ANABOLIC STEROID USAGE IN ATHLETICS: FACTS, FICTION, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS
Anecdotal evidence suggests the widespread usage of anabolic steroids among athletes (20–90%), particularly at the professional and elite amateur levels. In contrast, scientific studies indicate that usage is rare and no higher than 6%. Conclusions from scientific studies suggest that anabolic stero...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of strength and conditioning research 2004-11, Vol.18 (4), p.908-917 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 917 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 908 |
container_title | Journal of strength and conditioning research |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | BERNING, JOSEPH M. ADAMS, KENT J. STAMFORD, BRYANT A. |
description | Anecdotal evidence suggests the widespread usage of anabolic steroids among athletes (20–90%), particularly at the professional and elite amateur levels. In contrast, scientific studies indicate that usage is rare and no higher than 6%. Conclusions from scientific studies suggest that anabolic steroid usage declines progressively from high school to college and beyond; however, anecdotal evidence claims the opposite trend. In this clash between “hard” scientific data vs. “soft” anecdotal information, it is natural that professionals would gravitate toward scientifically based conclusions. However, in the case of anabolic steroids (a stigmatized and illegal substance), should word-of-mouth testimony from individuals closest to the issues—those who have participated in and coached sports, those who have served as drug-testing overseers, and journalists who relentlessly track leads and verify sources—be set aside as irrelevant? Not if a complete picture is to emerge. In this review, hard scientific evidence is placed on the table side-by-side with soft anecdotal evidence, without weighting or bias. The purpose is to allow the opportunity for each to illuminate the other and, in so doing, potentially bring us a step closer to determining the true extent of anabolic steroid usage in athletics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1519/00124278-200411000-00039 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67135487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67135487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2339-a8b0164710cd42e54bfda42a17b8f17220bc28aa2c4d1d8158285ac2dcc2df663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9PwkAQxTdGI4h-BbMnT1R39k-7eCulQJOmGFrOm227DWgR7EKI394iqCcPLzOZvDeT_AYhDOQRBAyeCAHKqScdSggHIIQ4rdjgAnVBMOZwKr3LticudyQB6KAba18JoUIIdo06IITH21gXRX7iD2dxFOA0C-ezaIQXqT8JcZRgP5vGYRYF6TMe-0GW9vE4CrJolvSxn4zwy2J4jM3D2D8O01t0Venamrtz7aHFOMyCqRPPJlHgx05BGRs4WuYEXO4BKUpOjeB5VWpONXi5rMCjlOQFlVrTgpdQShCSSqELWhatKtdlPfRw2rttNh97Y3dqvbKFqWv9bjZ7q1wPmODSa43yZCyajbWNqdS2Wa1186mAqCNG9YNR_WJU3xjb6P35xj5fm_IveObWGvjJcNjUO9PYt3p_MI1aGl3vluq_97AvTtl0uA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67135487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ANABOLIC STEROID USAGE IN ATHLETICS: FACTS, FICTION, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>BERNING, JOSEPH M. ; ADAMS, KENT J. ; STAMFORD, BRYANT A.</creator><creatorcontrib>BERNING, JOSEPH M. ; ADAMS, KENT J. ; STAMFORD, BRYANT A.</creatorcontrib><description>Anecdotal evidence suggests the widespread usage of anabolic steroids among athletes (20–90%), particularly at the professional and elite amateur levels. In contrast, scientific studies indicate that usage is rare and no higher than 6%. Conclusions from scientific studies suggest that anabolic steroid usage declines progressively from high school to college and beyond; however, anecdotal evidence claims the opposite trend. In this clash between “hard” scientific data vs. “soft” anecdotal information, it is natural that professionals would gravitate toward scientifically based conclusions. However, in the case of anabolic steroids (a stigmatized and illegal substance), should word-of-mouth testimony from individuals closest to the issues—those who have participated in and coached sports, those who have served as drug-testing overseers, and journalists who relentlessly track leads and verify sources—be set aside as irrelevant? Not if a complete picture is to emerge. In this review, hard scientific evidence is placed on the table side-by-side with soft anecdotal evidence, without weighting or bias. The purpose is to allow the opportunity for each to illuminate the other and, in so doing, potentially bring us a step closer to determining the true extent of anabolic steroid usage in athletics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/00124278-200411000-00039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15574100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Strength and Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Anabolic Agents - pharmacology ; Doping in Sports - legislation & jurisprudence ; Humans ; Public Opinion ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2004-11, Vol.18 (4), p.908-917</ispartof><rights>2004 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15574100$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BERNING, JOSEPH M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADAMS, KENT J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STAMFORD, BRYANT A.</creatorcontrib><title>ANABOLIC STEROID USAGE IN ATHLETICS: FACTS, FICTION, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Anecdotal evidence suggests the widespread usage of anabolic steroids among athletes (20–90%), particularly at the professional and elite amateur levels. In contrast, scientific studies indicate that usage is rare and no higher than 6%. Conclusions from scientific studies suggest that anabolic steroid usage declines progressively from high school to college and beyond; however, anecdotal evidence claims the opposite trend. In this clash between “hard” scientific data vs. “soft” anecdotal information, it is natural that professionals would gravitate toward scientifically based conclusions. However, in the case of anabolic steroids (a stigmatized and illegal substance), should word-of-mouth testimony from individuals closest to the issues—those who have participated in and coached sports, those who have served as drug-testing overseers, and journalists who relentlessly track leads and verify sources—be set aside as irrelevant? Not if a complete picture is to emerge. In this review, hard scientific evidence is placed on the table side-by-side with soft anecdotal evidence, without weighting or bias. The purpose is to allow the opportunity for each to illuminate the other and, in so doing, potentially bring us a step closer to determining the true extent of anabolic steroid usage in athletics.</description><subject>Anabolic Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Doping in Sports - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9PwkAQxTdGI4h-BbMnT1R39k-7eCulQJOmGFrOm227DWgR7EKI394iqCcPLzOZvDeT_AYhDOQRBAyeCAHKqScdSggHIIQ4rdjgAnVBMOZwKr3LticudyQB6KAba18JoUIIdo06IITH21gXRX7iD2dxFOA0C-ezaIQXqT8JcZRgP5vGYRYF6TMe-0GW9vE4CrJolvSxn4zwy2J4jM3D2D8O01t0Venamrtz7aHFOMyCqRPPJlHgx05BGRs4WuYEXO4BKUpOjeB5VWpONXi5rMCjlOQFlVrTgpdQShCSSqELWhatKtdlPfRw2rttNh97Y3dqvbKFqWv9bjZ7q1wPmODSa43yZCyajbWNqdS2Wa1186mAqCNG9YNR_WJU3xjb6P35xj5fm_IveObWGvjJcNjUO9PYt3p_MI1aGl3vluq_97AvTtl0uA</recordid><startdate>200411</startdate><enddate>200411</enddate><creator>BERNING, JOSEPH M.</creator><creator>ADAMS, KENT J.</creator><creator>STAMFORD, BRYANT A.</creator><general>National Strength and Conditioning Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200411</creationdate><title>ANABOLIC STEROID USAGE IN ATHLETICS: FACTS, FICTION, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS</title><author>BERNING, JOSEPH M. ; ADAMS, KENT J. ; STAMFORD, BRYANT A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2339-a8b0164710cd42e54bfda42a17b8f17220bc28aa2c4d1d8158285ac2dcc2df663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Anabolic Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Doping in Sports - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BERNING, JOSEPH M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADAMS, KENT J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STAMFORD, BRYANT A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BERNING, JOSEPH M.</au><au>ADAMS, KENT J.</au><au>STAMFORD, BRYANT A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ANABOLIC STEROID USAGE IN ATHLETICS: FACTS, FICTION, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2004-11</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>908</spage><epage>917</epage><pages>908-917</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Anecdotal evidence suggests the widespread usage of anabolic steroids among athletes (20–90%), particularly at the professional and elite amateur levels. In contrast, scientific studies indicate that usage is rare and no higher than 6%. Conclusions from scientific studies suggest that anabolic steroid usage declines progressively from high school to college and beyond; however, anecdotal evidence claims the opposite trend. In this clash between “hard” scientific data vs. “soft” anecdotal information, it is natural that professionals would gravitate toward scientifically based conclusions. However, in the case of anabolic steroids (a stigmatized and illegal substance), should word-of-mouth testimony from individuals closest to the issues—those who have participated in and coached sports, those who have served as drug-testing overseers, and journalists who relentlessly track leads and verify sources—be set aside as irrelevant? Not if a complete picture is to emerge. In this review, hard scientific evidence is placed on the table side-by-side with soft anecdotal evidence, without weighting or bias. The purpose is to allow the opportunity for each to illuminate the other and, in so doing, potentially bring us a step closer to determining the true extent of anabolic steroid usage in athletics.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Strength and Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>15574100</pmid><doi>10.1519/00124278-200411000-00039</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-8011 |
ispartof | Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2004-11, Vol.18 (4), p.908-917 |
issn | 1064-8011 1533-4287 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67135487 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Anabolic Agents - pharmacology Doping in Sports - legislation & jurisprudence Humans Public Opinion Space life sciences |
title | ANABOLIC STEROID USAGE IN ATHLETICS: FACTS, FICTION, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T20%3A11%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ANABOLIC%20STEROID%20USAGE%20IN%20ATHLETICS:%20FACTS,%20FICTION,%20AND%20PUBLIC%20RELATIONS&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=BERNING,%20JOSEPH%20M.&rft.date=2004-11&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=908&rft.epage=917&rft.pages=908-917&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/00124278-200411000-00039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67135487%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67135487&rft_id=info:pmid/15574100&rfr_iscdi=true |