Treatment of Blount Disease: A Comparison Between the Multiaxial Correction System and Other External Fixators

BACKGROUND:Many surgical procedures have been proposed for treatment of Blount disease (tibia vara). Gradual correction of Blount disease has been described with both unilateral and circular external fixators. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of gradual...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric orthopaedics 2009-03, Vol.29 (2), p.103-109
Hauptverfasser: Clarke, Sylvan E, McCarthy, James J, Davidson, Richard S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109
container_issue 2
container_start_page 103
container_title Journal of pediatric orthopaedics
container_volume 29
creator Clarke, Sylvan E
McCarthy, James J
Davidson, Richard S
description BACKGROUND:Many surgical procedures have been proposed for treatment of Blount disease (tibia vara). Gradual correction of Blount disease has been described with both unilateral and circular external fixators. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of gradual correction for severe or recurrent Blount disease using the Biomet Multi-Axial Correction (MAC; Biomet Trauma, Parsippany, NJ) external fixator to our historical controls using other devices (such as the Ilizarov and Garche T-clamp). METHODS:A total of 58 corrections were performed on the 54 limbs in 38 patients. Charts were analyzed to evaluate the presence of complications during the course of external fixator treatment. The tibiofemoral, anatomic medial proximal tibial, and proximal posterior tibial angles were measured on radiographs taken before application of the external fixator and after removal to compare the correction achieved by the MAC fixator and the other fixators. RESULTS:The mean values for the tibiofemoral angle, anatomic medial proximal tibial angle, and proximal posterior tibial angle were similar between the 2 groups after treatment and at follow up. The rate of complications between the 2 groups was also not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS:The MAC external fixator provides an acceptable alternative for gradual correction of Blount disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level III.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181982a62
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67109028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67109028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-3a6fc427b7cb10e99b7466bcc34d0e53a6705f39626560cb41a245b4c4c36dea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtv1DAQgC0EokvhHyDkC72lHT9ix9y6SwuVihap7TlyvBNtwIkX29Fu_z2uuqISh9GMNN889BHykcE5A6Mvlj_X59ABEyhYw0zDreKvyILVwlS81vCaLIBrViltmhPyLqVfAEwLKd6SE2ZEzbngCzLdR7R5xCnT0NOlD3Opvg4JbcIv9JKuwrizcUhhokvMe8SJ5i3SH7PPgz0M1hciRnR5KMTdY8o4Ujtt6LpQkV4dMsapQNfDweYQ03vyprc-4YdjPiUP11f3q-_V7frbzerytnKCG1YJq3onue606xigMZ2WSnXOCbkBrEtbQ90Lo7iqFbhOMstl3UknnVAbtOKUnD3v3cXwZ8aU23FIDr23E4Y5tUoXh8CbAspn0MWQUsS-3cVhtPGxZdA-eW6L5_Z_z2Xs03H_3I24eRk6ii3A5yNgk7O-j3ZyQ_rHcfZEGvFyfx98cZV--3mPsd2i9XnbAuOSCdNUHMq7AgCqEuWXv_0OlqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67109028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of Blount Disease: A Comparison Between the Multiaxial Correction System and Other External Fixators</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Clarke, Sylvan E ; McCarthy, James J ; Davidson, Richard S</creator><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Sylvan E ; McCarthy, James J ; Davidson, Richard S</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Many surgical procedures have been proposed for treatment of Blount disease (tibia vara). Gradual correction of Blount disease has been described with both unilateral and circular external fixators. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of gradual correction for severe or recurrent Blount disease using the Biomet Multi-Axial Correction (MAC; Biomet Trauma, Parsippany, NJ) external fixator to our historical controls using other devices (such as the Ilizarov and Garche T-clamp). METHODS:A total of 58 corrections were performed on the 54 limbs in 38 patients. Charts were analyzed to evaluate the presence of complications during the course of external fixator treatment. The tibiofemoral, anatomic medial proximal tibial, and proximal posterior tibial angles were measured on radiographs taken before application of the external fixator and after removal to compare the correction achieved by the MAC fixator and the other fixators. RESULTS:The mean values for the tibiofemoral angle, anatomic medial proximal tibial angle, and proximal posterior tibial angle were similar between the 2 groups after treatment and at follow up. The rate of complications between the 2 groups was also not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS:The MAC external fixator provides an acceptable alternative for gradual correction of Blount disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-6798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-2570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181982a62</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19352232</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPORDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; External Fixators ; Female ; Femur - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Ilizarov Technique ; Male ; Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations ; Medical sciences ; Osteotomy - methods ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Radiography ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Tibia - abnormalities ; Tibia - diagnostic imaging ; Tibia - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics, 2009-03, Vol.29 (2), p.103-109</ispartof><rights>2009 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-3a6fc427b7cb10e99b7466bcc34d0e53a6705f39626560cb41a245b4c4c36dea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21193593$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19352232$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Sylvan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Richard S</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of Blount Disease: A Comparison Between the Multiaxial Correction System and Other External Fixators</title><title>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Orthop</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Many surgical procedures have been proposed for treatment of Blount disease (tibia vara). Gradual correction of Blount disease has been described with both unilateral and circular external fixators. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of gradual correction for severe or recurrent Blount disease using the Biomet Multi-Axial Correction (MAC; Biomet Trauma, Parsippany, NJ) external fixator to our historical controls using other devices (such as the Ilizarov and Garche T-clamp). METHODS:A total of 58 corrections were performed on the 54 limbs in 38 patients. Charts were analyzed to evaluate the presence of complications during the course of external fixator treatment. The tibiofemoral, anatomic medial proximal tibial, and proximal posterior tibial angles were measured on radiographs taken before application of the external fixator and after removal to compare the correction achieved by the MAC fixator and the other fixators. RESULTS:The mean values for the tibiofemoral angle, anatomic medial proximal tibial angle, and proximal posterior tibial angle were similar between the 2 groups after treatment and at follow up. The rate of complications between the 2 groups was also not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS:The MAC external fixator provides an acceptable alternative for gradual correction of Blount disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level III.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>External Fixators</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ilizarov Technique</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Tibia - abnormalities</subject><subject>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tibia - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0271-6798</issn><issn>1539-2570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtv1DAQgC0EokvhHyDkC72lHT9ix9y6SwuVihap7TlyvBNtwIkX29Fu_z2uuqISh9GMNN889BHykcE5A6Mvlj_X59ABEyhYw0zDreKvyILVwlS81vCaLIBrViltmhPyLqVfAEwLKd6SE2ZEzbngCzLdR7R5xCnT0NOlD3Opvg4JbcIv9JKuwrizcUhhokvMe8SJ5i3SH7PPgz0M1hciRnR5KMTdY8o4Ujtt6LpQkV4dMsapQNfDweYQ03vyprc-4YdjPiUP11f3q-_V7frbzerytnKCG1YJq3onue606xigMZ2WSnXOCbkBrEtbQ90Lo7iqFbhOMstl3UknnVAbtOKUnD3v3cXwZ8aU23FIDr23E4Y5tUoXh8CbAspn0MWQUsS-3cVhtPGxZdA-eW6L5_Z_z2Xs03H_3I24eRk6ii3A5yNgk7O-j3ZyQ_rHcfZEGvFyfx98cZV--3mPsd2i9XnbAuOSCdNUHMq7AgCqEuWXv_0OlqA</recordid><startdate>200903</startdate><enddate>200903</enddate><creator>Clarke, Sylvan E</creator><creator>McCarthy, James J</creator><creator>Davidson, Richard S</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200903</creationdate><title>Treatment of Blount Disease: A Comparison Between the Multiaxial Correction System and Other External Fixators</title><author>Clarke, Sylvan E ; McCarthy, James J ; Davidson, Richard S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-3a6fc427b7cb10e99b7466bcc34d0e53a6705f39626560cb41a245b4c4c36dea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>External Fixators</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ilizarov Technique</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Tibia - abnormalities</topic><topic>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tibia - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Sylvan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Richard S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clarke, Sylvan E</au><au>McCarthy, James J</au><au>Davidson, Richard S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of Blount Disease: A Comparison Between the Multiaxial Correction System and Other External Fixators</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Orthop</addtitle><date>2009-03</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>103-109</pages><issn>0271-6798</issn><eissn>1539-2570</eissn><coden>JPORDO</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND:Many surgical procedures have been proposed for treatment of Blount disease (tibia vara). Gradual correction of Blount disease has been described with both unilateral and circular external fixators. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of gradual correction for severe or recurrent Blount disease using the Biomet Multi-Axial Correction (MAC; Biomet Trauma, Parsippany, NJ) external fixator to our historical controls using other devices (such as the Ilizarov and Garche T-clamp). METHODS:A total of 58 corrections were performed on the 54 limbs in 38 patients. Charts were analyzed to evaluate the presence of complications during the course of external fixator treatment. The tibiofemoral, anatomic medial proximal tibial, and proximal posterior tibial angles were measured on radiographs taken before application of the external fixator and after removal to compare the correction achieved by the MAC fixator and the other fixators. RESULTS:The mean values for the tibiofemoral angle, anatomic medial proximal tibial angle, and proximal posterior tibial angle were similar between the 2 groups after treatment and at follow up. The rate of complications between the 2 groups was also not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS:The MAC external fixator provides an acceptable alternative for gradual correction of Blount disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level III.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>19352232</pmid><doi>10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181982a62</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-6798
ispartof Journal of pediatric orthopaedics, 2009-03, Vol.29 (2), p.103-109
issn 0271-6798
1539-2570
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67109028
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
External Fixators
Female
Femur - surgery
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Ilizarov Technique
Male
Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations
Medical sciences
Osteotomy - methods
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Radiography
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Tibia - abnormalities
Tibia - diagnostic imaging
Tibia - surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Treatment of Blount Disease: A Comparison Between the Multiaxial Correction System and Other External Fixators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A08%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20Blount%20Disease:%20A%20Comparison%20Between%20the%20Multiaxial%20Correction%20System%20and%20Other%20External%20Fixators&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Clarke,%20Sylvan%20E&rft.date=2009-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=103-109&rft.issn=0271-6798&rft.eissn=1539-2570&rft.coden=JPORDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181982a62&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67109028%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67109028&rft_id=info:pmid/19352232&rfr_iscdi=true