Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients
Abstract Background Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) is one of the modalities of testing loss of protective sensation. Law of mobility for VPT is well known for n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Primary care diabetes 2009-02, Vol.3 (1), p.17-21 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | Primary care diabetes |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Manivannan, M Periyasamy, R Narayanamurthy, V.B |
description | Abstract Background Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) is one of the modalities of testing loss of protective sensation. Law of mobility for VPT is well known for normal subjects, but not for diabetic subjects. This is a pilot study to evaluate and plot the law of mobility for VPT among DM subjects. Methods We used biothesiometer to find the VPT of several areas in upper and lower extremities for normal and diabetic subjects. VPT of normal and diabetic subjects for different foot areas from proximal to distal is evaluated for 30 subjects. All the subjects are screened for peripheral artery occlusive disease with ankle brachial pressure index (0.9 or above). VPT values of different areas are arranged in a proximal to distal order for the analysis. Results VPT values monotonically decrease from proximal to distal areas. Vierodt's law of mobility holds well for normal subjects in both feet areas. The law of mobility does not hold good for the DM subjects in one or both feet areas. Conclusions The VPT value of diabetic subjects reveals that the law of mobility do not holds good for diabetic subjects in foot areas. Though the number of subjects is small, all the subjects defied the law. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pcd.2008.10.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67095667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S175199180800106X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67095667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-75b044e7178eccda50406d5baa8184a970cab3da4a3b59cdfeaaca9d86119d1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFTEQhYMozjj6A9xIVu76WnX7kQRBkMEXDLhwFHehOqlmcu2XSbfD_femvRcEF65SdTh1SH0lxHOEHQI2rw672fndHkDnfgfQPBCXqJUuYI_wMNeqxsIY1BfiSUqHbMBSq8fiAg0oBGUuxe230EZawjTKmaPj-U-53EVOd1PvJY0-dyx7updTJ4epDX1YjjKM0gdqeQlODtxnbU1yzkE8LumpeNRRn_jZ-b0SX9-_u73-WNx8_vDp-u1N4SpolkLVLVQVK1SanfNUQ5Z93RJp1BUZBY7a0lNFZVsb5zsmcmS8bhCNx668Ei9PuXOcfq6cFjuE5PJvaORpTbZRYOqmUdmIJ6OLU0qROzvHMFA8WgS7obQHm1HaDeUmZVJ55sU5fG0H9n8nzuyy4fXJwHnFX4GjTS6v79iHyG6xfgr_jX_zz7Trwxgc9T_4yOkwrXHM7CzatLdgv2y33E4JGgCh-V7-BoSoms4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67095667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Manivannan, M ; Periyasamy, R ; Narayanamurthy, V.B</creator><creatorcontrib>Manivannan, M ; Periyasamy, R ; Narayanamurthy, V.B</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) is one of the modalities of testing loss of protective sensation. Law of mobility for VPT is well known for normal subjects, but not for diabetic subjects. This is a pilot study to evaluate and plot the law of mobility for VPT among DM subjects. Methods We used biothesiometer to find the VPT of several areas in upper and lower extremities for normal and diabetic subjects. VPT of normal and diabetic subjects for different foot areas from proximal to distal is evaluated for 30 subjects. All the subjects are screened for peripheral artery occlusive disease with ankle brachial pressure index (0.9 or above). VPT values of different areas are arranged in a proximal to distal order for the analysis. Results VPT values monotonically decrease from proximal to distal areas. Vierodt's law of mobility holds well for normal subjects in both feet areas. The law of mobility does not hold good for the DM subjects in one or both feet areas. Conclusions The VPT value of diabetic subjects reveals that the law of mobility do not holds good for diabetic subjects in foot areas. Though the number of subjects is small, all the subjects defied the law.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-9918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2008.10.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19071079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Case-Control Studies ; Diabetic Neuropathies - diagnosis ; Diabetic Neuropathies - physiopathology ; Diabetic neuropathy ; Endocrinology & Metabolism ; Foot ; Geometry law ; Hand ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Mobility law ; Models, Biological ; Movement ; Neurologic Examination ; Neuropathy test ; Perception ; Pilot Projects ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Proximal to distal ; Sensation ; Sensitivity test ; Sensory Thresholds ; Two-point discrimination ; Verdotts's law ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Primary care diabetes, 2009-02, Vol.3 (1), p.17-21</ispartof><rights>Primary Care Diabetes Europe</rights><rights>2008 Primary Care Diabetes Europe</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-75b044e7178eccda50406d5baa8184a970cab3da4a3b59cdfeaaca9d86119d1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-75b044e7178eccda50406d5baa8184a970cab3da4a3b59cdfeaaca9d86119d1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175199180800106X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19071079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manivannan, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Periyasamy, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayanamurthy, V.B</creatorcontrib><title>Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients</title><title>Primary care diabetes</title><addtitle>Prim Care Diabetes</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) is one of the modalities of testing loss of protective sensation. Law of mobility for VPT is well known for normal subjects, but not for diabetic subjects. This is a pilot study to evaluate and plot the law of mobility for VPT among DM subjects. Methods We used biothesiometer to find the VPT of several areas in upper and lower extremities for normal and diabetic subjects. VPT of normal and diabetic subjects for different foot areas from proximal to distal is evaluated for 30 subjects. All the subjects are screened for peripheral artery occlusive disease with ankle brachial pressure index (0.9 or above). VPT values of different areas are arranged in a proximal to distal order for the analysis. Results VPT values monotonically decrease from proximal to distal areas. Vierodt's law of mobility holds well for normal subjects in both feet areas. The law of mobility does not hold good for the DM subjects in one or both feet areas. Conclusions The VPT value of diabetic subjects reveals that the law of mobility do not holds good for diabetic subjects in foot areas. Though the number of subjects is small, all the subjects defied the law.</description><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Diabetic Neuropathies - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetic Neuropathies - physiopathology</subject><subject>Diabetic neuropathy</subject><subject>Endocrinology & Metabolism</subject><subject>Foot</subject><subject>Geometry law</subject><subject>Hand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mobility law</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Neurologic Examination</subject><subject>Neuropathy test</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Proximal to distal</subject><subject>Sensation</subject><subject>Sensitivity test</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds</subject><subject>Two-point discrimination</subject><subject>Verdotts's law</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>1751-9918</issn><issn>1878-0210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuLFTEQhYMozjj6A9xIVu76WnX7kQRBkMEXDLhwFHehOqlmcu2XSbfD_femvRcEF65SdTh1SH0lxHOEHQI2rw672fndHkDnfgfQPBCXqJUuYI_wMNeqxsIY1BfiSUqHbMBSq8fiAg0oBGUuxe230EZawjTKmaPj-U-53EVOd1PvJY0-dyx7updTJ4epDX1YjjKM0gdqeQlODtxnbU1yzkE8LumpeNRRn_jZ-b0SX9-_u73-WNx8_vDp-u1N4SpolkLVLVQVK1SanfNUQ5Z93RJp1BUZBY7a0lNFZVsb5zsmcmS8bhCNx668Ei9PuXOcfq6cFjuE5PJvaORpTbZRYOqmUdmIJ6OLU0qROzvHMFA8WgS7obQHm1HaDeUmZVJ55sU5fG0H9n8nzuyy4fXJwHnFX4GjTS6v79iHyG6xfgr_jX_zz7Trwxgc9T_4yOkwrXHM7CzatLdgv2y33E4JGgCh-V7-BoSoms4</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Manivannan, M</creator><creator>Periyasamy, R</creator><creator>Narayanamurthy, V.B</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients</title><author>Manivannan, M ; Periyasamy, R ; Narayanamurthy, V.B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-75b044e7178eccda50406d5baa8184a970cab3da4a3b59cdfeaaca9d86119d1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Diabetic Neuropathies - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetic Neuropathies - physiopathology</topic><topic>Diabetic neuropathy</topic><topic>Endocrinology & Metabolism</topic><topic>Foot</topic><topic>Geometry law</topic><topic>Hand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mobility law</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Neurologic Examination</topic><topic>Neuropathy test</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Proximal to distal</topic><topic>Sensation</topic><topic>Sensitivity test</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds</topic><topic>Two-point discrimination</topic><topic>Verdotts's law</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manivannan, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Periyasamy, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayanamurthy, V.B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Primary care diabetes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manivannan, M</au><au>Periyasamy, R</au><au>Narayanamurthy, V.B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients</atitle><jtitle>Primary care diabetes</jtitle><addtitle>Prim Care Diabetes</addtitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>17-21</pages><issn>1751-9918</issn><eissn>1878-0210</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) is one of the modalities of testing loss of protective sensation. Law of mobility for VPT is well known for normal subjects, but not for diabetic subjects. This is a pilot study to evaluate and plot the law of mobility for VPT among DM subjects. Methods We used biothesiometer to find the VPT of several areas in upper and lower extremities for normal and diabetic subjects. VPT of normal and diabetic subjects for different foot areas from proximal to distal is evaluated for 30 subjects. All the subjects are screened for peripheral artery occlusive disease with ankle brachial pressure index (0.9 or above). VPT values of different areas are arranged in a proximal to distal order for the analysis. Results VPT values monotonically decrease from proximal to distal areas. Vierodt's law of mobility holds well for normal subjects in both feet areas. The law of mobility does not hold good for the DM subjects in one or both feet areas. Conclusions The VPT value of diabetic subjects reveals that the law of mobility do not holds good for diabetic subjects in foot areas. Though the number of subjects is small, all the subjects defied the law.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19071079</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pcd.2008.10.006</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1751-9918 |
ispartof | Primary care diabetes, 2009-02, Vol.3 (1), p.17-21 |
issn | 1751-9918 1878-0210 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67095667 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Case-Control Studies Diabetic Neuropathies - diagnosis Diabetic Neuropathies - physiopathology Diabetic neuropathy Endocrinology & Metabolism Foot Geometry law Hand Humans Internal Medicine Middle Aged Mobility law Models, Biological Movement Neurologic Examination Neuropathy test Perception Pilot Projects Predictive Value of Tests Proximal to distal Sensation Sensitivity test Sensory Thresholds Two-point discrimination Verdotts's law Vibration |
title | Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A25%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vibration%20perception%20threshold%20and%20the%20law%20of%20mobility%20in%20diabetic%20mellitus%20patients&rft.jtitle=Primary%20care%20diabetes&rft.au=Manivannan,%20M&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=17-21&rft.issn=1751-9918&rft.eissn=1878-0210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pcd.2008.10.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67095667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67095667&rft_id=info:pmid/19071079&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S175199180800106X&rfr_iscdi=true |