Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients

Abstract Background Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) is one of the modalities of testing loss of protective sensation. Law of mobility for VPT is well known for n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Primary care diabetes 2009-02, Vol.3 (1), p.17-21
Hauptverfasser: Manivannan, M, Periyasamy, R, Narayanamurthy, V.B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
container_title Primary care diabetes
container_volume 3
creator Manivannan, M
Periyasamy, R
Narayanamurthy, V.B
description Abstract Background Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) is one of the modalities of testing loss of protective sensation. Law of mobility for VPT is well known for normal subjects, but not for diabetic subjects. This is a pilot study to evaluate and plot the law of mobility for VPT among DM subjects. Methods We used biothesiometer to find the VPT of several areas in upper and lower extremities for normal and diabetic subjects. VPT of normal and diabetic subjects for different foot areas from proximal to distal is evaluated for 30 subjects. All the subjects are screened for peripheral artery occlusive disease with ankle brachial pressure index (0.9 or above). VPT values of different areas are arranged in a proximal to distal order for the analysis. Results VPT values monotonically decrease from proximal to distal areas. Vierodt's law of mobility holds well for normal subjects in both feet areas. The law of mobility does not hold good for the DM subjects in one or both feet areas. Conclusions The VPT value of diabetic subjects reveals that the law of mobility do not holds good for diabetic subjects in foot areas. Though the number of subjects is small, all the subjects defied the law.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pcd.2008.10.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67095667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S175199180800106X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67095667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-75b044e7178eccda50406d5baa8184a970cab3da4a3b59cdfeaaca9d86119d1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFTEQhYMozjj6A9xIVu76WnX7kQRBkMEXDLhwFHehOqlmcu2XSbfD_femvRcEF65SdTh1SH0lxHOEHQI2rw672fndHkDnfgfQPBCXqJUuYI_wMNeqxsIY1BfiSUqHbMBSq8fiAg0oBGUuxe230EZawjTKmaPj-U-53EVOd1PvJY0-dyx7updTJ4epDX1YjjKM0gdqeQlODtxnbU1yzkE8LumpeNRRn_jZ-b0SX9-_u73-WNx8_vDp-u1N4SpolkLVLVQVK1SanfNUQ5Z93RJp1BUZBY7a0lNFZVsb5zsmcmS8bhCNx668Ei9PuXOcfq6cFjuE5PJvaORpTbZRYOqmUdmIJ6OLU0qROzvHMFA8WgS7obQHm1HaDeUmZVJ55sU5fG0H9n8nzuyy4fXJwHnFX4GjTS6v79iHyG6xfgr_jX_zz7Trwxgc9T_4yOkwrXHM7CzatLdgv2y33E4JGgCh-V7-BoSoms4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67095667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Manivannan, M ; Periyasamy, R ; Narayanamurthy, V.B</creator><creatorcontrib>Manivannan, M ; Periyasamy, R ; Narayanamurthy, V.B</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) is one of the modalities of testing loss of protective sensation. Law of mobility for VPT is well known for normal subjects, but not for diabetic subjects. This is a pilot study to evaluate and plot the law of mobility for VPT among DM subjects. Methods We used biothesiometer to find the VPT of several areas in upper and lower extremities for normal and diabetic subjects. VPT of normal and diabetic subjects for different foot areas from proximal to distal is evaluated for 30 subjects. All the subjects are screened for peripheral artery occlusive disease with ankle brachial pressure index (0.9 or above). VPT values of different areas are arranged in a proximal to distal order for the analysis. Results VPT values monotonically decrease from proximal to distal areas. Vierodt's law of mobility holds well for normal subjects in both feet areas. The law of mobility does not hold good for the DM subjects in one or both feet areas. Conclusions The VPT value of diabetic subjects reveals that the law of mobility do not holds good for diabetic subjects in foot areas. Though the number of subjects is small, all the subjects defied the law.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-9918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2008.10.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19071079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Case-Control Studies ; Diabetic Neuropathies - diagnosis ; Diabetic Neuropathies - physiopathology ; Diabetic neuropathy ; Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism ; Foot ; Geometry law ; Hand ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Mobility law ; Models, Biological ; Movement ; Neurologic Examination ; Neuropathy test ; Perception ; Pilot Projects ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Proximal to distal ; Sensation ; Sensitivity test ; Sensory Thresholds ; Two-point discrimination ; Verdotts's law ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Primary care diabetes, 2009-02, Vol.3 (1), p.17-21</ispartof><rights>Primary Care Diabetes Europe</rights><rights>2008 Primary Care Diabetes Europe</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-75b044e7178eccda50406d5baa8184a970cab3da4a3b59cdfeaaca9d86119d1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-75b044e7178eccda50406d5baa8184a970cab3da4a3b59cdfeaaca9d86119d1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175199180800106X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19071079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manivannan, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Periyasamy, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayanamurthy, V.B</creatorcontrib><title>Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients</title><title>Primary care diabetes</title><addtitle>Prim Care Diabetes</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) is one of the modalities of testing loss of protective sensation. Law of mobility for VPT is well known for normal subjects, but not for diabetic subjects. This is a pilot study to evaluate and plot the law of mobility for VPT among DM subjects. Methods We used biothesiometer to find the VPT of several areas in upper and lower extremities for normal and diabetic subjects. VPT of normal and diabetic subjects for different foot areas from proximal to distal is evaluated for 30 subjects. All the subjects are screened for peripheral artery occlusive disease with ankle brachial pressure index (0.9 or above). VPT values of different areas are arranged in a proximal to distal order for the analysis. Results VPT values monotonically decrease from proximal to distal areas. Vierodt's law of mobility holds well for normal subjects in both feet areas. The law of mobility does not hold good for the DM subjects in one or both feet areas. Conclusions The VPT value of diabetic subjects reveals that the law of mobility do not holds good for diabetic subjects in foot areas. Though the number of subjects is small, all the subjects defied the law.</description><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Diabetic Neuropathies - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetic Neuropathies - physiopathology</subject><subject>Diabetic neuropathy</subject><subject>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</subject><subject>Foot</subject><subject>Geometry law</subject><subject>Hand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mobility law</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Neurologic Examination</subject><subject>Neuropathy test</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Proximal to distal</subject><subject>Sensation</subject><subject>Sensitivity test</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds</subject><subject>Two-point discrimination</subject><subject>Verdotts's law</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>1751-9918</issn><issn>1878-0210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuLFTEQhYMozjj6A9xIVu76WnX7kQRBkMEXDLhwFHehOqlmcu2XSbfD_femvRcEF65SdTh1SH0lxHOEHQI2rw672fndHkDnfgfQPBCXqJUuYI_wMNeqxsIY1BfiSUqHbMBSq8fiAg0oBGUuxe230EZawjTKmaPj-U-53EVOd1PvJY0-dyx7updTJ4epDX1YjjKM0gdqeQlODtxnbU1yzkE8LumpeNRRn_jZ-b0SX9-_u73-WNx8_vDp-u1N4SpolkLVLVQVK1SanfNUQ5Z93RJp1BUZBY7a0lNFZVsb5zsmcmS8bhCNx668Ei9PuXOcfq6cFjuE5PJvaORpTbZRYOqmUdmIJ6OLU0qROzvHMFA8WgS7obQHm1HaDeUmZVJ55sU5fG0H9n8nzuyy4fXJwHnFX4GjTS6v79iHyG6xfgr_jX_zz7Trwxgc9T_4yOkwrXHM7CzatLdgv2y33E4JGgCh-V7-BoSoms4</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Manivannan, M</creator><creator>Periyasamy, R</creator><creator>Narayanamurthy, V.B</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients</title><author>Manivannan, M ; Periyasamy, R ; Narayanamurthy, V.B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-75b044e7178eccda50406d5baa8184a970cab3da4a3b59cdfeaaca9d86119d1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Diabetic Neuropathies - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetic Neuropathies - physiopathology</topic><topic>Diabetic neuropathy</topic><topic>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</topic><topic>Foot</topic><topic>Geometry law</topic><topic>Hand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mobility law</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Neurologic Examination</topic><topic>Neuropathy test</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Proximal to distal</topic><topic>Sensation</topic><topic>Sensitivity test</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds</topic><topic>Two-point discrimination</topic><topic>Verdotts's law</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manivannan, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Periyasamy, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayanamurthy, V.B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Primary care diabetes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manivannan, M</au><au>Periyasamy, R</au><au>Narayanamurthy, V.B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients</atitle><jtitle>Primary care diabetes</jtitle><addtitle>Prim Care Diabetes</addtitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>17-21</pages><issn>1751-9918</issn><eissn>1878-0210</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Diabetic neuropathy is a family of nerve disorders with progressive loss of nerve function in 15% of diabetes mellitus (DM) subjects. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) is one of the modalities of testing loss of protective sensation. Law of mobility for VPT is well known for normal subjects, but not for diabetic subjects. This is a pilot study to evaluate and plot the law of mobility for VPT among DM subjects. Methods We used biothesiometer to find the VPT of several areas in upper and lower extremities for normal and diabetic subjects. VPT of normal and diabetic subjects for different foot areas from proximal to distal is evaluated for 30 subjects. All the subjects are screened for peripheral artery occlusive disease with ankle brachial pressure index (0.9 or above). VPT values of different areas are arranged in a proximal to distal order for the analysis. Results VPT values monotonically decrease from proximal to distal areas. Vierodt's law of mobility holds well for normal subjects in both feet areas. The law of mobility does not hold good for the DM subjects in one or both feet areas. Conclusions The VPT value of diabetic subjects reveals that the law of mobility do not holds good for diabetic subjects in foot areas. Though the number of subjects is small, all the subjects defied the law.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19071079</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pcd.2008.10.006</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-9918
ispartof Primary care diabetes, 2009-02, Vol.3 (1), p.17-21
issn 1751-9918
1878-0210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67095667
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Case-Control Studies
Diabetic Neuropathies - diagnosis
Diabetic Neuropathies - physiopathology
Diabetic neuropathy
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Foot
Geometry law
Hand
Humans
Internal Medicine
Middle Aged
Mobility law
Models, Biological
Movement
Neurologic Examination
Neuropathy test
Perception
Pilot Projects
Predictive Value of Tests
Proximal to distal
Sensation
Sensitivity test
Sensory Thresholds
Two-point discrimination
Verdotts's law
Vibration
title Vibration perception threshold and the law of mobility in diabetic mellitus patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A25%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vibration%20perception%20threshold%20and%20the%20law%20of%20mobility%20in%20diabetic%20mellitus%20patients&rft.jtitle=Primary%20care%20diabetes&rft.au=Manivannan,%20M&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=17-21&rft.issn=1751-9918&rft.eissn=1878-0210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pcd.2008.10.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67095667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67095667&rft_id=info:pmid/19071079&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S175199180800106X&rfr_iscdi=true