Validity of Instruments for Measuring Autonomy and Control Over Nursing Practice
Purpose: To review the psychometric properties and evaluate the estimates of validity of commonly used instruments to measure autonomy and control over nursing practice. Design: Literature review and evaluation of psychometric properties. Methods: Nursing research reports published in English in pee...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nursing scholarship 2009-03, Vol.41 (1), p.87-94 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 94 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 87 |
| container_title | Journal of nursing scholarship |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Weston, Marla J. |
| description | Purpose: To review the psychometric properties and evaluate the estimates of validity of commonly used instruments to measure autonomy and control over nursing practice.
Design: Literature review and evaluation of psychometric properties.
Methods: Nursing research reports published in English in peer‐reviewed journals between 1990 and 2007 were examined. Psychometric properties and the actual instrument were reviewed to determine validity for measuring autonomy and control over nursing practice.
Findings and Conclusions: Instruments used to measure autonomy and control over nursing practice are frequently imprecise or inaccurate for measuring the concept of interest. Valid instruments are available to allow measurement of the concepts of clinical autonomy, work autonomy, and control over nursing practice. Clear definitions and valid measures are helpful when communicating and synthesizing nursing knowledge concerning these concepts.
Clinical Relevance: Evaluating the validity of instruments for measuring clinical autonomy, work autonomy, and control over nursing practice can be helpful when organizing and synthesizing the literature related to these concepts, so that strategies to improve professional practice environments becomes more clear. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01255.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67096943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67096943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4635-bc37554d8530104b5ca3f83e6eb3fb113cd10c2bbd56a19a39d8db250d8d37023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFO3DAQhq2qqFDoK1RWD70l2J7YTg49oFXZpYJlQdAeLcdxqmyTmNoJ3X37OuwKJC6tLzOSv3-kmQ8hTElK4ztdp5RnMuFEFCkjpEgJZZynmzfo6Pnj7dQzmQieiUP0PoQ1IURQCe_QIS0AuMjZEVp9121TNcMWuxpf9GHwY2f7IeDaeXxldRh90__EZ-Pgetdtse4rPHP94F2Lrx-tx8vRh4lYeW2GxtgTdFDrNtgP-3qM7s-_3s0WyeX1_GJ2dpmYTABPSgOS86zKORBKspIbDXUOVtgS6pJSMBUlhpVlxYWmhYaiyquScRILSMLgGH3ezX3w7vdow6C6Jhjbtrq3bgxKSFKIIoN_glwyKYs8j-CnV-Dajb6PSygGIiMUxATlO8h4F4K3tXrwTaf9VlGiJjdqrSYFalKgJjfqyY3axOjH_fyx7Gz1EtzLiMCXHfCnae32vwerb8v7qYv5ZJdvwmA3z3ntf8VrxHOrH8u5Erc3GVus5moBfwHhiat4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236401368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of Instruments for Measuring Autonomy and Control Over Nursing Practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Weston, Marla J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weston, Marla J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To review the psychometric properties and evaluate the estimates of validity of commonly used instruments to measure autonomy and control over nursing practice.
Design: Literature review and evaluation of psychometric properties.
Methods: Nursing research reports published in English in peer‐reviewed journals between 1990 and 2007 were examined. Psychometric properties and the actual instrument were reviewed to determine validity for measuring autonomy and control over nursing practice.
Findings and Conclusions: Instruments used to measure autonomy and control over nursing practice are frequently imprecise or inaccurate for measuring the concept of interest. Valid instruments are available to allow measurement of the concepts of clinical autonomy, work autonomy, and control over nursing practice. Clear definitions and valid measures are helpful when communicating and synthesizing nursing knowledge concerning these concepts.
Clinical Relevance: Evaluating the validity of instruments for measuring clinical autonomy, work autonomy, and control over nursing practice can be helpful when organizing and synthesizing the literature related to these concepts, so that strategies to improve professional practice environments becomes more clear.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-6546</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01255.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19335682</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IMNSEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Autonomy ; Clinical nursing ; control over nursing practice ; Decision making ; Humans ; instrumentation ; Measurement ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Patients ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration ; Professional Autonomy ; Professional practices ; Psychometric properties ; Psychometrics - methods ; Quantitative psychology ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of nursing scholarship, 2009-03, Vol.41 (1), p.87-94</ispartof><rights>2009 Sigma Theta Tau International</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. First Quarter 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4635-bc37554d8530104b5ca3f83e6eb3fb113cd10c2bbd56a19a39d8db250d8d37023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4635-bc37554d8530104b5ca3f83e6eb3fb113cd10c2bbd56a19a39d8db250d8d37023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1547-5069.2009.01255.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1547-5069.2009.01255.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,12827,27905,27906,30980,30981,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19335682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weston, Marla J.</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of Instruments for Measuring Autonomy and Control Over Nursing Practice</title><title>Journal of nursing scholarship</title><addtitle>J Nurs Scholarsh</addtitle><description>Purpose: To review the psychometric properties and evaluate the estimates of validity of commonly used instruments to measure autonomy and control over nursing practice.
Design: Literature review and evaluation of psychometric properties.
Methods: Nursing research reports published in English in peer‐reviewed journals between 1990 and 2007 were examined. Psychometric properties and the actual instrument were reviewed to determine validity for measuring autonomy and control over nursing practice.
Findings and Conclusions: Instruments used to measure autonomy and control over nursing practice are frequently imprecise or inaccurate for measuring the concept of interest. Valid instruments are available to allow measurement of the concepts of clinical autonomy, work autonomy, and control over nursing practice. Clear definitions and valid measures are helpful when communicating and synthesizing nursing knowledge concerning these concepts.
Clinical Relevance: Evaluating the validity of instruments for measuring clinical autonomy, work autonomy, and control over nursing practice can be helpful when organizing and synthesizing the literature related to these concepts, so that strategies to improve professional practice environments becomes more clear.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>control over nursing practice</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>instrumentation</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration</subject><subject>Professional Autonomy</subject><subject>Professional practices</subject><subject>Psychometric properties</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1527-6546</issn><issn>1547-5069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFO3DAQhq2qqFDoK1RWD70l2J7YTg49oFXZpYJlQdAeLcdxqmyTmNoJ3X37OuwKJC6tLzOSv3-kmQ8hTElK4ztdp5RnMuFEFCkjpEgJZZynmzfo6Pnj7dQzmQieiUP0PoQ1IURQCe_QIS0AuMjZEVp9121TNcMWuxpf9GHwY2f7IeDaeXxldRh90__EZ-Pgetdtse4rPHP94F2Lrx-tx8vRh4lYeW2GxtgTdFDrNtgP-3qM7s-_3s0WyeX1_GJ2dpmYTABPSgOS86zKORBKspIbDXUOVtgS6pJSMBUlhpVlxYWmhYaiyquScRILSMLgGH3ezX3w7vdow6C6Jhjbtrq3bgxKSFKIIoN_glwyKYs8j-CnV-Dajb6PSygGIiMUxATlO8h4F4K3tXrwTaf9VlGiJjdqrSYFalKgJjfqyY3axOjH_fyx7Gz1EtzLiMCXHfCnae32vwerb8v7qYv5ZJdvwmA3z3ntf8VrxHOrH8u5Erc3GVus5moBfwHhiat4</recordid><startdate>200903</startdate><enddate>200903</enddate><creator>Weston, Marla J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200903</creationdate><title>Validity of Instruments for Measuring Autonomy and Control Over Nursing Practice</title><author>Weston, Marla J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4635-bc37554d8530104b5ca3f83e6eb3fb113cd10c2bbd56a19a39d8db250d8d37023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>control over nursing practice</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>instrumentation</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration</topic><topic>Professional Autonomy</topic><topic>Professional practices</topic><topic>Psychometric properties</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weston, Marla J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of nursing scholarship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weston, Marla J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of Instruments for Measuring Autonomy and Control Over Nursing Practice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nursing scholarship</jtitle><addtitle>J Nurs Scholarsh</addtitle><date>2009-03</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>87-94</pages><issn>1527-6546</issn><eissn>1547-5069</eissn><coden>IMNSEP</coden><abstract>Purpose: To review the psychometric properties and evaluate the estimates of validity of commonly used instruments to measure autonomy and control over nursing practice.
Design: Literature review and evaluation of psychometric properties.
Methods: Nursing research reports published in English in peer‐reviewed journals between 1990 and 2007 were examined. Psychometric properties and the actual instrument were reviewed to determine validity for measuring autonomy and control over nursing practice.
Findings and Conclusions: Instruments used to measure autonomy and control over nursing practice are frequently imprecise or inaccurate for measuring the concept of interest. Valid instruments are available to allow measurement of the concepts of clinical autonomy, work autonomy, and control over nursing practice. Clear definitions and valid measures are helpful when communicating and synthesizing nursing knowledge concerning these concepts.
Clinical Relevance: Evaluating the validity of instruments for measuring clinical autonomy, work autonomy, and control over nursing practice can be helpful when organizing and synthesizing the literature related to these concepts, so that strategies to improve professional practice environments becomes more clear.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>19335682</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01255.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1527-6546 |
| ispartof | Journal of nursing scholarship, 2009-03, Vol.41 (1), p.87-94 |
| issn | 1527-6546 1547-5069 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67096943 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Advocacy Autonomy Clinical nursing control over nursing practice Decision making Humans instrumentation Measurement Nurses Nursing Patients Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration Professional Autonomy Professional practices Psychometric properties Psychometrics - methods Quantitative psychology Validity |
| title | Validity of Instruments for Measuring Autonomy and Control Over Nursing Practice |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A32%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20Instruments%20for%20Measuring%20Autonomy%20and%20Control%20Over%20Nursing%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nursing%20scholarship&rft.au=Weston,%20Marla%20J.&rft.date=2009-03&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=87-94&rft.issn=1527-6546&rft.eissn=1547-5069&rft.coden=IMNSEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01255.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67096943%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236401368&rft_id=info:pmid/19335682&rfr_iscdi=true |