Reconstruction of skin cancer defects of the auricle

This article reviews the results of reconstruction of surface defects of the auricle after removal of skin cancer, and discusses the results of the delayed reconstruction method of care and modalities of treatment. Fifty-four patients with 62 defects involving various locations on the auricle were t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2004-12, Vol.62 (12), p.1457-1471
Hauptverfasser: Reddy, Likith V., Zide, Michael F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1471
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1457
container_title Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 62
creator Reddy, Likith V.
Zide, Michael F.
description This article reviews the results of reconstruction of surface defects of the auricle after removal of skin cancer, and discusses the results of the delayed reconstruction method of care and modalities of treatment. Fifty-four patients with 62 defects involving various locations on the auricle were treated. Management included direct closure, secondary epithelization, full thickness skin grafts, local flaps using direct advancement, and rotational advancement flaps using one or more stages. Nine defects were treated by direct closure with adjacent tissue, 12 defects healed by secondary epithelization, and 13 patients were treated with a full thickness skin graft. Twenty-eight defects were reconstructed with local flaps, which included the direct advancement, rotational flaps, transposition, and subcutaneous island flaps. No infections occurred. Many options are available for reconstruction of auricular defects which yield acceptable results. Factors to consider before choosing a reconstructive format include size, location, and depth of the defect, patient medical history, smoking, and esthetic concerns. This review exposed that patients easily accept the “delayed” method of reconstruction. Delaying allows the surgeon time to research options for care and allows the patient choices of secondary epithelization and significantly reduced costs of care.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67134056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278239104011607</els_id><sourcerecordid>67134056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-494e509174b6ddf4c05b3f8986cf7089ccbedc7ffc6688a669b2251977463cfb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtLxDAQwPEgirs-voAH6UVvrZPm1YIXEV8gCKLn0E4nmLXbrkkr-O1t2QVvngLDf4bwY-yMQ8aB66tVturXMcsBZAYmA9B7bMmV4KkCJfbZEnJTpLko-YIdxbgC4FwZfcgWXCkjhFRLJl8J-y4OYcTB913SuyR--i7BqkMKSUOOcIjzePigpBqDx5ZO2IGr2kinu_eYvd_fvd0-ps8vD0-3N88piiIfUllKUlByI2vdNE4iqFq4oiw0OgNFiVhTg8Y51LooKq3LOs8VL42RWqCrxTG73N7dhP5rpDjYtY9IbVt11I_RasOFBKWnMN-GGPoYAzm7CX5dhR_Lwc5WdmVnKztbWTB2spqWznfXx3pNzd_KDmcKLnZBFbFqXZhMfPzrtODclHN3ve1osvj2FGxET5Nf48OkZ5ve__ePX3XGhsY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67134056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconstruction of skin cancer defects of the auricle</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Reddy, Likith V. ; Zide, Michael F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Likith V. ; Zide, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><description>This article reviews the results of reconstruction of surface defects of the auricle after removal of skin cancer, and discusses the results of the delayed reconstruction method of care and modalities of treatment. Fifty-four patients with 62 defects involving various locations on the auricle were treated. Management included direct closure, secondary epithelization, full thickness skin grafts, local flaps using direct advancement, and rotational advancement flaps using one or more stages. Nine defects were treated by direct closure with adjacent tissue, 12 defects healed by secondary epithelization, and 13 patients were treated with a full thickness skin graft. Twenty-eight defects were reconstructed with local flaps, which included the direct advancement, rotational flaps, transposition, and subcutaneous island flaps. No infections occurred. Many options are available for reconstruction of auricular defects which yield acceptable results. Factors to consider before choosing a reconstructive format include size, location, and depth of the defect, patient medical history, smoking, and esthetic concerns. This review exposed that patients easily accept the “delayed” method of reconstruction. Delaying allows the surgeon time to research options for care and allows the patient choices of secondary epithelization and significantly reduced costs of care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15573345</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMSDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Dentistry ; Dermatology ; Ear Neoplasms - surgery ; Ear, External - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mohs Surgery - methods ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Skin Neoplasms - surgery ; Skin Transplantation - methods ; Surgical Flaps ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2004-12, Vol.62 (12), p.1457-1471</ispartof><rights>2004 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-494e509174b6ddf4c05b3f8986cf7089ccbedc7ffc6688a669b2251977463cfb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-494e509174b6ddf4c05b3f8986cf7089ccbedc7ffc6688a669b2251977463cfb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16311795$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15573345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Likith V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zide, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><title>Reconstruction of skin cancer defects of the auricle</title><title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>This article reviews the results of reconstruction of surface defects of the auricle after removal of skin cancer, and discusses the results of the delayed reconstruction method of care and modalities of treatment. Fifty-four patients with 62 defects involving various locations on the auricle were treated. Management included direct closure, secondary epithelization, full thickness skin grafts, local flaps using direct advancement, and rotational advancement flaps using one or more stages. Nine defects were treated by direct closure with adjacent tissue, 12 defects healed by secondary epithelization, and 13 patients were treated with a full thickness skin graft. Twenty-eight defects were reconstructed with local flaps, which included the direct advancement, rotational flaps, transposition, and subcutaneous island flaps. No infections occurred. Many options are available for reconstruction of auricular defects which yield acceptable results. Factors to consider before choosing a reconstructive format include size, location, and depth of the defect, patient medical history, smoking, and esthetic concerns. This review exposed that patients easily accept the “delayed” method of reconstruction. Delaying allows the surgeon time to research options for care and allows the patient choices of secondary epithelization and significantly reduced costs of care.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Ear Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Ear, External - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mohs Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Skin Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90EtLxDAQwPEgirs-voAH6UVvrZPm1YIXEV8gCKLn0E4nmLXbrkkr-O1t2QVvngLDf4bwY-yMQ8aB66tVturXMcsBZAYmA9B7bMmV4KkCJfbZEnJTpLko-YIdxbgC4FwZfcgWXCkjhFRLJl8J-y4OYcTB913SuyR--i7BqkMKSUOOcIjzePigpBqDx5ZO2IGr2kinu_eYvd_fvd0-ps8vD0-3N88piiIfUllKUlByI2vdNE4iqFq4oiw0OgNFiVhTg8Y51LooKq3LOs8VL42RWqCrxTG73N7dhP5rpDjYtY9IbVt11I_RasOFBKWnMN-GGPoYAzm7CX5dhR_Lwc5WdmVnKztbWTB2spqWznfXx3pNzd_KDmcKLnZBFbFqXZhMfPzrtODclHN3ve1osvj2FGxET5Nf48OkZ5ve__ePX3XGhsY</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>Reddy, Likith V.</creator><creator>Zide, Michael F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>Reconstruction of skin cancer defects of the auricle</title><author>Reddy, Likith V. ; Zide, Michael F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-494e509174b6ddf4c05b3f8986cf7089ccbedc7ffc6688a669b2251977463cfb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Ear Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Ear, External - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mohs Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Skin Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Likith V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zide, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reddy, Likith V.</au><au>Zide, Michael F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconstruction of skin cancer defects of the auricle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1457</spage><epage>1471</epage><pages>1457-1471</pages><issn>0278-2391</issn><eissn>1531-5053</eissn><coden>JOMSDA</coden><abstract>This article reviews the results of reconstruction of surface defects of the auricle after removal of skin cancer, and discusses the results of the delayed reconstruction method of care and modalities of treatment. Fifty-four patients with 62 defects involving various locations on the auricle were treated. Management included direct closure, secondary epithelization, full thickness skin grafts, local flaps using direct advancement, and rotational advancement flaps using one or more stages. Nine defects were treated by direct closure with adjacent tissue, 12 defects healed by secondary epithelization, and 13 patients were treated with a full thickness skin graft. Twenty-eight defects were reconstructed with local flaps, which included the direct advancement, rotational flaps, transposition, and subcutaneous island flaps. No infections occurred. Many options are available for reconstruction of auricular defects which yield acceptable results. Factors to consider before choosing a reconstructive format include size, location, and depth of the defect, patient medical history, smoking, and esthetic concerns. This review exposed that patients easily accept the “delayed” method of reconstruction. Delaying allows the surgeon time to research options for care and allows the patient choices of secondary epithelization and significantly reduced costs of care.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15573345</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.006</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2391
ispartof Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2004-12, Vol.62 (12), p.1457-1471
issn 0278-2391
1531-5053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67134056
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery
Dentistry
Dermatology
Ear Neoplasms - surgery
Ear, External - surgery
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Mohs Surgery - methods
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Skin Neoplasms - surgery
Skin Transplantation - methods
Surgical Flaps
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions
title Reconstruction of skin cancer defects of the auricle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A56%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconstruction%20of%20skin%20cancer%20defects%20of%20the%20auricle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Reddy,%20Likith%20V.&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1457&rft.epage=1471&rft.pages=1457-1471&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.eissn=1531-5053&rft.coden=JOMSDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67134056%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67134056&rft_id=info:pmid/15573345&rft_els_id=S0278239104011607&rfr_iscdi=true