In Vitro Antienterococcal Activity Explains Associations between Exposures to Antimicrobial Agents and Risk of Colonization by Multiresistant Enterococci

We compared ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam at doses ranging from 0.1 to 2 times the human equivalent daily dose (HEDD), to determine their impact on gastrointestinal colonization by ampicillin- and vancomycinresistant Enterococcus faecium C68 in a mouse model. Ceftriaxone failed to promote...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of infectious diseases 2004-12, Vol.190 (12), p.2162-2166
Hauptverfasser: Rice, Louis B., LakticĎvaá, Viera, Helfand, Marion S., Hutton-Thomas, Rebecca
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We compared ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam at doses ranging from 0.1 to 2 times the human equivalent daily dose (HEDD), to determine their impact on gastrointestinal colonization by ampicillin- and vancomycinresistant Enterococcus faecium C68 in a mouse model. Ceftriaxone failed to promote colonization at doses up to 0.25 times the HEDD, whereas piperacillin-tazobactam promoted colonization at doses up to 0.5 times the HEDD. Ceftriaxone promoted colonization at doses at least 0.5 times the HEDD, whereas piperacillin-tazobactam inhibited colonization at doses at least 0.75 times the HEDD. Both piperacillin-tazobactam and ceftriaxone inhibited colonization by an enterococcal strain devoid of low-affinity penicillin-binding protein-5 (significantly increasing its susceptibility to these agents), at doses that promoted colonization by E. faecium C68. These results support a model in which the impact that different β-lactam agents have on colonization by VRE is related to the level of the β-lactam agent's intrinsic antienterococcal activity against the colonizing strain.
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1086/425580