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter</general><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities</title><author>Scharnhorst, Volkher ; Apperloo, Joke ; Baadenhuijsen, Henk ; Vader, Huib L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-a82ee5366919ca6af26c2da98c799a928bf3cb4493d38d2fc9d4a3f0b1bb5edf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection</topic><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>catalytic enzyme concentration</topic><topic>Clinical Enzyme Tests - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Enzyme Tests - standards</topic><topic>dry chemistry analyzers</topic><topic>Enzymes - blood</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>harmonization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>matrix effect</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>reference materials</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sucrose - chemistry</topic><topic>traceability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scharnhorst, Volkher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apperloo, Joke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baadenhuijsen, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vader, Huib L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scharnhorst, Volkher</au><au>Apperloo, Joke</au><au>Baadenhuijsen, Henk</au><au>Vader, Huib L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities</atitle><jtitle>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine</addtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1401</spage><epage>1407</epage><pages>1401-1407</pages><issn>1434-6621</issn><eissn>1437-4331</eissn><abstract>Standardization of laboratory results allows for the use of common reference intervals and can be achieved via calibration of field methods with secondary reference materials. These harmonization materials should be commutable, i.e., they produce identical numerical results independent of assay principle or platform. This study assessed the commutability of a cryolyoprotectant-containing harmonization material, obtained from the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Clinical Laboratories, that is intended to harmonize measurements of enzyme activities within the Dutch project “Calibration 2000”. The catalytic concentrations of alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, γ-glutamyltransferase and creatine kinase were analyzed in pooled patient sera and in the reference material in 14 laboratories. On liquid chemistry analyzers the harmonization material behaves like patient material. The enzyme activities measured in it fall on the regression lines calculated from activities measured in serum samples. For dry chemistry analyzers the activities of all enzymes measured in the harmonizator differ from the serum-based regression line. We show that this is due to the sucrose-containing cryolyoprotectant in the harmonization material. For each enzyme, correction factors were calculated that compensated for the bias and proved to be constant between reagent lots. Depending on the enzyme activity measured, application of these factors leads to 2- to 10-fold reduction of between-laboratory percentage coefficient of variation. Thus, additives to (potential) reference materials may alter their matrix in a way that interferes with analysis on certain test systems. The bias caused may be quantifiable and correctable. Establishment of correction factors leads to analytical uncertainties and costs. Therefore, matrix-based materials without additives should be selected as reference materials.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Walter de Gruyter</pub><pmid>15576303</pmid><doi>10.1515/CCLM.2004.261</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1434-6621
ispartof Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2004-01, Vol.42 (12), p.1401-1407
issn 1434-6621
1437-4331
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67144398
source MEDLINE; De Gruyter journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Blood Specimen Collection
Catalysis
catalytic enzyme concentration
Clinical Enzyme Tests - methods
Clinical Enzyme Tests - standards
dry chemistry analyzers
Enzymes - blood
General aspects
harmonization
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Linear Models
matrix effect
Medical sciences
reference materials
Reference Standards
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sucrose - chemistry
traceability
title Multicenter evaluation of the commutability of a potential reference material for harmonization of enzyme activities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T01%3A12%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter%20evaluation%20of%20the%20commutability%20of%20a%20potential%20reference%20material%20for%20harmonization%20of%20enzyme%20activities&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20chemistry%20and%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=Scharnhorst,%20Volkher&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1401&rft.epage=1407&rft.pages=1401-1407&rft.issn=1434-6621&rft.eissn=1437-4331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/CCLM.2004.261&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67144398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67144398&rft_id=info:pmid/15576303&rfr_iscdi=true