Histologic Evaluation of a Stem Cell–Based Sinus‐Augmentation Procedure

Background: Predictability has been demonstrated for the long‐term success of dental implants placed simultaneously with or after a sinus‐augmentation procedure. However, the time required to obtain optimal bone formation can be from 6 to 9 months or longer with grafting materials other than autogen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of periodontology (1970) 2009-04, Vol.80 (4), p.679-686
Hauptverfasser: McAllister, Bradley S., Haghighat, Kamran, Gonshor, Aron
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 686
container_issue 4
container_start_page 679
container_title Journal of periodontology (1970)
container_volume 80
creator McAllister, Bradley S.
Haghighat, Kamran
Gonshor, Aron
description Background: Predictability has been demonstrated for the long‐term success of dental implants placed simultaneously with or after a sinus‐augmentation procedure. However, the time required to obtain optimal bone formation can be from 6 to 9 months or longer with grafting materials other than autogenous bone. For this reason, there is interest in a surgical technique that does not require the harvest of autogenous bone but still results in sufficient bone formation within a relatively short time frame. Methods: The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the bone formation following sinus‐augmentation procedures using an allograft cellular bone matrix containing native mesenchymal stem cells. Biopsy and histologic evaluation were performed after ∼4 months of healing. Results: Histomorphometric analysis revealed an average vital bone content of 33% (range, 22% to 40%) and an average residual graft content of 6% (range, 3% to 7%) for the five cases reported that had an average healing period of 4.1 months (range, 3 to 4.75 months). Conclusion: The high percentage of vital bone content, after a relatively short healing phase, may encourage a more rapid initiation of implant placement or restoration when a cellular grafting approach is considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1902/jop.2009.080345
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67094328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67094328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-cd964c54b7517238e3cc4784bc09351d6c4478af9b48861789e23dcd552f07693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL9OwzAQhy0EoqUws6EssKX1v8TxWKpCgUpUFGbLcZwqVRKXOAF16yMg8YZ9ElwlgpHpdNJ3v7v7ALhEcIg4xKO12QwxhHwII0hocAT6iFPik5DBY9CHEGOfUI574MzatWsRJfAU9BAnJIAR74OnWWZrk5tVprzph8wbWWem9EzqSW9Z68Kb6Dzf775vpdWJt8zKxu53X-NmVeiybtlFZZROmkqfg5NU5lZfdHUA3u6mr5OZP3--f5iM576ihHFfJTykKqAxCxDDJNJEKcoiGivISYCSUFHXypTHNIpCxCKuMUlUEgQ4hSzkZABu2txNZd4bbWtRZFa5O2WpTWOFe95JwJEDRy2oKmNtpVOxqbJCVluBoDj4E86fOPgTrT83cdVFN3Ghkz--E-aA6w6QVsk8rWSpMvvLYeRSGAodF7TcZ5br7X97xeNi-gJDxskPe-6Jdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67094328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Histologic Evaluation of a Stem Cell–Based Sinus‐Augmentation Procedure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>McAllister, Bradley S. ; Haghighat, Kamran ; Gonshor, Aron</creator><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Bradley S. ; Haghighat, Kamran ; Gonshor, Aron</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Predictability has been demonstrated for the long‐term success of dental implants placed simultaneously with or after a sinus‐augmentation procedure. However, the time required to obtain optimal bone formation can be from 6 to 9 months or longer with grafting materials other than autogenous bone. For this reason, there is interest in a surgical technique that does not require the harvest of autogenous bone but still results in sufficient bone formation within a relatively short time frame. Methods: The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the bone formation following sinus‐augmentation procedures using an allograft cellular bone matrix containing native mesenchymal stem cells. Biopsy and histologic evaluation were performed after ∼4 months of healing. Results: Histomorphometric analysis revealed an average vital bone content of 33% (range, 22% to 40%) and an average residual graft content of 6% (range, 3% to 7%) for the five cases reported that had an average healing period of 4.1 months (range, 3 to 4.75 months). Conclusion: The high percentage of vital bone content, after a relatively short healing phase, may encourage a more rapid initiation of implant placement or restoration when a cellular grafting approach is considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3492</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080345</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19335089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Academy of Periodontology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Matrix ; Bone Regeneration ; case series ; Cryopreservation ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Maxillary Sinus - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation ; Middle Aged ; Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic - methods ; osteoblasts ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; ridge augmentation ; stem cells ; tissue engineering ; Tissue Scaffolds</subject><ispartof>Journal of periodontology (1970), 2009-04, Vol.80 (4), p.679-686</ispartof><rights>2009 American Academy of Periodontology</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-cd964c54b7517238e3cc4784bc09351d6c4478af9b48861789e23dcd552f07693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-cd964c54b7517238e3cc4784bc09351d6c4478af9b48861789e23dcd552f07693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1902%2Fjop.2009.080345$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1902%2Fjop.2009.080345$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21345716$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19335089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Bradley S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghighat, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonshor, Aron</creatorcontrib><title>Histologic Evaluation of a Stem Cell–Based Sinus‐Augmentation Procedure</title><title>Journal of periodontology (1970)</title><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><description>Background: Predictability has been demonstrated for the long‐term success of dental implants placed simultaneously with or after a sinus‐augmentation procedure. However, the time required to obtain optimal bone formation can be from 6 to 9 months or longer with grafting materials other than autogenous bone. For this reason, there is interest in a surgical technique that does not require the harvest of autogenous bone but still results in sufficient bone formation within a relatively short time frame. Methods: The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the bone formation following sinus‐augmentation procedures using an allograft cellular bone matrix containing native mesenchymal stem cells. Biopsy and histologic evaluation were performed after ∼4 months of healing. Results: Histomorphometric analysis revealed an average vital bone content of 33% (range, 22% to 40%) and an average residual graft content of 6% (range, 3% to 7%) for the five cases reported that had an average healing period of 4.1 months (range, 3 to 4.75 months). Conclusion: The high percentage of vital bone content, after a relatively short healing phase, may encourage a more rapid initiation of implant placement or restoration when a cellular grafting approach is considered.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Matrix</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>case series</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic - methods</subject><subject>osteoblasts</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>ridge augmentation</subject><subject>stem cells</subject><subject>tissue engineering</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds</subject><issn>0022-3492</issn><issn>1943-3670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL9OwzAQhy0EoqUws6EssKX1v8TxWKpCgUpUFGbLcZwqVRKXOAF16yMg8YZ9ElwlgpHpdNJ3v7v7ALhEcIg4xKO12QwxhHwII0hocAT6iFPik5DBY9CHEGOfUI574MzatWsRJfAU9BAnJIAR74OnWWZrk5tVprzph8wbWWem9EzqSW9Z68Kb6Dzf775vpdWJt8zKxu53X-NmVeiybtlFZZROmkqfg5NU5lZfdHUA3u6mr5OZP3--f5iM576ihHFfJTykKqAxCxDDJNJEKcoiGivISYCSUFHXypTHNIpCxCKuMUlUEgQ4hSzkZABu2txNZd4bbWtRZFa5O2WpTWOFe95JwJEDRy2oKmNtpVOxqbJCVluBoDj4E86fOPgTrT83cdVFN3Ghkz--E-aA6w6QVsk8rWSpMvvLYeRSGAodF7TcZ5br7X97xeNi-gJDxskPe-6Jdw</recordid><startdate>200904</startdate><enddate>200904</enddate><creator>McAllister, Bradley S.</creator><creator>Haghighat, Kamran</creator><creator>Gonshor, Aron</creator><general>American Academy of Periodontology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200904</creationdate><title>Histologic Evaluation of a Stem Cell–Based Sinus‐Augmentation Procedure</title><author>McAllister, Bradley S. ; Haghighat, Kamran ; Gonshor, Aron</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-cd964c54b7517238e3cc4784bc09351d6c4478af9b48861789e23dcd552f07693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Matrix</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>case series</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic - methods</topic><topic>osteoblasts</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>ridge augmentation</topic><topic>stem cells</topic><topic>tissue engineering</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Bradley S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghighat, Kamran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonshor, Aron</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAllister, Bradley S.</au><au>Haghighat, Kamran</au><au>Gonshor, Aron</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Histologic Evaluation of a Stem Cell–Based Sinus‐Augmentation Procedure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><date>2009-04</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>679</spage><epage>686</epage><pages>679-686</pages><issn>0022-3492</issn><eissn>1943-3670</eissn><abstract>Background: Predictability has been demonstrated for the long‐term success of dental implants placed simultaneously with or after a sinus‐augmentation procedure. However, the time required to obtain optimal bone formation can be from 6 to 9 months or longer with grafting materials other than autogenous bone. For this reason, there is interest in a surgical technique that does not require the harvest of autogenous bone but still results in sufficient bone formation within a relatively short time frame. Methods: The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the bone formation following sinus‐augmentation procedures using an allograft cellular bone matrix containing native mesenchymal stem cells. Biopsy and histologic evaluation were performed after ∼4 months of healing. Results: Histomorphometric analysis revealed an average vital bone content of 33% (range, 22% to 40%) and an average residual graft content of 6% (range, 3% to 7%) for the five cases reported that had an average healing period of 4.1 months (range, 3 to 4.75 months). Conclusion: The high percentage of vital bone content, after a relatively short healing phase, may encourage a more rapid initiation of implant placement or restoration when a cellular grafting approach is considered.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Academy of Periodontology</pub><pmid>19335089</pmid><doi>10.1902/jop.2009.080345</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3492
ispartof Journal of periodontology (1970), 2009-04, Vol.80 (4), p.679-686
issn 0022-3492
1943-3670
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67094328
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Matrix
Bone Regeneration
case series
Cryopreservation
Dentistry
Female
Humans
Male
Maxillary Sinus - surgery
Medical sciences
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
Middle Aged
Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic - methods
osteoblasts
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
ridge augmentation
stem cells
tissue engineering
Tissue Scaffolds
title Histologic Evaluation of a Stem Cell–Based Sinus‐Augmentation Procedure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A09%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Histologic%20Evaluation%20of%20a%20Stem%20Cell%E2%80%93Based%20Sinus%E2%80%90Augmentation%20Procedure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20periodontology%20(1970)&rft.au=McAllister,%20Bradley%20S.&rft.date=2009-04&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=679&rft.epage=686&rft.pages=679-686&rft.issn=0022-3492&rft.eissn=1943-3670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1902/jop.2009.080345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67094328%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67094328&rft_id=info:pmid/19335089&rfr_iscdi=true