A Method for Standardizing Procedures in Rehabilitation: Use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract Morris DM, Taub E, Macrina DM, Cook EW, Geiger BF. A method for standardizing procedures in rehabilitation: use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation multisite randomized controlled trial. Objective An enduring problem in the field of rehabilitation has been the lack of sta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2009-04, Vol.90 (4), p.663-668 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 668 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 663 |
container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Morris, David M., PhD, PT Taub, Edward, PhD Macrina, David M., PhD Cook, Edwin W., PhD Geiger, Brian F., EdD |
description | Abstract Morris DM, Taub E, Macrina DM, Cook EW, Geiger BF. A method for standardizing procedures in rehabilitation: use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation multisite randomized controlled trial. Objective An enduring problem in the field of rehabilitation has been the lack of standardization in the protocols of treatments and tests. To develop a process evaluation method to standardize the administration of rehabilitation procedures used in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial, a randomized controlled trial of upper-extremity constraint-induced therapy implemented across 7 sites. Design Process evaluation. Setting Research laboratory. Participants Convenience sample or research personnel. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Checklist scoring sheets were developed to rate videotapes using systematic application of prescribed steps for each of 5 procedures across 3 time periods. Time periods were immediately after training, and 1 and 2 years later. A performance score of at least 90% was required before individual research personnel were allowed to participate in the trial. Results Overall performance scores ranged from 85.8% to 95% of performance items correctly executed. There was a significant improvement in standard performance of procedures between the first time period (immediately after training) and each of the subsequent time periods for all but 1 procedure. The scoring of standardized performance when carried out with routine participant testing and training did not differ significantly from scoring from videotaped sessions submitted for standardization rating for 2 of the procedures, suggesting adequate validity of scoring from videotape. Conclusions The present method was successful in assessing protocol fidelity for the EXCITE research personnel and represents 1 means of addressing the longstanding problem in rehabilitation of the lack of standardization in administering different treatments and tests. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.576 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67116061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0003999309000690</els_id><sourcerecordid>67116061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-7f49de474f9c3bc899351520aad5b7fe2ff7428fcd3c3458f6ba81d09e11d2043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksuKFDEUhgtRnHb0BVxINrqrMqnULSLC0LQ6MIMyF3AX0smJnTaVtElqsOdNfFtTdqPgwlU44fvP7T9F8ZzgimDSvd5WYjeGqsZ4qDCr2r57UCxIS-tyqMmXh8UCY0xLxhg9KZ7EuM1h11LyuDghjDZtPzSL4ucZuoS08QppH9B1Ek6JoMy9cV_R5-AlqClARMahK9iItbEmiWS8e4NuI8zfaQNo9SMFGE3ao6V3MQVhXELnTk1Zjm42EMRuj1Z3wk6_tehysslEkwBd5Xp-NPeZy9IUvLWzJBhhnxaPtLARnh3f0-L2_epm-bG8-PThfHl2UcqGslT2umEKmr7RTNK1HPK0LWlrLIRq172GWuu-qQctFZV56EF3azEQhRkQomrc0NPi1SHvLvjvE8TERxMlWCsc-Cnyriekwx3JYH0AZfAxBtB8F8wowp4TzGdD-JbPhvDZEI4Zz4Zk0Ytj9mk9gvorOTqQgZdHQEQprA7CSRP_cDWhtGeYZu7tgYO8izsDgUdpwOUNmwAyceXN__t4949cWuNMrvgN9hC3fgoub5kTHmuO-fV8OvPlYDZfTW7gFzsQwbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67116061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Method for Standardizing Procedures in Rehabilitation: Use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Morris, David M., PhD, PT ; Taub, Edward, PhD ; Macrina, David M., PhD ; Cook, Edwin W., PhD ; Geiger, Brian F., EdD</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, David M., PhD, PT ; Taub, Edward, PhD ; Macrina, David M., PhD ; Cook, Edwin W., PhD ; Geiger, Brian F., EdD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Morris DM, Taub E, Macrina DM, Cook EW, Geiger BF. A method for standardizing procedures in rehabilitation: use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation multisite randomized controlled trial. Objective An enduring problem in the field of rehabilitation has been the lack of standardization in the protocols of treatments and tests. To develop a process evaluation method to standardize the administration of rehabilitation procedures used in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial, a randomized controlled trial of upper-extremity constraint-induced therapy implemented across 7 sites. Design Process evaluation. Setting Research laboratory. Participants Convenience sample or research personnel. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Checklist scoring sheets were developed to rate videotapes using systematic application of prescribed steps for each of 5 procedures across 3 time periods. Time periods were immediately after training, and 1 and 2 years later. A performance score of at least 90% was required before individual research personnel were allowed to participate in the trial. Results Overall performance scores ranged from 85.8% to 95% of performance items correctly executed. There was a significant improvement in standard performance of procedures between the first time period (immediately after training) and each of the subsequent time periods for all but 1 procedure. The scoring of standardized performance when carried out with routine participant testing and training did not differ significantly from scoring from videotaped sessions submitted for standardization rating for 2 of the procedures, suggesting adequate validity of scoring from videotape. Conclusions The present method was successful in assessing protocol fidelity for the EXCITE research personnel and represents 1 means of addressing the longstanding problem in rehabilitation of the lack of standardization in administering different treatments and tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.576</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19345784</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Arm - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Protocols - standards ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Exercise Therapy - standards ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Methods ; Miscellaneous ; Occupational Therapy - standards ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Physical Therapy Specialty - standards ; Process assessment (Health Care) ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Rehabilitation ; Research Design ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; Videotape Recording</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2009-04, Vol.90 (4), p.663-668</ispartof><rights>American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-7f49de474f9c3bc899351520aad5b7fe2ff7428fcd3c3458f6ba81d09e11d2043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-7f49de474f9c3bc899351520aad5b7fe2ff7428fcd3c3458f6ba81d09e11d2043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21337903$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19345784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, David M., PhD, PT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taub, Edward, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macrina, David M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Edwin W., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, Brian F., EdD</creatorcontrib><title>A Method for Standardizing Procedures in Rehabilitation: Use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Abstract Morris DM, Taub E, Macrina DM, Cook EW, Geiger BF. A method for standardizing procedures in rehabilitation: use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation multisite randomized controlled trial. Objective An enduring problem in the field of rehabilitation has been the lack of standardization in the protocols of treatments and tests. To develop a process evaluation method to standardize the administration of rehabilitation procedures used in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial, a randomized controlled trial of upper-extremity constraint-induced therapy implemented across 7 sites. Design Process evaluation. Setting Research laboratory. Participants Convenience sample or research personnel. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Checklist scoring sheets were developed to rate videotapes using systematic application of prescribed steps for each of 5 procedures across 3 time periods. Time periods were immediately after training, and 1 and 2 years later. A performance score of at least 90% was required before individual research personnel were allowed to participate in the trial. Results Overall performance scores ranged from 85.8% to 95% of performance items correctly executed. There was a significant improvement in standard performance of procedures between the first time period (immediately after training) and each of the subsequent time periods for all but 1 procedure. The scoring of standardized performance when carried out with routine participant testing and training did not differ significantly from scoring from videotaped sessions submitted for standardization rating for 2 of the procedures, suggesting adequate validity of scoring from videotape. Conclusions The present method was successful in assessing protocol fidelity for the EXCITE research personnel and represents 1 means of addressing the longstanding problem in rehabilitation of the lack of standardization in administering different treatments and tests.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Arm - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols - standards</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy - standards</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Specialty - standards</subject><subject>Process assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Videotape Recording</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksuKFDEUhgtRnHb0BVxINrqrMqnULSLC0LQ6MIMyF3AX0smJnTaVtElqsOdNfFtTdqPgwlU44fvP7T9F8ZzgimDSvd5WYjeGqsZ4qDCr2r57UCxIS-tyqMmXh8UCY0xLxhg9KZ7EuM1h11LyuDghjDZtPzSL4ucZuoS08QppH9B1Ek6JoMy9cV_R5-AlqClARMahK9iItbEmiWS8e4NuI8zfaQNo9SMFGE3ao6V3MQVhXELnTk1Zjm42EMRuj1Z3wk6_tehysslEkwBd5Xp-NPeZy9IUvLWzJBhhnxaPtLARnh3f0-L2_epm-bG8-PThfHl2UcqGslT2umEKmr7RTNK1HPK0LWlrLIRq172GWuu-qQctFZV56EF3azEQhRkQomrc0NPi1SHvLvjvE8TERxMlWCsc-Cnyriekwx3JYH0AZfAxBtB8F8wowp4TzGdD-JbPhvDZEI4Zz4Zk0Ytj9mk9gvorOTqQgZdHQEQprA7CSRP_cDWhtGeYZu7tgYO8izsDgUdpwOUNmwAyceXN__t4949cWuNMrvgN9hC3fgoub5kTHmuO-fV8OvPlYDZfTW7gFzsQwbw</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Morris, David M., PhD, PT</creator><creator>Taub, Edward, PhD</creator><creator>Macrina, David M., PhD</creator><creator>Cook, Edwin W., PhD</creator><creator>Geiger, Brian F., EdD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>A Method for Standardizing Procedures in Rehabilitation: Use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Morris, David M., PhD, PT ; Taub, Edward, PhD ; Macrina, David M., PhD ; Cook, Edwin W., PhD ; Geiger, Brian F., EdD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-7f49de474f9c3bc899351520aad5b7fe2ff7428fcd3c3458f6ba81d09e11d2043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Arm - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols - standards</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy - standards</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Specialty - standards</topic><topic>Process assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Videotape Recording</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, David M., PhD, PT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taub, Edward, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macrina, David M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Edwin W., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, Brian F., EdD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, David M., PhD, PT</au><au>Taub, Edward, PhD</au><au>Macrina, David M., PhD</au><au>Cook, Edwin W., PhD</au><au>Geiger, Brian F., EdD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Method for Standardizing Procedures in Rehabilitation: Use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>663</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>663-668</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><coden>APMHAI</coden><abstract>Abstract Morris DM, Taub E, Macrina DM, Cook EW, Geiger BF. A method for standardizing procedures in rehabilitation: use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation multisite randomized controlled trial. Objective An enduring problem in the field of rehabilitation has been the lack of standardization in the protocols of treatments and tests. To develop a process evaluation method to standardize the administration of rehabilitation procedures used in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial, a randomized controlled trial of upper-extremity constraint-induced therapy implemented across 7 sites. Design Process evaluation. Setting Research laboratory. Participants Convenience sample or research personnel. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Checklist scoring sheets were developed to rate videotapes using systematic application of prescribed steps for each of 5 procedures across 3 time periods. Time periods were immediately after training, and 1 and 2 years later. A performance score of at least 90% was required before individual research personnel were allowed to participate in the trial. Results Overall performance scores ranged from 85.8% to 95% of performance items correctly executed. There was a significant improvement in standard performance of procedures between the first time period (immediately after training) and each of the subsequent time periods for all but 1 procedure. The scoring of standardized performance when carried out with routine participant testing and training did not differ significantly from scoring from videotaped sessions submitted for standardization rating for 2 of the procedures, suggesting adequate validity of scoring from videotape. Conclusions The present method was successful in assessing protocol fidelity for the EXCITE research personnel and represents 1 means of addressing the longstanding problem in rehabilitation of the lack of standardization in administering different treatments and tests.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19345784</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.576</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2009-04, Vol.90 (4), p.663-668 |
issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67116061 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Arm - physiopathology Biological and medical sciences Clinical Protocols - standards Diseases of the osteoarticular system Exercise Therapy - standards Humans Medical sciences Methods Miscellaneous Occupational Therapy - standards Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Physical Therapy Specialty - standards Process assessment (Health Care) Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Rehabilitation Research Design Stroke Rehabilitation Videotape Recording |
title | A Method for Standardizing Procedures in Rehabilitation: Use in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A23%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Method%20for%20Standardizing%20Procedures%20in%20Rehabilitation:%20Use%20in%20the%20Extremity%20Constraint%20Induced%20Therapy%20Evaluation%20Multisite%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Morris,%20David%20M.,%20PhD,%20PT&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=663-668&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.coden=APMHAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.576&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67116061%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67116061&rft_id=info:pmid/19345784&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0003999309000690&rfr_iscdi=true |